Next Article in Journal
The Extracellular MicroRNAs on Inflammation: A Literature Review of Rodent Studies
Next Article in Special Issue
Plasmacytoma Variant Translocation 1 (PVT1) Gene as a Potential Novel Target for the Treatment of Diabetic Nephropathy
Previous Article in Journal
N-3 PUFA Ameliorates the Gut Microbiota, Bile Acid Profiles, and Neuropsychiatric Behaviours in a Rat Model of Geriatric Depression
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

High Oxytocin Receptor Expression Linked to Increased Cell Migration and Reduced Survival in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Biomedicines 2022, 10(7), 1595; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071595
by Huiping Liu 1,2 and Markus Muttenthaler 1,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Biomedicines 2022, 10(7), 1595; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071595
Submission received: 11 May 2022 / Revised: 28 June 2022 / Accepted: 1 July 2022 / Published: 5 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Drug Discovery)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Liu et al.  biomedicines-1744433" High oxytocin receptor expression linked to increased cell migration and reduced survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer" is a valuable review paper that shows EGF induces ERK1/2-RSK activation via both EGFR and OTR in OTR-overexpressing MDA-MB-231 cells. Also, the authors show that the mTOR pathway is involved in EGF-stimulated rpS6 activation, independent of ERK1/2 activation. However, one point was difficult for the reviewer to understand. The reviewer hopes that providing more information (described below) will help improve this study's quality. 

 

As shown in Figure 5, the Authors indicate that Phosphorylated ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2), RSK 403 (p-RSK), and rpS6 (p-rpS6) increased in OTR-overexpressing MDA-405 MB-231 by treatment of EGF. In this part, the reviewer thought about the possibility of increasing EGFR in OTR-overexpressing MDA-405 MB-231. Does the expression of EGFR not change between OTR-overexpressing and control cells? The reviewer thinks that the authors should indicate this point.

 

Minor comment

The panels in Figure 5 are too small to read the text in the panels. Therefore, the reviewer thinks that figures should be resized to make them easier to read. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is well written and the results are extensively commented. The authors gave new insights on the role of oxytocin as promoter of metastasis in TNBC, increasing the clinical relevance for personalized treatment.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The current manuscript explores the expression of oxytocin receptor (OTR) on the migration of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). OTR was selected by Genevestigator, and further evaluated by MDA-MB-231 cell line, the authors observe that OTR was associated with cancer metastasis through EGF-mediated ERK1/2-RSK-rpS6 pathway.

 

Major comments:

 

The introduction can be slightly expanded, and transitions between sections smoother. (1)Discuss 5-year relative survival rate of female breast cancer patients (2) Provide more information on the signaling pathway of migration in cancers.

 

M & M: (1) To illustrate how to grouping and evaluate the differentially expressed gene by Genevestigator. (2) Simplify common experimental methods.

 

Results: (1) To reduce artificial bios and increase data reliability, it is recommended that experiment Fig 2D and 2E should be done at the same time. (2) it is recommend to evaluate EGFR and the signaling in “T2” and “T4” cell line.

 

Discussion: (1) Please further discuss the signaling pathway between EGF and OTR. More and more evidences reveal that the 2 receptors are associated in breast cancer. Therefore, please insert in Bibliography more recent references. (2) Please discuss any study limitations.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The second revised paper seems to be improved well and should be worth publishing in this journal.

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript is ready for publication after revision.

Back to TopTop