Next Article in Journal
USP Marion: A Few Prisoners Summon the Courage to Speak
Previous Article in Journal
The Electronic Monitoring Paradigm: A Proposal for Transforming Criminal Justice in the USA
Open AccessArticle

The Uneasy Marriage between Law and Equality

Faculty of Law, University of Groningen, Postbus 716, 9700 AS Groningen, The Netherlands
Academic Editor: Robert Johnson
Laws 2015, 4(1), 82-90; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws4010082
Received: 3 November 2014 / Revised: 18 November 2014 / Accepted: 19 January 2015 / Published: 2 February 2015
There are two ways in which the social ideal of equality has found expression in the law: in the principle of equal treatment and in the principle of non-discrimination. In this article the meaning of these two legal principles is analysed, in order to answer the question to what extent they can be said to contribute to equality in the sense of an equal distribution of collective resources. It is argued that whereas the first just requires decision-making to be rule-based, the second principle demands that rules should be based on sound categorical distinctions. Neither of the two can, however, sensibly be linked to equality as equal distribution. The article concludes that the only way to establish such a link is by adding to the principle of non-discrimination “financial resources” as a suspect ground. View Full-Text
Keywords: principle of differential treatment; principle of equality; principle of equal treatment; principle of non-discrimination; right to equality principle of differential treatment; principle of equality; principle of equal treatment; principle of non-discrimination; right to equality
MDPI and ACS Style

Westerman, P.C. The Uneasy Marriage between Law and Equality. Laws 2015, 4, 82-90.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop