Next Article in Journal
What Do We Have to Know about PD-L1 Expression in Prostate Cancer? A Systematic Literature Review (Part 6): Correlation of PD-L1 Expression with the Status of Mismatch Repair System, BRCA, PTEN, and Other Genes
Next Article in Special Issue
Poxviruses Bearing DNA Polymerase Mutations Show Complex Patterns of Cross-Resistance
Previous Article in Journal
Decreased SLC27A5 Suppresses Lipid Synthesis and Tyrosine Metabolism to Activate the Cell Cycle in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Orf Virus D1701-VrV-Based Dengue Virus (DENV) Vaccine Candidate Expressing HLA-Specific T Cell Epitopes: A Proof-of-Concept Study
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Small Hero with Great Powers: Vaccinia Virus E3 Protein and Evasion of the Type I IFN Response

Biomedicines 2022, 10(2), 235; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10020235
by Mateusz Szczerba 1, Sambhavi Subramanian 1,2,3, Kelly Trainor 1,4, Megan McCaughan 1,2, Karen V. Kibler 1 and Bertram L. Jacobs 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Biomedicines 2022, 10(2), 235; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10020235
Submission received: 16 December 2021 / Revised: 12 January 2022 / Accepted: 15 January 2022 / Published: 22 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Poxviruses: From Pathophysiology to Novel Therapeutic Approaches)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 

This manuscript by Szczerba et al. presents a comprehensive review of the various roles the protein (E3) encoded in the vaccinia virus E3L gene plays in modulating the type I interferon response to the virus’ advantage. The review is well structured and well written.

Just one minor comment: It is now more conventional to italicize the name of viral genes. In line with this norm, the authors should italicize E3L in the body of the review wherever it was used in reference to the gene encoding the vaccinia E3 protein.   

Author Response

Thank you for your review and comments.  Responses are in the attached file.

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have widely covered topics on vaccinia virus E3 protein and evasion of the type I IFN response. This manuscript presents vital points regarding 
- E3 protein and its mutants 
- Mechanism of inhibition of IFNs activation by E3 protein
- Role of the ZBP1 in pathogenesis

Comments:

  1. Are Figures 4&5 and supplementary gel images are based on the previously published data?  Kindly explain 
  2. Expansion for ZBP1? z-DNA binding protein 1? (line#89)
  3. Line#325: viruses here, not viral system
  4. Line#452-454: instead of these lines, the authors can convey their own ideas and possible future out comes here. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for your review and comments.  Responses are in the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

This is  well written review describing the various ways the vaccinia virus (VACV) E3 protein inhibits the interferon response induced upon viral infection. Most of the research in this area has been conducted by the authors’ own laboratory with various collaborators. Their research has identified two major domains of the E3 protein (N-terminal and C-terminal) that display distinct mechanisms of interference with the interferon response relying either on binding to dsRNA or binding to ZRNA, a recently discovered feature of the E3 protein. They have further demonstrated that the ZRNA binding component is responsible for VACV inhibition of necroptosis and their review highlights how this process occurs through the protein mediators of the necroptosis pathway. Finally, the authors point out a few areas where further research into our understanding of viral-induced necroptosis and the role of the E3 protein is needed. I have only one comment concerning the figures. If any figure appears in a previous publication its origin should be referenced. I gather that figure 5 presents data not previously published so this should be mentioned in the manuscript. Figure 5D is not very convincing since there appears to be no striking difference in RIPK3 and ZBP1 between the mutant virus E3L∆83N and wt VACV.      

Author Response

Thank you for your review and comments.  Responses are in the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop