Next Article in Journal
Reinforcement Learning for Radiotherapy Dose Fractioning Automation
Next Article in Special Issue
Activin-A Induces Early Differential Gene Expression Exclusively in Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts from Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Imaging Inflammation with Positron Emission Tomography
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cardiopulmonary and Neurologic Dysfunctions in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Challenges and Opportunities for Drug Repositioning in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva

Biomedicines 2021, 9(2), 213; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9020213
by Francesc Ventura 1, Eleanor Williams 2, Makoto Ikeya 3, Alex N. Bullock 2, Peter ten Dijke 4, Marie-José Goumans 5 and Gonzalo Sanchez-Duffhues 5,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Biomedicines 2021, 9(2), 213; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9020213
Submission received: 11 January 2021 / Revised: 8 February 2021 / Accepted: 15 February 2021 / Published: 19 February 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The topic is interesting. However, the paper is disorganized and should be reorganized.

Introduction should be shortened. I would limit information to biology and clinical presentation.

Paragraphs "TGF signaling" and "ACVR1/ALK2 signaling in FOP." are disorganized and not focused on FOP. They should be shortened and focused on the topic. Images might help to follow.

"In vitro screening platforms for FOP": this paragraph is partially disconnected with the rest of the paper.

I direct line between signaling pathway through the target drug would be more clear.

 

Author Response

We appreciate very much the assessment of our manuscript by these two reviewers.

Please, find below a point-by-point answer to the questions raised:

 

 

Reviewer #1:

 

The topic is interesting. However, the paper is disorganized and should be reorganized.

 

Response: We acknowledge Reviewer #1 for his/her useful comments and suggestions. In order to satisfy the concerns raised, we have adjusted the text and one Figure in the manuscript. We have particularly focused on improving the text flow and connections between sections. Some sections have been shortened and linking paragraphs have been incorporated. Finally, the manuscript has been proofread by English native speakers.

 

Introduction should be shortened. I would limit information to biology and clinical presentation.

 

Response: In this revised version we have considerably shortened the introduction according to Reviewer #1 suggestions.

 

Paragraphs "TGF signaling" and "ACVR1/ALK2 signaling in FOP." are disorganized and not focused on FOP. They should be shortened and focused on the topic. Images might help to follow.

 

Response: Rather than up-regulated BMP signalling, FOP results from disbalances in TGF-b signaling, both BMP and TGF-b branches. Feedback mechanisms between these two pathways in the context of FOP are only being unveiled in the last years. Furthermore, repositioned drugs may act by targeting these mechanisms. Therefore, we consider that a comprehensive understanding of TGF-b signalling (rather than only BMP or ALK2 signaling) is needed. We cite excellent review manuscripts illustrating these pathways.

 

In order to improve the text flow, we have rewritten the starting and ending paragraphs in these sections to favour the connection with prior and consecutive sections. In addition, we have rearranged the text to emphasize the role of ALK2 modulating signaling induced by members of the TGF-b family other than BMPs. 

 

 

"In vitro screening platforms for FOP": this paragraph is partially disconnected with the rest of the paper. I direct line between signaling pathway through the target drug would be more clear.

 

 

Response: We have renamed the section and further developed an introductory paragraph, to highlight the need and involvement of in vitro models for FOP in drug development. Moreover, we now refer to in vitro cell based FOP models throughout the text, to improve the embedding of this section. Finally, we have repositioned several elements within Figure 2, to clarify the target of saracatinib and alpelisib.

 

 

 

Reviewer #2:

 

No comments.

 

Response: We thank this reviewer for his/her time and consideration of our manuscript as publishable by Biomedicines.

Reviewer 2 Report

In this review, fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) has been discussed in terms of its causative mutation and downstream signaling, in vitro models for drug screening, and possible candidates for effective drugs. Although all these are complicated issues, this review describes them very clearly. It would be helpful for people who are interested in its fundamental mechanisms as well as the most advanced therapeutic challenges in this field. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The Authors made greta efforts in ameliorating their paper.

It is now more clear to follow

Back to TopTop