Practitioner Rehabilitation following Professional Misconduct: A Common Practice Now in Need of a Theory?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Benefits of Rehabilitation
3. Rehabilitation Theory Examples
3.1. Theories of Rehabilitation in Health Settings
3.1.1. Person-Centred Rehabilitation
3.1.2. Common Sense Model (CSM)
3.2. Theories of Rehabilitation in Justice Contexts
3.2.1. Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR)
3.2.2. Restorative Justice
3.2.3. Good Lives Model
3.2.4. Therapeutic Jurisprudence
“The study of the role of law as a therapeutic agent. It is an interdisciplinary approach designed to produce scholarship that is particularly useful for law reform. (It) proposes the exploration of ways in which, consistent with principles of justice, the knowledge, theories and insights of the mental health and related disciplines can help shape the development of the law.”
Psychological Jurisprudence
4. Why Is a Professional Misconduct Rehabilitation Theory Needed, and What Might Be Important in That Theory?
Requirements of a Professional Misconduct Rehabilitation Theory
5. Conclusions
“In sum, tribunals appear inclined to look behind the labels used in the charges brought before them to evaluate the rehabilitative potential of the doctor concerned. Research into professional misconduct must therefore do the same if it is to reach the aspects of clinicians’ behaviour that drive regulators’ deepest public-safety concerns and shape their calculus around sanctions.”(p. 1032)
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Acosta, David, and David R. Karp. 2018. Restorative Justice as the Rx for Mistreatment in Academic Medicine: Applications to Consider for Learners, Faculty, and Staff. Academic Medicine 93: 354–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anderson, Valerie R. 2016. Introduction to mixed methods approaches. In Handbook of Methodological Approaches to Community-Based Research: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods. Edited by Leonard A. Jason and David S. Glenwick. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 233–41. ISBN 978-0-19-024365-4. [Google Scholar]
- Andrews, Don A., and Craig Dowden. 2007. The Risk-Need-Responsivity model of assessment and human service in prevention and corrections: Rehabilitative jurisprudence. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 49: 439–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arrigo, Bruce A. 2004. The Ethics of Therapeutic Jurisprudence: A Critical and Theoretical Enquiry of Law, Psychology and Crime. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 11: 23–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arrigo, Bruce A. 2013. Managing risk and marginalizing identities: On the society-of-captives thesis and the harm of social dis-ease. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 57: 672–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arrigo, Bruce A. 2015. Psychological jurisprudence, normative philosophy, and trans-desistance theory. Criminal Justice and Behaviour 42: 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Best, David W., and Dan I. Lubman. 2012. The recovery paradigm: A model of hope and change for alcohol and drug addiction. Australian Family Physician 41: 593–97. [Google Scholar]
- Bloom, Tina, and Gay A. Bradshaw. 2021. Inside of a prison: How a culture of punishment prevents rehabilitation. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 28: 140–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonta, James, and Don Andrews. 2007. Risk-Need-Responsivity Model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Rehabilitation 6: 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Braithwaite, John. 1989. Crime, Shame and Reintegration. New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Brogan, Leah, Emily Haney-Caron, Amanda NeMoyer, and David Dematteo. 2015. Applying the Risks-Needs-Responsivity (RNR) model in juvenile justice. Criminal Justice Review 40: 277–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brookbanks, Warren, ed. 2015. Therapeutic Jurisprudence: New Zealand Perspectives. Wellington: Thomson Reuters. [Google Scholar]
- Browne, Julie, Alison Bullock, Chiara Poletti, and Dorottya Cserző. 2021. Recent research into healthcare professions regulation: A rapid evidence assessment. BMC Health Services Research 21: 934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cannon, Mareaux, Maecus Crede, Justin M. Kimber, Alexandria Brunkow, Rrebecca Nelson, and Lisa M. McAndrew. 2022. The common-sense model and mental illness outcomes: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 29: 1186–202. [Google Scholar]
- Carver, Charles S., Michael F. Scheier, and Christina Pozo. 1992. Conceptualizing the process of coping with health problems. In Hostility, Coping, and Health. Edited by H. S. Friedman. Washington, DC: APA, pp. 167–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crewe, Don. 2013. Beyond Accommodation: The Socio-Cultural Origins of Law, Transgression and Deviance. London: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
- Day, Andrew, Armon Tamatea, and Lynore Geia. 2019. Scientific inquiry and offender rehabilitation: The importance of epistemic and prudential values. Psychology, Crime & Law 25: 577–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dempster, Martin, Doris Howell, and Noleen K. McCorry. 2015. Illness perceptions and coping in physical health conditions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 79: 506–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Diesfeld, Kate, and Ian Freckelton, eds. 2003. Involuntary Detention and Therapeutic Jurisprudence: International Perspectives on Civil Commitment. Aldershot: Ashgate. [Google Scholar]
- Dowden, Craig, and Don A. Andrews. 2000. Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: A meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology 42: 449–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunn, Dana S., and Timothy R. Elliott. 2008. The place and promise of theory in rehabilitation psychology research. Rehabilitation Psychology 53: 254–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Elkin, Katie, Matthew J. Spittal, David Elkin, and David M. Studdert. 2012. Removal of doctors from practice for professional misconduct in Australia and New Zealand. BMJ Quality and Safety 21: 1027–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fernandes, Júlio B., Diana Varetea, Sónia Fernandes, Ana S. Almeida, Dina Peças, Noélia Ferreira, and Liliana Roldão. 2022. Rehabilitation workforce challenges to implement Person-Centered Care. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19: 3199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freckelton, Ian. 2008a. Therapeutic jurisprudence misunderstood and misrepresented: Price and risks of influence. Thomas Jefferson Law Review 30: 575–96. [Google Scholar]
- Freckelton, Ian. 2008b. Trends in regulation of mental health practitioners. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 15: 415–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldberg, Susan. 2011. Problem-Solving in Canada’s Courtrooms: A Guide to Therapeutic Justice. Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Ottawa: National Judicial Institute, p. 3. Available online: https://www.nji-inm.ca/index.cfm/publications/problem-solving-in-canada-s-courtrooms-a-guide-to-therapeutic-justice-2nd-edition/?langSwitch=enGoldberg (accessed on 7 February 2023).
- Grenyer, Brin F. S., and Kate L. Lewis. 2012. Prevalence, prediction, and prevention of psychologist misconduct. Australasian Psychologist 47: 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffin, Brandon J., Everett L. Worthington, Caroline R. Lavelock, Nathaniel G. Wade, and William T. Hoyt. 2015. Forgiveness and mental health. In Forgiveness and Health: Scientific Evidence and Theories Relating Forgiveness to Better Health. Edited by Loren L. Toussaint, Everett L. Worthington and David R. Williams. New York: Springer Science + Business Media, pp. 77–90. Available online: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/978-94-017-9993-5_6 (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- Hadley, Michael L. 2001. The Spiritual Roots of Restorative Justice. Albany: State University of New York Press. [Google Scholar]
- Hagger, Martin S., Severine Koch, Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis, and Sheina Orbell. 2017. The common sense model of self-regulation: Meta-analysis and test of a process model. Psychological Bulletin 143: 1117–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Haller, Linda. 2012. Restorative lawyer discipline in Australia. Nevada Law Journal 12: 316–332. [Google Scholar]
- Hass-Wisecup, Aida, and Caryn Saxon. 2018. Restorative Justice: Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice. Durham: Carolina Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- Health Innovation Network–South London. 2016. What Is Person-Centred Care and Why Is It Important? London: Health Innovation Network–South London. [Google Scholar]
- Jesus, Tiago S., Christina Papadimitriou, Felicity A. Bright, Nicola M. Kayes, Cátia S. Pinho, and Cheryl A. Cott. 2022. Person-centred rehabilitation model: Framing the concept and practice of person-centred adult physical rehabilitation based on a scoping review and thematic analysis of the literature. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 103: 106–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jesus, Tiago S., Felicity Bright, Nicola Kayes, and Cheryl A. Cott. 2016. Person-centred rehabilitation: What exactly does it mean? Protocol for a scoping review with thematic analysis towards framing the concept and practice of person-centred rehabilitation. BMJ Open 6: e011959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jones, Emma Jane. 2021. The rule of lawyers: Applying therapeutic jurisprudence at the intersections of wellbeing, disciplinary proceedings and professionalism. European Journal of Current Legal Issues 25. Available online: http://webjcli.org/index.php/webjcli/article/view/730 (accessed on 6 June 2023).
- Kawalek, Anna. 2020. A tool for measuring therapeutic jurisprudence values during empirical research. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry 71: 101581. [Google Scholar]
- Kayes, Nicola M., and Kathryn M. McPherson. 2010. Measuring what matters: Does ‘objectivity’ mean good science? Disability and Rehabilitation 32: 1011–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiel, Helen. 2017. Doctors with conditions—Rehabilitation or risk. Journal of Law and Medicine 25: 62–76. [Google Scholar]
- Koss, Mary P., Jay K. Wilgus, and Kaaren M. Williamsen. 2014. Campus sexual misconduct: Restorative justice approaches to enhance compliance with Title IX guidance. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse 15: 242–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Langlands, Robyn, Tony Ward, and Elizabeth Gilchrist. 2009. Applying the Good Lives Model to male perpetrators of domestic violence. Behavior Change 26: 113–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leventhal, Howard, Ian Brissette, and Elaine A. Leventhal. 2003. The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness. In The Self-Regulation of Health and Illness Behaviour. Edited by Linda D. Cameron and Howard Leventhal. London: Routledge, pp. 42–65. [Google Scholar]
- Looman, Jan, and Jeffrey Abracen. 2013. The risk need responsivity model of offender rehabilitation: Is there really a need for a paradigm shift? International Journal of Behavioral and Consultation Therapy 8: 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mallion, Jaimee S., Jane L. Wood, and Andrea Mallion. 2020. Systematic review of ‘Good Lives’ assumptions and interventions. Aggression and Violent Behavior 55: 101510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marinos, Voula, and Lisa Whittingham. 2019. The role of therapeutic jurisprudence to support persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the courtroom: Reflections from Ontario, Canada. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry 63: 18–25. [Google Scholar]
- Marshall, Tony F. 1999. Restorative Justice: An Overview. Available online: http://www.antoniocasella.eu/restorative/Marshall_1999-b.pdf (accessed on 6 June 2023).
- McCarthy, Bernard, Dympna Casey, Declan Devane, Kathy Murphey, Edel Murphy, and Yves Lacasse. 2015. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015: CD003793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McCold, Paul, and Ted Wachtel. 2002. Restorative justice theory validation. In Restorative Justice: Theoretical Foundations. Edited by Elmar Weitekamp and Hans-Jürgen Kerner. Devon: Willan Publishing, pp. 110–42. [Google Scholar]
- McPherson, Kathryn, Barbara E. Gibson, and Alain Leplège. 2015. Rethinking rehabilitation: Theory, practice history—And the future. In Rethinking Rehabilitation: Theory and Practice. Edited by Kathryn McPherson, Barbara E. Gibson and Alain Leplège. London: CRC Press, pp. 3–20. [Google Scholar]
- McPherson, Kathryn, William J. Taylor, and Alain Leplège. 2010. Rehabilitation outcomes: Values, methodologies and applications. Disability and Rehabilitation 32: 961–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 2007. Restorative Justice: What Is It and Does It Work? Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3: 161–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mescall, Devan, Fred Phillips, and Regan N. Schmidt. 2017. Does the accounting profession discipline its members differently after public scrutiny? Journal of Business Ethics 142: 285–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, Anita. 2017. Settlement of Complaints by Conciliation. Available online: https://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10063/7962/paper_access.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed on 11 May 2023).
- Paterson, Ron. 2017. Independent Review of the Use of Chaperones to Protect Patients in Australia; Report Commissioned by Medical Board of Australia and Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA). Available online: https://www.nhpo.gov.au/chaperone-review (accessed on 7 January 2023).
- Pavlacic, Jeffrey M., Karen K. Kellum, and Stefan E. Schulenberg. 2022. Advocating for the use of restorative justice practices: Examining the overlap between restorative justice and behavior analysis. Behavior Analysis Practice 15: 1237–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perlin, Michael L. 2008. ‘Baby, Look Inside Your Mirror’: The legal profession’s willful and sanist blindness to lawyers with mental disabilities. University of Pittsburg Law Review 69: 589–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Perlin, Michael L. 2019. Changing of the Guards: David Wexler, Therapeutic jurisprudence and the transformation of legal scholarship. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry 63: 3–7. [Google Scholar]
- Perry, Amanda E., Marrissa Martyn-St James, Lucy Burns, Catherine Hewitt, Julie M. Glanville, Anne Aboaja, Pratish Thakker, Keshava Kumar, Caroline Pearson, Kath Wright, and et al. 2019. Interventions for female drug-using offenders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 12: CD010910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peters, Susan E., Bhavana Jha, and Mark Ross. 2021. Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1: CD012479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Polaschek, Devon L. 2012. An appraisal of the risk–need–responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and its application in correctional treatment. Legal and Criminological Psychology 17: 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polizzi, David, and Matthew Draper. 2015. Forensic Psychology Reconsidered: A Critique of Mental Illness and the Courts. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Polizzi, David, Michael Braswell, and Matthew Draper, eds. 2014. Transforming Corrections: Humanistic Approaches to Corrections and Offender Treatment, 2nd ed. Durham: Carolina Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- Presser, Lois, and Sveinung Sandberg, eds. 2015. Narrative Criminology: Understanding Stories of Crime. New York: NYU Press, vol. 17. [Google Scholar]
- Robinson, Paul H. 2003. The virtues of restorative processes, the vices of “restorative justice”. Utah Law Review 2003: 375–88. [Google Scholar]
- Scholl, Isabelle, Jördis M. Zill, Martin Härter, and Jörg Dirmaier. 2014. How do health services researchers understand the concept of patient-centeredness? Results from an expert survey. Patient Preference and Adherence 30: 1153–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sellers, Brian G., and Bruce A. Arrigo. 2022. The narrative framework of psychological jurisprudence: Virtue ethics as criminal justice practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior 63: 101671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siegert, Richard J., Tony Ward, and E. Diane Playford. 2010. Human rights and rehabilitation outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation 32: 965–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siegert, Richard J., Tony Ward, William M. M. Levack, and Kathryn M. McPherson. 2007. A Good Lives Model of clinical and community rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation 29: 1604–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slobogin, Christopher. 1995. Therapeutic jurisprudence: Five dilemmas to ponder. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 1: 193–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snell, Deborah L., E. Jean C. Hay-Smith, Lois J. Surgenor, and Richard J. Siegert. 2013. Examination of outcome after mild traumatic brain injury: The contribution of injury beliefs and Leventhal’s Common Sense Model. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 23: 333–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stemwedel, Janet D. 2014. Life after misconduct: Promoting rehabilitation while minimising damage. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 14: 177–80. [Google Scholar]
- Strauss-Hughes, Annalisa, Tony Ward, and Tia Neha. 2022. Considering practice frameworks for culturally diverse populations in the correctional domains. Aggression and Violent Behavior 63: 101673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surgenor, Lois J., and Kate Diesfeld. 2018. Outcomes of notifications against psychologists in the New Zealand health context. Journal of Law and Medicine 25: 800–15. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Surgenor, Lois J., Kate Diesfeld, Kate Kersey, Olivia Kelly, and Marta Rychert. 2020. Fifteen years on: What patterns continue to emerge from New Zealand’s Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal? Journal of Law and Medicine 28: 165–78. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Suzuki, Masahiro, and Tamera Jenkins. 2022. The role of (self-) forgiveness in restorative justice: Linking restorative justice to desistance. European Journal of Criminology 19: 202–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syauf, Ahmad, Diana Haiti, and Mursidah Mursidah. 2020. Application of restorative justice values in the settlement of medical malpractice cases. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 10: 103–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tashakkori, Abbas, and John W. Creswell. 2007. The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1: 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, Emma, M. Mojtaba Lotfaliany, Sherry L. Grace, Brian Oldenburg, C. Barr Taylor, David L. Hare, W. P. Thanuja Tangani, D. S. Anoja F. Dheerasinghe, Domnique A. Cadilhac, and Adrienne O’Neil. 2019. Effect of cardiac rehabilitation on 24-month all-cause hospital readmissions: A prospective cohort study. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 18: 234–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varghese, Femina P., Erin E. Hardin, Rebecca L. Bauer, and Robert D. Morgan. 2010. Attitudes toward hiring Offenders. The roles of criminal history, job qualifications, and race. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 54: 769–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaz, Daniela V., Paula L. Silva, Marisa C. Mancini, Claudia Carello, and Jeffrey Kinsella-Shaw. 2017. Towards an ecologically grounded functional practice in rehabilitation. Human Movement Science 52: 117–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vols, Michel. 2019. Theory and methodology of therapeutic jurisprudence. In The Methodology and Practice of Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Edited by Nigel Stobbs, Lorana Bartels and Michel Vols. Durham: Carolina Academic Press, pp. 59–81. [Google Scholar]
- Vose, Brenda, Francis T. Cullen, and Heejin Lee. 2020. Targeted release in the COVID-19 correctional crisis: Using the RNR model to save lives. American Journal of Criminal Justice 45: 769–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wade, Derick. 2015. Rethinking rehabilitation. In Rethinking Rehabilitation Theory and Practice. Edited by Kathryn McPherson, Barbara Gibson and Alain Leplège. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. vii–x. [Google Scholar]
- Ward, Tony. 2002. Good lives and the rehabilitation of sexual offenders: Promises and problems. Aggression and Violent Behaviour 7: 513–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ward, Tony, and Russil Durrant. 2021. Practice frameworks in correctional psychology: Translating causal theories and normative assumptions into practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior 58: 101612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ward, Tony, Pamela M. Yates, and Gwenda M. Willis. 2012. The good lives model and the risk need responsivity model: A critical response to Andrews, Bonta, and Wormith 2011. Criminal Justice and Behavior 39: 94–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wexler, David B. 2012. Elevating Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Structural Suggestions for Promoting a Therapeutic Jurisprudence Perspective in the Appellate Courts (June 4, 2012). 5 Phoenix Law Review 777 (2012), Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 12–03. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2001046 (accessed on 8 January 2023).
- Wexler, David B. 2014. Two decades of therapeutic jurisprudence. Tauro Law Review 24: 17–29. [Google Scholar]
- Wexler, David B., and Bruce J. Winick, eds. 1996. Law in a Therapeutic Key: Developments in Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Durham: Carolina Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- Zeccola, Jenna, Sally F. Kelty, and Douglas Boer. 2021. Does the good lives model work? A systematic review of the recidivism evidence. Journal of Forensic Practice 23: 285–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Surgenor, L.J.; Diesfeld, K.; Rychert, M. Practitioner Rehabilitation following Professional Misconduct: A Common Practice Now in Need of a Theory? Laws 2023, 12, 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12030059
Surgenor LJ, Diesfeld K, Rychert M. Practitioner Rehabilitation following Professional Misconduct: A Common Practice Now in Need of a Theory? Laws. 2023; 12(3):59. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12030059
Chicago/Turabian StyleSurgenor, Lois J., Kate Diesfeld, and Marta Rychert. 2023. "Practitioner Rehabilitation following Professional Misconduct: A Common Practice Now in Need of a Theory?" Laws 12, no. 3: 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12030059