Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Collection and Handling of Thoracic Small Biopsy and Cytology Specimens for Ancillary Studies: Guidelines from the College of American Pathologists (CAP)
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparison Between First-, Second- and Third-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JMP
Volume 2
Issue 1
10.3390/jmp2010002
jmp-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Practical Applications of Molecular Testing in the Cytologic Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cysts

by
Mingjuan Lisa Zhang
* and
Martha B. Pitman
*
Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mol. Pathol. 2021, 2(1), 11-22; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp2010002
Submission received: 15 January 2021 / Revised: 31 January 2021 / Accepted: 2 February 2021 / Published: 7 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Highlights of the 9th Molecular Cytopathology Meeting)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Mucinous pancreatic cysts are precursor lesions of ductal adenocarcinoma. Discoveries of the molecular alterations detectable in pancreatic cyst fluid (PCF) that help to define a mucinous cyst and its risk for malignancy have led to more routine molecular testing in the preoperative evaluation of these cysts. The differential diagnosis of pancreatic cysts is broad and ranges from non-neoplastic to premalignant to malignant cysts. Not all pancreatic cysts—including mucinous cysts—require surgical intervention, and it is the preoperative evaluation with imaging and PCF analysis that determines patient management. PCF analysis includes biochemical and molecular analysis, both of which are ancillary studies that add significant value to the final cytological diagnosis. While testing PCF for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a very specific test for a mucinous etiology, many mucinous cysts do not have an elevated CEA. In these cases, detection of a KRAS and/or GNAS mutation is highly specific for a mucinous etiology, with GNAS mutations supporting an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. Late mutations in the progression to malignancy such as those found in TP53, p16/CDKN2A, and/or SMAD4 support a high-risk lesion. This review highlights PCF triage and analysis of pancreatic cysts for optimal cytological diagnosis.

1. Introduction

Radiologic detection of pancreatic cysts in asymptomatic patients has increased in recent years, and distinguishing benign cystic lesions versus those with malignant potential is essential for patient management. Currently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with pancreatic cyst fluid (PCF) analysis is the standard of care for the preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic cysts [1,2,3,4].
There are many different types of cysts in the pancreas, but the most common differential diagnosis of cysts that provide PCF includes non-neoplastic pseudocysts, benign neoplastic serous cysts, premalignant mucinous cysts, malignant mucinous cysts (such as those with invasive carcinoma), and secondarily cystic solid malignancies such as cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
The Papanicolaou Society for Cytopathology (PSC) System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology [5], published in 2015, promotes using a multimodal approach for the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts, whereby all the clinical, radiologic, cytologic, biochemical, and molecular information available are incorporated to provide the optimal preoperative risk assessment.
PCF combines cytology and biochemical analysis for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and amylase to distinguish mucinous from non-mucinous cysts and to assess for high-risk features [6,7]. Cytologic evaluation provides high specificity but lower sensitivity for the detection of a mucinous cyst. The interpretation of CEA levels is also not without limitations: in one study, using a cutoff of 192 ng/mL resulted in the misdiagnosis of 39% of cystic mucinous neoplasms [8]. Furthermore, CEA levels have been shown to fluctuate in repeated FNA samples [9]. At some institutions, molecular testing is routinely performed on all PCF with sufficient cyst fluid volumes to improve the detection of mucinous cysts as well as those at high risk for malignancy. With the addition of routine molecular analysis, where KRAS/GNAS mutations are highly specific for a mucinous etiology, the detection of mucinous cysts by PCF has been shown to have a sensitivity of 90% and specificity >90% [10,11,12,13].
The aim of this review is to summarize how cytopathologists approach the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts and how molecular testing impacts this diagnosis and ultimately patient care.

2. Tissue Management

Fresh, unfixed, and undiluted PCF is required for accurate evaluation and analysis. Fixing and diluting PCF in liquid-based preservatives or saline precludes the ability to obtain biochemical information. Rapid on-site evaluation does not aid in patient management, and all drained cyst fluid should instead be saved and appropriately triaged. If the lesion has a solid component, that area should be separately sampled and made into direct smears.
Even with minimal amounts of cyst fluid, PCF can be triaged for cytology, CEA/amylase analysis, and molecular testing (Figure 1) [6]. One study showed that using supernatant fluid for CEA/amylase testing is comparable to using neat fluid/cell block preparation [14]. If the PCF is very thick, a direct smear should be made, as the chemistry lab will reject the specimen for CEA analysis due to high viscosity. In these cases, the CEA level is not necessary because the thick, viscous nature of the cyst fluid indicates that the cyst is mucinous (and therefore CEA does not contribute additional information). Furthermore, the added value of testing for KRAS may be small if cytology and/or CEA levels are conclusive, as KRAS mutations do not add to the determination of a mucinous cyst and does not stratify the lesion by grade.

3. Benign Cystic Lesions

The benign pancreatic cysts have no malignant potential and can be conservatively managed. Grossly, the cyst fluid appears thin and brown or clear, and on cytology, these lesions tend to be sparsely cellular.

3.1. Pseudocyst

Pseudocysts are typically seen in the setting of acute pancreatitis and result from autodigestive damage of pancreatic parenchyma. These cysts lack a true epithelial lining and are collections of necrotic material surrounded by a thick, inflammatory fibrous capsule. PCF almost always shows a very high amylase level (≥250 U/L) and low CEA level (Table 1) [15]. Cytology shows an absence of epithelial cells (aside from possible gastrointestinal contamination) and can demonstrate mixed polymorphous inflammatory cells, histiocytes, crystalline debris, and yellow hematoidin-like pigment (Figure 2) [16]. The differential diagnosis includes serous cystadenomas and cystic mucinous neoplasms, which can slough the cyst lining and result in a very inflammatory cyst fluid without viable epithelial cells.

3.2. Serous Cystadenoma

Serous cystadenomas (SCAs) are the most common benign cystic neoplasm of the pancreas and comprise 1–2% of pancreatic neoplasms [17,18]. As these cysts are benign, the goal of preoperative diagnosis is to distinguish them from neoplastic mucinous cysts, thus allowing optimal triage of patients to conservative management instead of surgical resection in the case of neoplastic cysts. However, the lack of intact cyst lining epithelium makes the diagnosis extremely challenging on cytology alone, with a sensitivity of 10% in a recent case series [19]. SCAs are lined by nonmucinous cuboidal cells with uniform round nuclei. Cytoplasmic clearing due to glycogen accumulation can be seen in some cases (Figure 3), but should not be mistaken for mucinous epithelial cells, which are columnar with abundant intracellular mucin. Most cytologic specimens are hypocellular, and epithelial cells are not always present. The background can be bloody with hemosiderin-laden macrophages, which can act as a surrogate marker suggestive of the diagnosis [19]. SCAs have a low CEA level (<5 ng/mL) and a low amylase level [20].
Mutations in the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene (3p25), loss of heterozygosity at the VHL gene locus on chromosome 3, and chromosome 3p aneuploidy have been identified in up to 67% of sporadic and hereditary SCAs but were not identified in mucinous cysts [21]. Thus, detection of one of the above genetic alterations in PCF supports a diagnosis of SCA (Table 1). Of note, cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors can also harbor VHL mutations or promoter hypermethylation in up to 25% of sporadic cases [22].

3.3. Lymphoepithelial Cyst

Lymphoepithelial cysts (LECs) are benign cysts lined by mature squamous epithelium without atypia. The subepithelial stroma consists of dense, non-neoplastic lymphoid tissue with germinal center formation that may not be as well-represented on the FNA mateial as compared to the squamous epithelial component. Cytology shows anucleated and nucleated squamous cells with abundant keratinous debris, variable cholesterol crystals, lymphocytes, and histiocytes [23,24].
Importantly, there are pitfalls to consider in the differential diagnosis between LECs and mucinous cysts. More often than not, LECs produce a thick aspirate for direct smears where the keratinous debris and admixed lymphocytes are recognized and no liquid fluid is available for CEA testing (Figure 4). However, rarely, the keratinous debris is so degenerated and liquified that the PCF does get sent for CEA, which typically results in a very high CEA level (in the thousands), leading to a false classification of the cyst as mucinous (Table 1).

4. Premalignant/Malignant Cystic Lesions

Premalignant/malignant pancreatic cysts include the neoplastic mucinous cysts, which are diagnosed using the proposed standardized terminology system for pancreaticobiliary specimens from the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) based on having one or more of these features: thick, colloid-like extracellular mucin (Figure 5), mucinous cyst lining epithelium, and/or elevated CEA ≥ 192 ng/mL [15,26,27]. The two types of neoplastic mucinous cysts—intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) and mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN)—share common cytomorphological features but have differing clinical and biological characteristics. Both are stratified into low/intermediate-grade dysplasia or high-grade dysplasia. Both cyst types may be associated with an invasive carcinoma component, which is the most important negative prognostic factor. Cytology alone cannot distinguish between IPMN and MCN; however, this distinction has important implications, as surgical resection is recommended for all MCNs regardless of grade, while most low-grade branch-duct IPMNs can be managed without surgery.
Cyst fluid CEA levels have been shown to be the most accurate method for identifying a mucinous etiology, while cytologic evaluation of the cyst lining epithelium is the best modality for identifying high-risk cysts [15,26,28]. A CEA ≥ 192 ng/mL has an overall accuracy of ~80% (74% sensitivity and 84% specificity). However, a CEA level below 192 ng/mL does not exclude a mucinous cyst. In addition, increasing the cutoff CEA level increases the specificity but lowers the sensitivity for the diagnosis of a mucinous cyst [20]. Amylase levels are highly variable in mucinous cysts and do not reliably distinguish between the mucinous cysts.
Pancreatic cancer arising from mucinous cysts is one of two major pathways; the other and more common pathway is from pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN). PanIN is not visible on imaging in its early noninvasive stages, whereas mucinous cysts are visible. Mutations in KRAS are shared by both pathways and are an early marker of neoplasia. Molecular studies have shown that KRAS mutations are highly specific but only moderately sensitive for the identification of a mucinous pancreatic cyst [10,29]. GNAS mutations were detected in 66% of cases, while KRAS or GNAS mutations were detected in 96% of cases [30]. A large prospective study performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) on 626 PCF specimens and found KRAS and/or GNAS mutations in 100% of IPMNs; GNAS mutations were 100% specific for an IPMN. KRAS mutations were detected in 30% of MCNs. Overall, KRAS/GNAS mutations were found to have a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 100% for the detection of a mucinous cyst [31], but these mutations did not stratify the cysts by grade. RNF43 mutations were also detected in both IPMNs and MCNs [21,32].
Late mutations in the development of carcinoma include TP53 mutations and deletions in p16/CDKN2A and SMAD4; thus, the presence of any of these mutations indicates a high-risk lesion [12]. In addition, mutations in TP53, PIK3CA, and/or PTEN with mutant allele frequencies equivalent to those for KRAS and/or GNAS mutations were highly sensitive and specific for IPMNs with advanced neoplasia (i.e., high-grade dysplasia and invasive adenocarcinoma) [31]. For GNAS mutations, mutant allele frequencies >55% were also correlated with IPMNs with high-grade dysplasia. These findings are promising for the possibility of detecting high-risk cysts and may become more relevant as molecular testing becomes more integrated into routine clinical practice.
NGS can have a significant impact on the clinical impression of the cyst etiology. One study of 92 PCFs found that NGS changed the clinical diagnosis in 12% of cases and importantly supported the clinical diagnosis in 78% of the cases, often when little other information was available from cytology and CEA analysis [10]. Additional studies showed that NGS was positive for a significant mutation in 59% and 38% of PCF cases, respectively, with some cases diagnosed as neoplastic mucinous cysts solely on the basis of molecular results [12,33].
The cytological evaluation of PCF aims to determine if the cyst is mucinous and, if mucinous, if the cyst is high-risk for malignancy. A mucinous etiology is supported by thick colloid-like extracellular mucin, mucinous epithelium that is clearly not contaminating gastrointestinal epithelium, CEA ≥ 192 ng/mL, or the detection of mutations in KRAS/GNAS/RNF43. A mucinous cyst at high-risk for malignancy is one with high-grade epithelial atypia (Figure 6b) or late mutations in the dysplasia-to-carcinoma progression (see below).

4.1. Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) comprise 3–5% of pancreatic tumors and 20% of neoplastic pancreatic cysts. The majority arise in the head of the pancreas (~70%). Overall, the prognosis for low-grade IPMNs is excellent, and most can be conservatively managed by surveillance. High-risk features that may prompt surgical resection include the presence of a mural ndodule, involvement of the main duct, and identification of high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma [34]. Main duct IPMNs have a high rate of malignancy, with 40% of cases showing invasive carcinoma at the time of detection. On the other hand, branch duct IPMNs have a low rate of malignancy, and their management depends on other high-risk features. The Fukuoka Guidelines, first introduced in 2012 and then revised in 2017, provides an algorithm for the management of IPMNs [4,35]. EUS-FNA is recommended for patients with worrisome/high-risk imaging features, and suspicious or positive cytology warrants surgery. Thus, cytopathologists have important roles in guiding patient management with the goal of determining whether the cyst is non-mucinous or mucinous, as well as whether the cyst is low-grade or high-grade (and therefore high-risk for malignancy) based on evaluation of the epithelium and molecular testing.

4.2. Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm

Mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) comprise 5–6% of pancreatic tumors and almost always occur in middle-aged women; 90% arise in the body or tail of the pancreas. In contrast to IPMNs, surgical resection is recommended for all patients with MCN, as their location in the distal pancreas lends them to a less morbid distal pancreatectomy or laparoscopic procedures, and resection removes the need for lifelong surveillance in these relatively young patients.
The characterstic histologic feature of MCN is the presence of subepithelial ovarian-type stroma. This feature can only be evaluated on a biopsy specimen. The ovarian-type stromal cells express estrogen and progesterone receptors, and immunohistochemistry may be performed if the morphology is ambiguous [36,37].
There are no known genetic mutations specific to MCN [38,39]. KRAS mutations are found in 30% of MCNs with low-grade dysplasia and 80% of MCNs with high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma [40]. Mutations in TP53, p16/CDKN2A, and SMAD4 have been detected in MCNs with malignant transformation (i.e., high-grade dysplasia or invasive adenocarcinoma), which comprises <15% of MCNs.

5. Molecular Testing in Practice

As previously mentioned, molecular testing can help to determine a mucinous etiology for a pancreatic cyst. This information is typically not available at the time of sign out; however, when a KRAS or GNAS mutation is subsequently detected in an otherwise nondiagnostic or indeterminate aspirate, it can impact the final clinical impression of the cyst and affect patient management. On the other hand, molecular testing may be limited by scant cyst fluid volumes: in previous studies, insufficient material precluded NGS analysis in 7–31% of cases [31,33]. It is important to note that mutations in KRAS, GNAS, and RNF43 simply support a neoplastic mucinous cyst (and GNAS additionally supports an IPMN), but none of these mutations defines a high-grade cyst. When late mutations—primarily in TP53, SMAD4, and p16/CDKN2A, but also others—are found, they do indeed define a high-risk cyst, which warrants surgical intervention.
If NGS is not an option at your institution, immunohistochemistry for p53 and SMAD4 can be used as surrogate markers for their respective genes. These stains can be very helpful if there is sufficient tissue for evaluation in the cell block. Aberrant p53 staining suggestive of a mutant phenotype can show either strong, diffuse nuclear staining (in contrast to the patchy weak staining of wildtype p53) or a null staining pattern with no nuclear staining at all (Figure 7). In one study of 32 cases, increased p53 expression was seen in 31% of all mucinous cysts (all with at least “atypical epithelium”) and 70% of those with high-grade dysplasia [41]. For SMAD4, loss of nuclear staining supports a high-grade lesion (seen in up to half of cases) (Figure 8).
In summary, performing NGS in conjunction with biochemical testing and cytology improves the sensitivity for the detection of premalignant/malignant pancreatic cysts. Although molecular analysis is not a replacement for cytopathology, reflex co-testing provides additional valuable information for a more accurate preoperative diagnosis, helping to classify neoplastic mucinous cysts and high-risk cysts that require surgical resection, thereby impacting patient management.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B.P. and M.L.Z.; resources, M.L.Z. and M.B.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.L.Z.; writing—review and editing, M.L.Z. and M.B.P.; visualization, M.L.Z. and M.B.P.; supervision, M.B.P.; project administration, M.L.Z. and M.B.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Genevay, M.; Mino-Kenudson, M.; Yaeger, K.; Konstantinidis, I.T.; Ferrone, C.R.; Thayer, S.; Castillo, C.F.; Sahani, D.; Bounds, B.; Forcione, D.; et al. Cytology adds value to imaging studies for risk assessment of malignancy in pancreatic mucinous cysts. Ann. Surg. 2011, 254, 977–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Khashab, M.A.; Kim, K.; Lennon, A.M.; Shin, E.J.; Tignor, A.S.; Amateau, S.K.; Singh, V.K.; Wolfgang, C.L.; Hruban, R.H.; Canto, M.I. Should we do EUS/FNA on patients with pancreatic cysts? The incremental diagnostic yield of EUS over CT/MRI for prediction of cystic neoplasms. Pancreas 2013, 42, 717–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pitman, M.B.; Deshpande, V. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of the pancreas: A morphological and multimodal approach to the diagnosis of solid and cystic mass lesions. Cytopathology 2007, 18, 331–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tanaka, M.; Fernández-del Castillo, C.; Kamisawa, T.; Jang, J.Y.; Levy, P.; Ohtsuka, T.; Salvia, R.; Shimizu, Y.; Tada, M.; Wolfgang, C.L. Revisions of international consensus Fukuoka guidelines for the management of IPMN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2017, 17, 738–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pitman, M.B.; Layfield, L.J. (Eds.) The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. Pitman, M.B. Pancreatic cyst fluid triage: A critical component of the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cysts. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013, 121, 57–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, M.L.; Pitman, M.B. Molecular Diagnostics in Pancreatic and Biliary Cytology. In Molecular Diagnostics in Cytopathology: A Practical Handbook for the Practicing Pathologist; Roy-Chowdhuri, S., VanderLaan, P.A., Stewart, J.M., da Santos, G.C., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 355–376. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gaddam, S.; Ge, P.S.; Keach, J.W.; Mullady, D.; Fukami, N.; Edmundowicz, S.A.; Azar, R.R.; Shah, R.J.; Murad, F.M.; Kushnir, V.M.; et al. Suboptimal accuracy of carcinoembryonic antigen in differentiation of mucinous and nonmucinous pancreatic cysts: Results of a large multicenter study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2015, 82, 1060–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nakai, Y.; Iwashita, T.; Shinoura, S.; Park, D.H.; Samarasena, J.B.; Lee, J.G.; Chang, K.J. Role of serial EUS-guided FNA on pancreatic cystic neoplasms: A retrospective analysis of repeat carcinoembryonic antigen measurements. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2016, 84, 780–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Jones, M.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, J.; Dudley, J.; Albanese, E.; Kadayifci, A.; Dias-Santagata, D.; Le, L.; Brugge, W.R.; Fernandez-del Castillo, C.; et al. Impact of next-generation sequencing on the clinical diagnosis of pancreatic cysts. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2016, 83, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kadayifci, A.; Atar, M.; Wang, J.L.; Forcione, D.G.; Casey, B.W.; Pitman, M.B.; Brugge, W.R. Value of adding GNAS testing to pancreatic cyst fluid KRAS and carcinoembryonic antigen analysis for the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Dig. Endosc. 2017, 29, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rosenbaum, M.W.; Jones, M.; Dudley, J.C.; Le, L.P.; Iafrate, A.J.; Pitman, M.B. Next-generation sequencing adds value to the preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic cysts. Cancer Cytopathol. 2017, 125, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Singhi, A.D.; Nikiforova, M.N.; Fasanella, K.E.; McGrath, K.M.; Pai, R.K.; Ohori, N.P.; Bartholow, T.L.; Brand, R.E.; Chennat, J.S.; Lu, X.; et al. Preoperative GNAS and KRAS testing in the diagnosis of pancreatic mucinous cysts. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 4381–4389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Chai, S.M.; Herba, K.; Kumarasinghe, M.P.; de Boer, W.B.; Amanuel, B.; Grieu-Iacopetta, F.; Lim, E.M.; Segarajasingam, D.; Yusoff, I.; Choo, C.; et al. Optimizing the multimodal approach to pancreatic cyst fluid diagnosis: Developing a volume-based triage protocol. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013, 121, 86–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Brugge, W.R.; Lewandrowski, K.; Lee-Lewandrowski, E.; Centeno, B.A.; Szydlo, T.; Regan, S.; del Castillo, C.F.; Warshaw, A.L. Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: A report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study. Gastroenterology 2004, 126, 1330–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Gonzalez Obeso, E.; Murphy, E.; Brugge, W.; Deshpande, V. Pseudocyst of the pancreas: The role of cytology and special stains for mucin. Cancer 2009, 117, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Valsangkar, N.P.; Morales-Oyarvide, V.; Thayer, S.P.; Ferrone, C.R.; Wargo, J.A.; Warshaw, A.L.; Fernandez-del Castillo, C. 851 resected cystic tumors of the pancreas: A 33-year experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Surgery 2012, 152, S4–S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Singhi, A.D.; Zeh, H.J.; Brand, R.E.; Nikiforova, M.N.; Chennat, J.S.; Fasanella, K.E.; Khalid, A.; Papachristou, G.I.; Slivka, A.; Hogg, M.; et al. American Gastroenterological Association guidelines are inaccurate in detecting pancreatic cysts with advanced neoplasia: A clinicopathologic study of 225 patients with supporting molecular data. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2016, 83, 1107–1117.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lilo, M.T.; VandenBussche, C.J.; Allison, D.B.; Lennon, A.M.; Younes, B.K.; Hruban, R.H.; Wolfgang, C.L.; Ali, S.Z. Serous Cystadenoma of the Pancreas: Potentials and Pitfalls of a Preoperative Cytopathologic Diagnosis. Acta Cytol. 2017, 61, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. van der Waaij, L.A.; van Dullemen, H.M.; Porte, R.J. Cyst fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: A pooled analysis. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2005, 62, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Springer, S.; Wang, Y.; Dal Molin, M.; Masica, D.L.; Jiao, Y.; Kinde, I.; Blackford, A.; Raman, S.P.; Wolfgang, C.L.; Tomita, T.; et al. A combination of molecular markers and clinical features improve the classification of pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology 2015, 149, 1501–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Reid, M.D.; Choi, H.; Balci, S.; Akkas, G.; Adsay, V. Serous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: Clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics. Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 2014, 31, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. VandenBussche, C.J.; Maleki, Z. Fine-needle aspiration of squamous-lined cysts of the pancreas. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2014, 42, 592–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Groot, V.P.; Thakker, S.S.; Gemenetzis, G.; Noë, M.; Javed, A.A.; Burkhart, R.A.; Noveiry, B.B.; Cameron, J.L.; Weiss, M.J.; VandenBussche, C.J.; et al. Lessons learned from 29 lymphoepithelial cysts of the pancreas: Institutional experience and review of the literature. HPB 2018, 20, 612–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Takano, S.; Fukasawa, M.; Maekawa, S.; Kadokura, M.; Miura, M.; Shindo, H.; Takahashi, E.; Sato, T.; Enomoto, N. Deep sequencing of cancer-related genes revealed GNAS mutations to be associated with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and its main pancreatic duct dilation. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Cizginer, S.; Turner, B.G.; Turner, B.; Bilge, A.R.; Karaca, C.; Pitman, M.B.; Brugge, W.R. Cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen is an accurate diagnostic marker of pancreatic mucinous cysts. Pancreas 2011, 40, 1024–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Pitman, M.B.; Centeno, B.A.; Ali, S.Z.; Genevay, M.; Stelow, E.; Mino-Kenudson, M.; Fernandez-del Castillo, C.; Max Schmidt, C.; Brugge, W.; Layfield, L. Papanicolaou Society of, Cytopathology Standardized terminology and nomenclature for pancreatobiliary cytology: The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2014, 42, 338–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Scourtas, A.; Dudley, J.C.; Brugge, W.R.; Kadayifci, A.; Mino-Kenudson, M.; Pitman, M.B. Preoperative characteristics and cytological features of 136 histologically confirmed pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms. Cancer Cytopathol. 2017, 125, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rockacy, M.; Khalid, A. Update on pancreatic cyst fluid analysis. Ann. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 26, 122–127. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wu, J.; Matthaei, H.; Maitra, A.; Dal Molin, M.; Wood, L.D.; Eshleman, J.R.; Goggins, M.; Canto, M.I.; Schulick, R.D.; Edil, B.H.; et al. Recurrent GNAS mutations define an unexpected pathway for pancreatic cyst development. Sci. Transl. Med. 2011, 3, 92ra66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Singhi, A.D.; McGrath, K.; Brand, R.E.; Khalid, A.; Zeh, H.J.; Chennat, J.S.; Fasanella, K.E.; Papachristou, G.I.; Slivka, A.; Bartlett, D.L.; et al. Preoperative next-generation sequencing of pancreatic cyst fluid is highly accurate in cyst classification and detection of advanced neoplasia. Gut 2018, 67, 2131–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Wu, J.; Jiao, Y.; Dal Molin, M.; Maitra, A.; de Wilde, R.F.; Wood, L.D.; Eshleman, J.R.; Goggins, M.G.; Wolfgang, C.L.; Canto, M.I.; et al. Whole-exome sequencing of neoplastic cysts of the pancreas reveals recurrent mutations in components of ubiquitin-dependent pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 21188–21193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Zhang, M.L.; Arpin, R.N.; Brugge, W.R.; Forcione, D.G.; Basar, O.; Pitman, M.B. Moray micro forceps biopsy improves the diagnosis of specific pancreatic cysts. Cancer Cytopathol. 2018, 126, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Pitman, M.B.; Centeno, B.A.; Daglilar, E.S.; Brugge, W.R.; Mino-Kenudson, M. Cytological criteria of high-grade epithelial atypia in the cyst fluid of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014, 122, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Tanaka, M.; Fernández-del Castillo, C.; Adsay, V.; Chari, S.; Falconi, M.; Jang, J.-Y.; Kimura, W.; Levy, P.; Pitman, M.B.; Schmidt, C.M.; et al. International Association of Pancreatology International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2012, 12, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yamao, K.; Yanagisawa, A.; Takahashi, K.; Kimura, W.; Doi, R.; Fukushima, N.; Ohike, N.; Shimizu, M.; Hatori, T.; Nobukawa, B.; et al. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of mucinous cystic neoplasm with ovarian-type stroma: A multi-institutional study of the Japan pancreas society. Pancreas 2011, 40, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Reddy, R.P.; Smyrk, T.C.; Zapiach, M.; Levy, M.J.; Pearson, R.K.; Clain, J.E.; Farnell, M.B.; Sarr, M.G.; Chari, S.T. Pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasm defined by ovarian stroma: Demographics, clinical features, and prevalence of cancer. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2004, 2, 1026–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Reid, M.D.; Lewis, M.M.; Willingham, F.F.; Adsay, N.V. The Evolving Role of Pathology in New Developments, Classification, Terminology, and Diagnosis of Pancreatobiliary Neoplasms. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2017, 141, 366–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Pittman, M.E.; Rao, R.; Hruban, R.H. Classification, Morphology, Molecular Pathogenesis, and Outcome of Premalignant Lesions of the Pancreas. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2017, 141, 1606–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Wood, L.D.; Hruban, R.H. Pathology and molecular genetics of pancreatic neoplasms. Cancer J. 2012, 18, 492–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Satoh, K.; Shimosegawa, T.; Moriizumi, S.; Koizumi, M.; Toyota, T. K-ras mutation and p53 protein accumulation in intraductal mucin-hypersecreting neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreas 1996, 12, 362–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jmp 02 00002 g001 550
Figure 1. Pancreatic cyst fluid triage.
Figure 1. Pancreatic cyst fluid triage.
Jmp 02 00002 g001
Jmp 02 00002 g002 550
Figure 2. Pancreatic pseudocyst. Cytology shows inflammatory cells, macrophages, amorphous crystalline globular debris, and abundant hematoidin-like pigment (Papanicolaou stain).
Figure 2. Pancreatic pseudocyst. Cytology shows inflammatory cells, macrophages, amorphous crystalline globular debris, and abundant hematoidin-like pigment (Papanicolaou stain).
Jmp 02 00002 g002
Jmp 02 00002 g003 550
Figure 3. Serous cystadenoma. Cytology shows cuboidal cells with non-mucinous cytoplasm and uniform, bland centrally located nuclei. This finding may be a pitfall for mucinous epithelium (Papanicolaou stain).
Figure 3. Serous cystadenoma. Cytology shows cuboidal cells with non-mucinous cytoplasm and uniform, bland centrally located nuclei. This finding may be a pitfall for mucinous epithelium (Papanicolaou stain).
Jmp 02 00002 g003
Jmp 02 00002 g004 550
Figure 4. Lymphoepithelial cyst. Cytology shows thick keratinous debris and scattered admixed lymphocytes (Papanicolaou stain).
Figure 4. Lymphoepithelial cyst. Cytology shows thick keratinous debris and scattered admixed lymphocytes (Papanicolaou stain).
Jmp 02 00002 g004
Jmp 02 00002 g005 550
Figure 5. Mucinous cyst with thick colloid-like extracellular mucin (Papanicolaou stain). Even without the presence of mucinous epithelium in the sample, this finding is diagnostic of a mucinous cyst.
Figure 5. Mucinous cyst with thick colloid-like extracellular mucin (Papanicolaou stain). Even without the presence of mucinous epithelium in the sample, this finding is diagnostic of a mucinous cyst.
Jmp 02 00002 g005
Jmp 02 00002 g006 550
Figure 6. Mucinous epithelium with (a) low-grade atypia versus (b) high-grade atypia (Papanicolaou stain). Features of high-grade atypia include small cell size, high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratios, hyper- or hypochromasia, and nuclear membrane irregularities.
Figure 6. Mucinous epithelium with (a) low-grade atypia versus (b) high-grade atypia (Papanicolaou stain). Features of high-grade atypia include small cell size, high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratios, hyper- or hypochromasia, and nuclear membrane irregularities.
Jmp 02 00002 g006
Jmp 02 00002 g007 550
Figure 7. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. (a) Cell block preparation (H&E) and (b) corresponding p53 immunostain showing diffuse strong nuclear overexpression. (c) Cell block preparation (H&E) and (d) corresponding p53 immunostain showing complete loss (“null pattern”) of nuclear expression.
Figure 7. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. (a) Cell block preparation (H&E) and (b) corresponding p53 immunostain showing diffuse strong nuclear overexpression. (c) Cell block preparation (H&E) and (d) corresponding p53 immunostain showing complete loss (“null pattern”) of nuclear expression.
Jmp 02 00002 g007
Jmp 02 00002 g008 550
Figure 8. Well-differentiated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. (a) Cell block preparation shows strips of adenocarcinoma with loss of nuclear polarity/disarray and nuclear membrane irregularities (H&E). (b) SMAD4 immunostain shows loss of nuclear staining within adenocarcinoma cells. Note the background inflammatory cells that are positive and serve as an internal control.
Figure 8. Well-differentiated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. (a) Cell block preparation shows strips of adenocarcinoma with loss of nuclear polarity/disarray and nuclear membrane irregularities (H&E). (b) SMAD4 immunostain shows loss of nuclear staining within adenocarcinoma cells. Note the background inflammatory cells that are positive and serve as an internal control.
Jmp 02 00002 g008
Table
Table 1. Pancreatic cyst fluid analysis of cystic pancreatic lesions.
Table 1. Pancreatic cyst fluid analysis of cystic pancreatic lesions.
Cystic EntityBiochemical TestsGenetic Mutations
CEAAmylaseKRASGNAS3p25 (VHL)p53p16SMAD4
Pseudocyst↓↑↑−−−−−−
SCA↓↓↓↓−−+−−−
LEC↑↑↓−−−−−−
IPMN↑↓↓↑++−+(HR)+(HR)+(HR)
MCN↑↓↓↑+−−+(HR)+(HR)+(HR)
PanNET *↓↓↓↑−−+/−−−−
PDAC *↑↓↓↑+−/+ **−+++ (55%)
Abbreviations: CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; SCA, serous cystadenoma; LEC, lymphoepithelial cyst; IPMN, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; MCN, mucinous cystic neoplasm; PanNET, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; HR, high-risk.* Cystic variants. ** GNAS mutations have been reported in PDACs with associated IPMN (~8% of cases) [25].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, M.L.; Pitman, M.B. Practical Applications of Molecular Testing in the Cytologic Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cysts. J. Mol. Pathol. 2021, 2, 11-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp2010002

AMA Style

Zhang ML, Pitman MB. Practical Applications of Molecular Testing in the Cytologic Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cysts. Journal of Molecular Pathology. 2021; 2(1):11-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp2010002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Mingjuan Lisa, and Martha B. Pitman. 2021. "Practical Applications of Molecular Testing in the Cytologic Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cysts" Journal of Molecular Pathology 2, no. 1: 11-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp2010002

APA Style

Zhang, M. L., & Pitman, M. B. (2021). Practical Applications of Molecular Testing in the Cytologic Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cysts. Journal of Molecular Pathology, 2(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp2010002

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop