Next Article in Journal
Whole-Body Cryostimulation in Post-COVID Rehabilitation for Patients with Obesity: A Multidisciplinary Feasibility Study
Next Article in Special Issue
The Anti-Virulence Activities of the Antihypertensive Drug Propranolol in Light of Its Anti-Quorum Sensing Effects against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Serratia marcescens
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Disease Activity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Diagnostic Tools in the Assessment of Histological Healing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Predicting Drug–Gene–Disease Associations by Tensor Decomposition for Network-Based Computational Drug Repositioning
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/biomedicines11113091
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Azadiradione, a Component of Neem Oil, Behaves as a Superoxide Dismutase Mimic When Scavenging the Superoxide Radical, as Shown Using DFT and Hydrodynamic Voltammetry

by
Raiyan Sakib
,
Francesco Caruso
*,
Stuart Belli
and
Miriam Rossi
*
Department of Chemistry, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY 12604, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2023, 11(11), 3091; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11113091
Submission received: 30 October 2023 / Revised: 14 November 2023 / Accepted: 16 November 2023 / Published: 18 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Drug Repositioning)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The neem tree, Azadirachta indica, belongs to the Meliaceae family, and its use in the treatment of medical disorders from ancient times to the present in the traditional medical practices of Asia, Africa and the Middle East is well-documented. Neem oil, extracted from the seeds of the fruit, is widely used, with promising medicinal benefits. Azadiradione, a principal antioxidant component of the seeds of A. indica, is known to reduce oxidative stress and has anti-inflammatory effects. To directly measure the antioxidant ability of neem oil, we used Rotating Ring Disk Electrode (RRDE) hydrodynamic voltammetry to quantify how it can scavenge superoxide radical anions. The results of these experiments show that neem oil is approximately 26 times stronger than other natural products, such as olive oil, propolis and black seed oil, which were previously measured using this method. Next, computational Density Functional Theory (DFT) methods were used to arrive at a mechanism for the scavenging of superoxide radical anions with azadiradione. Our work indicates that azadiradione is an effective antioxidant and, according to our DFT study, its scavenging of the superoxide radical anion occurs through a reaction mechanism in which azadiradione mimics the antioxidant action of superoxide dismutase (SOD). In this mechanism, analogous to the SOD enzymatic reaction, azadiradione is regenerated, along with the production of two products: hydrogen peroxide and molecular oxygen. This antioxidant process provides an explanation for azadiradione’s more general and protective biochemical effects.

1. Introduction

The neem tree, Azadirachta indica, belongs to the Meliaceae family of plants, which are found in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Its use in the treatment of medical disorders from ancient times to the present is well-documented. In fact, extremely ancient medicinal practices from the Indian subcontinent, such as Indian Siddha medicine, highlight the importance of the neem tree as a medicinal plant [1,2]. Evidence for the long history of neem use can be seen in the findings of neem leaves among the archaeological treasures of the Harappan Indus Civilization, uncovered in the 1921 explorations [2]. Today, the use of neem products to treat skin diseases including chicken pox, caused by varicella zoster virus, is still common. Until its eradication, neem was used in the treatment of smallpox (variola virus) [2]. Today, neem products are widely used in the traditional medical practices of Asia, Africa and the Middle East [3], and a number of more recent reviews describing the extensive biomedical properties of the neem tree are available [4,5,6,7,8]. To date, research in pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry has explored the molecular components of the neem tree and its products in an effort to derive chemical mechanisms for its exceptional therapeutic properties. Different constituents of the tree have proved to be rich sources of natural compounds, with neem leaves, seeds and oil extensively used for biomedical purposes [9,10,11].
The neem tree is a rich source of plant secondary metabolites, including many terpenes that have promising biological activities, as in the biosynthesis of important compounds such as steroids and sterols [12,13,14]. Limonoids are a sub-group of triterpenes found mainly in the Meliaceae and Rutaceae plant families; their name arose due to the fact that they were first identified from the Citrus family (Rutaceae). An important review describing the chemistry and biological properties of the large number of Meliaceae limonoids was published in 2011 [15]. Of interest, the neem tree serves as the source of several limonoids with significant biological activities, including insect antifeeding action. For example, azadirachtin has been identified as the principal active insecticidal species [16] against a broad range of insects while also being non-toxic towards mammals, thus giving a scientific basis for the wide popularity of neem tree products as insect repellants. Gedunin is a potent larvicide, antifungal and antitumor agent [15,17], while nimbolide has shown antimalarial and antitumor properties [13,18,19,20]. Nimbolide has also been reported to have a positive effect in animal studies in treating gestational diabetes by boosting total antioxidant capacity and antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione S-transferase (GST) and catalase (CAT) [21]. Gedunin was described as a robust and non-toxic Nrf2 activator acting against oxidative stress, since Nrf2 is a key transcriptional regulator of antioxidant defense and detoxification [22]. The ROS scavenging of gedunin and its ability to reduce oxidative stress to augment current type 2 diabetes therapies were described [23]. Gedunin was also the first identified antimalarial limonoid agent from the neem tree [24]. In summary, the literature comprises many reports on the neem limonoids azadirachtin, gedunin, and nimbolide.
The impressive biomedical consequences of using neem tree parts are often accompanied by descriptions of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities [2,25,26,27,28]. For example, A. indica (neem) oil significantly reduced oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation, leading to mice liver damage when exposed to the mycotoxin Ochratoxin A [29]. The antioxidant effects of neem leaf fractions against H2O2-induced lipid peroxidation and DNA damage were attributed to their ability to inhibit various free radicals [2,30].
The composition/concentration of neem tree limonoids was shown to vary according to different factors including ripening [31]. Another study used HPLC and NMR data on neem components in five different stages of ripening to quantify, isolate and identify the limonoids [32]. This report showed that the azadirachtin content was very low in green berries (3%), and it increased to 13% on ripening. The compound having the highest concentration (59%) in green berries, which gradually decreased to 3% on fruit ripening, was azadiradione, as shown in Figure 1, a major but less-studied limonoid constituent.
This compound, azadiradione, also has important biological actions such as reducing oxidative stress and anti-inflammatory effects [8,28,33,34]. In neurodegenerative diseases such as polyglutamine-based diseases and Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s and Parkinson’s diseases, the current treatment options are limited. Azadiradione is of therapeutic interest because it is an inducer of Heat Shock Factor 1 activity in cell and Drosophila models [35]. A study performed on the deacetyl derivative of azadiradione showed that this molecule exerted a protective effect on zebrafish larvae that were stressed through exposure to lipopolysaccharides, LPS (the increased circulation of LPS leads to the induction of oxidative stress and a systemic inflammatory response). This was accomplished through its scavenging of the free radicals produced during oxidative stress, thereby reducing the inflammatory response [36].
Indeed, azadiradione has a triterpenoid structure similar to that of another biologically active antioxidant plant species previously studied by us, celastrol [37]. Consequently, our objective in this work was to study the antioxidant properties of azadiradione and the commonly available neem oil in which it is found, so that we could obtain general insights into the chemistry and biological activities of this meliaceous limonoid. To this end, we measured the superoxide radical scavenging ability of neem oil directly using Rotating Ring Disk Electrode (RRDE) hydrodynamic voltammetry. To arrive at a reaction mechanism through which azadiradione can effect this scavenging of the superoxide radical anion, we used DFT computational methods.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Hydrodynamic Voltammetry (RRDE)

A commercial sample of 100% cold-pressed neem oil was used as received (Milania, Amazon.com). For the experiment, the electrochemical cell containing a solution of 0.1 M dried tetrabutylammonium bromide, TBAB (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), dissolved in 50 mL dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO, anhydrous, ≥99.9% (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), was bubbled with dry O2/N2 (35%/65%) for five minutes to establish the required dissolved molecular oxygen level. The rotation setting used for the rotation of the Au/Au disk electrode was fixed at 1000 rpm, and the potential sweep was applied to the disk from 0.2 V to −1.2 V and then reversed to 0.2 V, while the potential of the ring electrode was held invariable at 0.0 V. The disk voltage sweep rate was positioned at 25 mV/s. The molecular oxygen reduction peak (Reaction 1) was detected around −0.6 V at the disk electrode. Meanwhile, the oxidation (Reaction 2) occurred at the ring electrode. An initial blank solution consisting of bubbled O2, the electrolyte TBMB and DMSO alone (in the absence of neem oil), was run, and the ratio of the ring/disk current was defined as the “efficiency”. Next, a neem oil antioxidant aliquot was provided, as indicated in Figure 2. The solution in the voltaic cell was bubbled with the gas mixture for 5 min, an updated voltammogram was recorded, and the corresponding efficiency was obtained. In this way, the rate at which the increasing concentrations of the antioxidant sequester the generated superoxide radicals during the electrochemical reaction is determined as each additional antioxidant aliquot is added. Aftermath software Release 1.6.10523 was used to record the results from each run, represented as voltammograms showing the current vs. potential graphs. These were later analyzed using Microsoft Excel. The volume amount used in each of the aliquots is indicated in the related RRDE graph. Finally, the decreasing slope of the curve, describing the overall decrease in efficiency with the incremental addition of the antioxidant, serves as a quantitative measure of the antioxidant activity of neem oil. Any decrease in the collection efficiency is anticipated to be due to the amount of superoxide consumed by the neem oil. This method was developed in our laboratory [38]. In our RRDE voltammetry experiment, the generation of the superoxide radical anions occurred through a reduction at the disk electrode, while the reverse oxidation reaction of the residual superoxide radicals (those that remain unreacted) were detected at the ring electrode.
Reaction 1: Reduction of molecular oxygen occurring at the disk electrode
O2 + e− → O2•−
Reverse Reaction 2: Oxidation of superoxide radicals at the ring electrode
O2•− → O2 + e−

2.2. Computational Study

Calculations were run using Dmol3, a program in the Biovia package (Dassault Systèmes, San Diego, CA, USA). This program utilizes Density Functional Theory (DFT) to calculate energy, geometry, and frequencies, implemented in Materials Studio 7.0 [39]. We employed the double numerical polarized (DNP) basis set including all the occupied atomic orbitals plus a second set of valence atomic orbitals, as well as polarized d-valence orbitals [40]. Correlation generalized gradient approximation (GGA) was used, including BLYP correlation and Becke exchange [41]. All electrons were treated explicitly, and the real space cutoff of 5 Å was set for the numerical integration of the Hamiltonian matrix elements. The self-consistent field convergence criterion was established for the root mean square variation in the electronic density to be less than 10−6 electron/Å3. No solvent effects were included in these calculations. The convergence criteria applied during geometry optimization were 2.72 × 10−4 eV for energy and 0.054 eV/Å for force.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Electrochemical Study

The Rotating Ring Disk Electrode (RRDE) method is an electroanalytic technique related to standard cyclic voltammetry. It is effective in rapidly detecting stable species during electrochemical reactions and has the advantages of a high sensitivity and low cost. The antioxidant capability of neem oil for the superoxide radical was studied using the RRDE method. Essentially, the superoxide radical is generated in a voltaic cell using anhydrous DMSO as a solvent, together with an electrolyte, and by bubbling a controlled amount of oxygen gas, allowing for solution saturation. The superoxide radical is obtained at a sufficiently negative potential so that the O2 can capture an electron from the working disk electrode to form the anionic superoxide radical, O2 + e− → O2•−, as in Reaction (1). From the RRDE graph in Figure 2, it can be seen that increasing amounts of neem oil decrease and even almost deplete the superoxide concentration in the voltaic cell. That is, the signal detected at the ring electrode shows that the superoxide is still existing and not consumed by the antioxidant. This is located at the upper part of the graph, and we see that upon adding 16 μL of neem oil, the superoxide concentration is almost completely eliminated. The collection efficiency graph also shows this effect in Figure 3.
The clear-cut parameter defining antioxidant superoxide scavenging ability is the slope of the collection efficiency graph, which is shown in Figure 4. A comparison of the slopes of neem oil and other previously studied natural products is shown in Table 1. We highlight that the steeper the slope is, the stronger the antioxidant capacity of the studied scavenger species will be.
The previously examined oils have slopes of approximately −0.08. Neem oil has a slope approximately 26 times stronger, −2.271. Among these studied oils, extra virgin olive oil is well-known to have a low concentration of polyphenols, from 50 to 1000 mg/kg [45], since it mostly contains fatty acids and esters, which cannot provide an antioxidant action. Therefore, the limited amount of polyphenols in olive oil are not able to scavenge as much superoxide as those antioxidants in neem oil. It can be concluded that the effective components of scavenging in neem oil are in higher concentration than those in olive oil, black seed oil and propolis. Additionally, some neem oil components are more effective scavengers than the tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol found in extra virgin olive oil. Section 3.2 explores these details further.

3.2. DFT Study

The molecular structure of azadiradione was DFT-energy-minimized using starting coordinates from its crystal structure [46]. After a proton was placed at the van der Waals separation from the six-membered ring of azadiradione O(carbonyl), 2.60 Å, Figure 5, the whole arrangement was DFT minimized, and the proton resulted bound to the oxygen, 0.970 Å, Figure 6. Next, a superoxide was placed using van der Waals separation through the added proton in Figure 6, and DFT minimization showed the formation of a HO2 moiety, separated from the remaining azadiradione neutral radical by 1.624 Å, as shown in Figure 7. Next, the more exposed oxygen of HO2 was positioned 2.60 Å from an additional proton, making the whole radical system charged (+1), from two protons plus the reacted superoxide. Upon DFT optimization, H2O2 formed and detached from the organic moiety, 1.572 Å, showing the neighboring carbonyl (C-O bond of 1.254 Å), which was very similar to the carbonyl at the opposite end, as in Figure 8.
Next, in the arrangement shown in Figure 8, another superoxide was placed at the van der Waals separation, 3.50 Å above the ring containing the double bond, to explore a π-π interaction. Upon DFT minimization, the original distance between the O atoms in the attacking superoxide, 1.373 Å, was shortened to 1.269 Å, which is approximately the bond distance for a molecule of O2, as shown in Figure 9. Meanwhile, this molecule of O2 was rejected from the system at 3.791 Å, and H2O2, already formed in Figure 8 (separated 1.572 Å), further detached from the organic moiety at 1.685 Å. It can be concluded that the unpaired electron of the second superoxide was directed towards the double bond in the cyclohexene ring. The consequence of this process was the consumption of two superoxide radicals and two protons to obtain O2, H2O2 and reformed azadiradione, which was ready for the additional scavenging of superoxide. The related Reaction (3) is the same as that of superoxide dismutase and fully described in Scheme 1, which also includes the involved ΔGreaction for each step. For instance, the capture of the proton by the azadiradione O(carbonyl) has ΔGreaction of −552.3 kcal/mol (Figure 6), and for the oxidation of the superoxide (Figure 9), ΔGreaction is −17.3 kcal/mol. No energy barriers were observed for all the reactions.
2 O2•− + 2H+ → O2 + H2O2
We can conclude that by incorporating a proton, the azadiradione carbonyl, the C=O bond distance of which is 1.243 Å, lengthens to 1.365 Å, which is a typical single C-O bond length, and so a C-O-H moiety is established (Figure 6). Next, a superoxide anion interacts with the previously added proton in the reacting moiety, and later, a second proton further reacts to form H2O2, which restores the C=O bond in azadiradione, 1.250 Å (Figure 8). However, the charge of the whole molecular system is +1 (from two protons and −1 from the superoxide), and, more importantly, the system also has an uneven number of electrons (it is a radical) due to the reacting superoxide radical. It is therefore not surprising that the reaction of a second superoxide anion is feasible, making the whole system non-radical (the new product has an even number of electrons) and neutral. The interesting redox property of this second superoxide interaction is the eventual elimination of a molecule of O2, as seen in the energy minimized ensemble resulting in a π-π separation of 3.791 Å to the cyclohexene centroid (Figure 9), longer than the original van der Waals separation of 3.5 Å, while more importantly, the superoxide shortens its O-O bond to 1.269 Å, which is consistent with a molecule of O2, that is, it is shorter than the O-O bond distance of the reacting superoxide, 1.373 Å. Thus, interestingly, the second superoxide is not an oxidizing agent; rather, it oxidizes itself. The receptor of this extra electron seems to be the double bond in the cyclohexene moiety. As will be explained later, in a previous study, we described a similar reducing superoxide action through a π-π interaction with the pyrone ring of isoflavones. In summary, the final result is a dismutase action, e.g., the first superoxide incorporates two protons to form H2O2 (a typical reaction for antioxidants found in fruit and vegetables as for instance flavonoids), while the second superoxide is a reducing reagent, as it becomes oxidized on releasing its unpaired electron.
Other tetracyclic terpenoids found in neem oil may also contribute to superoxide scavenging, among them azadirone, epoxyazadiradione, gedunin, nimbolide and zafaral [6], shown in Figure 10, which all contain the cyclohexene carbonyl moiety responsible for antioxidant activity in azadiradione. In fact, this moiety is conserved after the deacetylation of the epoxy group coupled with the substitution of a hydroxy group, with the resulting molecule showing enhanced free radical scavenging and experimental antioxidant activities [36], in agreement with our DFT calculations, as shown in Scheme 1.
The antioxidant properties of neem oil compounds have been explored in the literature. For instance, nimbolide exhibited a concentration-dependent anti-radical scavenging activity and is a potent antioxidative agent [17]. Moreover, nimbolide decreased oxidative damage by reducing ROS accumulation in cells while increasing the activity of radical scavenging enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione S-transferase (GST) and catalase (CAT) [47]. The antioxidant action of nimbolide was also recently substantiated through its ability to increase the antioxidant enzyme activity of SOD, GST and CAT in a rat model of gestational diabetes [21]. In contrast, the pro-oxidant effects of nimbolide, with its causation of oxidative stress through the suppression of antioxidant enzyme activity, appears to be beneficial and part of its cytotoxic action [20]. Additionally, there is another report of nimbolide-induced oxidative stress with a significant decrease in antioxidant enzyme activity in rat spermatozoa [48]. The nimbolide mechanism of action, with respect to ROS, thus remains unclear.

4. Conclusions

The results of our data, taken together, indicate that azadiradione, a component of neem fruit, is an effective antioxidant, and a mechanism for its scavenging of the superoxide radical anion has been proposed.
In this study, we have shown that azadiradione is a strong antioxidant, along with neem oil. Additionally, these electrochemistry experiments showed that neem oil is approximately 26 times stronger than other natural products, such as extra virgin olive oil [42], propolis [44] and black seed oil [43], which were previously measured using this method. Moreover, according to our DFT study, azadiradione mimics the antioxidant action of superoxide dismutase (SOD), suggesting an explanation for its more general and protective effects as an antiplasmodial, anti-insecticidal, anti-inflammatory, antifungal and antitumor product in aging-related conditions as Parkinson’s disease [33]. SOD are a family of metalloproteins that protect cells against oxidative stress by catalyzing the chemical reaction for the dismutation of the superoxide radical anion (O2●−) into molecular oxygen and hydrogen peroxide through metal ion redox chemistry, as described in Reaction (3) [49]. In the literature, the active site interaction of two antioxidant enzymes, superoxide dismutase and xanthine oxidase, with three small molecules found in A. indica extract, protocatechuic acid (−)− epicatechin and gallic acid, has been described [50].
We also observed a different correlation: the neem oil component azadiradione can mimic SOD activity directly by interacting with the superoxide radical anion to produce hydrogen peroxide and the oxygen molecule. Because SOD provides a defense against oxidative stress under physiological and disease conditions, the finding of natural products that can mimic SOD activity is of interest for their therapeutic potential. Thus far, most SOD mimics have been metal complexes [51], and the reactions depend on redox active metals, whereas azadiradione and other plant-derived compounds can achieve this effect through initial intermolecular interactions such as hydrogen bonding and stacking interactions.
Here, these SOD mimics carry out the dismutation of superoxide in this manner: overall, there are two superoxide anions reacting, the first capturing two H atoms and forming H2O2, while the second superoxide releases its unpaired electron to the antioxidant.
The results of this work add to our earlier studies, which demonstrated that some organic natural products such as isoflavones [52], galangin [44] and other natural products [53] can effectively act as SOD mimics. Our results suggest the possibility that azadiradione can mimic SOD action, thus facilitating an explanation for its ability to assist in lowering superoxide concentrations. Because oxidative stress is associated with a variety of disease states, we plan to conduct future research aimed at illuminating this important biomedical activity using non-toxic natural compounds.
Our results confirm that the RRDE cyclic voltammetry experiment has several advantages over traditional methods for measuring antioxidant activity (e.g., the DPPH assay, which uses an unsuitable non-biological radical). Other methods used to generate the superoxide radical consist of measuring a product after superoxide consumption, in which adding an antioxidant will decrease the concentration of such a product, e.g., the superoxide concentration is measured indirectly. One of these methods is an enzymatic reaction using xanthine dehydrogenase [54], while a non-enzymatic option utilizes phenazine methosulphate, NADH and molecular oxygen [55]. In contrast, the RRDE can be used to directly measure antioxidant superoxide scavenging ability in the sample cell after superoxide production in situ.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R.; Methodology, M.R.; Validation, R.S.; Investigation, F.C.; Resources, S.B.; Data curation, R.S.; Writing—original draft, F.C. and M.R.; Supervision, F.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Andrea Caruso for helpful conversations and are grateful for the assistance of the Vassar College Department of Chemistry.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Siddiqui, S. Siddha medicine. Curr. Sci. 1942, 11, 278–279. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sarkar, S.; Singh, R.P.; Bhattacharya, G. Exploring the role of Azadirachta indica (neem) and its active compounds in the regulation of biological pathways: An update on molecular approach. 3 Biotech. 2021, 11, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. National Research Council (US) Panel on Neem. Neem: A Tree For Solving Global Problems; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1992; Volume 3, The Tree. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK234651/ (accessed on 20 June 2023).
  4. Biswas, K.; Chattopadhyay, I.; Banerjee, R.K.; Bandyopadhyay, U. Biological activities and medicinal properties of neem (Azadirachta indica). Curr. Sci. 2002, 82, 1336–1345. [Google Scholar]
  5. Subapriya, R.; Nagini, S. Medicinal properties of neem leaves: A review. Curr. Med. Chem. Anti-Cancer Agents 2005, 5, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gupta, S.C.; Prasad, S.; Tyagi, A.K.; Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Aggarwal, B.B. Neem (Azadirachta indica): An indian traditional panacea with modern molecular basis. Phytomedicine 2017, 34, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alzohairy, M.A. Therapeutics Role of Azadirachta indica (Neem) and Their Active Constituents in Diseases Prevention and Treatment. Evid. Based Complement Altern. Med. 2016, 2016, 7382506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Islas, J.F.; Acosta, E.; G-Buentello, Z.; Delgado-Gallegos, J.L.; Moreno-Treviño, M.G.; Escalante, B.A.; Moreno-Cuevas, J.E. An overview of Neem (Azadirachta indica) and its potential impact on health. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 74, 104171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Patel, S.M.; Nagulapalli Venkata, K.C.; Bhattacharyya, P.; Sethi, G.; Bishayee, A. Potential of neem (Azadirachta indica L.) for prevention and treatment of oncologic diseases. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2016, 40–41, 100–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Deng, Y.X.; Cao, M.; Shi, D.X.; Yin, Z.Q.; Jia, R.Y.; Xu, J.; Wang, C.; Lv, C.; Liang, X.X.; He, C.L.; et al. Toxicological evaluation of neem (Azadirachta indica) oil: Acute and subacute toxicity. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2013, 35, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kadu, T.B.; Dighade, S.J.; Dongare, P.N.; Dod, S.R. An overview on Azadirachta indica plant parts benefits and marketed preparation. World J. Pharm. Pharmaceut. Sci. 2022, 11, 659–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Proshkina, E.; Plyusnin, S.; Babak, T.; Lashmanova, E.; Maganova, F.; Koval, L.; Platonova, E.; Shaposhnikov, M.; Moskalev, A. Terpenoids as Potential Geroprotectors. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Setzer, W.N.; Setzer, M.C. Plant-derived triterpenoids as potential antineoplastic agents. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2003, 3, 540–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Barrek, S.; Paisse, O.; Grenier-Loustalot, M.F. Analysis of neem oils by LC-MS and degradation kinetics of azadirachtin-A in a controlled environment. Characterization of degradation products by HPLC-MS-MS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 378, 753–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tan, Q.G.; Luo, X.D. Meliaceous limonoids: Chemistry and biological activities. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 7437–7522, Erratum in Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 2591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lin, M.; Yang, S.; Huang, J.; Zhou, L. Insecticidal Triterpenes in Meliaceae: Plant Species, Molecules and Activities: Part I (Aphanamixis-Chukrasia). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Priyadarsini, R.V.; Manikandan, P.; Kumar, G.H.; Nagini, S. The neem limonoids azadirachtin and nimbolide inhibit hamster cheek pouch carcinogenesis by modulating xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes, DNA damage, antioxidants, invasion and angiogenesis. Free Rad. Res. 2009, 43, 492–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Harish Kumar, G.; Vidya Priyadarsini, R.; Vinothini, G.; Vidjaya Letchoumy, P.; Nagini, S. The neem limonoids azadirachtin and nimbolide inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in an animal model of oral oncogenesis. Investig. New Drugs 2010, 28, 392–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Nagini, S. Neem limonoids as anticancer agents: Modulation of cancer hallmarks and oncogenic signaling. Enzymes 2014, 36, 131–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jaiswara, P.K.; Kumar, A. Nimbolide retards T cell lymphoma progression by altering apoptosis, glucose metabolism, pH regulation, and ROS homeostasis. Environ. Toxicol. 2022, 37, 1445–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, Y.; Xu, S.; Meng, J.; Li, L. Protective effect of nimbolide against streptozotocin induced gestational diabetes mellitus in rats via alteration of inflammatory reaction, oxidative stress, and gut microbiota. Environ. Toxicol. 2022, 37, 1382–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Smirnova, N.A.; Haskew-Layton, R.E.; Basso, M.; Hushpulian, D.M.; Payappilly, J.B.; Speer, R.E.; Ahn, Y.-H.; Rakhman, I.; Cole, P.A.; Pinto, J.T.; et al. Development of Neh2-Luciferase Reporter and Its Application for High Throughput Screening and Real-Time Monitoring of Nrf2 Activators. Chem. Biol. 2011, 18, 752–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mazumdar, S.; Marar, T.; Devarajan, S.; Patki, J. Functional relevance of Gedunin as a bona fide ligand of NADPH oxidase 5 and ROS scavenger: An in silico and in vitro assessment in a hyperglycemic RBC model. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2021, 25, 100904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Khalid, S.A.; Duddeck, H.; Gonzalez-Sierra, M. Isolation and characterization of an antimalarial agent of the neem tree Azadirachta indica. J. Nat. Prod. 1989, 52, 922–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Al Akeel, R.; Mateen, A.; Janardhan, K.; Gupta, V.C. Analysis of anti-bacterial and anti-oxidative activity of Azadirachta indica bark using various solvents extracts. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 24, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Basir, S.; Shailey, S. Strengthening of antioxidant defense by Azadirachta indica in alloxan-diabetic rat tissues. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 2012, 3, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shori, A.B.; Baba, A.S. Antioxidant activity and inhibition of key enzymes linked to type-2 diabetes and hypertension by Azadirachta indica-yogurt. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2013, 17, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kaur, S.; Sharma, P.; Bains, A.; Chawla, P.; Sridhar, K.; Sharma, M.; Inbaraj, B.S. Antimicrobial and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Low-Energy Assisted Nanohydrogel of Azadirachta indica Oil. Gels 2022, 8, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nikolova, G.; Ananiev, J.; Ivanov, V.; Petkova-Parlapanska, K.; Georgieva, E.; Karamalakova, Y. The Azadirachta indica (Neem) Seed Oil Reduced Chronic Redox-Homeostasis Imbalance in a Mice Experimental Model on Ochratoxine A-Induced Hepatotoxicity. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Manikandan, P.; Anandan, R.; Nagini, S. Evaluation of Azadirachta indica Leaf Fractions for in Vitro Antioxidant Potential and Protective Effects against H2O2-Induced Oxidative Damage to pBR322 DNA and Red Blood Cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 6990–6996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gahukar, R.T. Factors affecting content and bioefficacy of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) phytochemicals used in agricultural pest control: A review. Crop Prot. 2014, 62, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Siddiqui, B.S.; Ali, S.K.; Ali, S.T.; Naqvi, S.N.; Tariq, R.M. Variation of major limonoids in Azadirachta indica fruits at different ripening stages and toxicity against Aedes aegypti. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2009, 4, 473–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ilango, K.; Maharajan, G.; Narasimhan, S. Anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities of Azadirachta indica fruit skin extract and its isolated constituent azadiradione. Nat. Prod. Res. 2013, 27, 1463–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jin, T.; Cao, X.; Gao, Z.; Yan, X.-Q. Azadiradione exerts anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant effects, alleviates dopaminergic neurodegeneration and reduces α-synuclein levels in MPTP-induced mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2019, 18, 2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nelson, V.K.; Ali, A.; Dutta, N.; Ghosh, S.; Jana, M.; Ganguli, A.; Komarov, A.; Paul, S.; Dwivedi, V.; Chatterjee, S.; et al. Azadiradione ameliorates polyglutamine expansion disease in Drosophila by potentiating DNA binding activity of heat shock factor 1. Oncotarget 2016, 29, 78281–78296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Murugan, R.; Rajesh, R.; Guru, A.; Haridevamuthu, B.; Almutairi, B.O.; Almutairi, M.H.; Juliet, A.; Renganayagi, S.; Gopinath, P.; Arockiaraj, J. Deacetylepoxyazadiradione Derived from Epoxyazadiradione of Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) Fruits Mitigates LPS-Induced Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Zebrafish Larvae. Chem. Biodivers. 2022, 19, e202200041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Caruso, F.; Singh, M.; Belli, S.; Berinato, M.; Rossi, M. Interrelated Mechanism by Which the Methide Quinone Celastrol, Obtained from the Roots of Tripterygium wilfordii, Inhibits Main Protease 3CLpro of COVID-19 and Acts as Superoxide Radical Scavenger. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Belli, S.; Rossi, M.; Molasky, N.; Middleton, L.; Caldwell, C.; Bartow-McKenney, C.; Duong, M.; Chiu, J.; Gibbs, E.; Caldwell, A.; et al. Effective and novel application of superoxide radical scavenging by natural phenolic antioxidants. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Delley, B.J. From molecules to solids with the DMol3 approach. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 7756–7764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Perdew, J.P.; Chevary, J.A.; Vosko, S.H.; Jackson, K.A.; Pederson, M.R.; Singh, D.J.; Fiolhais, C. Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. Phys. Rev. 1992, 46, 6671–6687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Becke, A.D. Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098–3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rossi, M.; Caruso, F.; Kwok, L.; Lee, G.; Caruso, A.; Gionfra, F.; Candelotti, E.; Belli, S.; Molasky, N.; Raley-Susman, K.M.; et al. Protection by extra virgin olive oil against oxidative stress in vitro and in vivo. Chemical and biological studies on the health benefits due to a major component of the Mediterranean diet. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0189341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sakib, R.; Caruso, F.; Aktar, S.; Belli, S.; Kaur, S.; Hernandez, M.; Rossi, M. Antioxidant Properties of Thymoquinone, Thymohydroquinone and Black Cumin (Nigella sativa L.) Seed Oil: Scavenging of Superoxide Radical Studied Using Cyclic Voltammetry, DFT and Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Caruso, F.; Berinato, M.; Hernandez, M.; Belli, S.; Smart, C.; Rossi, M. Antioxidant properties of bee propolis and an important component, galangin, described by X-ray crystal structure, DFT-D and hydrodynamic voltammetry. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0267624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gorzynik-Debicka, M.; Przychodzen, P.; Cappello, F.; Kuban-Jankowska, A.; Marino Gammazza, A.; Knap, N.; Wozniak, M.; Gorska-Ponikowska, M. Potential Health Benefits of Olive Oil and Plant Polyphenols. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bilton, J.N.; Broughton, H.B.; Jones, P.S.; Ley, S.V.; Lidert, Z.; Morgan, E.D.; Rzepa, H.Z.; Sheppard, R.N.; Slawin, A.M.Z.; Williams, D.J. An X-ray crystallographic, mass spectroscopic, and NMR-study of the limonoid insect antifeedant azadirachtin and related derivatives. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 2805–2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Alshammari, G.M.; Balakrishnan, A.; Chinnasamy, T. Nimbolide attenuates the lipid accumulation, oxidative stress and antioxidant in primary hepatocytes. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2017, 44, 463–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kumbar, S.B.; Jadaramkunti, U.C.; Aladakatti, R.H. In-vitro effect of nimbolide, an isoprenoid of neem leaf, on antioxidant system of rat cauda epididymal spermatozoa: A dose dependent study. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 2, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sheng, Y.; Abreu, I.A.; Cabelli, D.E.; Maroney, M.J.; Miller, A.F.; Teixeira, M.; Valentine, J.S. Superoxide dismutases and superoxide reductases. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 3854–3918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fan, M.-X.; Chen, G.-L.; Guo, M.-Q. Potential Antioxidative Components in Azadirachta indica Revealed by Bio-Affinity Ultrafiltration with SOD and XOD. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Policar, C.; Bouvet, J.; Bertrand, H.C.; Delsuc, N. SOD mimics: From the tool box of the chemists to cellular studies. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2022, 67, 102109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yu, S.; Caruso, F.; Belli, S.; Rossi, M. Scavenging of Superoxide in Aprotic Solvents of Four Isoflavones That Mimic Superoxide Dismutase. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Caruso, F.; Incerpi, S.; Pedersen, J.; Belli, S.; Kaur, S.; Rossi, M. Aromatic Polyphenol π-π Interactions with Superoxide Radicals Contribute to Radical Scavenging and Can Make Polyphenols Mimic Superoxide Dismutase Activity. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44, 5209–5220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zarepour, M.; Kaspari, K.; Stagge, S.; Rethmeier, R.; Mendel, R.R.; Bittner, F. Xanthine dehydrogenase AtXDH1 from Arabidopsis thaliana is a potent producer of superoxide anions via its NADH oxidase activity. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2010, 72, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Barthomeuf, C.M.; Debiton, E.; Barbakade, V.V.; Kemertelidze, E.P. Evaluation of the dietetic and therapeutic potential of a high molecular weight hydroxycinnamate-derived polymer from Symphytum asperum Lepech. Regarding its antioxidant, antilipoperoxidant, antiinflammatory, and cytotoxic properties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 3942–3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomedicines 11 03091 g001
Figure 1. Azadiradione molecular structure.
Figure 1. Azadiradione molecular structure.
Biomedicines 11 03091 g001
Biomedicines 11 03091 g002
Figure 2. RRDE data for neem oil. The bottom part (negative current) shows the formation of superoxide detected at the disk electrode; the top (positive current) shows that the superoxide detected at the ring electrode decreases after adding neem oil aliquots.
Figure 2. RRDE data for neem oil. The bottom part (negative current) shows the formation of superoxide detected at the disk electrode; the top (positive current) shows that the superoxide detected at the ring electrode decreases after adding neem oil aliquots.
Biomedicines 11 03091 g002
Biomedicines 11 03091 g003
Figure 3. Collection efficiency of RRDE neem oil. The ring current/disk current (% Efficiency) at each concentration vs. added amount of neem oil shows a decreasing trend.
Figure 3. Collection efficiency of RRDE neem oil. The ring current/disk current (% Efficiency) at each concentration vs. added amount of neem oil shows a decreasing trend.
Biomedicines 11 03091 g003
Biomedicines 11 03091 g004
Figure 4. Collection efficiency of neem oil, limited to the first four data points, shows the linear trend y = −2.271x + 20.469, R2 = 0.9966.
Figure 4. Collection efficiency of neem oil, limited to the first four data points, shows the linear trend y = −2.271x + 20.469, R2 = 0.9966.
Biomedicines 11 03091 g004
Biomedicines 11 03091 g005
Figure 5. Azadiradione was DFT-minimized, and a proton was placed through van der separation forces using the O(carbonyl) associated with the cyclohexene ring, 2.60 Å.
Figure 5. Azadiradione was DFT-minimized, and a proton was placed through van der separation forces using the O(carbonyl) associated with the cyclohexene ring, 2.60 Å.
Biomedicines 11 03091 g005
Biomedicines 11 03091 g006
Figure 6. Upon DFT minimization of the azadiradione, as shown in Figure 5, the O(carbonyl) captures the added proton without any energy barrier, with an O-H bond distance of 0.970 Å, while the associated C-O bond becomes longer, at 1.365 Å, compared to the other C=O carbonyl, 1.227 Å.
Figure 6. Upon DFT minimization of the azadiradione, as shown in Figure 5, the O(carbonyl) captures the added proton without any energy barrier, with an O-H bond distance of 0.970 Å, while the associated C-O bond becomes longer, at 1.365 Å, compared to the other C=O carbonyl, 1.227 Å.
Biomedicines 11 03091 g006
Biomedicines 11 03091 g007
Figure 7. Near the proton added to azadiradione in Figure 6, a superoxide radical (O-O bond distance 1.373 Å) is initially placed through van der Waals forces, 2.60 Å apart (not shown). Upon DFT minimization, the proton becomes linked to superoxide, forming a HO2 species, which results in its detachment from the remaining azadiradione neutral radical, O---H distance = 1.624 Å.
Figure 7. Near the proton added to azadiradione in Figure 6, a superoxide radical (O-O bond distance 1.373 Å) is initially placed through van der Waals forces, 2.60 Å apart (not shown). Upon DFT minimization, the proton becomes linked to superoxide, forming a HO2 species, which results in its detachment from the remaining azadiradione neutral radical, O---H distance = 1.624 Å.
Biomedicines 11 03091 g007
Biomedicines 11 03091 g008
Figure 8. A second proton is initially placed near the more exposed oxygen atom in HO2, 2.60 Å (not shown), making the whole arrangement a 1+ charged radical system (from 2 protons plus the reacted negative superoxide). Upon DFT optimization, H2O2 forms and detaches from the organic moiety, 1.572 Å, with the adjacent carbonyl having an only slightly longer CO bond length, 1.250 Å, than the carbonyl at the opposite end of the molecule, 1.220 Å.
Figure 8. A second proton is initially placed near the more exposed oxygen atom in HO2, 2.60 Å (not shown), making the whole arrangement a 1+ charged radical system (from 2 protons plus the reacted negative superoxide). Upon DFT optimization, H2O2 forms and detaches from the organic moiety, 1.572 Å, with the adjacent carbonyl having an only slightly longer CO bond length, 1.250 Å, than the carbonyl at the opposite end of the molecule, 1.220 Å.
Biomedicines 11 03091 g008
Biomedicines 11 03091 g009
Figure 9. To the arrangement shown in Figure 8, a 2nd superoxide radical was π-π-posed at the van der Waals separation, 3.50 Å from the center of the ring, making the system neutral and non-radical (not shown). After DFT optimization, the superoxide donated its unpaired electron to the ring, forming a molecule of O2 (O-O bond 1.269 Å, much shorter than the 1.373 Å distance in the superoxide) that then detached from azadiradione, 3.791 Å. Meanwhile, the separation distance of H2O2 from azadiradione increased, 1.685 Å. Thus, after the reaction of azadiradione with two superoxide radicals (Figure 7 and Figure 9) and two protons (Figure 6 and Figure 8), azadiradione is reformed and becomes ready for an additional cycle of superoxide radical scavenging. The reaction products are H2O2 (Figure 7) and O2 (Figure 9). Scheme 1 displays the whole process.
Figure 9. To the arrangement shown in Figure 8, a 2nd superoxide radical was π-π-posed at the van der Waals separation, 3.50 Å from the center of the ring, making the system neutral and non-radical (not shown). After DFT optimization, the superoxide donated its unpaired electron to the ring, forming a molecule of O2 (O-O bond 1.269 Å, much shorter than the 1.373 Å distance in the superoxide) that then detached from azadiradione, 3.791 Å. Meanwhile, the separation distance of H2O2 from azadiradione increased, 1.685 Å. Thus, after the reaction of azadiradione with two superoxide radicals (Figure 7 and Figure 9) and two protons (Figure 6 and Figure 8), azadiradione is reformed and becomes ready for an additional cycle of superoxide radical scavenging. The reaction products are H2O2 (Figure 7) and O2 (Figure 9). Scheme 1 displays the whole process.
Biomedicines 11 03091 g009
Biomedicines 11 03091 sch001
Scheme 1. Azadiradione scavenging of superoxide follows the same pattern as the superoxide dismutase enzyme, Reaction (3). No energy barriers were observed for all reactions. In the first step, the initially van-der-Waals-separated proton and O(carbonyl) are established, and upon DFT geometry optimization, the corresponding ΔGreaction is −552.3 kcal/mol (top). Next, a green-colored superoxide is placed (van-der-Waals-separated to join the previously added proton), and C=O-H-O2 is established (ΔG = −1362.5 kcal/mol) (center right). To the center right species, a second (turquoise-colored) proton is placed by the most exposed O atom in the O2-H-O-C moiety, and applying DFT minimization, the H2O2 moiety forms and slightly detaches from O(carbonyl), ΔG = −117.3 kcal/mol (center left). Next, a second (pink-colored) superoxide is π-π-attached to the cyclohexene ring (bottom left), and upon DFT minimization, the superoxide transfers its unpaired electron to the ring, and O2 is eliminated along with the previously formed H2O2, ΔG = −17.3 kcal/mol. Thus, the final products are indicated, including reformed azadiradione, ready to start another catalytic cycle (bottom right).
Scheme 1. Azadiradione scavenging of superoxide follows the same pattern as the superoxide dismutase enzyme, Reaction (3). No energy barriers were observed for all reactions. In the first step, the initially van-der-Waals-separated proton and O(carbonyl) are established, and upon DFT geometry optimization, the corresponding ΔGreaction is −552.3 kcal/mol (top). Next, a green-colored superoxide is placed (van-der-Waals-separated to join the previously added proton), and C=O-H-O2 is established (ΔG = −1362.5 kcal/mol) (center right). To the center right species, a second (turquoise-colored) proton is placed by the most exposed O atom in the O2-H-O-C moiety, and applying DFT minimization, the H2O2 moiety forms and slightly detaches from O(carbonyl), ΔG = −117.3 kcal/mol (center left). Next, a second (pink-colored) superoxide is π-π-attached to the cyclohexene ring (bottom left), and upon DFT minimization, the superoxide transfers its unpaired electron to the ring, and O2 is eliminated along with the previously formed H2O2, ΔG = −17.3 kcal/mol. Thus, the final products are indicated, including reformed azadiradione, ready to start another catalytic cycle (bottom right).
Biomedicines 11 03091 sch001
Biomedicines 11 03091 g010
Figure 10. Molecular structures of tetracyclic terpenoid neem oil compounds closely related to azadiradione, e.g., containing the cyclohexene-carbonyl moiety: azadirone (A), epoxyazadiradione (B), gedunin (C), nimbolide (D) and zafaral (E).
Figure 10. Molecular structures of tetracyclic terpenoid neem oil compounds closely related to azadiradione, e.g., containing the cyclohexene-carbonyl moiety: azadirone (A), epoxyazadiradione (B), gedunin (C), nimbolide (D) and zafaral (E).
Biomedicines 11 03091 g010
Table 1. Comparison of slopes of the plant products studied in this work and other natural products analyzed with the RRDE method.
Table 1. Comparison of slopes of the plant products studied in this work and other natural products analyzed with the RRDE method.
Olive Oil [42]Black Seed Oil [43]Propolis [44]Neem Oil
−0.0838−0.078−0.0864−2.271
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sakib, R.; Caruso, F.; Belli, S.; Rossi, M. Azadiradione, a Component of Neem Oil, Behaves as a Superoxide Dismutase Mimic When Scavenging the Superoxide Radical, as Shown Using DFT and Hydrodynamic Voltammetry. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11113091

AMA Style

Sakib R, Caruso F, Belli S, Rossi M. Azadiradione, a Component of Neem Oil, Behaves as a Superoxide Dismutase Mimic When Scavenging the Superoxide Radical, as Shown Using DFT and Hydrodynamic Voltammetry. Biomedicines. 2023; 11(11):3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11113091

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sakib, Raiyan, Francesco Caruso, Stuart Belli, and Miriam Rossi. 2023. "Azadiradione, a Component of Neem Oil, Behaves as a Superoxide Dismutase Mimic When Scavenging the Superoxide Radical, as Shown Using DFT and Hydrodynamic Voltammetry" Biomedicines 11, no. 11: 3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11113091

APA Style

Sakib, R., Caruso, F., Belli, S., & Rossi, M. (2023). Azadiradione, a Component of Neem Oil, Behaves as a Superoxide Dismutase Mimic When Scavenging the Superoxide Radical, as Shown Using DFT and Hydrodynamic Voltammetry. Biomedicines, 11(11), 3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11113091

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop