ijms-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Molecular Mechanisms of Hepatotoxicity 2.0

A special issue of International Journal of Molecular Sciences (ISSN 1422-0067). This special issue belongs to the section "Molecular Toxicology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 September 2024 | Viewed by 4320

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
UMR_S 1193, INSERM/Université Paris-Saclay, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) Hépatinov, F-94807 Villejuif, France
Interests: organoids; human pluripotent stem cells; hepatic differentiation; biomaterials; biohybrid systems; bioartificial liver; bioengineering; bio-printing; imaging; light-sheet microscopy; biochemistry; pharmacology; organ-on-chip

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
UMR_S 1193, INSERM/Université Paris-Saclay, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) Hépatinov, F-94807 Villejuif, France
Interests: end stage liver disease; rare liver disorders; liver regenerative medicine; liver transplantation; liver bioconstruction; bioengineering

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This is a continued collection of the hot topic of Molecular Mechanisms of Hepatotoxicity. We already have done a successful special issue which received interesting contributions and discussions (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms/special_issues/molecula_hepatotoxicity).

Liver toxicity is the leading cause of the removal of approved drugs from the market as well as the constant increase in patients suffering from acute liver failure. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) can be caused by numerous pharmaceutical agents, as well as dietary or herbal supplements. Moreover, with a few exceptions, the mechanisms by which these drugs and molecules cause hepatic injury are elusive. Since there is no real treatment available apart from orthotopic liver transplantation for the most severe cases, the characterization of the specific mechanisms that lead to hepatotoxicity, the identification of potential novel targets for the development of new therapeutic strategies, as well as the development of new devices for improving drug screening and pharmacological responses are major priorities in this field.

The aim of this Special Issue is to provide an overview of the main cellular and molecular mechanisms; to elucidate the causes and sources of hepatoxicity, which leads to the onset and progression of hepatic disorders, highlighting both the common and specific pathways involved in each one of them; and to propose new bio-technological approaches for studying toxicity.

Dr. Antonietta Messina
Prof. Dr. Jean-Charles Duclos-Vallée
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Molecular Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. There is an Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal. For details about the APC please see here. Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • hepatotoxicity
  • drug-induced liver injury (DILI)
  • epidemiology of liver toxicity
  • organoids
  • organ-on-chip
  • acute liver failure (ALF)' drugs
  • paracetamol
  • antibiotics
  • mitochondria
  • drug-screening
  • immuno-toxicity

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

18 pages, 1605 KiB  
Article
IL-23/IL-17 Axis in Chronic Hepatitis C and Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis—New Insight into Immunohepatotoxicity of Different Chronic Liver Diseases
by Ankica Vujovic, Andjelka M. Isakovic, Sonja Misirlic-Dencic, Jovan Juloski, Milan Mirkovic, Andja Cirkovic, Marina Djelic and Ivana Milošević
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(15), 12483; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512483 - 5 Aug 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1692
Abstract
Considering the relevance of the research of pathogenesis of different liver diseases, we investigated the possible activity of the IL-23/IL-17 axis on the immunohepatotoxicity of two etiologically different chronic liver diseases. A total of 36 chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients, 16 with (CHC-SF) [...] Read more.
Considering the relevance of the research of pathogenesis of different liver diseases, we investigated the possible activity of the IL-23/IL-17 axis on the immunohepatotoxicity of two etiologically different chronic liver diseases. A total of 36 chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients, 16 with (CHC-SF) and 20 without significant fibrosis (CHC-NSF), 19 patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and 20 healthy controls (CG) were recruited. Anthropometric, biochemical, and immunological cytokines (IL-6, IL-10, IL-17 and IL-23) tests were performed in accordance with standard procedure. Our analysis revealed that a higher concentration of plasma IL-23 was associated with NASH (p = 0.005), and a higher concentration of plasma IL-17A but a lower concentration of plasma IL-10 was associated with CHC in comparison with CG. A lower concentration of plasma IL-10 was specific for CHC-NSF, while a higher concentration of plasma IL-17A was specific for CHC-SF in comparison with CG. CHC-NSF and CHC-SF groups were distinguished from NASH according to a lower concentration of plasma IL-17A. Liver tissue levels of IL-17A and IL-23 in CHC-NSF were significantly lower in comparison with NASH, regardless of the same stage of the liver fibrosis, whereas only IL-17A tissue levels showed a difference between the CHC-NSF and CHC-SF groups, namely, a lower concentration in CHC-NSF in comparison with CHC-SF. In CHC-SF and NASH liver tissue, IL17-A and IL-23 were significantly higher in comparison with plasma. Diagnostic accuracy analysis showed significance only in the concentration of plasma cytokines. Plasma IL-6, IL-17A and IL-23 could be possible markers that could differentiate CHC patients from controls. Plasma IL-23 could be considered a possible biomarker of CHC-NSF patients in comparison with controls, while plasma IL-6 and IL-17-A could be biomarkers of CHC-SF patients in comparison with controls. The most sophisticated difference was between the CHC-SF and CHC-NSF groups in the plasma levels of IL-10, which could make this cytokine a useful biomarker of liver fibrosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Hepatotoxicity 2.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 5110 KiB  
Article
Involvement of the p38/MK2 Pathway in MCLR Hepatotoxicity Revealed through MAPK Pharmacological Inhibition and Phosphoproteomics in HepaRG Cells
by Katherine D. Lynch, Dayne T. Iverson, Namrata K. Bachhav, Michael Ridge Call, Guihua Eileen Yue, Bhagwat Prasad and John D. Clarke
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(13), 11168; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241311168 - 6 Jul 2023
Viewed by 1882
Abstract
Microcystin-leucine arginine (MCLR) is one of the most common and toxic microcystin variants, a class of cyanotoxins produced by cyanobacteria. A major molecular mechanism for MCLR-elicited liver toxicity involves the dysregulation of protein phosphorylation through protein phosphatase (PP) inhibition and mitogen-activated protein kinase [...] Read more.
Microcystin-leucine arginine (MCLR) is one of the most common and toxic microcystin variants, a class of cyanotoxins produced by cyanobacteria. A major molecular mechanism for MCLR-elicited liver toxicity involves the dysregulation of protein phosphorylation through protein phosphatase (PP) inhibition and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) modulation. In this study, specific pharmacological MAPK inhibitors were used in HepaRG cells to examine the pathways associated with MCLR cytotoxicity. SB203580 (SB), a p38 inhibitor, rescued HepaRG cell viability, whereas treatment with SP600125 (JNK inhibitor), MK2206 (AKT inhibitor), or N-acetylcysteine (reactive oxygen species scavenger) did not. Phosphoproteomic analysis revealed that phosphosites—which were altered by the addition of SB compared to MCLR treatment alone—included proteins involved in RNA processing, cytoskeletal stability, DNA damage response, protein degradation, and cell death. A closer analysis of specific proteins in some of these pathways indicated that SB reversed the MCLR-mediated phosphorylation of the necroptosis-associated proteins, the mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL), receptor-interacting serine/threonine kinase 1 (RIP1), DNA damage response proteins, ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related kinase (ATR), and checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1). Overall, these data implicate p38/MK2, DNA damage, and necroptosis in MCLR-mediated hepatotoxicity, and suggest these pathways may be targets for prevention prior to, or treatment after, MCLR toxicity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Hepatotoxicity 2.0)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Review

Jump to: Research

24 pages, 5520 KiB  
Review
Drug-Induced Fatty Liver Disease (DIFLD): A Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical, Biochemical, and Histopathological Data for Mechanisms Identification and Consistency with Current Adverse Outcome Pathways
by Ernesto López-Pascual, Ivan Rienda, Judith Perez-Rojas, Anna Rapisarda, Guillem Garcia-Llorens, Ramiro Jover and José V. Castell
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(10), 5203; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105203 - 10 May 2024
Viewed by 275
Abstract
Drug induced fatty liver disease (DIFLD) is a form of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), which can also be included in the more general metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), which specifically refers to the accumulation of fat in the liver unrelated to alcohol [...] Read more.
Drug induced fatty liver disease (DIFLD) is a form of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), which can also be included in the more general metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), which specifically refers to the accumulation of fat in the liver unrelated to alcohol intake. A bi-directional relationship between DILI and MASLD is likely to exist: while certain drugs can cause MASLD by acting as pro-steatogenic factors, MASLD may make hepatocytes more vulnerable to drugs. Having a pre-existing MASLD significantly heightens the likelihood of experiencing DILI from certain medications. Thus, the prevalence of steatosis within DILI may be biased by pre-existing MASLD, and it can be concluded that the genuine true incidence of DIFLD in the general population remains unknown. In certain individuals, drug-induced steatosis is often accompanied by concomitant injury mechanisms such as oxidative stress, cell death, and inflammation, which leads to the development of drug-induced steatohepatitis (DISH). DISH is much more severe from the clinical point of view, has worse prognosis and outcome, and resembles MASH (metabolic-associated steatohepatitis), as it is associated with inflammation and sometimes with fibrosis. A literature review of clinical case reports allowed us to examine and evaluate the clinical features of DIFLD and their association with specific drugs, enabling us to propose a classification of DIFLD drugs based on clinical outcomes and pathological severity: Group 1, drugs with low intrinsic toxicity (e.g., ibuprofen, naproxen, acetaminophen, irinotecan, methotrexate, and tamoxifen), but expected to promote/aggravate steatosis in patients with pre-existing MASLD; Group 2, drugs associated with steatosis and only occasionally with steatohepatitis (e.g., amiodarone, valproic acid, and tetracycline); and Group 3, drugs with a great tendency to transit to steatohepatitis and further to fibrosis. Different mechanisms may be in play when identifying drug mode of action: (1) inhibition of mitochondrial fatty acid β-oxidation; (2) inhibition of fatty acid transport across mitochondrial membranes; (3) increased de novo lipid synthesis; (4) reduction in lipid export by the inhibition of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein; (5) induction of mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening; (6) dissipation of the mitochondrial transmembrane potential; (7) impairment of the mitochondrial respiratory chain/oxidative phosphorylation; (8) mitochondrial DNA damage, degradation and depletion; and (9) nuclear receptors (NRs)/transcriptomic alterations. Currently, the majority of, if not all, adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) for steatosis in AOP-Wiki highlight the interaction with NRs or transcription factors as the key molecular initiating event (MIE). This perspective suggests that chemical-induced steatosis typically results from the interplay between a chemical and a NR or transcription factors, implying that this interaction represents the primary and pivotal MIE. However, upon conducting this exhaustive literature review, it became evident that the current AOPs tend to overly emphasize this interaction as the sole MIE. Some studies indeed support the involvement of NRs in steatosis, but others demonstrate that such NR interactions alone do not necessarily lead to steatosis. This view, ignoring other mitochondrial-related injury mechanisms, falls short in encapsulating the intricate biological mechanisms involved in chemically induced liver steatosis, necessitating their consideration as part of the AOP’s map road as well. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Hepatotoxicity 2.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop