Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Does Avoiding Judicial Isolation Outweigh the Risks Related to “Professional Death by Facebook”?
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Cyberbullying at Work: In Search of Effective Guidance
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Laws 2014, 3(3), 618-635;

Students vs. Jurors: Responding to Enhanced Video Technology

Department of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK
Justice Research Group, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1979, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
School of Psychology and Australian Graduate School of Policing and Security, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 168, Manly, NSW 1655, Australia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 April 2014 / Revised: 16 August 2014 / Accepted: 28 August 2014 / Published: 9 September 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Technology, Social Media and Law)
Full-Text   |   PDF [263 KB, uploaded 9 September 2014]


This study investigated the influence of visual media technologies used in remote witness testimony, examining whether it is suitable to use students as mock jurors when measuring the impact of new technologies. A 2 × 2 mixed factorial design explored how student status impacted ratings of the quality of the technology and remote witness facilities. A sample of 79 students and non-empanelled jurors from the Victorian Metropolitan County Court viewed direct questioning of four lay witnesses who testified from a remote location via standard or enhanced video technology. Students differed significantly from jurors in their attitudes towards media and technology. In responding to technology enhancements, students were similar in rating changes in the quality of the technology, but differed significantly in how they rated changes to the design of remote witness facilities. Students were thus a suitable sample to measure the effect of technological change in court on perceptions of technology, but not on perceptions of design. We conclude by stressing such technology enhancements can improve the quality of experience for all jurors. View Full-Text
Keywords: mock-juries; remote testimonies; court technology; witness evidence mock-juries; remote testimonies; court technology; witness evidence
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Rossner, M.; Tait, D.; Goodman-Delahunty, J. Students vs. Jurors: Responding to Enhanced Video Technology. Laws 2014, 3, 618-635.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Laws EISSN 2075-471X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top