Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = GC-RANSAC

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 10094 KiB  
Article
EMS-SLAM: Dynamic RGB-D SLAM with Semantic-Geometric Constraints for GNSS-Denied Environments
by Jinlong Fan, Yipeng Ning, Jian Wang, Xiang Jia, Dashuai Chai, Xiqi Wang and Ying Xu
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(10), 1691; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17101691 - 12 May 2025
Viewed by 620
Abstract
Global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) exhibit significant performance limitations in signal-deprived environments such as indoor spaces and underground spaces. Although visual SLAM has emerged as a viable solution for ego-motion estimation in GNSS-denied areas, conventional approaches remain constrained by static environment assumptions, resulting [...] Read more.
Global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) exhibit significant performance limitations in signal-deprived environments such as indoor spaces and underground spaces. Although visual SLAM has emerged as a viable solution for ego-motion estimation in GNSS-denied areas, conventional approaches remain constrained by static environment assumptions, resulting in a substantial degradation in accuracy when handling dynamic scenarios. The EMS-SLAM framework combines the geometric constraints and semantics of SLAM to provide a real-time solution for addressing the challenges of robustness and accuracy in dynamic environments. To improve the accuracy of the initial pose, EMS-SLAM employs a feature-matching algorithm based on a graph-cut RANSAC. In addition, a degeneracy-resistant geometric constraint method is proposed, which effectively addresses the degeneracy issues of purely epipolar approaches. Finally, EMS-SLAM combines semantic information with geometric constraints to maintain high accuracy while quickly eliminating dynamic feature points. Experiments were conducted on the public datasets and our collected datasets. The results demonstrate that our method outperformed the current algorithms of SLAM in highly dynamic environments. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

9 pages, 2106 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Experimental Analysis of Feature-Based Image Registration Methods in Combination with Different Outlier Rejection Algorithms for Histopathological Images
by Pritika Adhikari, Bijoyeta Roy, Om Sinkar, Mousumi Gupta and Chitrapriya Ningthoujam
Eng. Proc. 2023, 59(1), 121; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023059121 - 26 Dec 2023
Viewed by 944
Abstract
Registration involves aligning two or more images by transforming one image into the coordinate system of another. Registration of histopathological slide images is a critical step in many image analysis applications including disease detection, classification, and prognosis. It is very useful in Computer-Aided [...] Read more.
Registration involves aligning two or more images by transforming one image into the coordinate system of another. Registration of histopathological slide images is a critical step in many image analysis applications including disease detection, classification, and prognosis. It is very useful in Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) and allows automatic analysis of tissue images, enabling more accurate detection and prognosis than manual analysis. Due to the complexity and heterogeneity of histopathological images, registration is challenging and requires the careful consideration of various factors, such as tissue deformation, staining variation, and image noise. There are different types of registration and this work focuses on feature-based image registration specifically. A qualitative analysis of different feature detection and description methods combined with different outlier rejection methods is conducted. The four feature detection and description methods experimentally analyzed are Oriented FAST and rotated BRIEF (ORB), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Key points (BRISK), KAZE, and Accelerated KAZE, and the three outlier rejection methods examined are Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC), Graph cut RANSAC (GC-RANSAC), and Marginalizing Sample Consensus (MAGSAC++). The results are visually and quantitively analyzed to select the method that gives the most accurate and robust registration of the histopathological dataset at hand. Several evaluation metrics, the number of key points detected, and a number of inliers are used as parameters for evaluating the performance of different feature detection–description methods and outlier rejection algorithm pairs. Among all the combinations of methods analyzed, BRISK paired with MAGSAC++ generates the most optimal registration results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of Eng. Proc., 2023, RAiSE-2023)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop