Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Brian D. O. Anderson ORCID = 0000-0002-1493-4774

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
26 pages, 395 KiB  
Article
Linear System Challenges of Dynamic Factor Models
by Brian D. O. Anderson, Manfred Deistler and Marco Lippi
Econometrics 2022, 10(4), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics10040035 - 6 Dec 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2620
Abstract
A survey is provided dealing with the formulation of modelling problems for dynamic factor models, and the various algorithm possibilities for solving these modelling problems. Emphasis is placed on understanding requirements for the handling of errors, noting the relevance of the proposed application [...] Read more.
A survey is provided dealing with the formulation of modelling problems for dynamic factor models, and the various algorithm possibilities for solving these modelling problems. Emphasis is placed on understanding requirements for the handling of errors, noting the relevance of the proposed application of the model, be it for example prediction or business cycle determination. Mixed frequency problems are also considered, in which certain entries of an underlying vector process are only available for measurement at a submultiple frequency of the original process. Certain classes of processes are shown to be generically identifiable, and others not to have this property. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue High-Dimensional Time Series in Macroeconomics and Finance)
16 pages, 4180 KiB  
Article
Deep Learning Models for Automated Assessment of Breast Density Using Multiple Mammographic Image Types
by Bastien Rigaud, Olena O. Weaver, Jennifer B. Dennison, Muhammad Awais, Brian M. Anderson, Ting-Yu D. Chiang, Wei T. Yang, Jessica W. T. Leung, Samir M. Hanash and Kristy K. Brock
Cancers 2022, 14(20), 5003; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14205003 - 13 Oct 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2927
Abstract
Recently, convolutional neural network (CNN) models have been proposed to automate the assessment of breast density, breast cancer detection or risk stratification using single image modality. However, analysis of breast density using multiple mammographic types using clinical data has not been reported in [...] Read more.
Recently, convolutional neural network (CNN) models have been proposed to automate the assessment of breast density, breast cancer detection or risk stratification using single image modality. However, analysis of breast density using multiple mammographic types using clinical data has not been reported in the literature. In this study, we investigate pre-trained EfficientNetB0 deep learning (DL) models for automated assessment of breast density using multiple mammographic types with and without clinical information to improve reliability and versatility of reporting. 120,000 for-processing and for-presentation full-field digital mammograms (FFDM), digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), and synthesized 2D images from 5032 women were retrospectively analyzed. Each participant underwent up to 3 screening examinations and completed a questionnaire at each screening encounter. Pre-trained EfficientNetB0 DL models with or without clinical history were optimized. The DL models were evaluated using BI-RADS (fatty, scattered fibroglandular densities, heterogeneously dense, or extremely dense) versus binary (non-dense or dense) density classification. Pre-trained EfficientNetB0 model performances were compared using inter-observer and commercial software (Volpara) variabilities. Results show that the average Fleiss’ Kappa score between-observers ranged from 0.31–0.50 and 0.55–0.69 for the BI-RADS and binary classifications, respectively, showing higher uncertainty among experts. Volpara-observer agreement was 0.33 and 0.54 for BI-RADS and binary classifications, respectively, showing fair to moderate agreement. However, our proposed pre-trained EfficientNetB0 DL models-observer agreement was 0.61–0.66 and 0.70–0.75 for BI-RADS and binary classifications, respectively, showing moderate to substantial agreement. Overall results show that the best breast density estimation was achieved using for-presentation FFDM and DBT images without added clinical information. Pre-trained EfficientNetB0 model can automatically assess breast density from any images modality type, with the best results obtained from for-presentation FFDM and DBT, which are the most common image archived in clinical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Breast Cancer Risk and Prevention)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop