Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Bilsky grade

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 1028 KiB  
Article
Exploring the Potential of a Deep Learning Model for Early CT Detection of High-Grade Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression and Its Impact on Treatment Delays
by James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan, Junran Wu, Changshuo Liu, Hien Anh Tran, Noah Tian Run Lim, Andrew Makmur, Wilson Ong, Shilin Wang, Ee Chin Teo, Yiong Huak Chan, Hwee Weng Dennis Hey, Leok-Lim Lau, Joseph Thambiah, Hee-Kit Wong, Gabriel Liu, Naresh Kumar, Beng Chin Ooi and Jiong Hao Jonathan Tan
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2180; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132180 - 28 Jun 2025
Viewed by 421
Abstract
Background: Delay in diagnosing metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) adversely impacts clinical outcomes. High-grade MESCC is frequently overlooked on routine staging CT scans. We aim to assess the potential of our deep learning model (DLM) in detecting high-grade MESCC and reducing diagnostic [...] Read more.
Background: Delay in diagnosing metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) adversely impacts clinical outcomes. High-grade MESCC is frequently overlooked on routine staging CT scans. We aim to assess the potential of our deep learning model (DLM) in detecting high-grade MESCC and reducing diagnostic delays. Methods: This retrospective review analyzed 140 patients with surgically treated MESCC between C7 and L2 during 2015–2022. An experienced radiologist (serving as the reference standard), a consultant spine surgeon, and the DLM independently classified staging CT scans into high-grade MESCC or not. The findings were compared to original radiologist (OR) reports; inter-rater agreement was assessed. Diagnostic delay referred to the number of days elapsed from CT to diagnostic MRI scan. Results: Overall, 95/140 (67.8%) patients had preoperative CT scans. High-grade MESCC was identified in 84/95 (88.4%) of the scans by the radiologist (reference standard), but in only 32/95 (33.7%) of the preoperative scans reported by the OR. There was almost perfect agreement between the radiologist and the surgeon (kappa = 0.947, 95% CI = 0.893–1.000) (p < 0.001), and between the radiologist and the DLM (kappa = 0.891, 95% CI = 0.816–0.967) (p < 0.001). In contrast, inter-observer agreement between the OR and all other readers was slight (kappa range = 0.022–0.125). Diagnostic delay was potentially reduced by 20 ± 28 (range = 1–131) days. Conclusions: The original radiologist reports frequently missed high-grade MESCC in staging CT. Our DLM for CT diagnosis of high-grade MESCC showed almost perfect inter-rater agreement with two experienced reviewers. This study is the first to demonstrate that the DLM could help reduce diagnostic delays. Further prospective research is required to understand its precise role in improving the early diagnosis/treatment of MESCC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Surgical Treatment of Spinal Tumors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 997 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Early Post-Radiation Surgical Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors
by Sang Yun Seok, Jae Hwan Cho, Hyung Rae Lee, Jae Woo Park, Jin Hoon Park, Dong-Ho Lee, Chang Ju Hwang and Sehan Park
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(3), 1032; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14031032 - 6 Feb 2025
Viewed by 784
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Radiotherapy is one of the various treatment options for patients with metastatic spinal tumors (MST). However, it is difficult to say that this is definitely an optimal treatment for MST, and there are several patients who need surgical treatment because pain or [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Radiotherapy is one of the various treatment options for patients with metastatic spinal tumors (MST). However, it is difficult to say that this is definitely an optimal treatment for MST, and there are several patients who need surgical treatment because pain or neurologic deficits occur even after radiotherapy. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze which patients received early operative treatment after radiotherapy. Methods: We included 81 patients who underwent decompression and fusion surgery after radiotherapy for MST. Patients who underwent surgery within 6 months after radiotherapy were classified as the early operation group (group E, n = 47), while surgery cases after 6 months after radiotherapy were assigned to the late operation group (group L, n = 34). Risk factor analysis using multivariate regression analysis for early operative treatment after radiotherapy was performed. Also, we analyzed the period from radiotherapy to surgery according to the Bilsky grade. Results: In multivariate analysis, pathologic fractures and semirigid (thoracic) lesions were more frequent in group E than group L (adjusted odds ratio, 4.282, 10.524; p = 0.001, 0.039). In subgroup analysis, there was a difference in the period from radiotherapy to surgery in Bilsky grades above 2 than Bilsky grade 1 (grade 1, 13.6 ± 11.4 months, grade 2, 6.9 ± 6.8 months, grade 3, 6.6 ± 7.5 months; grade 1 vs. 2, p = 0.049, grade 1 vs. 3, p = 0.047). Conclusions: Although the information in this study may only be limited to patients who underwent surgery, early operative treatment after radiotherapy is highly likely for patients with MST accompanied by a Bilsky grade above 2, pathologic fracture and thoracic lesion. In these patients, surgical treatment could be considered as the primary treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1534 KiB  
Article
Surgical Interventions Following Radiotherapy in Spinal Metastases with Intermediate Instability: A Risk Factor Analysis: The Korean Society of Spinal Tumor Multicenter Study (KSST 2022-02)
by Se-Jun Park, Jin Ho Kim, Yong Chan Ahn, Woong Sub Koom, Hwa Kyung Byun, Young-Hoon Kim, Sang-Il Kim, Dong-Ho Kang and on behalf of the Korean Society of Spinal Tumor
Cancers 2024, 16(14), 2554; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16142554 - 16 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1325
Abstract
Background: One important determinant in choosing a treatment modality is spinal instability. Clear management guidelines are suggested for stable and unstable spinal metastatic lesions, but lesions in the intermediate instability category (SINS [spinal instability neoplastic score] score of 7–12) remain a clinical dilemma. [...] Read more.
Background: One important determinant in choosing a treatment modality is spinal instability. Clear management guidelines are suggested for stable and unstable spinal metastatic lesions, but lesions in the intermediate instability category (SINS [spinal instability neoplastic score] score of 7–12) remain a clinical dilemma. This study aims to analyze the risk factors necessitating surgical intervention after radiotherapy (RT) in patients with those lesions. Methods: A multicenter cohort of 469 patients with spinal metastases of intermediate instability who received radiotherapy (RT) as the initial treatment between 2019 and 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. All patients were neurologically intact at the time of RT. According to the performance of surgical intervention after RT, various clinical and radiographic risk factors for surgical intervention were compared between surgery and non-surgery groups using uni- and multivariate analyses. A recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was performed using significant determinants identified in multivariate analysis. Results: The mean age at the time of RT was 59.9 years and there were 198 females. The lung was the most common primary site. During the mean follow-up duration of 18.2 months, surgical treatment was required in 79 (17.9%) of patients. The most common surgical method was decompressive laminectomy with stabilization (62.0%), followed by vertebrectomy with stabilization (22.8%) and stabilization only (15.2%). The mean SINS for the total cohort was 9.0. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that the primary tumor site of the lung, liver, and kidney, higher Bilsky grades of ESCC, lytic bone lesions, and higher EQD210 were significant risk factors for surgical intervention after RT. Among them, Bilsky grade, primary tumor type of the lung, liver, and kidney, and EQD210 were the most important determinants for expecting the probability of surgical intervention on RPA. Conclusions: Surgical intervention was performed in 17.9% of patients with intermediate instability after RT as the initial treatment. The primary tumor site of the lung, liver, and kidney, higher Bilsky grade of ESCC, and EQD210 were the most important determinants for expecting the probability of surgical intervention. Therefore, the optimal treatment strategy needs to be devised by carefully evaluating the risk of surgical intervention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bone and Spine Metastases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop