Islamic Religious Thought (Volume II)

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (11 September 2023) | Viewed by 1352

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Philosophy and Religion, Christopher Newport University, Newport News, VA 23606, USA
Interests: classical and modern Islamic thought; Qur’anic studies; Islamic reformism; Islamic liberalism; progressive Islam; Shari‘a reasoning
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue on Islamic religious thought will explore the thoughts of Muslim thinkers whose writings fall in the realm of what is called the wasatiyya school of thought. These prolific thinkers, such as Yusuf al-Qaradawi and Khaled Abou El Fadl, have produced extensive works to define and argue for the Islamic wasatiyya, as well as to offer their response to and refutation of the salafiyya, one of the most influential schools of thought in the Muslim world today. The wasatiyya, or al-wasatiyya––a name given to those who promote moderation in Islam––is a school of Sunni Islam that condemns extremist thought and promotes a moderate and balanced interpretation of Islam. The salafiyya, or al-salafiyya––a name given to those who follow the ideas and practices of the pious ancestors, al-salaf al-salih––is also a school of Sunni Islam that condemns theological innovation and advocates strict adherence to the shari‘a (Islamic law) and to the social structures existing in the earliest days of Islam.

This Special Issue will explore how thinkers in the al-wasatiyya school of thought have responded to al-salafiyya’s interpretation of theological concepts that have influenced and shaped Islamic beliefs throughout Islamic history. Concepts such as al-wala’ wa al-bara’ (loyalty and disavowal), takfir (declaring a Muslim unbeliever), and iman (belief or faith) have long been debated in the circles of Muslim thinkers, theologians, Jurists, and scholars. These concepts occupy a central role in the salafi thought, justifying calls to cut or limit Muslim interactions with non-Muslims and to declare other Muslim unbelievers on the assumption that they are not following “correct” Islam. By contrast, the wasati approach promotes a moderate and pragmatic interpretation of the Qur’an, hadith, and shari‘a (Islamic law) that emphasizes the compatibility of Islam and modernity.

The salafis have emphasized a textualist approach to the Qur’an where they base their teachings and interpretation of Qur’anic concepts on the literal reading of the text. This method of reading does not take into consideration the historical context of the verse. The wasatis, on the other hand, consider the challenges of modern society and allow an interpretation of the Qur’an that suits the modern Muslim needs. In regard to the doctrine of al-wala’ and al-bara’, for instance, the salafis have highlighted the Qur’anic teachings that command Muslims to be faithful and loyal to their fellow Muslims and to disassociate themselves from unbelievers. Likewise, in regard to the issue of takfir, the salafis are quick to declare the unbelief of other Muslims if they do not adhere to their strict interpretation of Islam. The wasatis, in contrast, contend that these interpretations served Muslims in the past when Islam was in the formative stages, as the infidels exerted pressure on early Muslims to leave their faith and argue that Islam promotes interactions between communities, hold that Muslims should play an active role in the society where they end up as a minority, and believe that takfir is too dangerous to practice today.

This Special Issue will shed light on the wasatiyya school of thought, its response to the salafi interpretation of theological concepts and doctrines that have contributed to the rise of radicalism, extremism, intolerance, and even violence, and how wasatiyya thinkers have utilized Islamic theology to confront the salafi interpretation of Islam.

Prof. Dr. Hussam S. Timani
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • wasatiyya
  • salafiyya
  • Salafism
  • Qur’an
  • Islamic theology
  • shari‘a
 

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 382 KiB  
Article
The Ambiguity of the Quest for Mastership of the World: The Concept of Ustāḏiyyat al-ʿĀlam in the Doctrine of the Muslim Brotherhood
by Limor Lavie
Religions 2023, 14(9), 1144; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091144 - 6 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 900
Abstract
This article examines the idea of ustāḏiyyat al-ʿālam (mastership of the world), in the political thought of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). Ustāḏiyyat al-ʿālam was formulated by the movements’ founder, Ḥasan al-Bannā, as the ultimate goal of the MB, the last of a gradual [...] Read more.
This article examines the idea of ustāḏiyyat al-ʿālam (mastership of the world), in the political thought of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). Ustāḏiyyat al-ʿālam was formulated by the movements’ founder, Ḥasan al-Bannā, as the ultimate goal of the MB, the last of a gradual seven-stage plan to Islamize the individual, the family, society, the government, and the state, and restore the caliphate. In an attempt to unpack this abstract concept, this article offers a contextualized reading of its use in the foundational tracts of the MB general guides, and in pertinent commentaries on some of these tracts. We point to an inherent ambiguity in the concept, which intertwines ideational and active elements of domination, ranging between the homiletical task of propagating Islam to the world and striving to rule the world. Within the MB, ustāḏiyyat al-ʿālam is found to serve alternately as a privileged status of the Islamic nation, a duty, a mechanism of power legitimation, and as a source of motivation in times of despair, while utilized in anti-MB campaigns to discredit the MB and curb its internationalization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Islamic Religious Thought (Volume II))
Back to TopTop