sensors-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Wearable Sensors in the Evaluation of Gait and Balance in Neurological Disorders

A special issue of Sensors (ISSN 1424-8220). This special issue belongs to the section "Biosensors".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (24 April 2020) | Viewed by 85483

Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
Interests: pathophysiology of motor symptoms; Parkinson's disease (PD); human movement disorders; wireless and wearable technology; inertial measurement units (IMUs); early diagnosis; treatment of PD patients
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Information Engineering, Electronics and Telecommunications, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Interests: wearable electronics; More-than-Moore integration; nanoelectronics; CMOS device reliability; CMOS image sensors; innovative non-volatile memories
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
ISSET Research Group (Integrated Smart Sensors and Health Technologies), Department of Electronic Engineering, Universitat Politcnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Interests: movement diseases; people with gait problems; the application of electronic and communication engineering in Parkinson Disease; identification and measurement of Parkinson Disease-related symptoms and falls
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are pleased to invite you to contribute to this Special Issue of Sensors entitled “Wearable Sensors in the Evaluation of Gait and Balance in Neurological Disorders”. The aim of this Special Issue is to collect the most up-to-date information about the objective evaluation of gait and balance impairment, by means of biosensors (IMUs, etc), in patients with various types of neurological disorders including Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, cerebellar ataxia, multiple sclerosis, stroke, and spasticity. We will accept full-length research articles and reviews focused on this research topic. We hope this initiative will encourage new ideas and produce unparalleled networking opportunities in the field.

Prof. Dr. Antonio Suppa
Prof. Dr. Fernanda Irrera
Prof. Dr. Joan Cabestany
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sensors is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Wearable sensors
  • IMU
  • Gait
  • Balance
  • Parkinson’s disease
  • Movement disorders
  • Neurology
  • Real time monitoring
  • Longitudinal monitoring
  • Home monitoring

Published Papers (16 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

20 pages, 2978 KiB  
Article
High-Specificity Digital Architecture for Real-Time Recognition of Loss of Balance Inducing Fall
by Daniela De Venuto and Giovanni Mezzina
Sensors 2020, 20(3), 769; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030769 - 31 Jan 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2982
Abstract
Falls are a significant cause of loss of independence, disability and reduced quality of life in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Intervening quickly and accurately on the postural instability could strongly reduce the consequences of falls. In this context, the paper proposes and [...] Read more.
Falls are a significant cause of loss of independence, disability and reduced quality of life in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Intervening quickly and accurately on the postural instability could strongly reduce the consequences of falls. In this context, the paper proposes and validates a novel architecture for the reliable recognition of losses of balance situations. The proposed system addresses some challenges related to the daily life applicability of near-fall recognition systems: the high specificity and system robustness against the Activities of Daily Life (ADL). In this respect, the proposed algorithm has been tested on five different tasks: walking steps, sudden curves, chair transfers via the timed up and go (TUG) test, balance-challenging obstacle avoidance and slip-induced loss of balance. The system analyzes data from wireless acquisition devices that capture electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG) signals. The collected data are sent to two main units: the muscular unit and the cortical one. The first realizes a binary ON/OFF pattern from muscular activity (10 EMGs) and triggers the cortical unit. This latter unit evaluates the rate of variation in the EEG power spectrum density (PSD), considering five bands of interest. The neuromuscular features are then sent to a logical network for the final classification, which distinguishes among falls and ADL. In this preliminary study, we tested the proposed model on 9 healthy subjects (aged 26.3 ± 2.4 years), even if the study on PD patients is under investigation. Experimental validation on healthy subjects showed that the system reacts in 370.62 ± 60.85 ms with a sensitivity of 93.33 ± 5.16%. During the ADL tests the system showed a specificity of 98.91 ± 0.44% in steady walking steps recognition, 99.61 ± 0.66% in sudden curves detection, 98.95 ± 1.27% in contractions related to TUG tests and 98.42 ± 0.90% in the obstacle avoidance protocol. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 4148 KiB  
Article
Indoor Trajectory Reconstruction of Walking, Jogging, and Running Activities Based on a Foot-Mounted Inertial Pedestrian Dead-Reckoning System
by Jesus D. Ceron, Christine F. Martindale, Diego M. López, Felix Kluge and Bjoern M. Eskofier
Sensors 2020, 20(3), 651; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030651 - 24 Jan 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3239
Abstract
The evaluation of trajectory reconstruction of the human body obtained by foot-mounted Inertial Pedestrian Dead-Reckoning (IPDR) methods has usually been carried out in controlled environments, with very few participants and limited to walking. In this study, a pipeline for trajectory reconstruction using a [...] Read more.
The evaluation of trajectory reconstruction of the human body obtained by foot-mounted Inertial Pedestrian Dead-Reckoning (IPDR) methods has usually been carried out in controlled environments, with very few participants and limited to walking. In this study, a pipeline for trajectory reconstruction using a foot-mounted IPDR system is proposed and evaluated in two large datasets containing activities that involve walking, jogging, and running, as well as movements such as side and backward strides, sitting, and standing. First, stride segmentation is addressed using a multi-subsequence Dynamic Time Warping method. Then, detection of Toe-Off and Mid-Stance is performed by using two new algorithms. Finally, stride length and orientation estimation are performed using a Zero Velocity Update algorithm empowered by a complementary Kalman filter. As a result, the Toe-Off detection algorithm reached an F-score between 90% and 100% for activities that do not involve stopping, and between 71% and 78% otherwise. Resulting return position errors were in the range of 0.5% to 8.8% for non-stopping activities and 8.8% to 27.4% otherwise. The proposed pipeline is able to reconstruct indoor trajectories of people performing activities that involve walking, jogging, running, side and backward walking, sitting, and standing. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 897 KiB  
Article
Is a Wearable Sensor-Based Characterisation of Gait Robust Enough to Overcome Differences Between Measurement Protocols? A Multi-Centric Pragmatic Study in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
by Lorenza Angelini, Ilaria Carpinella, Davide Cattaneo, Maurizio Ferrarin, Elisa Gervasoni, Basil Sharrack, David Paling, Krishnan Padmakumari Sivaraman Nair and Claudia Mazzà
Sensors 2020, 20(1), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010079 - 21 Dec 2019
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4452
Abstract
Inertial measurement units (IMUs) allow accurate quantification of gait impairment of people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Nonetheless, it is not clear how IMU-based metrics might be influenced by pragmatic aspects associated with clinical translation of this approach, such as data collection settings and [...] Read more.
Inertial measurement units (IMUs) allow accurate quantification of gait impairment of people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Nonetheless, it is not clear how IMU-based metrics might be influenced by pragmatic aspects associated with clinical translation of this approach, such as data collection settings and gait protocols. In this study, we hypothesised that these aspects do not significantly alter those characteristics of gait that are more related to quality and energetic efficiency and are quantifiable via acceleration related metrics, such as intensity, smoothness, stability, symmetry, and regularity. To test this hypothesis, we compared 33 IMU-based metrics extracted from data, retrospectively collected by two independent centres on two matched cohorts of pwMS. As a worst-case scenario, a walking test was performed in the two centres at a different speed along corridors of different lengths, using different IMU systems, which were also positioned differently. The results showed that the majority of the temporal metrics (9 out of 12) exhibited significant between-centre differences. Conversely, the between-centre differences in the gait quality metrics were small and comparable to those associated with a test-retest analysis under equivalent conditions. Therefore, the gait quality metrics are promising candidates for reliable multi-centric studies aiming at assessing rehabilitation interventions within a routine clinical context. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2151 KiB  
Article
Reactive Postural Responses to Continuous Yaw Perturbations in Healthy Humans: The Effect of Aging
by Ilaria Mileti, Juri Taborri, Stefano Rossi, Zaccaria Del Prete, Marco Paoloni, Antonio Suppa and Eduardo Palermo
Sensors 2020, 20(1), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010063 - 20 Dec 2019
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 3454
Abstract
Maintaining balance stability while turning in a quasi-static stance and/or in dynamic motion requires proper recovery mechanisms to manage sudden center-of-mass displacement. Furthermore, falls during turning are among the main concerns of community-dwelling elderly population. This study investigates the effect of aging on [...] Read more.
Maintaining balance stability while turning in a quasi-static stance and/or in dynamic motion requires proper recovery mechanisms to manage sudden center-of-mass displacement. Furthermore, falls during turning are among the main concerns of community-dwelling elderly population. This study investigates the effect of aging on reactive postural responses to continuous yaw perturbations on a cohort of 10 young adults (mean age 28 ± 3 years old) and 10 older adults (mean age 61 ± 4 years old). Subjects underwent external continuous yaw perturbations provided by the RotoBit1D platform. Different conditions of visual feedback (eyes opened and eyes closed) and perturbation intensity, i.e., sinusoidal rotations on the horizontal plane at different frequencies (0.2 Hz and 0.3 Hz), were applied. Kinematics of axial body segments was gathered using three inertial measurement units. In order to measure reactive postural responses, we measured body-absolute and joint absolute rotations, center-of-mass displacement, body sway, and inter-joint coordination. Older adults showed significant reduction in horizontal rotations of body segments and joints, as well as in center-of-mass displacement. Furthermore, older adults manifested a greater variability in reactive postural responses than younger adults. The abnormal reactive postural responses observed in older adults might contribute to the well-known age-related difficulty in dealing with balance control during turning. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 4446 KiB  
Article
Gait Asymmetry Post-Stroke: Determining Valid and Reliable Methods Using a Single Accelerometer Located on the Trunk
by Christopher Buckley, M. Encarna Micó-Amigo, Michael Dunne-Willows, Alan Godfrey, Aodhán Hickey, Sue Lord, Lynn Rochester, Silvia Del Din and Sarah A. Moore
Sensors 2020, 20(1), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010037 - 19 Dec 2019
Cited by 28 | Viewed by 5642
Abstract
Asymmetry is a cardinal symptom of gait post-stroke that is targeted during rehabilitation. Technological developments have allowed accelerometers to be a feasible tool to provide digital gait variables. Many acceleration-derived variables are proposed to measure gait asymmetry. Despite a need for accurate calculation, [...] Read more.
Asymmetry is a cardinal symptom of gait post-stroke that is targeted during rehabilitation. Technological developments have allowed accelerometers to be a feasible tool to provide digital gait variables. Many acceleration-derived variables are proposed to measure gait asymmetry. Despite a need for accurate calculation, no consensus exists for what is the most valid and reliable variable. Using an instrumented walkway (GaitRite) as the reference standard, this study compared the validity and reliability of multiple acceleration-derived asymmetry variables. Twenty-five post-stroke participants performed repeated walks over GaitRite whilst wearing a tri-axial accelerometer (Axivity AX3) on their lower back, on two occasions, one week apart. Harmonic ratio, autocorrelation, gait symmetry index, phase plots, acceleration, and jerk root mean square were calculated from the acceleration signals. Test–retest reliability was calculated, and concurrent validity was estimated by comparison with GaitRite. The strongest concurrent validity was obtained from step regularity from the vertical signal, which also recorded excellent test–retest reliability (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (rho) = 0.87 and Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC21) = 0.98, respectively). Future research should test the responsiveness of this and other step asymmetry variables to quantify change during recovery and the effect of rehabilitative interventions for consideration as digital biomarkers to quantify gait asymmetry. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 450 KiB  
Article
Exploring Risk of Falls and Dynamic Unbalance in Cerebellar Ataxia by Inertial Sensor Assessment
by Pietro Caliandro, Carmela Conte, Chiara Iacovelli, Antonella Tatarelli, Stefano Filippo Castiglia, Giuseppe Reale and Mariano Serrao
Sensors 2019, 19(24), 5571; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19245571 - 17 Dec 2019
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 3275
Abstract
Background. Patients suffering from cerebellar ataxia have extremely variable gait kinematic features. We investigated whether and how wearable inertial sensors can describe the gait kinematic features among ataxic patients. Methods. We enrolled 17 patients and 16 matched control subjects. We acquired data by [...] Read more.
Background. Patients suffering from cerebellar ataxia have extremely variable gait kinematic features. We investigated whether and how wearable inertial sensors can describe the gait kinematic features among ataxic patients. Methods. We enrolled 17 patients and 16 matched control subjects. We acquired data by means of an inertial sensor attached to an ergonomic belt around pelvis, which was connected to a portable computer via Bluetooth. Recordings of all the patients were obtained during overground walking. From the accelerometric data, we obtained the harmonic ratio (HR), i.e., a measure of the acceleration patterns, smoothness and rhythm, and the step length coefficient of variation (CV), which evaluates the variability of the gait cycle. Results. Compared to controls, patients had a lower HR, meaning a less harmonic and rhythmic acceleration pattern of the trunk, and a higher step length CV, indicating a more variable step length. Both HR and step length CV showed a high effect size in distinguishing patients and controls (p < 0.001 and p = 0.011, respectively). A positive correlation was found between the step length CV and both the number of falls (R = 0.672; p = 0.003) and the clinical severity (ICARS: R = 0.494; p = 0.044; SARA: R = 0.680; p = 0.003). Conclusion. These findings demonstrate that the use of inertial sensors is effective in evaluating gait and balance impairment among ataxic patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 712 KiB  
Article
Wearable Electronics Assess the Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Balance and Gait in Parkinson’s Disease Patients
by Mariachiara Ricci, Giulia Di Lazzaro, Antonio Pisani, Simona Scalise, Mohammad Alwardat, Chiara Salimei, Franco Giannini and Giovanni Saggio
Sensors 2019, 19(24), 5465; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19245465 - 11 Dec 2019
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3069
Abstract
Currently, clinical evaluation represents the primary outcome measure in Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, clinical evaluation may underscore some subtle motor impairments, hidden from the visual inspection of examiners. Technology-based objective measures are more frequently utilized to assess motor performance and objectively measure motor [...] Read more.
Currently, clinical evaluation represents the primary outcome measure in Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, clinical evaluation may underscore some subtle motor impairments, hidden from the visual inspection of examiners. Technology-based objective measures are more frequently utilized to assess motor performance and objectively measure motor dysfunction. Gait and balance impairments, frequent complications in later disease stages, are poorly responsive to classic dopamine-replacement therapy. Although recent findings suggest that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can have a role in improving motor skills, there is scarce evidence for this, especially considering the difficulty to objectively assess motor function. Therefore, we used wearable electronics to measure motor abilities, and further evaluated the gait and balance features of 10 PD patients, before and (three days and one month) after the tDCS. To assess patients’ abilities, we adopted six motor tasks, obtaining 72 meaningful motor features. According to the obtained results, wearable electronics demonstrated to be a valuable tool to measure the treatment response. Meanwhile the improvements from tDCS on gait and balance abilities of PD patients demonstrated to be generally partial and selective. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1155 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Walking Protocols and Gait Assessment Systems for Machine Learning-Based Classification of Parkinson’s Disease
by Rana Zia Ur Rehman, Silvia Del Din, Jian Qing Shi, Brook Galna, Sue Lord, Alison J. Yarnall, Yu Guan and Lynn Rochester
Sensors 2019, 19(24), 5363; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19245363 - 05 Dec 2019
Cited by 33 | Viewed by 7402
Abstract
Early diagnosis of Parkinson’s diseases (PD) is challenging; applying machine learning (ML) models to gait characteristics may support the classification process. Comparing performance of ML models used in various studies can be problematic due to different walking protocols and gait assessment systems. The [...] Read more.
Early diagnosis of Parkinson’s diseases (PD) is challenging; applying machine learning (ML) models to gait characteristics may support the classification process. Comparing performance of ML models used in various studies can be problematic due to different walking protocols and gait assessment systems. The objective of this study was to compare the impact of walking protocols and gait assessment systems on the performance of a support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) for classification of PD. 93 PD and 103 controls performed two walking protocols at their normal pace: (i) four times along a 10 m walkway (intermittent walk-IW), (ii) walking for 2 minutes on a 25 m oval circuit (continuous walk-CW). 14 gait characteristics were extracted from two different systems (an instrumented walkway—GAITRite; and an accelerometer attached at the lower back—Axivity). SVM and RF were trained on normalized data (accounting for step velocity, gender, age and BMI) and evaluated using 10-fold cross validation with area under the curve (AUC). Overall performance was higher for both systems during CW compared to IW. SVM performed better than RF. With SVM, during CW Axivity significantly outperformed GAITRite (AUC: 87.83 ± 7.81% vs. 80.49 ± 9.85%); during IW systems performed similarly. These findings suggest that choice of testing protocol and sensing system may have a direct impact on ML PD classification results and highlight the need for standardization for wide scale implementation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1428 KiB  
Article
Gait Quality Assessment in Survivors from Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: An Instrumented Approach Based on Inertial Sensors
by Valeria Belluscio, Elena Bergamini, Marco Tramontano, Amaranta Orejel Bustos, Giulia Allevi, Rita Formisano, Giuseppe Vannozzi and Maria Gabriella Buzzi
Sensors 2019, 19(23), 5315; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19235315 - 03 Dec 2019
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 3758
Abstract
Despite existing evidence that gait disorders are a common consequence of severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI), the literature describing gait instability in sTBI survivors is scant. Thus, the present study aims at quantifying gait patterns in sTBI through wearable inertial sensors and investigating [...] Read more.
Despite existing evidence that gait disorders are a common consequence of severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI), the literature describing gait instability in sTBI survivors is scant. Thus, the present study aims at quantifying gait patterns in sTBI through wearable inertial sensors and investigating the association of sensor-based gait quality indices with the scores of commonly administered clinical scales. Twenty healthy adults (control group, CG) and 20 people who suffered from a sTBI were recruited. The Berg balance scale, community balance and mobility scale, and dynamic gait index (DGI) were administered to sTBI participants, who were further divided into two subgroups, severe and very severe, according to their score in the DGI. Participants performed the 10 m walk, the Figure-of-8 walk, and the Fukuda stepping tests, while wearing five inertial sensors. Significant differences were found among the three groups, discriminating not only between CG and sTBI, but also for walking ability levels. Several indices displayed a significant correlation with clinical scales scores, especially in the 10 m walking and Figure-of-8 walk tests. Results show that the use of wearable sensors allows the obtainment of quantitative information about a patient’s gait disorders and discrimination between different levels of walking abilities, supporting the rehabilitative staff in designing tailored therapeutic interventions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1123 KiB  
Article
Turning Analysis during Standardized Test Using On-Shoe Wearable Sensors in Parkinson’s Disease
by Nooshin Haji Ghassemi, Julius Hannink, Nils Roth, Heiko Gaßner, Franz Marxreiter, Jochen Klucken and Björn M. Eskofier
Sensors 2019, 19(14), 3103; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19143103 - 13 Jul 2019
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 3507
Abstract
Mobile gait analysis systems using wearable sensors have the potential to analyze and monitor pathological gait in a finer scale than ever before. A closer look at gait in Parkinson’s disease (PD) reveals that turning has its own characteristics and requires its own [...] Read more.
Mobile gait analysis systems using wearable sensors have the potential to analyze and monitor pathological gait in a finer scale than ever before. A closer look at gait in Parkinson’s disease (PD) reveals that turning has its own characteristics and requires its own analysis. The goal of this paper is to present a system with on-shoe wearable sensors in order to analyze the abnormalities of turning in a standardized gait test for PD. We investigated turning abnormalities in a large cohort of 108 PD patients and 42 age-matched controls. We quantified turning through several spatio-temporal parameters. Analysis of turn-derived parameters revealed differences of turn-related gait impairment in relation to different disease stages and motor impairment. Our findings confirm and extend the results from previous studies and show the applicability of our system in turning analysis. Our system can provide insight into the turning in PD and be used as a complement for physicians’ gait assessment and to monitor patients in their daily environment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3467 KiB  
Article
Comparing Gait Trials with Greedy Template Matching
by Aliénor Vienne-Jumeau, Laurent Oudre, Albane Moreau, Flavien Quijoux, Pierre-Paul Vidal and Damien Ricard
Sensors 2019, 19(14), 3089; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19143089 - 12 Jul 2019
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2951
Abstract
Gait assessment and quantification have received an increased interest in recent years. Embedded technologies and low-cost sensors can be used for the longitudinal follow-up of various populations (neurological diseases, elderly, etc.). However, the comparison of two gait trials remains a tricky question as [...] Read more.
Gait assessment and quantification have received an increased interest in recent years. Embedded technologies and low-cost sensors can be used for the longitudinal follow-up of various populations (neurological diseases, elderly, etc.). However, the comparison of two gait trials remains a tricky question as standard gait features may prove to be insufficient in some cases. This article describes a new algorithm for comparing two gait trials recorded with inertial measurement units (IMUs). This algorithm uses a library of step templates extracted from one trial and attempts to detect similar steps in the second trial through a greedy template matching approach. The output of our method is a similarity index (SId) comprised between 0 and 1 that reflects the similarity between the patterns observed in both trials. Results on healthy and multiple sclerosis subjects show that this new comparison tool can be used for both inter-individual comparison and longitudinal follow-up. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

22 pages, 2237 KiB  
Review
Gait Analysis in Parkinson’s Disease: An Overview of the Most Accurate Markers for Diagnosis and Symptoms Monitoring
by Lazzaro di Biase, Alessandro Di Santo, Maria Letizia Caminiti, Alfredo De Liso, Syed Ahmar Shah, Lorenzo Ricci and Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
Sensors 2020, 20(12), 3529; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20123529 - 22 Jun 2020
Cited by 92 | Viewed by 17046
Abstract
The aim of this review is to summarize that most relevant technologies used to evaluate gait features and the associated algorithms that have shown promise to aid diagnosis and symptom monitoring in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients. We searched PubMed for studies published between [...] Read more.
The aim of this review is to summarize that most relevant technologies used to evaluate gait features and the associated algorithms that have shown promise to aid diagnosis and symptom monitoring in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients. We searched PubMed for studies published between 1 January 2005, and 30 August 2019 on gait analysis in PD. We selected studies that have either used technologies to distinguish PD patients from healthy subjects or stratified PD patients according to motor status or disease stages. Only those studies that reported at least 80% sensitivity and specificity were included. Gait analysis algorithms used for diagnosis showed a balanced accuracy range of 83.5–100%, sensitivity of 83.3–100% and specificity of 82–100%. For motor status discrimination the gait analysis algorithms showed a balanced accuracy range of 90.8–100%, sensitivity of 92.5–100% and specificity of 88–100%. Despite a large number of studies on the topic of objective gait analysis in PD, only a limited number of studies reported algorithms that were accurate enough deemed to be useful for diagnosis and symptoms monitoring. In addition, none of the reported algorithms and technologies has been validated in large scale, independent studies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

32 pages, 1725 KiB  
Review
Fifteen Years of Wireless Sensors for Balance Assessment in Neurological Disorders
by Alessandro Zampogna, Ilaria Mileti, Eduardo Palermo, Claudia Celletti, Marco Paoloni, Alessandro Manoni, Ivan Mazzetta, Gloria Dalla Costa, Carlos Pérez-López, Filippo Camerota, Letizia Leocani, Joan Cabestany, Fernanda Irrera and Antonio Suppa
Sensors 2020, 20(11), 3247; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113247 - 07 Jun 2020
Cited by 62 | Viewed by 7738
Abstract
Balance impairment is a major mechanism behind falling along with environmental hazards. Under physiological conditions, ageing leads to a progressive decline in balance control per se. Moreover, various neurological disorders further increase the risk of falls by deteriorating specific nervous system functions contributing [...] Read more.
Balance impairment is a major mechanism behind falling along with environmental hazards. Under physiological conditions, ageing leads to a progressive decline in balance control per se. Moreover, various neurological disorders further increase the risk of falls by deteriorating specific nervous system functions contributing to balance. Over the last 15 years, significant advancements in technology have provided wearable solutions for balance evaluation and the management of postural instability in patients with neurological disorders. This narrative review aims to address the topic of balance and wireless sensors in several neurological disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke, and other neurodegenerative and acute clinical syndromes. The review discusses the physiological and pathophysiological bases of balance in neurological disorders as well as the traditional and innovative instruments currently available for balance assessment. The technical and clinical perspectives of wearable technologies, as well as current challenges in the field of teleneurology, are also examined. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 521 KiB  
Review
Cueing Paradigms to Improve Gait and Posture in Parkinson’s Disease: A Narrative Review
by Niveditha Muthukrishnan, James J. Abbas, Holly A. Shill and Narayanan Krishnamurthi
Sensors 2019, 19(24), 5468; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19245468 - 11 Dec 2019
Cited by 42 | Viewed by 8875
Abstract
Progressive gait dysfunction is one of the primary motor symptoms in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). It is generally expressed as reduced step length and gait speed and as increased variability in step time and step length. People with PD also exhibit stooped [...] Read more.
Progressive gait dysfunction is one of the primary motor symptoms in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). It is generally expressed as reduced step length and gait speed and as increased variability in step time and step length. People with PD also exhibit stooped posture which disrupts gait and impedes social interaction. The gait and posture impairments are usually resistant to the pharmacological treatment, worsen as the disease progresses, increase the likelihood of falls, and result in higher rates of hospitalization and mortality. These impairments may be caused by perceptual deficiencies (poor spatial awareness and loss of temporal rhythmicity) due to the disruptions in processing intrinsic information related to movement initiation and execution which can result in misperceptions of the actual effort required to perform a desired movement and maintain a stable posture. Consequently, people with PD often depend on external cues during execution of motor tasks. Numerous studies involving open-loop cues have shown improvements in gait and freezing of gait (FoG) in people with PD. However, the benefits of cueing may be limited, since cues are provided in a consistent/rhythmic manner irrespective of how well a person follows them. This limitation can be addressed by providing feedback in real-time to the user about performance (closed-loop cueing) which may help to improve movement patterns. Some studies that used closed-loop cueing observed improvements in gait and posture in PD, but the treadmill-based setup in a laboratory would not be accessible outside of a research setting, and the skills learned may not readily and completely transfer to overground locomotion in the community. Technologies suitable for cueing outside of laboratory environments could facilitate movement practice during daily activities at home or in the community and could strongly reinforce movement patterns and improve clinical outcomes. This narrative review presents an overview of cueing paradigms that have been utilized to improve gait and posture in people with PD and recommends development of closed-loop wearable systems that can be used at home or in the community to improve gait and posture in PD. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

8 pages, 1616 KiB  
Technical Note
The Coefficient of Variation of Step Time Can Overestimate Gait Abnormality: Test-Retest Reliability of Gait-Related Parameters Obtained with a Tri-Axial Accelerometer in Healthy Subjects
by Shunrou Fujiwara, Shinpei Sato, Atsushi Sugawara, Yasumasa Nishikawa, Takahiro Koji, Yukihide Nishimura and Kuniaki Ogasawara
Sensors 2020, 20(3), 577; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030577 - 21 Jan 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3377
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate whether variation in gait-related parameters among healthy participants could help detect gait abnormalities. In total, 36 participants (21 men, 15 women; mean age, 35.7 ± 9.9 years) performed a 10-m walk six times while wearing [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether variation in gait-related parameters among healthy participants could help detect gait abnormalities. In total, 36 participants (21 men, 15 women; mean age, 35.7 ± 9.9 years) performed a 10-m walk six times while wearing a tri-axial accelerometer fixed at the L3 level. A second walk was performed ≥1 month after the first (mean interval, 49.6 ± 7.6 days). From each 10-m data set, the following nine gait-related parameters were automatically calculated: assessment time, number of steps, stride time, cadence, ground force reaction, step time, coefficient of variation (CV) of step time, velocity, and step length. Six repeated measurement values were averaged for each gait parameter. In addition, for each gait parameter, the difference between the first and second assessments was statistically examined, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated with the level of significance set at p < 0.05. Only the CV of step time showed a significant difference between the first and second assessments (p = 0.0188). The CV of step time also showed the lowest ICC, at <0.50 (0.425), among all parameters. Test–retest results of gait assessment using a tri-axial accelerometer showed sufficient reproducibility in terms of the clinical evaluation of all parameters except the CV of step time. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 527 KiB  
Brief Report
Functional Evaluation Using Inertial Measurement of Back School Therapy in Lower Back Pain
by Claudia Celletti, Roberta Mollica, Cristina Ferrario, Manuela Galli and Filippo Camerota
Sensors 2020, 20(2), 531; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20020531 - 18 Jan 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3285
Abstract
Lower back pain is an extremely common health problem and globally causes more disability than any other condition. Among other rehabilitation approaches, back schools are interventions comprising both an educational component and exercises. Normally, the main outcome evaluated is pain reduction. The aim [...] Read more.
Lower back pain is an extremely common health problem and globally causes more disability than any other condition. Among other rehabilitation approaches, back schools are interventions comprising both an educational component and exercises. Normally, the main outcome evaluated is pain reduction. The aim of this study was to evaluate not only the efficacy of back school therapy in reducing pain, but also the functional improvement. Patients with lower back pain were clinically and functionally evaluated; in particular, the timed “up and go” test with inertial movement sensor was studied before and after back school therapy. Forty-four patients completed the program, and the results showed not only a reduction of pain, but also an improvement in several parameters of the timed up and go test, especially in temporal parameters (namely duration and velocity). The application of the inertial sensor measurement in evaluating functional aspects seems to be useful and promising in assessing the aspects that are not strictly correlated to the specific pathology, as well as in rehabilitation management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop