Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of a Functional Bread Made with Wheat Flour (Triticum spp.), Tarwi Flour (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet) and Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in the Chemical Composition and Bioactive Compounds of Quinoa Seeds by Germination
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Antibacterial Properties of Dental Copolymer Modified with Monomers Possessing Quaternary Ammonium Groups †

by
Patryk Drejka
1,*,
Marta Chrószcz-Porębksa
1,
Alicja Kazek-Kęsik
2,3 and
Izabela Barszczewska-Rybarek
1
1
Department of Physical Chemistry and Technology of Polymers, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
2
Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
3
Biotechnology Centre, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Biomolecules, 23–25 April 2024; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/IECBM2024.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2024, 35(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2024035010
Published: 13 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 3rd International Electronic Conference on Biomolecules)

Abstract

:
Dental caries are treated using dental composite restorative materials (DCRM). However, commercial DCRMs lack antibacterial activity. This research aimed to analyze the in vitro antibacterial activity of a series of copolymers consisting of a urethane–dimethacrylate monomer (UDMA), bisphenol A glycerolate dimethacrylate (Bis-GMA), triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) and urethane–dimethacrylate monomer with two quaternary ammonium groups and a 1,3-bis(1-isocyanate-1-methylethyl)benzene core (QAn+TMXDI, where n = 8, 10, or 12 is the number of carbon atoms in the N-alkyl substituent). QAn+TMXDI contents in copolymers were 20 and 40 wt.%. The results of the Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli adhesion test demonstrated that the logCFU/mL decreased as the length of the N-alkyl chain decreased and QAn+TMXDI content increased. The copolymers of QA8+TMXDI 40 wt.%, Bis-GMA 40 wt.%, and TEGDMA 20 wt.% showed the highest antibacterial activity, with a logCFU/mL of 2.39 for S. aureus and no viable E. coli cells.

1. Introduction

The pathogenic bacteria occurring in the biofilm that forms on teeth and mouth surfaces may cause dental caries [1,2]. This biofilm is also found in the marginal gap between dental fillings and the tooth surface, causing secondary caries [3].
Typical dental fillings are made of dental composite restorative materials (DCRM), which are composed of a silica filler dispersed in a dimethacrylate polymer matrix, and they do not have antibacterial activity. Research aiming to prevent secondary caries by providing DCRMs with antibacterial activity is being conducted worldwide [4,5,6]. One of these approaches is based on the modification of existing dimethacrylate DCRM adhesives through copolymerization with bioactive comonomers. Promising examples of such compounds are monomethacrylate (QAMMA) and dimetchacrylates (QADMAs), which possess quaternary ammonium groups [6]. QADMAs are a better alternative because, unlike QAMMAs, they do not reduce the crosslink density in the DCRM matrix. Several types of QADMAs are known from the literature. They include derivatives of (i) N-methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) [7,8,9], (ii) N,N-dimethyloaminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA) [10], (iii) UDMA based on diisocyanates, such as isophorone diisocyanate [11] or 1,6-diisocyanato-2,2,4-trimethylhexane [12], 1,3-bis(1-isocyanato-1-methylethyl)benzene [13], and (iv) Bis-GMA [14,15]. The incorporation of quaternary ammonium monomers into common dental copolymers usually leads to increased antibacterial activity but a decreased physico-mechanical performance. Therefore, they are interesting research objects, whose use in DCRM matrices allows for materials to be obtained with properties that are at least no worse compared to the materials currently available.
In our previous study, we synthesized and characterized two novel urethane-dimethacrylate monomers with two quaternary ammonium groups and a 1,3-bis(1-isocyanato-1-methylethyl)benzene-derived core: QA10+TMXDI and QA12+TMXDI. They were subjected to copolymerization with UDMA, Bis-GMA, and TEGDMA, at 20, 20, 40, and 20 wt.%, respectively. The obtained copolymers, 20(QA10+TMXDI) and 20(QA12+TMXDI), demonstrated very good physicochemical and mechanical properties and certain antibacterial activity. The latter manifested in a reduction in the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against S. aureus and E. coli in comparison to the reference polymer (UDMA 40 wt.%, Bis-GMA 40 wt.%, and TEGDMA 20 wt.% (40(UDMA)). The results also showed that a decrease in the N-alkyl chain in QAn+TMXDI resulted in an increase in copolymer antibacterial activity [13]. Therefore, the aim of this work was to continue the research on the antibacterial activity of copolymers containing QAn+TMXDI to assess their potential as chemically bonded biocides in dental dimethacrylate copolymers. For this purpose, another new QAn+TMXDI monomer with the N-octyl substituent (QA8+TMXDI) was synthesized. This was introduced at 20 wt.% in the copolymer with UDMA 20 wt.%, Bis-GMA 40 wt.%, and TEGDMA 20 wt.% (20(QA8+TMXDI)) and, additionally, at 40 wt.% in a copolymer with Bis-GMA 40 wt.% and TEGDMA 20 wt.% (40(QA8+TMXDI)). The antibacterial properties of the obtained copolymers were characterized using logCFU/mL values in adhesion tests against S. aureus and E. coli. The copolymers presented in the previous work [13], the copolymer with QA10+TMXDI 40 wt.% (40(QA10+TMXDI)), and the 40(UDMA) reference polymer were also obtained for comparison purposes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Octyl bromide (OB), decyl bromide (DB), dodecyl bromide (DDB), N-methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), and methyl methacrylate (MMA) were purchased from Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium. 1,3-bis(1-isocyanato-1-methylethyl)benzene (TMXDI), phenothiazine (PTZ), camphorquinone (CQ), N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA), bisphenol A-glycidyl dimethacrylate (Bis-GMA), triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA), urethane–dimethacrylate (UDMA), and tetramethylsilane (TMS) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA. Dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) was purchased from Fluka, Charlotte, NC, USA. Deuterated dichloromethane (CD2Cl2) and deuterated trichloromethane (CDCl3) were purchased from Deutero GMBH, Kastellaun, Germany. Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) and potassium carbonate (K2CO3) were purchased from Chempur, Piekary Śląskie, Poland. Toluene, trichloromethane, and dichloromethane were purchased from Stanlab, Lublin, Poland. All chemicals were used as received. Tryptic soy broth (TSB) was purchased from Biomaxima, Lublin, Poland. TSB was dissolved in sterile water following the information posted on the packaging.

2.2. Monomer Synthesis

The monomers were synthesized according to a procedure known from the literature [12] (Figure 1). The first step in the synthesis involves the transesterification of MMA. MMA 1.00 mol (100.12 g), and MDEA 0.67 mol (79.85 g), a catalyst, K2CO3 8 wt.% (14.40 g), a polymerization inhibitor, PTZ 0.05% wt.% (0.09 g), and toluene 400 cm3 were introduced into a 1000 mL, single-necked, round-bottom flask equipped with a distillation kit. The reaction was carried out until the temperature at the column head reached 100 °C. The cooled and filtered solution was washed three times with distilled water in a 1:2 volume ratio. The aqueous fractions were washed three times with trichloromethane in a 1:3 volume ratio. Then, trichloromethane was evaporated on a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure (30 mbar). The crude product (HAMA) was subjected to vacuum distillation (3 mbar), collecting a boiling fraction from 110 to 130 °C. In the second step, HAMA 0.107 mol (20.00 g), alkyl bromide 0.107 mol (OB 20.66 g, DB 23.66 g, and DDB 26.67 g), and PTZ 0.05 wt.% (0.020, 0.022, and 0.023 g, respectively, in the reactions with OB, DB, and DDB) were introduced into a 250 mL, three-necked, round-bottom flask equipped with a reflux condenser, thermometer, and mechanical stirrer. The reaction was carried out at 80 °C for 90 h. The reaction yielded 100% 2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl-2-hydroxyethylmethyloctylammonium bromide (QAHAMA-8), 2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl-2-decylhydroxyethylmethylammonium bromide (QAHAMA-10), and 2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl-2-dodecylhydroxyethylmethylammonium bromide (QAHAMA-12).
In the final step (Figure 1), a 50% solution of QAHAMA-n 0.070 mol (QAHAMA-8 26.67 g, QAHAMA-10 28.60 g, and QAHAMA-12 30.55 g), a catalyst, DBTDL 0.035 wt.% (0.013 g), and a solvent, dichloromethane 21 cm3, were introduced into a 250 mL, three-necked, round-bottom flask equipped with a dropping funnel, reflux condenser, and thermometer. A 50% solution of TMXDI 0.035 mol (8.55 g) in 6.5 cm3 dichloromethane was dropped into the flask. After the reaction mixture was brought to a boil (approximately 42 °C), a TMXDI solution was added to the flask dropwise for 1.5 h. The reaction was carried out for 5 h, maintaining the temperature in the flask. The solvent was removed using a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure (30 and then 3 mbar) and the products were stored in the laboratory dryer (SLW 53 STD, POL-EKO, Wodzisław Śląski, Poland) at 40 °C for 24 h. The products were light yellow, viscous, liquid resins. The reaction yield for all products was 100%.
The chemical structures of the final products and semi-products were confirmed via Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (1H and 13C NMR).

2.3. Curing Procedure and Sample Preparation

Five liquid monomer compositions were prepared using mechanical stirring at 50 °C. The first series consisted of QAUDMA (QA8+TMXDI, QA10+TMXDI and QA12+TMXDI) 20 wt.%, UDMA 20 wt.%, Bis-GMA 40 wt.%, and TEGDMA 20 wt.%; the second series was composed of QAUDMA (QA8+TMXDI and QA10+TMXDI) 40 wt.%, Bis-GMA 40 wt.%, and TEGDMA 20 wt.%. The reference composition was also prepared; it consisted of UDMA 40 wt.%, Bis-GMA 40 wt.%, and TEGDMA 20 wt.%. The photopolymerization-initiating system components, CQ 0.4 wt.% and DMAEMA 1 wt.%, were introduced into homogeneous monomer mixtures and stirred until CQ dissolved. The compositions achieved in this way were poured into the molds, covered with PET foil to minimize oxygen inhibition, and exposed to UV–VIS irradiation at room temperature for 1 h utilizing the Ultra Vitalux 300 lamp (Osram, Munich, Germany). Each obtained cast was polished with fine sandpaper before the experiments.

2.4. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (NMR)

In the study, the NMR 300 MHz spectrometer (UNITY/INOVA, Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used. The spectrometer collected 256 scans for 1H spectra and 40,000 scans for 13C NMR spectra. CD2Cl2 and CDCl3 were used as deuterated solvents, and TMS was used as an internal standard.

2.5. Bacterial Adhesion

The bacterial adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) was tested with copolymer disc-like samples (10 mm diameter and 3 mm thickness). Each sample was placed in a 25 mL test tube and immersed in 1 mL of bacterial suspension (~5 × 106 CFU/mL). After incubation, carried out at 37 °C for 18 h, the bacterial suspensions were removed from the tubes and copolymer samples were washed with sterile water. Washed samples were moved to new test tubes, impressed in 1 mL of sterile water, and vortexed at 3000 rpm for 1 min to remove the bacteria that had adhered to the surface of the samples. Next, 100 μL of the obtained bacteria suspensions was mixed with 0.9% NaCl at the following concentrations: 1:10, 1:100, 1:1000, 1:10,000, 1:100,000, and 1:1 000,000. Then, 100 μL of those solutions was speared on agar plates (Müller-Hinton agar, Diag-Med, Warsaw, Poland). The bacteria incubation lasted for 18 h at 37 °C. After that point, bacterial colonies were counted.

3. Results

3.1. 1H and 13C Spectroscopy Analysis

Figure 2 shows the exemplary 1H and 13CNMR spectrum of QA10+TMXDI.
Table 1 shows the 1H NMR signals for QAn+TMXDI monomers and their chemical shifts.
Table 2 shows the 13C NMR signals for the QAn+TMXDI monomers and their chemical shifts.

3.2. Bacterial Adhesion

An adhesion test for 20(QA8+TMXDI) showed that both logCFU/mL values (for S. aureus and E. coli) were lower than those for 20(QA10+TMXDI) and 20(QA12+TMXDI) (Table 3 and Figure 3). Compared to 40(UDMA), no significant differences were observed for 20(QA10+TMXDI) and 20(QA12+TMXDI). It was also observed that the logCFU/mL values for 40(QAn+TMXDI) were lower than those for 20(QAn+TMXDI) and 40(UDMA) (Table 3 and Figure 3). In summary, 40(QA8+TMXDI) demonstrated the highest antibacterial activity, as shown by the lowest logCFU/mL of 2.39 observed for S. aureus and the lack of colonies observed for E. coli.

4. Discussion

In this study, three QAn+TMXDI monomers were synthesized utilizing a procedure known from the literature [12]. The synthesis was carried out to obtain monomers with two quaternary ammonium groups and a core derived from 1,6-diisocyanato-2,2,4-trimethylhexane (QAn+TMDI). The three-step process involved the synthesis of HAMA and QAHAMA-n semi-products, and the final synthesis of QAn+TMDI. We replaced TMDI with TMXDI, and QA8+TMXDI, QA10+TMXDI, and QA12+TMXDI (Figure 1) were obtained. Two of these products, QA10+TMXDI, and QA12+TMXDI, were described in our previous work [13], while QA8+TMXDI is new and presented in the literature for the first time.
The bacteria adhesion test demonstrated that the antibacterial activity depended on the length of the N-alkyl chain. As the logCFU/mL values for 20(QA8+TMXDI) and 40(QA8+TMXDI) were lower than those for 20(QA10+TMXDI), 20(QA12+TMXDI), and 40(QA10+TMXDI), it can be concluded that the shorter the N-alkyl substituent, the higher the antibacterial activity of the copolymer (Table 3). The mechanism of antibacterial action of the quaternary ammonium (QA) compound, leading to bacteria death, indicates that the N-alkyl substituent should have a specific length to allow for effective interaction between the cationic QA group, which contains negatively charged compounds forming the bacteria cell wall [16]. According to Gilbert et al., effective antibacterial action can be achieved for N-alkyl substituents constituting from 4 to 18 carbon atoms. This is due to the similar length of the N-alkyl substituent and the number of carbon atoms in the alkyl chains present in the compounds used to build bacteria cell walls [17]. The present study showed that the highest antibacterial activity was achieved for 20(QA8+TMXDI) and 40(QA8+TMXDI), indicating that the N-octyl substituent was the most efficient. This finding is in agreement with the finding of Yudovin-Farber, who observed the highest antibacterial activity in quaternary ammonium polyethyleneimine nanoparticles quantized with octyl bromide [18]. Another parameter that influences the antibacterial properties is the concentration of QAn+TMXDI in copolymers. We found that the logCFU/mL values for 20(QA8+TMXDI) and 20(QA10+TMXDI) were higher than those for 40(QA8+TMXDI) and 40(QA10+TMXDI), leading to the conclusion that the higher the QAUDMA content in the copolymers, the higher their antibacterial activity.

5. Conclusions

In comparison to copolymers based on QAn+TMDI, the use of QAn+TMXDI for the synthesis of copolymers with Bis-GMA, UDMA, and TEGDMA can improve the physicochemical and mechanical properties but decreases the antibacterial activity of copolymers. This study showed that antibacterial activity increased with an increase in the length of the N-alkyl substituent and an increase in the QAn+TMXDI content in the copolymer. As the 40(QA8+TMXDI) copolymer had the highest antibacterial activity, further studies should focus on an analysis of the physico-mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of this copolymer and its derivatives. Antibacterial activity studies should also be extended to the Streptococcus mutans strain, the most common pathogenic bacteria present in the human mouth.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.D. and I.B.-R.; methodology, P.D. and I.B.-R.; validation, P.D.; formal analysis, I.B.-R.; investigation, P.D. and M.C.-P.; resources, P.D. and I.B.-R.; data curation, P.D. and A.K.-K.; writing—original draft, P.D. and I.B.-R.; writing—review and editing, I.B.-R.; visualization, P.D.; supervision, A.K.-K. and I.B.-R.; project administration, I.B.-R.; funding acquisition, P.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Polish Budget Funds for Scientific Research in 2023 as core funding for research and development activities at the Silesian University of Technology—funding for young scientists grant number 04/040/BKM23/0258.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Lu, M.; Xuan, S.; Wang, Z. Oral microbiota: A new view of body health. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2019, 8, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rezaei, T.; Mehramouz, B.; Gholizadeh, P.; Yousefi, L.; Ganbarov, K.; Ghotaslou, R.; Taghizadeh, S.; Kafil, H.S. Factors Associated with Streptococcus mutans Pathogenicity in the Oral Cavity. Biointerface Res. App Chem. 2023, 13, 368–387. [Google Scholar]
  3. Eick, S.; Glockmann, E.; Brandl, B.; Pfister, W. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous flow system. J. Oral. Rehabil. 2004, 31, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Badr, S.; Abdulrahman, A.; Abdullah, A.; Essam, A.; Mohammad, Y.; Shahzeb, H. Effect of various antibacterial materials in dental composites: A systematic review. Ann. Dent. Spec. 2021, 9, 39–44. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, L.; Suh, B.; Yang, J. Antibacterial dental restorative materials: A review. Am. J. Dent. 2018, 31, 6B–12B. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Hu, Y.; Huang, F.; Xiao, Y. Quaternary ammonium compounds in dental restorative materials. Dent. Mater. J. 2018, 37, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Huang, L.; Xiao, Y.H.; Xing, X.D.; Li, F.; Ma, S.; Qi, L.L.; Chen, J.H. Antibacterial Activity and Cytotoxicity of Two Novel Cross-Linking Antibacterial Monomers on Oral Pathogens. Arch. Oral. Biol. 2011, 56, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Liang, X.; Söderling, E.; Liu, F.; He, J.; Lassila, L.V.J.; Vallittu, P.K. Optimizing the Concentration of Quaternary Ammonium Dimethacrylate Monomer in Bis-GMA/TEGDMA Dental Resin System for Antibacterial Activity and Mechanical Properties. J. Mater. Sci. Mate Med. 2014, 25, 1387–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Huang, Q.T.; He, J.W.; Lin, Z.M.; Liu, F.; Lassila, L.V.J.; Vallittu, P.K. Physical and Chemical Properties of an Antimicrobial Bis-GMA Free Dental Resin with Quaternary Ammonium Dimethacrylate Monomer. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016, 56, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Manouchehri, F.; Sadeghi, B.; Najafi, F.; Mosslemin, M.H.; Niakan, M. Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Polymerizable Bis-Quaternary Ammonium Dimethacrylate Monomers with Antibacterial Activity as an Efficient Adhesive System for Dental Restoration. Polym. Bull. 2019, 76, 1295–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liang, X.; Huang, Q.; Liu, F.; He, J.; Lin, Z. Synthesis of Novel Antibacterial Monomers (UDMQA) and Their Potential Application in Dental Resin. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 129, 3373–3381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chrószcz, M.W.; Barszczewska-Rybarek, I.M. Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Quaternary Ammonium Urethane-Dimethacrylate Monomers—A Pilot Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Drejka, P.; Chrószcz-Porębska, M.; Kazek-Kęsik, A.; Chladek, G.; Barszczewska-Rybarek, I. Chemical Modification of Dental Dimethacrylate Copolymer with Tetramethylxylylene Diisocyanate-Based Quaternary Ammonium Urethane-Dimethacrylates—Physicochemical, Mechanical, and Antibacterial Properties. Materials 2024, 17, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, L.; Ma, Z.; Wang, R.; Zuo, W.; Zhu, M. Bis-quaternary ammonium betulin-based dimethacrylate: Synthesis, characterization, and application in dental restorative resins. Mater. Adv. 2023, 4, 2127–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Makvandi, P.; Ghaemy, M.; Mohseni, M. Synthesis and Characterization of Photo-Curable Bis-Quaternary Ammonium Dimethacrylate with Antimicrobial Activity for Dental Restoration Materials. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 74, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ge, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhou, X.; Wang, H.; Xu, H.H.K.; Cheng, L. The Use of Quaternary Ammonium to Combat Dental Caries. Materials 2015, 8, 3532–3549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gilbert, P.; Moore, L.E. Cationic antiseptics: Diversity of action under a common epithet. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 99, 703–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yudovin-Farber, I.; Beyth, N.; Weiss, E.I.; Domb, A.J. Antibacterial Effect of Composite Resins Containing Quaternary Ammonium Polyethyleneimine Nanoparticles. J. Nanopart Res. 2010, 12, 591–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Synthesis route of novel urethane–dimethacryalte monomers—QAn+TMXDI.
Figure 1. Synthesis route of novel urethane–dimethacryalte monomers—QAn+TMXDI.
Blsf 35 00010 g001
Figure 2. NMR spectrum for QA10+TMXDI: (a) 1H NMR and (b) 13C NMR.
Figure 2. NMR spectrum for QA10+TMXDI: (a) 1H NMR and (b) 13C NMR.
Blsf 35 00010 g002
Figure 3. S. aureus colonies on Petri dishes after the adhesion test: (a) sterile water; (b) 40(UDMA); (c) 20(QA8+TMXDI); (d) 40(QA8+TMXDI); (e) 20(QA10+TMXDI); (f) 40(QA10+TMXDI).
Figure 3. S. aureus colonies on Petri dishes after the adhesion test: (a) sterile water; (b) 40(UDMA); (c) 20(QA8+TMXDI); (d) 40(QA8+TMXDI); (e) 20(QA10+TMXDI); (f) 40(QA10+TMXDI).
Blsf 35 00010 g003
Table 1. 1H NMR signals of QA8+TMXDI, QA10+TMXDI, and QA12+TMXDI monomers.
Table 1. 1H NMR signals of QA8+TMXDI, QA10+TMXDI, and QA12+TMXDI monomers.
Signal SymbolHydrogen AtomMultiplicityNumber of ProtonsChemical Shift [ppm]
aCH3-C=S61.95
b=CH22m45.70 and 6.14
c-O-CH2-CH2-N+-m44.33–4.91
d-O-CH2-CH2-N+-m44.00–4.26
e-N+-CH3s63.30–3.77
f-O-CH2-CH2-N+-m44.00–4.26
g-O-CH2-CH2-N+-m44.33–4.91
h-NH-C=Om27.10–7.80
i-N+-CH2-CH2-(CH2)5(or 7 or 9)-CH3 1m43.30–3.77
j-N+-CH2-CH2-(CH2)5(or 7 or 9)-CH3 1m41.49–1.88
k-N+-CH2-CH2-(CH2)5(or 7 or 9)-CH3 1m20/28/36 21.16–1.47
l-N+-CH2-CH2-(CH2)5(or 7 or 9)-CH3 1m60.82–1.00
mCH3-C-CH3m121.49–1.88
n-CH- (Ar)m17.10–7.80
o-CH- (Ar)m27.10–7.80
p-CH- (Ar)m17.10–7.80
1 -(CH2)5- corresponds to QA8+TMXDI; -(CH2)7- corresponds to QA10+TMXDI; -(CH2)9- corresponds to QA12+TMXDI; 2 20 corresponds to QA8+TMXDI; 28 corresponds to QA10+TMXDI; 36 corresponds to QA12+TMXDI.
Table 2. 13C NMR signals of QA8+TMXDI, QA10+TMXDI, and QA12+TMXDI monomers.
Table 2. 13C NMR signals of QA8+TMXDI, QA10+TMXDI, and QA12+TMXDI monomers.
Signal SymbolCarbon AtomChemical Shift [ppm]
aCH3-C=21
b=CH2130
cCH3-C=CH2138
d-O-C=O169
e–h-CH2-59–67
i-N+-CH353
j-N+-CH2-(CH2)6(or 8 or 10)-CH3 159–67
k-N+-CH2-(CH2)6(or 8 or 10)-CH3 126–35
l-N+-CH2-(CH2)6(or 8 or 10)-CH3 117
m-NH-C=O157
n-NH-C-59–67
o>C-CH326–35
p–s-CH= (Ar)124–126
t>C= (Ar)
1 -(CH2)6- corresponds to QA8+TMXDI; -(CH2)8- corresponds to QA10+TMXDI; –(CH2)10- corresponds to QA12+TMXDI.
Table 3. The results of the adhesion test of S. auresus and E.coli.
Table 3. The results of the adhesion test of S. auresus and E.coli.
SampleStaphylococcus aureus
(logCFU/mL)
Escherichia coli
(logCFU/mL)
Experimental copolymers
20(QA8+TMXDI)4.97 ± 0.283.94 ± 0.97
20(QA10+TMXDI)6.41 ± 0.035.57 ± 0.73
20(QA12+TMXDI)6.32 ± 0.176.26 ± 0.23
40(QA8+TMXDI)2.39 ± 0.62Not observed
40(QA10+TMXDI)5.41 ± 0.271.76 ± 0.67
Reference copolymer
40(UDMA)6.21 ± 0.216.26 ± 0.51
Control
Sterile water11.42 ± 0.0511.01 ± 0.25
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Drejka, P.; Chrószcz-Porębksa, M.; Kazek-Kęsik, A.; Barszczewska-Rybarek, I. Antibacterial Properties of Dental Copolymer Modified with Monomers Possessing Quaternary Ammonium Groups. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2024, 35, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2024035010

AMA Style

Drejka P, Chrószcz-Porębksa M, Kazek-Kęsik A, Barszczewska-Rybarek I. Antibacterial Properties of Dental Copolymer Modified with Monomers Possessing Quaternary Ammonium Groups. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2024; 35(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2024035010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Drejka, Patryk, Marta Chrószcz-Porębksa, Alicja Kazek-Kęsik, and Izabela Barszczewska-Rybarek. 2024. "Antibacterial Properties of Dental Copolymer Modified with Monomers Possessing Quaternary Ammonium Groups" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 35, no. 1: 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2024035010

APA Style

Drejka, P., Chrószcz-Porębksa, M., Kazek-Kęsik, A., & Barszczewska-Rybarek, I. (2024). Antibacterial Properties of Dental Copolymer Modified with Monomers Possessing Quaternary Ammonium Groups. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 35(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2024035010

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop