Precision Nutrition and Artificial Intelligence Mobile Apps: A Narrative Review †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kirk, D.; Catal, C.; Tekinerdogan, B. Precision Nutrition: A Systematic Literature Review. Comput. Biol. Med. 2021, 133, 104365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rodgers, G.P.; Collins, F.S. Precision Nutrition-the Answer to “What to Eat to Stay Healthy”. JAMA 2020, 324, 735–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wirtz, B.W.; Weyerer, J.C.; Geyer, C. Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges. Int. J. Publ. Adm. 2018, 42, 596–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Moraes Lopes, M.H.B.; Ferreira, D.D.; Ferreira, A.C.B.H.; da Silva, G.R.; Caetano, A.S.; Braz, V.N. Use of Artificial Intelligence in Precision Nutrition and Fitness. In Artificial Intelligence in Precision Health; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 465–496. ISBN 9780128171332. [Google Scholar]
- Franco, R.Z.; Fallaize, R.; Lovegrove, J.A.; Hwang, F. Popular Nutrition-Related Mobile Apps: A Feature Assessment. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016, 4, e85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ji, Y.; Plourde, H.; Bouzo, V.; Kilgour, R.D.; Cohen, T.R. Validity and Usability of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment App Compared to 3-Day Food Diaries in Assessing Dietary Intake Among Canadian Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020, 8, e16953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moyen, A.; Rappaport, A.I.; Fleurent-Grégoire, C.; Tessier, A.-J.; Brazeau, A.-S.; Chevalier, S. Relative Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced, Image-Assisted Mobile App for Dietary Assessment in Adults: Randomized Crossover Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2022, 24, e40449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nakata, Y.; Sasai, H.; Gosho, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Shi, Y.; Ohigashi, T.; Mizuno, S.; Murayama, C.; Kobayashi, S.; Sasaki, Y. A Smartphone Healthcare Application, CALO mama Plus, to Promote Weight Loss: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rafferty, A.J.; Hall, R.; Johnston, C.S. A Novel Mobile App (Heali) for Disease Treatment in Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23, e24134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Forman, E.M.; Goldstein, S.P.; Crochiere, R.J.; Butryn, M.L.; Juarascio, A.S.; Zhang, F.; Foster, G.D. Randomized Controlled Trial of OnTrack, a Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention Designed to Enhance Weight Loss. Transl. Behav. Med. 2019, 9, 989–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Faruqui, S.H.A.; Du, Y.; Meka, R.; Alaeddini, A.; Li, C.; Shirinkam, S.; Wang, J. Development of a Deep Learning Model for Dynamic Forecasting of Blood Glucose Level for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019, 7, e14452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nguyen, P.H.; Tran, L.M.; Hoang, N.T.; Trương, D.T.T.; Tran, T.H.T.; Huynh, P.N.; Koch, B.; McCloskey, P.; Gangupantulu, R.; Folson, G.; et al. Relative Validity of a Mobile AI-Technology-Assisted Dietary Assessment in Adolescent Females in Vietnam. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2022, 116, 992–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Volpe, S.L. Artificial Intelligence and Precision Nutrition. ACSMs Health Fit. J. 2022, 26, 43–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mortazavi, B.J.; Gutierrez-Osuna, R. A Review of Digital Innovations for Diet Monitoring and Precision Nutrition. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2023, 17, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Orte, S.; Migliorelli, C.; Sistach-Bosch, L.; Gómez-Martínez, M.; Boqué, N. A Tailored and Engaging mHealth Gamified Framework for Nutritional Behaviour Change. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Berry, S.E.; Valdes, A.M.; Drew, D.A.; Asnicar, F.; Mazidi, M.; Wolf, J.; Capdevila, J.; Hadjigeorgiou, G.; Davies, R.; Al Khatib, H.; et al. Human Postprandial Responses to Food and Potential for Precision Nutrition. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 964–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hong, Y.; Lian, J.; Xu, L.; Min, J.; Wang, Y.; Freeman, L.J.; Deng, X. Statistical Perspectives on Reliability of Artificial Intelligence Systems. Qual. Eng. 2023, 35, 56–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naik, N.; Hameed, B.M.Z.; Shetty, D.K.; Swain, D.; Shah, M.; Paul, R.; Aggarwal, K.; Ibrahim, S.; Patil, V.; Smriti, K.; et al. Legal and Ethical Consideration in Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Who Takes Responsibility? Front. Surg. 2022, 9, 862322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Keskinbora, K.H. Medical Ethics Considerations on Artificial Intelligence. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2019, 64, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nadarzynski, T.; Miles, O.; Cowie, A.; Ridge, D. Acceptability of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Led Chatbot Services in Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study. Digit. Health 2019, 5, 2055207619871808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Population | Intervention | Comparison | Outcomes | Study Design | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
102 healthy adults | An image-based dietary assessment app (Keenoa) | A 3-day food diary | The app showed acceptable relative validity for certain nutrients compared to the food diary. However, the average intake of energy, protein, carbohydrates, % fat, saturated fatty acids, and iron differed from the values recorded in the food diary. | RCT | [6] |
136 healthy or diabetic adults | An image-based dietary assessment app (Keenoa) | A validated web-based food recall platform | The app showed moderate to strong relative validity against comparison for energy, macronutrient, and most micronutrient intakes analyzed in healthy adults and those with diabetes. | CS | [7] |
141 overweight or obese adults | An AI dietary app (CALO mama Plus) | No intervention | Participants in the intervention group experienced a change in body weight of −2.4 ± 4.0 kg, while those in the control group had a change of −0.7 ± 3.3 kg. The app facilitated weight loss among the participants. | RCT | [8] |
58 adults with IBS | An AI dietary app (Heali) + educational materials | Educational materials only | The app group showed a 24% greater reduction in total IBS symptom severity score, though not statistically significant. However, the intervention group had a twofold greater reduction in the subscore for bowel habit dissatisfaction. | RCT (pilot) | [9] |
181 overweight or obese adults | An app that collects data on dietary lapses and their triggers (OnTrack) + a standard WLP | A standard WLP | The app facilitated weight loss by predicting and preventing dietary lapses. The participants assigned to the intervention group also reported considerably higher satisfaction and engagement, and algorithm accuracy was superior. | RCT | [10] |
10 diabetic adults | A DLM for dynamic forecasting of blood glucose levels | None | The proposed DLM, based on mobile lifestyle data collected through a smartphone, exhibited significant accuracy in predicting the next day’s glucose level, as assessed by the Clarke error grid and a ±10% range of the actual values. | RCT (secondary analysis) | [11] |
36 female adolescents | An AI app for dietary assessment (FRANI) | A 3-day food diary | AI-assisted dietary assessment accurately estimated nutrient intake in adolescent females when compared with the standard methods. | CS | [12] |
Advantages | Limitations |
---|---|
Data analysis and pattern recognition | Data reliability and quality |
Personalized dietary recommendations | Lack of individualization |
Real-time monitoring and adaptation | Ethical concerns |
Uncovering novel insights and biomarkers | Limited human interaction |
Predictive models and decision support | Overreliance on technology |
Scalability and efficiency | Generalizability issues |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Antonelli, M.; Donelli, D. Precision Nutrition and Artificial Intelligence Mobile Apps: A Narrative Review. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2023, 29, 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECN2023-15532
Antonelli M, Donelli D. Precision Nutrition and Artificial Intelligence Mobile Apps: A Narrative Review. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2023; 29(1):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECN2023-15532
Chicago/Turabian StyleAntonelli, Michele, and Davide Donelli. 2023. "Precision Nutrition and Artificial Intelligence Mobile Apps: A Narrative Review" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 29, no. 1: 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECN2023-15532
APA StyleAntonelli, M., & Donelli, D. (2023). Precision Nutrition and Artificial Intelligence Mobile Apps: A Narrative Review. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 29(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECN2023-15532