We are thrilled to share the updated Exceptional Reviewers List 2025. This program was designed to recognize and honor scholars who have delivered consistently exceptional review reports to our journal. Committed to fostering rigorous research and promoting knowledge exchange, Coatings (ISSN: 2079-6412) recognizes the significant role our reviewers play in maintaining the quality and integrity of the articles we publish. According to surveys conducted in 2024, 92% of our authors rate the peer review as good or excellent, thanks to our pool of excellent reviewers.

We would like to express our sincere appreciation to all the reviewers who have generously volunteered their time and expertise to assist in Coatings' peer-review process. Their dedication and attention to detail in evaluating manuscripts, offering valuable feedback, and contributing to academic rigor are truly commendable.

The Exceptional Reviewers List has been introduced in June 2025. Every month, we will be selecting a group of outstanding reviewers and introducing them here.

September 2025

See what our reviewers say about the review process of Coatings:

“The review process has been both insightful and inspiring, allowing me to stay connected with new ideas and contribute to advancing our discipline. I am deeply appreciative of the editorial team’s dedication and the opportunity to be part of this community.”—Dr. Cornelia Baera

“My review experience with Coatings has been rewarding, allowing me to engage with cutting-edge research while contributing to scientific rigor.”—Dr. Dao Nguyen Thuan

“The Coatings journal, and other journals from MDPI, offered me great resources and guidelines in my early reviewer experience. With those helpful information, my reviewing processes have been always smooth and straightforward.”—Dr. Hongxuan Chen

“It has been a pleasure to contribute to the peer-review process and to support the journal’s commitment to scientific quality.”—Dr. Luis Filipe Almeida Bernardo

“I was honored to serve as a reviewer, supporting the advancement of scientific research through thoughtful and constructive evaluations. Peer review is a crucial process that maintains the integrity, accuracy, and relevance of published work, and I take great responsibility in providing fair and detailed feedback. Each review not only assesses the quality of the research but also helps authors refine their ideas, improve clarity, and strengthen their arguments. From my experience, I have learned that effective reviewing requires a balance between critical analysis and encouragement, helping researchers at all stages to improve the impact of their work. I am motivated by the collaborative nature of the process, where reviewers, editors, and authors work together to maintain scientific standards and foster innovation. Participating as a reviewer enables me to stay current on the latest developments in my field, deepen my understanding, and contribute to shaping the direction of research. I appreciate the opportunity to be part of this global community of scientists dedicated to excellence, transparency, and continuous improvement in scholarly publishing.”—Dr. Nicoleta Nedelcu

“Peer review is an essential part of the publishing and knowledge dissemination process. Taking part in the process is essential for me to be aware of the newest advances in my field and others. It’s especially valuable to encourage open access to make science more accessible.”—Dr. Samuel McMaster

“Coatings’ review platform is objective, intuitive, and transparent; it informs editors and authors clearly and enables fast, efficient evaluations with consistently high scientific standards.”—Dr. Sinan Fidan

“Reviewing for Coatings has been a rewarding experience, allowing me to contribute to high-quality research and learn from leading work in the field.”—Dr. Worawat Wattanathana

August 2025

See what our reviewers say about the review process of Coatings:

“My experience reviewing for Coatings (MDPI) was excellent; the system is modern and accessible, voucher incentives are valuable, and the published articles fit the journal’s scope”.—Dr. Ahmad Mostafa

“My experience as reviewer for the journal Coatings has been positive. It was very stimulating to revise valuable papers in a variety of topics concerning coatings. The Editorial Office and the Assistant Editors have been helpful during the process”.—Dr. Claudia Pelosi

“The review process and experience of the Coatings journal platform is straightforward and user friendly. This platform promotes transparency while maintaining confidentiality. The review criteria are clearly defined, and the editorial communication is timely and respectful. As a reviewer, I felt a valued contributor. This platform provides high-quality, ethical, and efficient scholarly evaluation”.—Dr. Leonardo Gutierrez

“Reviewing for the journal was an enriching experience, allowing me to contribute to advancing scientific quality and rigor. I appreciate the opportunity to support the journal through peer review and promote excellence in scientific publication”.—Dr. Lucien Reclaru

July 2025

See what our reviewers say about the review process of Coatings:

“Reviewing for Coatings has been an inspiring process, allowing me to contribute to the advancement of high-quality research in materials science.”—Dr. Abdullah Hasan Karabacak

“The review experience was excellent. I appreciate the journal’s emphasis on accepting reviewers’ technical and scientific feedback to improve quality, along with efficient processing times.”—Dr. Abhijith Sukumaran

“I greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute to the high quality of the journal’s peer-review process. Reviewing has been a very rewarding experience for me, where I can contribute to the further development of the field, and I look forward to reviewing articles in the future.”—Dr. Bruno Alderete

“Part of the duty of a scientist is to evaluate how other research groups work. I believe that reviewing articles gives you i) on one hand, alternative, more functional, approaches and ii) on the other hand, the chance to offer the community the suggestions that made you the scientist you are today.”—Dr. Gianluca Tondi

“Reviewing for Coatings (MDPI) has been a rewarding way to engage with groundbreaking research in materials science. The editorial team's professionalism—clear guidelines, prompt communication, and respect for reviewers' time—makes the process seamless. I appreciate being included in the Materials 2025 Exceptional Reviewers List as practical recognition, but the true value lies in contributing to a journal that balances speed, rigor, and openness. It is fulfilling to focus on experimental soundness, novelty, and clarity and help authors strengthen their contributions while advancing materials innovation.”—Dr. Nay Win Khun

“Reviewing for Coatings was a great opportunity to participate in cutting-edge research and constructively support the development of materials science.”—Dr. Nikolay Sirotkin

June 2025

See what our reviewers have to say about the review process of Coatings:

“The reviewing process for Coatings is streamlined and easy to conduct through a well-defined interface and prompt communications. Seeing and learning about new developments through the review process also gives me the opportunity to expand my knowledge and be updated on the state of the art in this field.”– Dr. Igor Karlovits

“Serving as a reviewer for Coatings has been a rewarding and intellectually stimulating experience. Over the past year, I have had the opportunity to evaluate manuscripts covering a wide range of topics in surface science, thin films, protective layers, and related coating technologies. This role has not only allowed me to contribute to the advancement of the field but has also enriched my own understanding of emerging research trends and experimental methods.

Each review presented a unique challenge, requiring careful consideration of the methodology, data interpretation, and the novelty of the work. I strived to provide constructive, detailed, and balanced feedback that could help authors strengthen their manuscripts while maintaining fairness and objectivity. The editorial team at Coatings has been highly professional and supportive, ensuring smooth communication and clear timelines throughout the review process.”– Dr. Mohsin Sattar

“I value the opportunity to contribute to Coatings by ensuring the quality and impact of published research for the scientific community.”– Dr. Muayad Muayad Habashneh

“Contributing to the peer-review process has always been a rewarding experience for me, as it allows me to engage with cutting-edge research, provide constructive feedback, and help authors strengthen the scientific quality of their work. I greatly value the opportunity to collaborate with the editorial team, who maintain a high standard of academic rigor while ensuring an efficient and transparent review process. Peer review is an essential part of advancing science, and I am proud to contribute to the integrity and excellence of scholarly publishing through Coatings.”– Dr. Mustafa Bora

“Reviewing for Coatings has been a rewarding experience—rigorous, efficient, and inspiring in advancing high-quality research.”– Dr. Rashid Dallaev

January–May 2025

See what our reviewers say about the review process of Coatings:
“I value the opportunity to contribute to science by reviewing manuscripts from around the world. My goal is constructive assessment, helping authors improve their work and enhance its scientific merit.”—Dr. Andrei Chernil'nik

“Serving as a reviewer for Coatings has been a valuable and rewarding experience. The review deadlines are often quite short, which has taught me to approach each manuscript with efficiency and focus. In my reviews, I pay particular attention not only to the scientific rigor and validity of the research, but also to the originality of the work and its compliance with ethical standards in scientific publishing. Throughout my time as a reviewer, I have consistently received prompt and helpful support from the Editorial Office, which has made the process smooth and professional. Their responsiveness and clear communication have greatly contributed to a positive reviewing experience. I am grateful for the opportunity to contribute to the advancement of open science through peer review.”—Dr. Anna V. Gubarevich

“Peer reviewing is not only a responsibility but also an opportunity to contribute to the scientific dialogue and support the growth of knowledge.”—Dr. Daniele Almonti

“Serving as a reviewer with the journal of Coatings has been a fulfilling way to contribute to the scientific community and engage with innovative research in my field.”—Dr. Ehsan Hosseini

“I have reviewed a good number of interesting articles for the journal Coatings, and helped to publish good quality articles. The review experience for Coatings is quite good, with excellent support from the Editorial Office and a follow-up process for each reviewed article. In the future, I would also like to commit myself to reviewing articles for the journal Coatings and thereby contributing high-quality and standard publications for the progress of the journal.”—Dr. Golap Kalita

“The review enables me to learn about new techniques, processes, perspectives, and approaches from various researchers worldwide. I enjoy contributing to the improvement of my colleagues' manuscripts.”—Dr. Hilda Esperanza Esparza-Ponce

“Reviewing for Coatings has been a fulfilling experience that allows me to stay engaged with cutting-edge research and support authors through constructive feedback.”—Dr. Hassan Ghanem

“In my review work, I see myself and others as grain boundaries—each catching flaws others might miss, working together to stop errors and strengthen scientific research.”—Dr. Konrad Kwiatkowski

“Reviewing for Coatings was intellectually rewarding, the manuscripts were innovative, well-structured, and aligned with emerging trends in energy materials and environmental sustainability.”—Dr. Kledi Xhaxhiu

“I appreciate my interactions with Coatings as Reviewer and Section Editor very much. I reviewed research on thin various materials covering synthesis methods, structural and optical characterization, and applications in sensors, photovoltaics, nanoelectronics and much more.”—Dr. Mihai Anastasescu

“Reviewing for Coatings is an enriching experience that enables me to support scientific excellence and stay at the forefront of surface and materials engineering research.”—Dr. Onur Güler

“Reviewing manuscripts allows me to stay engaged with the latest developments in my field while supporting the scientific community. I find great satisfaction in reading and evaluating new research, and I am always eager to learn from innovative approaches and emerging topics. Peer review not only enhances my own scientific perspective but also strengthens the overall quality and rigor of published research.”—Dr. Otto Todor-Boer

“It’s rewarding to contribute to a journal that consistently promotes innovation and rigor in the coatings and materials science community.”—Dr. Pragathi Darapaneni

“Reviewing for Coatings has been a smooth and professional experience. The process is efficient, and communication is clear. I'm glad to contribute to the journal’s high standards.”—Dr. Rashid Dallaev

“Participating in peer review has deepened my understanding of current research trends and reinforced my commitment to scientific progress.”—Dr. Ramsha Khan

“For me, reviewing a scientific work is one of the best ways to collaborate for a better diffusion of scientific knowledge. It is much more than pointing out mistakes or requesting explanations. Reviewing is the strategy that I use to help other authors to make their work even better and more impactful for scholars. Every single review I carry out is full of hope that the authors could learn with me at the same time that I learnt from them by reading and analysing their research results. I am glad to help Coatings to improve its impact factor as well as motivate the authors to produce better works.”—Dr. Rodolpho Vaz

“The peer-review experience with Coatings has enabled me to stay up to date with the latest scientific developments, contribute to the quality of published work, and continuously enhance my professional expertise.“—Dr. Sara Havrlisan

“Reviewing for Coatings has been a rewarding experience that has allowed me to contribute to the advancement of high-quality research.”—Dr. Tri Ho Minh Le

“Constant peer-review activity is a way to stay on top of scientific news.”—Dr. Vytenis Jankauskas

You can read more testimonials at the following link: https://www.mdpi.com/testimonials?type=all&journal_id=107&page_count=20.