Next Article in Journal
Evolving Approaches and Resources for Clinical Practice in the Management of HIV Infection in the HAART Era
Previous Article in Journal
Erratum
 
 
GERMS is published by MDPI from Volume 15 Issue 4 (2025). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with the former publisher Infection Science Forum.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Hepatitis B in the Spotlight

by
Adrian Streinu-Cercel
1
1
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 37 Dionisie Lupu Street, Bucharest 020022, Romania
2
National Institute of Infectious Diseases ‘Prof. Dr. Matei Balş’, 1 Dr. Calistrat Grozovici Street, Bucharest, Romania
Submission received: 24 September 2011 / Revised: 24 October 2011 / Accepted: 24 November 2011 / Published: 24 December 2011
In the context of recent developments in the area of antiviral therapy, accurate selection of patients into treatment groups and timely initiation of therapy has become crucial. As infectious diseases practitioners, it is important to use all available tools for identifying those patients which have the potential of responding to the therapeutic options at hand.
Given the fact that hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a leading cause of chronic liver disease and of hepatocellular carcinoma, the decision-making process behind the clinical management of the infection needs to take into account all parameters known to play a role in patients’ response to treatment.
Bearing in mind the four stages of disease and given the fact that each patient may respond differently to the presence of the virus, it is vital to choose who to treat, when to start treatment, what to start with and when to stop. It has been postulated that who to treat is no longer an issue, the real question being rather when to switch from watch-and-wait to active therapeutic intervention for each patient.
When talking about therapy in HBV hepatitis, one might automatically think about chronic HBV infection. But what about severe acute hepatitis? Can we spare those initial 6 months watching and waiting only to eventually start therapy for chronic hepatitis? Or should we customize the clinical judgment early to apply a treatment protocol individualized for each patient?
Field literature describes a wide range of options, from lamivudine treatment to entecavir, pegylated interferon and back to the watch-and-wait approach. Which option best suits our patient? This remains an open question. It might be time to learn from the management of HIV infection, where therapy is tailored for each patient.
Looking back at our experience with managing patients with HBV infection, we should focus more on acting in the acute phase of the disease for the symptomatic patients, and treat more actively at that time point in order to limit the integration of HBV into the hepatic cell and the subsequent evolution towards chronic hepatopathy, and as we browse through field literature, we notice some interesting results for these patients.
We should also focus on better vaccination implementing programs and test for response to vaccine in order to minimize the responsive mass for HBV infection, as HBV is a chronic disease with lifelong complications.
‘As for the future, your task is not to foresee it, but to enable it.’-- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Streinu-Cercel, A. Hepatitis B in the Spotlight. GERMS 2011, 1, 5. https://doi.org/10.11599/germs.2012.1001

AMA Style

Streinu-Cercel A. Hepatitis B in the Spotlight. GERMS. 2011; 1(1):5. https://doi.org/10.11599/germs.2012.1001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Streinu-Cercel, Adrian. 2011. "Hepatitis B in the Spotlight" GERMS 1, no. 1: 5. https://doi.org/10.11599/germs.2012.1001

APA Style

Streinu-Cercel, A. (2011). Hepatitis B in the Spotlight. GERMS, 1(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.11599/germs.2012.1001

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop