Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia
AbstractTax amnesty programs are often used by governments to improve tax compliance and to increase tax revenue. However, the policy choice to provide a tax amnesty often results in adverse consequences, including the violation of other legal rules. For this reason, the policy choice to offer a tax amnesty (‘tax amnesty policy’) is often controversial. The tax amnesty policy and resulting program offered by the Government of Indonesia has been criticized both because it is considered to be unfair and because it favors the perpetrators of tax evasion. In particular, the tax amnesty law offered special treatment to taxpayers who participated in the program, such as no checking of the source of funds, no checking of the financial statements reported by law enforcers, protection from punishment on the financial reports provided to the Director General of Taxation, and the requirement to pay only a small penalty. Tax amnesty programs also provide the potential for money laundering. This is certainly the case in Indonesia. In addition, tax amnesty programs weaken law enforcement in Indonesia; in particular, in the areas of corruption and money laundering. This is because law enforcement officers cannot investigate the perpetrators of white-collar crime that benefit from the tax amnesty program. Under the terms of the tax amnesty program, the financial data is not accessible by them. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Said, E.W. Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia. Laws 2017, 6, 16.
Said EW. Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia. Laws. 2017; 6(4):16.Chicago/Turabian Style
Said, Emmiryzan W. 2017. "Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia." Laws 6, no. 4: 16.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.