Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Adriaan C. G. M. van Es

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 3517 KiB  
Article
Impact of Intracranial Volume and Brain Volume on the Prognostic Value of Computed Tomography Perfusion Core Volume in Acute Ischemic Stroke
by Jan W. Hoving, Praneeta R. Konduri, Manon L. Tolhuisen, Miou S. Koopman, Henk van Voorst, Laura M. Van Poppel, Jasper D. Daems, Adriaan C. G. M. van Es, Marianne A. A. van Walderveen, Hester F. Lingsma, Diederik W. J. Dippel, Wim H. Van Zwam, Henk A. Marquering, Charles B. L. M. Majoie and Bart J. Emmer
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2024, 11(3), 80; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11030080 - 28 Feb 2024
Viewed by 2235
Abstract
Background: Computed tomography perfusion (CTP)-estimated core volume is associated with functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. This relationship might differ among patients, depending on brain volume. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively included patients from the MR CLEAN Registry. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and intracranial [...] Read more.
Background: Computed tomography perfusion (CTP)-estimated core volume is associated with functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. This relationship might differ among patients, depending on brain volume. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively included patients from the MR CLEAN Registry. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and intracranial volume (ICV) were automatically segmented on NCCT. We defined the proportion of the ICV and total brain volume (TBV) affected by the ischemic core as ICVcore and TBVcore. Associations between the core volume, ICVcore, TBVcore, and functional outcome are reported per interquartile range (IQR). We calculated the area under the curve (AUC) to assess diagnostic accuracy. Results: In 200 patients, the median core volume was 13 (5–41) mL. Median ICV and TBV were 1377 (1283–1456) mL and 1108 (1020–1197) mL. Median ICVcore and TBVcore were 0.9 (0.4–2.8)% and 1.7 (0.5–3.6)%. Core volume (acOR per IQR 0.48 [95%CI 0.33–0.69]), ICVcore (acOR per IQR 0.50 [95%CI 0.35–0.69]), and TBVcore (acOR per IQR 0.41 95%CI 0.33–0.67]) showed a lower likelihood of achieving improved functional outcomes after 90 days. The AUC was 0.80 for the prediction of functional independence at 90 days for the CTP-estimated core volume, the ICVcore, and the TBVcore. Conclusion: Correcting the CTP-estimated core volume for the intracranial or total brain volume did not improve the association with functional outcomes in patients who underwent EVT. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 751 KiB  
Article
Alternative Arterial Access Routes for Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Study from the MR CLEAN Registry
by Sabine L. Collette, Elke A. van de Ven, Gert-Jan R. Luijckx, Hester F. Lingsma, Pieter Jan van Doormaal, Adriaan C. G. M. van Es, Ido R. van den Wijngaard, Robert-Jan B. Goldhoorn, Jan Cees de Groot, Wim H. van Zwam, Charles B. L. M. Majoie, Diederik W. J. Dippel, Reinoud P. H. Bokkers, Maarten Uyttenboogaart and on behalf of the MR CLEAN Registry Investigators
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(9), 3257; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093257 - 2 May 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1941
Abstract
Background: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) through femoral access is difficult to perform in some patients with acute ischemic stroke due to challenging vasculature. We compared outcomes of EVT through femoral versus alternative arterial access. Methods: In this observational study, we included patients from the [...] Read more.
Background: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) through femoral access is difficult to perform in some patients with acute ischemic stroke due to challenging vasculature. We compared outcomes of EVT through femoral versus alternative arterial access. Methods: In this observational study, we included patients from the MR CLEAN Registry who underwent EVT for acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation between 2014 and 2019 in the Netherlands. Patients who underwent EVT through alternative and femoral access were matched on propensity scores in a 1:3 ratio. The primary endpoint was favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2) at 90 days. Secondary endpoints were early neurologic recovery, mortality, successful intracranial reperfusion and puncture related complications. Results: Of the 5197 included patients, 17 patients underwent EVT through alternative access and were matched to 48 patients who underwent EVT through femoral access. Alternative access was obtained through the common carotid artery (n = 15/17) and brachial artery (n = 2/17). Favorable functional outcome was less often observed after EVT through alternative than femoral access (18% versus 27%; aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.05–2.74). The rate of successful intracranial reperfusion was higher for alternative than femoral access (88% versus 58%), although mortality (59% versus 31%) and puncture related complications (29% versus 0%) were more common after alternative access. Conclusions: EVT through alternative arterial access is rarely performed in the Netherlands and seems to be associated with worse outcomes than standard femoral access. A next step would be to compare the additional value of EVT through alternative arterial access after failure of femoral access. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Status of Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1624 KiB  
Article
Deep-Learning-Based Thrombus Localization and Segmentation in Patients with Posterior Circulation Stroke
by Riaan Zoetmulder, Agnetha A. E. Bruggeman, Ivana Išgum, Efstratios Gavves, Charles B. L. M. Majoie, Ludo F. M. Beenen, Diederik W. J. Dippel, Nikkie Boodt, Sanne J. den Hartog, Pieter J. van Doormaal, Sandra A. P. Cornelissen, Yvo B. W. E. M. Roos, Josje Brouwer, Wouter J. Schonewille, Anne F. V. Pirson, Wim H. van Zwam, Christiaan van der Leij, Rutger J. B. Brans, Adriaan C. G. M. van Es and Henk A. Marquering
Diagnostics 2022, 12(6), 1400; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061400 - 6 Jun 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4031
Abstract
Thrombus volume in posterior circulation stroke (PCS) has been associated with outcome, through recanalization. Manual thrombus segmentation is impractical for large scale analysis of image characteristics. Hence, in this study we develop the first automatic method for thrombus localization and segmentation on CT [...] Read more.
Thrombus volume in posterior circulation stroke (PCS) has been associated with outcome, through recanalization. Manual thrombus segmentation is impractical for large scale analysis of image characteristics. Hence, in this study we develop the first automatic method for thrombus localization and segmentation on CT in patients with PCS. In this multi-center retrospective study, 187 patients with PCS from the MR CLEAN Registry were included. We developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) that segments thrombi and restricts the volume-of-interest (VOI) to the brainstem (Polar-UNet). Furthermore, we reduced false positive localization by removing small-volume objects, referred to as volume-based removal (VBR). Polar-UNet is benchmarked against a CNN that does not restrict the VOI (BL-UNet). Performance metrics included the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) between automated and manually segmented thrombus volumes, the thrombus localization precision and recall, and the Dice coefficient. The majority of the thrombi were localized. Without VBR, Polar-UNet achieved a thrombus localization recall of 0.82, versus 0.78 achieved by BL-UNet. This high recall was accompanied by a low precision of 0.14 and 0.09. VBR improved precision to 0.65 and 0.56 for Polar-UNet and BL-UNet, respectively, with a small reduction in recall to 0.75 and 0.69. The Dice coefficient achieved by Polar-UNet was 0.44, versus 0.38 achieved by BL-UNet with VBR. Both methods achieved ICCs of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.27–0.54). Restricting the VOI to the brainstem improved the thrombus localization precision, recall, and segmentation overlap compared to the benchmark. VBR improved thrombus localization precision but lowered recall. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence in Stroke Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop