Next Article in Journal
Don’t Read the Comments: Examining Social Media Discourse on Trans Athletes
Previous Article in Journal
Smart Justice in Italy: Cases of Apps Created by Lawyers for Lawyers and Beyond
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Follow-Up and Review Mechanisms of the Global Compacts: What Room Is There for Human Mobility in the Context of Disasters and Climate Change?
 
 
Article

GCM Objective 13: In Search of Synergies with the UN Human Rights Regime to Foster the Rule of Law in the Area of Immigration Detention

Visiting Fellow at the Global Migration Centre, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
Academic Editors: Marion Panizzon, Daniela Vitiello and Tamas Molnar
Laws 2022, 11(4), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11040052
Received: 23 February 2022 / Revised: 13 June 2022 / Accepted: 15 June 2022 / Published: 23 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rule of Law and Human Mobility in the Age of the Global Compacts)
Reflecting the focus of this Special Issue on “Rule of Law and Human Mobility in the Age of the Global Compacts,” this article contributes to the discussion on the threats to the rule of law posed by immigration detention through the lens of the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM). In GCM’s Objective 13, states committed to use immigration detention only as a measure of last resort, work towards alternatives and draw from eight sets of actions to realise this commitment. Given the attention the GCM attracts, its nonbinding character and the voluntary nature of its review can be used by states as justification for their inadequate implementation of binding human rights obligations and insufficient reporting on implementation to the supervising bodies. While acknowledging these challenges to the rule of law, this article explores the ways the GCM can actually foster the rule of law in the area of immigration detention. To strengthen the rule of law principles of legality, legal certainty, prohibition of arbitrariness, access to justice and the right to an effective remedy, Objective 13 needs to support a binding human rights regime by preventing arbitrary detention and its implementation at the domestic level. The article discusses the interplay between Objective 13 on the one hand, and, on the other, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families and Convention on the Rights of the Child at three levels—the detention provisions, the support provided to states for the implementation of these provisions and the monitoring of states’ implementation—and it proposes means to strengthen the synergies between the two frameworks. View Full-Text
Keywords: administrative detention; rule of law; proportionality; alternatives to detention; review of detention; Global Compact for Migration; human rights treaty bodies administrative detention; rule of law; proportionality; alternatives to detention; review of detention; Global Compact for Migration; human rights treaty bodies
MDPI and ACS Style

Majcher, I. GCM Objective 13: In Search of Synergies with the UN Human Rights Regime to Foster the Rule of Law in the Area of Immigration Detention. Laws 2022, 11, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11040052

AMA Style

Majcher I. GCM Objective 13: In Search of Synergies with the UN Human Rights Regime to Foster the Rule of Law in the Area of Immigration Detention. Laws. 2022; 11(4):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11040052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Majcher, Izabella. 2022. "GCM Objective 13: In Search of Synergies with the UN Human Rights Regime to Foster the Rule of Law in the Area of Immigration Detention" Laws 11, no. 4: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11040052

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop