Next Article in Journal
The High-Throughput Analyses Era: Are We Ready for the Data Struggle?
Previous Article in Journal
Applying Expression Profile Similarity for Discovery of Patient-Specific Functional Mutations
Please note that, as of 21 September 2020, High-Throughput has been renamed to BioTech and is now published here.
Review

When Transcriptomics and Metabolomics Work Hand in Hand: A Case Study Characterizing Plant CDF Transcription Factors

1
Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)—Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid), Spain
2
Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
High-Throughput 2018, 7(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/ht7010007
Received: 28 December 2017 / Revised: 21 February 2018 / Accepted: 21 February 2018 / Published: 28 February 2018
Over the last three decades, novel “omics” platform technologies for the sequencing of DNA and complementary DNA (cDNA) (RNA-Seq), as well as for the analysis of proteins and metabolites by mass spectrometry, have become more and more available and increasingly found their way into general laboratory life. With this, the ability to generate highly multivariate datasets on the biological systems of choice has increased tremendously. However, the processing and, perhaps even more importantly, the integration of “omics” datasets still remains a bottleneck, although considerable computational and algorithmic advances have been made in recent years. In this mini-review, we use a number of recent “multi-omics” approaches realized in our laboratories as a common theme to discuss possible pitfalls of applying “omics” approaches and to highlight some useful tools for data integration and visualization in the form of an exemplified case study. In the selected example, we used a combination of transcriptomics and metabolomics alongside phenotypic analyses to functionally characterize a small number of Cycling Dof Transcription Factors (CDFs). It has to be remarked that, even though this approach is broadly used, the given workflow is only one of plenty possible ways to characterize target proteins. View Full-Text
Keywords: secondary metabolites; metabolomics; systems biology; plant biology secondary metabolites; metabolomics; systems biology; plant biology
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Pérez-Alonso, M.-M.; Carrasco-Loba, V.; Medina, J.; Vicente-Carbajosa, J.; Pollmann, S. When Transcriptomics and Metabolomics Work Hand in Hand: A Case Study Characterizing Plant CDF Transcription Factors. High-Throughput 2018, 7, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/ht7010007

AMA Style

Pérez-Alonso M-M, Carrasco-Loba V, Medina J, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Pollmann S. When Transcriptomics and Metabolomics Work Hand in Hand: A Case Study Characterizing Plant CDF Transcription Factors. High-Throughput. 2018; 7(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/ht7010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pérez-Alonso, Marta-Marina, Víctor Carrasco-Loba, Joaquín Medina, Jesús Vicente-Carbajosa, and Stephan Pollmann. 2018. "When Transcriptomics and Metabolomics Work Hand in Hand: A Case Study Characterizing Plant CDF Transcription Factors" High-Throughput 7, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/ht7010007

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop