Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Borda voting procedures

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
39 pages, 14803 KB  
Article
The Greatest Common Decision Maker: A Novel Conflict and Consensus Analysis Compared with Other Voting Procedures
by Pedro García-del-Valle-y-Durán, Eduardo Gamaliel Hernandez-Martinez and Guillermo Fernández-Anaya
Mathematics 2022, 10(20), 3815; https://doi.org/10.3390/math10203815 - 16 Oct 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2920
Abstract
Consensus or conflict agreements, and how these change over time, have significant consequences for understanding the network behavior of human beings, especially when it is necessary to have agreements to move companies and countries forward peacefully. This paper proposes a new Greatest Common [...] Read more.
Consensus or conflict agreements, and how these change over time, have significant consequences for understanding the network behavior of human beings, especially when it is necessary to have agreements to move companies and countries forward peacefully. This paper proposes a new Greatest Common Decision Maker (GCDM) aggregation voting procedure applied to square preference matrices of n alternatives and n decision makers. An analysis of the mathematical combinatory ranking of consensus and conflicts generated by the GCDM is realized, and compared to the well-known Borda, Pluralism and Condorcet aggregation procedures to cover the entire class of dynamic accountable group decision-making phenomena. A classification for the family of magic squares is reviewed and it is determined that a conflict decision matrix corresponds to a Latin square. As an original contribution, a 2D color heatmap is generated as a visual tool to compare the consensus and conflict cases generated by the compared methods. Finally, a new consensus reaching model is proposed to compare these aggregation methods defining cost and effort change matrices to convert the cases of conflicts into consensus according to the change in individual preferences. The incorporation of social concepts into our research makes the results obtained stronger. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Multi-Criteria Decision Making)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop