sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Social Responsibility and Sustainability Accounting: Key Corporate Performance Drivers and Measures

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2022) | Viewed by 42121

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Interests: social responsibility; sustainability accounting; non-financial reporting capital; integrated reporting; sustainable development goals
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management and Innovation Systems, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
Interests: intellectual capital; corporate risk disclosure; integrated reporting; local banks accounting and local food sector
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In recent years, the blend of the global financial and sustainability crisis caused by increasing climate change, irresponsible consumption, poor working conditions, social inequality, water usage, waste, financial instability, and the most recent COVID-19 pandemic has created a wide business case for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Sustainable Development. As a result, organizations are no longer expected to merely focus on profit maximization objectives, but rather to align their vision, business strategy, models, operations, and value creation processes with environmental, social, and human rights concerns, for the sake of present and future generations.

The launch in 2015 of the 2030 United Nations Agenda for Sustainable Development has further solidified this need by the means of the adoption of 17 Sustainable Development Goals’ (SDGs) and 169 associated targets which provide companies with a comprehensive framework to address, in a balanced and integrated manner, CSR and Sustainable Development challenges through the three pillars: economic, social, and environmental. Attuned, a renewed pressure on firms by investors and other stakeholders to broaden the scope of their reporting practices has emerged, paving the way for expanding corporate accounting and accountability boundaries to embrace the triple bottom line of economic profitability, environmental protection, and social responsibility. Accordingly, by releasing the Directive 2014/95, the European Union (EU) has marked a final step in the regulatory process started in 2003 with the adoption of the Accounts Modernization Directive 2003/51, mandating certain large undertakings which are public-interest entities, to draw up a non-financial statement including information about environmental and social issues. The EU Directive also promoted the use of relevant non-financial key performance indicators to enhance the comparability and consistency of information disclosed.

However, several scholars advocate that the adoption of a mandatory approach does not automatically imply higher quality and transparency of non-financial information; accordingly, the debate on voluntary vs. mandatory non-financial reporting is still ongoing. Moreover, the EU directive does not prescribe a specific standard or rules to convey non-financial information, also allowing companies the possibility to choose among the different types of existing frameworks and reports to comply with the norm. This has resulted in a proliferation of reports (e.g., annual reports; sustainability reports; CSR reports; integrated reporting) and frameworks (e.g., Global Reporting Initiative (GRI); International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC); Account Ability (AA); the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC)), each with its strength and weaknesses, that companies are employing to provide investors and other stakeholders with non-financial information. As a consequence, corporate non-financial reporting practices are barely uniform both in terms of extent and quality.

Given these premises, the main aim of the Special Issue is to stimulate the debate about the different forms of corporate non-financial reporting, inviting scholars to critically examine the different ways companies are pursuing to demonstrate stakeholders their commitment towards CSR and sustainable development issues. Contributions that question the adoption of voluntary or mandatory non-financial approaches to non-financial reporting, in the light of the EU non-financial directive adoption, are also welcomed. Papers can be both theoretical and empirical.

The Special Issue will consider contributions related but not limited to the following topics:

  • The role of the different types of reports (e.g., sustainability reports; CSR reports; integrated reporting) in complying with EU directive requirements;
  • Sustainability reporting vs. integrated reporting: theoretical and practical implications;
  • Sustainability accounting and management in practice;
  • The use of relevant key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure non-financial business performance;
  • The impact of regulation on non-financial disclosure;
  • Voluntary versus mandatory non-financial reporting;
  • Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics disclosure and its determinants;
  • SDGs implementation and reporting in both private and public sector entities;
  • Emerging digital channels (e.g., company website, social media) and non-financial disclosure;
  • The role of the assurance in enhancing the credibility of non-financial information;
  • Corporate governance mechanisms and non-financial reporting.

References

Bebbington, J., & Unerman, J. (2018). Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: an enabling role for accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(1), 2–24.

Bebbington, J., Kirk, E. A., & Larrinaga, C. (2012). The production of normativity: A comparison of reporting regimes in Spain and the UK. Accounting. Organizations and Society, 37(2), 78–94.

Boiral, O., Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., & Brotherton, M. C. (2019). Assessing and improving the quality of sustainability reports: The auditors’ perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(3), 703–721.

Camilleri, M.A. (2015), "Environmental, social and governance disclosures in Europe", Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 224–242.

Doni, F., Bianchi Martini, S., Corvino, A. and Mazzoni, M. (2019), “Voluntary versus mandatory non-financial disclosure: EU Directive 95/2014 and sustainability reporting practices based on empirical evidence from Italy”, Meditari Accountancy Research, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.

Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2017). The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Harvard Business School research working paper, (11–100).

La Torre, M., Sabelfeld, S., Blomkvist, M., Tarquinio, L. and Dumay, J. (2018), “Harmonising nonfinancial reporting regulation in Europe: practical forces and projections for future”, Meditari Accountancy Research, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 598–621.

Manes Rossi, F., Tiron-Tudor, A., Nicolò, G. and Zanellato, G. (2018), “Ensuring more sustainable reporting in Europe using non financial disclosure – De facto and De jure evidence”, Sustainability, Vol. 10, pp. 1162, pp. 1–20.

Venturelli, A., Caputo, F., Cosma, S., Leopizzi, R. and Pizzi, S. (2017), “Directive 2014/95/EU: are Italian companies already compliant?”, Sustainability, Vol. 9 No. 8, pp. 1385–1404.

Prof. Adriana Tiron-Tudor
Dr. Giuseppe Nicolò
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Non-financial reporting
  • Sustainability reporting
  • Integrated reporting
  • Corporate Social Responsibility
  • Sustainable development
  • SDGs reporting
  • Non-financial directive
  • Non-financial accountability
  • ESG disclosure

Published Papers (11 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

19 pages, 2674 KiB  
Article
Reporting University Performance through the Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 Agenda: Lessons Learned from Italian Case Study
by Gloria Fiorani and Chiara Di Gerio
Sustainability 2022, 14(15), 9006; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159006 - 22 Jul 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2455
Abstract
The shift of sustainability paradigms within the academic context has prompted universities to develop additional accountability tools to respond to the resulting demand for information. However, in terms of social reporting, universities have complete discretion regarding the content and nature of their sustainability [...] Read more.
The shift of sustainability paradigms within the academic context has prompted universities to develop additional accountability tools to respond to the resulting demand for information. However, in terms of social reporting, universities have complete discretion regarding the content and nature of their sustainability budgets. The resulting diversity has led to greater heterogeneity with regard to information systems, which in turn poses the risk of making reports for stakeholders difficult to understand and complicates benchmark comparisons between different institutions. This paper aims to summarize the state of the art of sustainability reporting in Italian state universities, and to assess the compliance of these reports with global sustainability trends. This is achieved by determining the extent to which the sustainable development goals, outlined by the 2030 Agenda, are integrated into the substantive indicators used in the preparation of sustainability reports. The results show that sustainability reporting in universities is still in its early stages. Although only 29 universities—which represent 42% of the total number of universities initially surveyed—have pursued a sustainability reporting process, this research highlights a gradual increase in the implementation of SDGs as a criterion for assessing sustainable performances. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 322 KiB  
Article
Social Responsibility of Mining Companies at a Time of COVID-19: Dear Shareholders!
by Irena Jindřichovská and Eva Eckert
Sustainability 2022, 14(1), 350; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010350 - 29 Dec 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3061
Abstract
This paper examines annual reports (ARs) of multinational mining companies Glencore, Rio Tinto and BHP framed by the challenge of COVID-19 in 2020. We apply a linguistic analysis to screening the letters of chairmen and CEOs that encapsulate an ideology of mining, prioritize [...] Read more.
This paper examines annual reports (ARs) of multinational mining companies Glencore, Rio Tinto and BHP framed by the challenge of COVID-19 in 2020. We apply a linguistic analysis to screening the letters of chairmen and CEOs that encapsulate an ideology of mining, prioritize the message of sustained and prospective financial success, and display commitment to employees and communities. Using critical discourse analysis, we explore how corporations involved in destructive activities managed to mask the nature of their conduct and promote positive PR when expected to document an on-the-ground involvement with employees and local communities due to the global pandemic. We accounted for the ideology of mining natural resources, the central message foregrounded in the reports, the selection and distribution of key topics and keywords, and relexicalization of critical concepts and descriptions. The CDA revealed “smart management” of COVID-19 aimed to hide facts related to the destruction of the environment and to manipulate people in exchange for education, financial rewards and social improvement. The critical contribution of our paper is that the COVID-19 crisis became an opportunity for corporations to display resilience as well as to manage, dominate and render local populations dependent and vulnerable. Full article
17 pages, 10065 KiB  
Article
The Relationship between the Implementation of ERP Systems and the Financial and Non-Financial Reporting of Organizations
by Laura-Eugenia-Lavinia Barna, Bogdan-Ștefan Ionescu and Liliana Ionescu-Feleagă
Sustainability 2021, 13(21), 11566; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111566 - 20 Oct 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 5883
Abstract
Numerous studies have shown that ERP systems can improve organizational performance and efficiency. Thus, the main concepts addressed in the paper are ERP systems, their performance and the manner in which they improve financial and non-financial reporting. The purpose of this paper is [...] Read more.
Numerous studies have shown that ERP systems can improve organizational performance and efficiency. Thus, the main concepts addressed in the paper are ERP systems, their performance and the manner in which they improve financial and non-financial reporting. The purpose of this paper is to observe the relationship between ERP systems and financial reporting. The role of these systems is to ensure transparency over the financial and non-financial reporting process of an organization. The research method is represented by an archival analysis (organization’s annual reports) to highlight the relationship between ERP systems and financial and non-financial reporting, given the impact of ERP systems on the information used to prepare financial and non-financial reports and how the organization changes after implementing these systems. The results highlight the significant role of ERP systems within an organization, in terms of performance and improvements in financial and non-financial reporting. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 815 KiB  
Article
Board Composition and Social & Environmental Accountability: A Dynamic Model Analysis of Chinese Firms
by Muhammad Kaleem Khan, R. M. Ammar Zahid, Adil Saleem and Judit Sági
Sustainability 2021, 13(19), 10662; https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910662 - 25 Sep 2021
Cited by 48 | Viewed by 3644
Abstract
This research contributes to the existing corporate governance (CG) and social and environmental accountability (SEA) literature by exploring the impact of CG mechanisms (board independence, board size, CEO duality, and board gender diversity) on Chinese firms’ environmental performance, sustainability performance, and environmental information [...] Read more.
This research contributes to the existing corporate governance (CG) and social and environmental accountability (SEA) literature by exploring the impact of CG mechanisms (board independence, board size, CEO duality, and board gender diversity) on Chinese firms’ environmental performance, sustainability performance, and environmental information disclosures (EID). Furthermore, the investigation consequently ascertains the amount to which the CG–SEA connection is influenced by CEO qualities. Using a dynamic model of a SysGMM regression model, we found that board size, independence, and gender diversity in board and CEO duality are all favorably connected to Chinese enterprises’ environmental performance over a window of 10 years (2010–2019). Additionally, our findings imply that the analyzed CEO characteristics positively moderate the relationship between CG and SEA. Our findings have significant consequences for all stakeholders, including environmentalists, corporate regulators, CEOs, policymakers, and regulators. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 2259 KiB  
Article
Integrated Management Solution for a Sustainable SME—Selection Proposal Using AHP
by Ramona Lacurezeanu, Alexandru Chis and Vasile Paul Bresfelean
Sustainability 2021, 13(19), 10616; https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910616 - 24 Sep 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2414
Abstract
In the conditions of the pandemic crisis, implementing an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system with a sustainability component represents a crucial investment for a small and medium enterprise (SME) but critical for the organization, if it is not the matching solution. A comprehensive [...] Read more.
In the conditions of the pandemic crisis, implementing an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system with a sustainability component represents a crucial investment for a small and medium enterprise (SME) but critical for the organization, if it is not the matching solution. A comprehensive framework for selecting the S–ERP system was elaborated, including a set of relevant criteria for an SME to draw and assess the selection of an ERP system, considering that the factors extracted as well as the importance in the proposed model have been debated for years in the available literature. A methodology based on the brainstorming and questionnaire techniques was proposed in establishing the selection criteria, and the AHP decision analysis method was used for evaluating the weight of the criteria, all these in order to provide a model for ERP selection. This model was tested on a set of numerical, hypothetical, and applied data of the Romanian context. The use of the recommended model shows that it can be applied to improve decisions and decrease the time interval required for S–ERP selection. The results also show that AHP can fulfill the S–ERP selection objective for SMEs and the decisive factors that affect decision–making processes in a systematic way. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2549 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanism over Financial Performance: Evidence from Romania
by Tatiana Dănescu, Ioan-Ovidiu Spătăcean, Maria-Alexandra Popa and Carmen-Gabriela Sîrbu
Sustainability 2021, 13(19), 10494; https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910494 - 22 Sep 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3694
Abstract
In the context of the globalization and internationalization of economies, to efficiently attract financial and intellectual capital that is necessary for business sustainability, the mechanisms of corporate governance have to be based on gaining the trust of all the interested parties. These objectives [...] Read more.
In the context of the globalization and internationalization of economies, to efficiently attract financial and intellectual capital that is necessary for business sustainability, the mechanisms of corporate governance have to be based on gaining the trust of all the interested parties. These objectives require an organizational culture and a climate which is based on correctness, responsibility, transparency, and efficiency, in which ethical principles govern the spread of behaviors in the entire entity. This research identifies the relation between the corporate governance and the entities’ financial performance using the specific context of Romania. The findings of this study reveal new insights on the corporate governance and financial performance based on a sample of companies listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange. The results show a positive correlation between the net accounting results, earnings per share, and the duality of the CEO, and a negative correlation between price per share and the duality of the CEO. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 2912 KiB  
Article
Disclosure Dynamics and Non-Financial Reporting Analysis. The Case of Romanian Listed Companies
by Mărioara Beleneși, Victoria Bogdan and Dorina Nicoleta Popa
Sustainability 2021, 13(9), 4732; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094732 - 23 Apr 2021
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3974
Abstract
New challenges and perspectives to improve non-financial reporting and the disclosure of environmental, social, and governance indicators have been launched towards the development horizon of Romanian public interest entities, implementing the provisions of Directive 2014/95/EU in the local regulatory framework. In this context, [...] Read more.
New challenges and perspectives to improve non-financial reporting and the disclosure of environmental, social, and governance indicators have been launched towards the development horizon of Romanian public interest entities, implementing the provisions of Directive 2014/95/EU in the local regulatory framework. In this context, our approach focused on the content analysis of the non-financial information reported by listed companies, for the period 2017–2019, and the measure of the average disclosure degree on environmental, social, economic, and governance (ESEG) indicators. To measure the average degree of disclosure, a composite index was constructed through the main component analysis for categorical data that allowed the classification of sampled companies by sustainable performance. The results showed a slight increase in the ESEG disclosure index at the level of the sampled companies, from 47 units in 2017 to 52 units in 2019, several companies “went ahead” and others “recovered over the period”. Cross-sectional analysis revealed differences in the average non-financial disclosure index, and also in the disclosure index of ESEG indicators. The non-parametric correlation analysis highlighted the existence of a statistically significant positive correlation of medium intensity between the disclosure index of non-financial information and the publication of the non-financial statement or report. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 5269 KiB  
Article
Sustainability Reporting in the Public Realm—Trends and Patterns in Knowledge Development
by Cristina Alexandrina Stefanescu
Sustainability 2021, 13(8), 4128; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084128 - 7 Apr 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4122
Abstract
In the wake of increased awareness, as there has been an increasing need for sustainability reporting, research studies have evolved over time. Addressing the challenges and pathways of research in the particular realm of public entities was appropriate to enrich the scientific literature. [...] Read more.
In the wake of increased awareness, as there has been an increasing need for sustainability reporting, research studies have evolved over time. Addressing the challenges and pathways of research in the particular realm of public entities was appropriate to enrich the scientific literature. Since prior studies either conducted a structured literature review on non-financial reporting formats or were focused exclusively on social and environmental accounting, and no bibliometric review has yet been conducted on sustainability reporting in the public sector, this study aims to fill this gap. The objective of the paper is to identify the trends and patterns in knowledge development in the area of sustainability reporting in the public sector to investigate its structure and derive inferences and insights. Bibliometric results reveal that research in this field is still at an early stage, showing an unsteady, slightly upward trend. The literature responded well to the need to enhance the understanding of the public institutions’ role in advancing non-financial reporting and evolved along with the continuous development of the related voluntary frameworks (e.g., GRI, <IR>). In this assent, further studies approaching the first mandatory regulation of non-financial information disclosure (Directive 95/2014/EU) are encouraged. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 290 KiB  
Article
Accountability and Reporting for Sustainability and Public Value: Challenges in the Public Sector
by Lodovico Gherardi, Anna Maria Linsalata, Enrico Deidda Gagliardo and Rebecca Levy Orelli
Sustainability 2021, 13(3), 1097; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031097 - 21 Jan 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3908
Abstract
The present study aims at identifying accountability and reporting answers to the public sector challenges surrounding public value and sustainability. To that end, we take into account the Cohesion Policy Programmes, the EU major investment strategy to understand needs and possible answers in [...] Read more.
The present study aims at identifying accountability and reporting answers to the public sector challenges surrounding public value and sustainability. To that end, we take into account the Cohesion Policy Programmes, the EU major investment strategy to understand needs and possible answers in terms of accountability and reporting of the public sector. Particularly, we will consider how a specific policy, the cohesion policy, takes place in practice in the Emilia-Romagna Region case, one of the most advanced European regions in terms of capacity in managing funds received by the EU Cohesion Policy. The Emilia-Romagna Region experience shows the extent to which it planned forms of accountability and reporting that hybridize two of the most recent sustainability developments, integrated reporting and sustainable development goals, as a means to deliver sustainability and public value. Full article
16 pages, 300 KiB  
Article
The Level of European Companies’ Integrated Reports Alignment to the <IR> Framework: The Role of Boards’ Characteristics
by Adriana Tiron-Tudor, Rares Hurghis, Ramona Lacurezeanu and Lucia Podoaba
Sustainability 2020, 12(21), 8777; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218777 - 22 Oct 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2838
Abstract
In terms of corporate governance, the board of directors (BoDs) is the main responsible structure in meeting and safeguarding both shareholders and stakeholders’ interests. Integrated reporting’s primary aim is to improve information quality provided to shareholders while responding to stakeholders’ interests and needs. [...] Read more.
In terms of corporate governance, the board of directors (BoDs) is the main responsible structure in meeting and safeguarding both shareholders and stakeholders’ interests. Integrated reporting’s primary aim is to improve information quality provided to shareholders while responding to stakeholders’ interests and needs. Using lenses of stakeholder theory, this study explores the relationship between board of directors’ characteristics as size, gender diversity, activity, tenure, outside directors, chief executive officer (CEO) duality and the Integrated Reports alignment level to the International Integrated Reporting Committee (IIRC) framework, using a self-constructed disclosure index. Applying a content analysis method, data were collected from integrated reports to determine the self-constructed disclosure index (Integrated Reporting Score—IRS). Through quantitative analysis, we analyzed which BoDs’ characteristics are correlated to IRS. The analyzed sample was formed of 98 integrated reports produced by 61 European companies, published on the IIRC website for the period 2013–2017. The current study contributes to existing knowledge by exploring the voluntary adoption of integrated reporting using quantitative analysis and focusing on the European context. The obtained results highlight that integrated report alignment levels with IIRF is directly correlated with the proportion of outside directors on the board and longer board tenure. Results show a higher alignment for reports produced by two-tier or mixed boards than the unitary ones. Additionally, there is a constant improvement in alignment score, with a statistical difference occurring in 2016 compared to 2013. Full article

Review

Jump to: Research

15 pages, 554 KiB  
Review
Sustainability Accounting Studies: A Metasynthesis
by Miseldra Gil-Marín, Alejandro Vega-Muñoz, Nicolás Contreras-Barraza, Guido Salazar-Sepúlveda, Sandra Vera-Ruiz and Analia Verónica Losada
Sustainability 2022, 14(15), 9533; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159533 - 3 Aug 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4223
Abstract
This review article seeks to discuss the sustainability accounting concept by examining previously conducted studies on this topic in order to understand its thematic progress in the academic literature. This study is a metasynthesis, where, in the identification phase, 334 documents published in [...] Read more.
This review article seeks to discuss the sustainability accounting concept by examining previously conducted studies on this topic in order to understand its thematic progress in the academic literature. This study is a metasynthesis, where, in the identification phase, 334 documents published in the Web of Science (WoS) database are selected, and in the literature review stages, 15 re-reviews are selected according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method. The results reveal that businesses, academia, and regulatory bodies do not recognize a homogeneous terminology when it comes to sustainability accounting. There is a variety of synonyms that complicate the disclosure of activities carried out by companies in the pursuit of the sustainability development goals (SDGs), with SDGs 5, 6, 13, 14, and 15 being analyzed in the academic literature in relation to the sustainability accounting concept. For future research directions, the review articles analyzed suggest examining the concrete effects produced by practices related to sustainability performance in companies, linking the relevance of understanding the sustainability reports related to the sustainability performance of companies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop