sensors-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Wearable and BAN Sensors for Physical Rehabilitation and eHealth Architectures (Volume II)

A special issue of Sensors (ISSN 1424-8220). This special issue belongs to the section "Sensor Networks".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 25 May 2024 | Viewed by 2238

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
DITEN, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
Interests: digital signal processing; eHealth applications; mobile computing
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The demographic shift in the population toward an increase in the number of elderly citizens, together with the sedentary lifestyle we are adopting, is reflected in the increasingly debilitated physical health of the population. The resulting physical impairments require rehabilitation therapies, which may be aided by the use of wearable sensors or body area network sensors (BANs). The use of novel technology for medical therapies can also contribute to reducing the cost for healthcare systems and decreasing patient overflow in medical centers. Sensors are the primary enablers of any wearable medical device, and play a central role in eHealth architectures. The accuracy of the acquired data relies on the sensors; hence, when considering wearable and BAN sensing integration, they must prove to be accurate and reliable solutions. 

This Special Issue will focus on the current state-of-the-art BANs and wearable sensing devices for physical rehabilitation of impaired or debilitated citizens. It will cover novel technological achievements related to different sensing technologies (optical or electronic), their design, and implementation. Both original research papers and review articles describing these current state-of-the-art technologies are welcome. We hope this SI will provide you with an overview of the present status and future outlook of the aforementioned topics. 

The manuscripts should cover, but need not be limited to, the following topics:

  • Optical fiber sensing of physiological parameters;
  • Wearable biomedical sensors;
  • Optical fiber non-invasive devices;
  • Optical fiber sensors in eHealth architectures;
  • Body area network sensors (BANs);
  • Energy efficient eHealth architectures;
  • Big data analysis for eHealth;
  • Sensors for physical rehabilitation;
  • Innovative materials for sensing design;
  • Advanced signal processing techniques;
  • Applications including, but not limited to, physical rehabilitation, robotics, medical diagnostics and therapy, and cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation.

Dr. Maria de Fátima Domingues
Dr. Ayman Radwan
Dr. Andrea Sciarrone
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sensors is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

12 pages, 2115 KiB  
Article
Feasibility of Using a GENEActiv Accelerometer with Triaxial Acceleration and Temperature Sensors to Monitor Adherence to Shoulder Sling Wear Following Surgery
by Ahmed Barakat, Abdurrahmaan Manga, Aneesa Sheikh, Ryan McWilliams, Alex V. Rowlands and Harvinder Singh
Sensors 2024, 24(3), 880; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24030880 - 29 Jan 2024
Viewed by 664
Abstract
Background: Self-reported adherence to sling wear is unreliable due to recall bias. We aim to assess the feasibility and accuracy of quantifying sling wear and non-wear utilising slings pre-fitted with a GENEActiv accelerometer that houses triaxial acceleration and temperature sensors. Methods: Ten participants [...] Read more.
Background: Self-reported adherence to sling wear is unreliable due to recall bias. We aim to assess the feasibility and accuracy of quantifying sling wear and non-wear utilising slings pre-fitted with a GENEActiv accelerometer that houses triaxial acceleration and temperature sensors. Methods: Ten participants were asked to wear slings for 480 min (8 h) incorporating 180 min of non-wear time in durations varying from 5–120 min. GENEActiv devices were fitted in sutured inner sling pockets and participants logged sling donning and doffing times. An algorithm based on variability in acceleration in three axes and temperature change was developed to identify sling wear and non-wear and compared to participants’ logs. Results: There was no significant difference between algorithm detected non-wear duration (mean ± standard deviation = 172.0 ± 6.8 min/participant) and actual non-wear (179.7 ± 1.0 min/participant). Minute-by-minute agreement of sensor-detected wear and non-wear with participant reported wear was 97.3 ± 1.5% (range = 93.9–99.0), with mean sensitivity 94.3 ± 3.5% (range = 86.1–98.3) and specificity 99.1 ± 0.8% (range = 93.7–100). Conclusion: An algorithm based on accelerometer-assessed acceleration and temperature can accurately identify shoulder sling wear/non-wear times. This method may have potential for assessing whether sling wear adherence after shoulder surgeries have any bearing on patient functional outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

21 pages, 2489 KiB  
Review
Wearables for Monitoring and Postural Feedback in the Work Context: A Scoping Review
by Vânia Figueira, Sandra Silva, Inês Costa, Bruna Campos, João Salgado, Liliana Pinho, Marta Freitas, Paulo Carvalho, João Marques and Francisco Pinho
Sensors 2024, 24(4), 1341; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24041341 - 19 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 794
Abstract
Wearables offer a promising solution for simultaneous posture monitoring and/or corrective feedback. The main objective was to identify, synthesise, and characterise the wearables used in the workplace to monitor and postural feedback to workers. The PRISMA-ScR guidelines were followed. Studies were included between [...] Read more.
Wearables offer a promising solution for simultaneous posture monitoring and/or corrective feedback. The main objective was to identify, synthesise, and characterise the wearables used in the workplace to monitor and postural feedback to workers. The PRISMA-ScR guidelines were followed. Studies were included between 1 January 2000 and 22 March 2023 in Spanish, French, English, and Portuguese without geographical restriction. The databases selected for the research were PubMed®, Web of Science®, Scopus®, and Google Scholar®. Qualitative studies, theses, reviews, and meta-analyses were excluded. Twelve studies were included, involving a total of 304 workers, mostly health professionals (n = 8). The remaining studies covered workers in the industry (n = 2), in the construction (n = 1), and welders (n = 1). For assessment purposes, most studies used one (n = 5) or two sensors (n = 5) characterised as accelerometers (n = 7), sixaxial (n = 2) or nonaxialinertial measurement units (n = 3). The most common source of feedback was the sensor itself (n = 6) or smartphones (n = 4). Haptic feedback was the most prevalent (n = 6), followed by auditory (n = 5) and visual (n = 3). Most studies employed prototype wearables emphasising kinematic variables of human movement. Healthcare professionals were the primary focus of the study along with haptic feedback that proved to be the most common and effective method for correcting posture during work activities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop