Next Article in Journal
Addressing a Pre-Clinical Pipeline Gap: Development of the Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patient-Derived Xenograft Program at Texas Children’s Hospital at Baylor College of Medicine
Previous Article in Journal
Hypoglycemia Unawareness—A Review on Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Modelling the Distribution of Cognitive Outcomes for Early-Stage Neurocognitive Disorders: A Model Comparison Approach

1
Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore 169857, Singapore
2
Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore 308433, Singapore
3
Dementia Research Centre (Singapore), Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308232, Singapore
4
Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore 169857, Singapore
5
Stern School of Business (Emeritus), New York University, New York, NY 10012, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2024, 12(2), 393; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12020393
Submission received: 13 December 2023 / Revised: 5 February 2024 / Accepted: 6 February 2024 / Published: 8 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Neurobiology and Clinical Neuroscience)

Abstract

Background: Cognitive assessments for patients with neurocognitive disorders are mostly measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Visual Cognitive Assessment Test (VCAT) as screening tools. These cognitive scores are usually left-skewed and the results of the association analysis might not be robust. This study aims to study the distribution of the cognitive outcomes and to discuss potential solutions. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study of individuals with subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment, the inverse-transformed cognitive outcomes are modelled using different statistical distributions. The robustness of the proposed models are checked under different scenarios: with intercept-only, models with covariates, and with and without bootstrapping. Results: The main results were based on the VCAT score and validated via the MoCA score. The findings suggested that the inverse transformation method improved the modelling the cognitive scores compared to the conventional methods using the original cognitive scores. The association of the baseline characteristics (age, gender, and years of education) and the cognitive outcomes were reported as estimates and 95% confidence intervals. Bootstrap methods improved the estimate precision and the bootstrapped standard errors of the estimates were more robust. Cognitive outcomes were widely analysed using linear regression models with the default normal distribution as a conventional method. We compared the results of our suggested models with the normal distribution under various scenarios. Goodness-of-fit measurements were compared between the proposed models and conventional methods. Conclusions: The findings support the use of the inverse transformation method to model the cognitive outcomes instead of the original cognitive scores for early-stage neurocognitive disorders where the cognitive outcomes are left-skewed.
Keywords: cognitive impairment; cognitive screening tool; Montreal Cognitive Assessment; visual cognitive assessment test; skewness cognitive impairment; cognitive screening tool; Montreal Cognitive Assessment; visual cognitive assessment test; skewness

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saffari, S.E.; Soo, S.A.; Mohammadi, R.; Ng, K.P.; Greene, W.; Kandiah, N. Modelling the Distribution of Cognitive Outcomes for Early-Stage Neurocognitive Disorders: A Model Comparison Approach. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12020393

AMA Style

Saffari SE, Soo SA, Mohammadi R, Ng KP, Greene W, Kandiah N. Modelling the Distribution of Cognitive Outcomes for Early-Stage Neurocognitive Disorders: A Model Comparison Approach. Biomedicines. 2024; 12(2):393. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12020393

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saffari, Seyed Ehsan, See Ann Soo, Raziyeh Mohammadi, Kok Pin Ng, William Greene, and Negaenderan Kandiah. 2024. "Modelling the Distribution of Cognitive Outcomes for Early-Stage Neurocognitive Disorders: A Model Comparison Approach" Biomedicines 12, no. 2: 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12020393

APA Style

Saffari, S. E., Soo, S. A., Mohammadi, R., Ng, K. P., Greene, W., & Kandiah, N. (2024). Modelling the Distribution of Cognitive Outcomes for Early-Stage Neurocognitive Disorders: A Model Comparison Approach. Biomedicines, 12(2), 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12020393

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop