Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Angocin® Anti-Infekt N

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 1476 KB  
Article
Effectiveness of a Combination of Nasturtium Herb and Horseradish Root (Angocin® Anti-Infekt N) Compared to Antibiotics in Managing Acute and Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections: A Retrospective Real-world Cohort Study
by Nina Kassner, Meinolf Wonnemann, Yvonne Ziegler, Winfried Vahlensieck, Jennifer Kranz and Karel Kostev
Antibiotics 2024, 13(11), 1036; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13111036 - 2 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3538
Abstract
Background: The goal of this study was to evaluate whether the medical recommendation of Angocin® Anti-Infekt N, compared to standard antibiotic treatment shortly after the diagnosis of a urinary tract infection (UTI) or cystitis, is negatively associated with an early, [...] Read more.
Background: The goal of this study was to evaluate whether the medical recommendation of Angocin® Anti-Infekt N, compared to standard antibiotic treatment shortly after the diagnosis of a urinary tract infection (UTI) or cystitis, is negatively associated with an early, sporadic, or recurrent UTI, subsequent antibiotic prescriptions, pyelonephritis as a renal complication, or UTI-associated sick leave. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was based on data from the IQVIATM Disease Analyzer database and included patients diagnosed with acute UTI or cystitis by physicians in Germany between 2005 and 2021, who were prescribed either Angocin® or standard antibiotics within 4 days after diagnosis. Patients prescribed antibiotics were matched to those prescribed Angocin® (5:1) using propensity scores. Univariable logistic and Cox regression models were used to investigate the association between Angocin® prescription and the defined study outcomes. The effects of Angocin® were adjusted for age, sex, insurance status, index diagnosis, and physician specialty. Results: A total of 2277 Angocin® patients and 11,385 antibiotic patients were available for analysis. Compared to antibiotic prescriptions, Angocin® prescription was associated with significantly lower odds of an early relapse within 1–30 days after the index date (odds ratio (OR): 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62–0.87; p < 0.001), further sporadic UTI within 31–365 days after the index date (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.58–0.78; p < 0.001), and recurrent UTI (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.48–0.82; p < 0.001). This was also accompanied by reduced antibiotic prescriptions (1–30 days: OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.53–0.74, p < 0.001; 31–365 days: OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.49–0.64, p < 0.001). A strong, but due to the low incidence, not significant, negative association was observed between Angocin® prescription and the occurrence of pyelonephritis (hazard ratio (HR): 0.67; 95% CI: 0.43–1.06; p = 0.073). Conclusions: The results of this real-world data study demonstrate that Angocin® can be an effective therapeutic option for managing acute and recurrent UTIs and serves as an alternative therapy to antibiotics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2862 KB  
Article
Investigation into the Effectiveness of an Herbal Combination (Angocin®Anti-Infekt N) in the Therapy of Acute Bronchitis: A Retrospective Real-World Cohort Study
by Nina Kassner, Meinolf Wonnemann, Yvonne Ziegler, Rainer Stange and Karel Kostev
Antibiotics 2024, 13(10), 982; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13100982 - 17 Oct 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 5294
Abstract
Background: The goal of this study was to evaluate whether the medical recommendation of Angocin®Anti-Infekt N (heretofore referenced as Angocin®) on the day of diagnosis of acute bronchitis is negatively associated with the recurrence of acute bronchitis diagnosis, antibiotic [...] Read more.
Background: The goal of this study was to evaluate whether the medical recommendation of Angocin®Anti-Infekt N (heretofore referenced as Angocin®) on the day of diagnosis of acute bronchitis is negatively associated with the recurrence of acute bronchitis diagnosis, antibiotic prescriptions, incidence of chronic bronchitis, and duration of sick leave. Methods: This study included patients in general practices in Germany with a first documented diagnosis of acute bronchitis between 2005 and 2022 (index date) and a prescription of Angocin®, thyme products, essential oils, mucolytics or antibiotics on the index date. The association between Angocin® prescription and the risks of a relapse of acute bronchitis, development of chronic bronchitis, or subsequent antibiotic prescription were evaluated using Cox regression models. Univariable conditional logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between Angocin® prescription and duration of sick leave. Results: After a 1:5 propensity score matching, 598 Angocin® patients and 2990 patients in each of the four comparison cohorts were available for analysis. Angocin® prescription was associated with significantly lower incidence of a renewed confirmed diagnosis of acute bronchitis as compared to essential oils (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.61; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.46–0.80), thyme products (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.53–0.91), mucolytics (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.49–0.85) or antibiotics (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.49–0.84). Also, there were significantly lower incidences of subsequent re-prescriptions of antibiotics when compared to mucolytics (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.53–0.99) or antibiotics (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.39–0.72) and a significantly lower risk of chronic bronchitis as compared to essential oils (HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.46–0.78), thyme products (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.41–0.69), mucolytics (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.38–0.63) or antibiotics (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.45–0.76). Conclusions: Considering the limitations of the study, the results shed light on the sustaining effectiveness of Angocin® prescription in the management of acute bronchitis and the associated outcomes when compared to several other treatments commonly used for this condition. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop