Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Rytis Markelis

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
6 pages, 276 KiB  
Article
CpG Island Methylation of the MLH1, MGMT, DAPK, and CASP8 Genes in Cancerous and Adjacent Noncancerous Stomach Tissues
by Rita Kupčinskaitė-Noreikienė, Jurgita Skiecevičienė, Laimas Jonaitis, Rasa Ugenskienė, Juozas Kupčinskas, Rytis Markelis, Vidmantas Baltrėnas, Linas, Irina Semakina, Saulius Grižas and Elona Juozaitytė
Medicina 2013, 49(8), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina49080056 - 4 Sep 2013
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 2910
Abstract
Background and Objective. Many factors are involved in the development of gastric adenocarcinoma. The CpG island methylation of apoptosis and mismatch repair genes by the loss of their function is important in gastric adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to determine [...] Read more.
Background and Objective. Many factors are involved in the development of gastric adenocarcinoma. The CpG island methylation of apoptosis and mismatch repair genes by the loss of their function is important in gastric adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to determine the methylation frequency of MLH1, MGMT, CASP8, and DAPK in cancerous and adjacent noncancerous stomach tissues, to determine possible associations with the selected clinicopathological characteristics, and to identify possible correlation between the methylation of individual genes.
Material and Methods. The methylation status of MLH1, MGMT, DAPK, and CASP8 was investigated in 69 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma by using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. The associations between patients’ clinical characteristics and methylation status were assessed.
Results
. The methylation frequency of the MLH1, DAPK, MGMT, and CASP8 gene promoters in cancerous and adjacent noncancerous tissues was 31.9% and 27.5%; 47.8% and 46.4%; 36.2% and 44.9%; and 5.8% and 5.8%, respectively, but the differences were not significant. There was no significant association between the methylation status of the mentioned genes and clinicopathological characteristics, such as age, sex, tumor type by the Lauren classification, degree of differentiation G, and TNM staging. An inverse correlation between the methylation of the DAPK and MLH1 gene promoters in cancerous and surrounding noncancerous tissues was found.
Conclusions. The methylation of the MLH1, MGMT, DAPK, and CASP8 genes was found to occur both in cancerous and noncancerous stomach tissues. These findings provide additional insights into gene methylation patterns in gastric adenocarcinoma. Full article
9 pages, 1060 KiB  
Article
Adjuvant therapy after curative resection with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: Results of a prospective clinical trial
by Rytis Markelis, Žilvinas Endzinas, Mindaugas Kiudelis, Saulius Grižas, Juozas Pundzius, Žilvinas Saladžinskas, Elona Juozaitytė, Arturas Inčiūra, Darius Pranys and Almantas Maleckas
Medicina 2009, 45(6), 460; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina45060060 - 10 Jun 2009
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 1535
Abstract
Objective. Adjuvant chemoradiation for gastric cancer is used more frequently, but there is no general opinion about the effect of this treatment. The aim of this study was to compare adjuvant chemoradiation with adjuvant chemotherapy after radical operation for stomach cancer.
Material [...] Read more.
Objective. Adjuvant chemoradiation for gastric cancer is used more frequently, but there is no general opinion about the effect of this treatment. The aim of this study was to compare adjuvant chemoradiation with adjuvant chemotherapy after radical operation for stomach cancer.
Material and methods. A total of 133 patients were included in this prospective study. Sixty-three patients after curative gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer were assigned to the chemoradiotherapy group and 70 to the chemotherapy group. The groups were identical by age, sex, and cancer stages. Toxicity was evaluated by the WHO scale, and survival was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results. Grade III and IV toxicity was found more frequently in the chemoradiation group than in the chemotherapy group (44.4% and 7.1%, respectively; P<0.0001). Treatment was not finished in 27% of patients in the chemoradiation group and 11.4% in the chemotherapy group (P=0.03). Overall survival was better in the chemotherapy group as compared with the chemoradiation group (P=0.039). Median survival for patients with stage III and IV cancer was 41 months in the chemotherapy group and 18 months in the chemoradiation group (P=0.085). Survival of patients with stage IIIA cancer in the chemotherapy group was significantly better (P=0.005).
Conclusions. Median survival is shorter in the adjuvant chemoradiation group after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer as compared with the adjuvant chemotherapy group. Adjuvant chemoradiation is more toxic and should be recommended only for patients with advanced-stage cancer. Full article
Back to TopTop