Next Article in Journal
Techno-Stress: Damage Caused by New Emerging Risks
Next Article in Special Issue
The Regulation of Media and Communications in the Borderless Networked Society
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Toward a Post-Apocalyptic Rule of Law
Article

Contested Sovereignties: States, Media Platforms, Peoples, and the Regulation of Media Content and Big Data in the Networked Society

1
Faculty of Law, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
2
Department of Rhetoric, Writing, and Communications, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB R3B 2E9, Canada
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Laws 2021, 10(3), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10030066
Received: 9 June 2021 / Revised: 19 July 2021 / Accepted: 28 July 2021 / Published: 18 August 2021
This article examines the legal and normative foundations of media content regulation in the borderless networked society. We explore the extent to which internet undertakings should be subject to state regulation, in light of Canada’s ongoing debates and legislative reform. We bring a cross-disciplinary perspective (from the subject fields of law; communications studies, in particular McLuhan’s now classic probes; international relations; and technology studies) to enable both policy and language analysis. We apply the concept of sovereignty to states (national cultural and digital sovereignty), media platforms (transnational sovereignty), and citizens (autonomy and personal data sovereignty) to examine the competing dynamics and interests that need to be considered and mediated. While there is growing awareness of the tensions between state and transnational media platform powers, the relationship between media content regulation and the collection of viewers’ personal data is relatively less explored. We analyse how future media content regulation needs to fully account for personal data extraction practices by transnational platforms and other media content undertakings. We posit national cultural sovereignty—a constant unfinished process and framework connecting the local to the global—as the enduring force and justification of media content regulation in Canada. The exercise of state sovereignty may be applied not so much to secure strict territorial borders and centralized power over citizens but to act as a mediating power to promote and protect citizens’ individual and collective interests, locally and globally. View Full-Text
Keywords: media content regulation; sovereignty; transnational digital platforms; broadcasting regulation; McLuhan; Canada; personal data; privacy; technological neutrality; net neutrality; discoverability media content regulation; sovereignty; transnational digital platforms; broadcasting regulation; McLuhan; Canada; personal data; privacy; technological neutrality; net neutrality; discoverability
MDPI and ACS Style

Chapdelaine, P.; McLeod Rogers, J. Contested Sovereignties: States, Media Platforms, Peoples, and the Regulation of Media Content and Big Data in the Networked Society. Laws 2021, 10, 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10030066

AMA Style

Chapdelaine P, McLeod Rogers J. Contested Sovereignties: States, Media Platforms, Peoples, and the Regulation of Media Content and Big Data in the Networked Society. Laws. 2021; 10(3):66. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10030066

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chapdelaine, Pascale, and Jaqueline McLeod Rogers. 2021. "Contested Sovereignties: States, Media Platforms, Peoples, and the Regulation of Media Content and Big Data in the Networked Society" Laws 10, no. 3: 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10030066

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop