Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = BioFire® RP 2.1plus

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 544 KB  
Article
Evaluation of the PowerChek™ Respiratory Virus Panel 1/2/3/4 for the Detection of 16 Respiratory Viruses: A Comparative Study with the Allplex™ Respiratory Panel Assay 1/2/3 and BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 plus
by Hyeongyu Lee, Rokeya Akter, Jong-Han Lee and Sook Won Ryu
Diagnostics 2025, 15(21), 2713; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15212713 - 27 Oct 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 898 | Correction
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Acute respiratory infections remain a major global public health concern affecting individuals across all ages. Accurate and rapid diagnosis of respiratory pathogens is crucial for effective patient management and infection control. Multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays have gained prominence [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Acute respiratory infections remain a major global public health concern affecting individuals across all ages. Accurate and rapid diagnosis of respiratory pathogens is crucial for effective patient management and infection control. Multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays have gained prominence over conventional methods for routine viral detection in clinical laboratories owing to their enhanced sensitivity and specificity; however, comparative performance data for PowerChek™ RVP remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the PowerChek™ Respiratory Virus Panel 1/2/3/4, which detects 16 respiratory viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, in nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens. Methods: Overall, 336 NPS specimens were analyzed using the PowerChek™ RVP, BioFire® RP 2.1plus, and Allplex™ RP assays, with nucleic acid extraction performed using the Advansure™ E3 system. The performance metrics were calculated using two-by-two contingency tables. Results: Among 336 NPS specimens (232 positive, 104 negative), PowerChek™ RVP detected 226 positives with minimal discrepancies, showing high concordance with BioFire® RP 2.1plus (accuracy 94.6%, kappa 0.843–1.000). Fifteen discordant cases were identified in this study. Eleven could not be sequenced because of amplification failure and most had high Ct values (>30). Sequencing of four samples confirmed concordance with BioFire® RP 2.1plus and PowerChek™ RVP, whereas Allplex™ RP showed false-negative results. Conclusions: The PowerChek™ RVP assay demonstrated a high level of relative sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, diagnostic predictive values and strong concordance with comparable reference assays in identifying its targets. This assay is a reliable and efficient diagnostic tool for clinical laboratories to facilitate the accurate identification of respiratory pathogens. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laboratory Diagnosis of Infections)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 778 KB  
Communication
Clinical Evaluation of the BIOFIRE SPOTFIRE Respiratory Panel
by Wai-Sing Chan, Christy Wing-Yiu Ho, Tsz-Ching Chan, Jeffrey Hung, Man-Yan To, Sau-Man Leung, Ka-Chun Lai, Ching-Yan Wong, Chin-Pang Leung, Chun-Hang Au, Thomas Shek-Kong Wan, Jonpaul Sze-Tsing Zee, Edmond Shiu-Kwan Ma and Bone Siu-Fai Tang
Viruses 2024, 16(4), 600; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16040600 - 13 Apr 2024
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 7334
Abstract
The BIOFIRE SPOTFIRE Respiratory (R) Panel is a novel, in vitro diagnostic PCR assay with 15 pathogen targets. The runtime is about 15 min which is the shortest among similar panels in the market. We evaluated the performance of the SPOTFIRE R Panel [...] Read more.
The BIOFIRE SPOTFIRE Respiratory (R) Panel is a novel, in vitro diagnostic PCR assay with 15 pathogen targets. The runtime is about 15 min which is the shortest among similar panels in the market. We evaluated the performance of the SPOTFIRE R Panel with 151 specimens, including 133 collected from the upper respiratory tract (URT), 13 from the lower respiratory tract (LRT) and 5 external quality assessment program (EQAP) samples. The respiratory specimens were enrolled throughout the first two post-COVID-19 influenza seasons in Hong Kong (March to December 2023). For URT specimens, full concordance was observed between the SPOTFIRE R Panel and the standard-of-care FilmArray Respiratory 2.1 plus Panel (RP2.1plus) for 109 specimens (109/133, 81.95%). After discrepant analysis, the SPOTFIRE R Panel identified more pathogens than the RP2.1plus in 15 specimens and vice versa in 3 specimens. The per-target negative and positive percentage agreement (NPA and PPA) were 92.86–100% except the PPA of adenovirus (88.24%). For LRT and EQAP samples, all results were fully concordant. To conclude, the performance of the SPOTFIRE R Panel was comparable to the RP2.1plus. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Human Virology and Viral Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop