Islamic Religious Thought (Volume I)

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Humanities/Philosophies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 November 2021) | Viewed by 7094

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Philosophy and Religion, Christopher Newport University, Newport News, VA 23606, USA
Interests: classical and modern Islamic thought; Qur’anic studies; Islamic reformism; Islamic liberalism; progressive Islam; Shari‘a reasoning
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue on Islamic religious thought will explore the thoughts of Muslim thinkers whose writings fall in the realm of what is called the wasatiyya school of thought. These prolific thinkers, such as Yusuf al-Qaradawi and Khaled Abou El Fadl, have produced extensive works to define and argue for the Islamic wasatiyya, as well as to offer their response to and refutation of the salafiyya, one of the most influential schools of thought in the Muslim world today. The wasatiyya, or al-wasatiyya––a name given to those who promote moderation in Islam––is a school of Sunni Islam that condemns extremist thought and promotes a moderate and balanced interpretation of Islam. The salafiyya, or al-salafiyya––a name given to those who follow the ideas and practices of the pious ancestors, al-salaf al-salih––is also a school of Sunni Islam that condemns theological innovation and advocates strict adherence to the shari‘a (Islamic law) and to the social structures existing in the earliest days of Islam.

This Special Issue will explore how thinkers in the al-wasatiyya school of thought have responded to al-salafiyya’s interpretation of theological concepts that have influenced and shaped Islamic beliefs throughout Islamic history. Concepts such as al-wala’ wa al-bara’ (loyalty and disavowal), takfir (declaring a Muslim unbeliever), and iman (belief or faith) have long been debated in the circles of Muslim thinkers, theologians, Jurists, and scholars. These concepts occupy a central role in the salafi thought, justifying calls to cut or limit Muslim interactions with non-Muslims and to declare other Muslims unbelievers on the assumption that they are not following “correct” Islam. On the contrary, the wasati approach promotes a moderate and pragmatic interpretation of the Qur’an, hadith, and shari‘a (Islamic law) that emphasizes the compatibility of Islam and modernity.

The salafis have emphasized a textualist approach to the Qur’an where they base their teachings and interpretation of Qur’anic concepts on the literal reading of the text. This method of reading does not take into consideration the historical context of the verse. The wasatis, on the other hand, consider the challenges of modern society and allow an interpretation of the Qur’an that suits the modern Muslim needs. In regard to the doctrine of al-wala’ and al-bara’, for instance, the salafis have highlighted the Qur’anic teachings that command Muslims to be faithful and loyal to their fellow Muslims and to disassociate themselves from unbelievers. Likewise, in regard to the issue of takfir, the salafis are quick to declare the unbelief of other Muslims if they do not adhere to their strict interpretation of Islam. The wasatis, in contrast, contend that these interpretations served Muslims in the past when Islam was in the formative stages, as the infidels exerted pressure on early Muslims to leave their faith and argue that Islam promotes interactions between communities, hold that Muslims should play an active role in the society where they end up as a minority, and believe that takfir is too dangerous to practice today.

This Special Issue will shed the light on the wasatiyya school of thought, its response to the salafi interpretation of theological concepts and doctrines that have contributed to the rise of radicalism, extremism, intolerance, and even violence, and how wasatiyya thinkers have utilized Islamic theology to confront the salafi interpretation of Islam.

Prof. Dr. Hussam S. Timani
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • wasatiyya
  • salafiyya
  • salafism
  • Qur’an
  • Islamic theology
  • shari‘a

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 373 KiB  
Article
Wasatiyya Discourse in Shi’i Islam: Ayatollah Montazeri and Human Rights Jurisprudence
by Naser Ghobadzadeh
Religions 2022, 13(2), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020126 - 28 Jan 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2336
Abstract
There are significant differences of opinion about the successes and failures of Iran’s clerical government, but it can hardly be disputed that the experience has led to the flourishing of Shīʿī political thought. In the past four decades, aided by government support, extensive [...] Read more.
There are significant differences of opinion about the successes and failures of Iran’s clerical government, but it can hardly be disputed that the experience has led to the flourishing of Shīʿī political thought. In the past four decades, aided by government support, extensive literature has been produced endorsing the political theology of “governmental Shīʿism” conceptualized by Khomeini in the early 1970s. Numerous other schools of thought have also emerged in opposition to the militant Shīʿī interpretation of religion by governmental Shīʿism. Using the concept of Wasatiyyah to conceptualize the most important counter-discourse to governmental Shīʿism, this article addresses the life and thought of Ayatollah Montazeri, one of the most prominent Wasatiyyah thinkers. Focusing on the issue of human rights in Montazeri’s thought, the article seeks to demonstrate how Montazeri instigated a fundamental reform of the seminary episteme, and by doing so articulated intra-religious reasoning in favor of the promotion of modern concepts such as human rights. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Islamic Religious Thought (Volume I))
19 pages, 372 KiB  
Article
Between Text and Context: Understanding Ḥadīth through Asbab al Wurud
by Muhamad Rozaimi Ramle and Miftachul Huda
Religions 2022, 13(2), 92; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020092 - 19 Jan 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3942
Abstract
A comprehensive understanding of Ḥadīth, with their narrative background in Islamic tradition, would require the application of the principle of asbāb al-wurūd (discerning the specific circumstances for the reason or purpose of revealing Ḥadīth), an approach which gives detailed information about [...] Read more.
A comprehensive understanding of Ḥadīth, with their narrative background in Islamic tradition, would require the application of the principle of asbāb al-wurūd (discerning the specific circumstances for the reason or purpose of revealing Ḥadīth), an approach which gives detailed information about narrated Ḥadīth. Having such a comprehension about the essence of the message of Ḥadīth could enhance the understanding of Muslim audiences and followers. This situation will indirectly provide a stepping stone to comprehensive information to prevent misunderstanding the message of Islamic religion. Taking due cognizance of these circumstances could potentially result in preventing actions of religious radicalism, which might result from obtaining religious messages through a solely textual approach. In this situation, the sufficient application of asbāb al-wurūd plays a significant role in leading an order to achieve the contextual comprehension of the religious message of Ḥadīth. This paper aims to examine the significance of asbāb al-wurūd in understanding the contextual meaning of Ḥadīth beyond a textual basis. The findings reveal that the contextual elaboration of the message of Ḥadīth could be adapted in a proper way, in which its textual comprehension could be elaborated on clearly through detailing its asbāb al-wurūd, one method of which is to refer to Muslim scholars together with schools of thought in order to clearly attain the message of Islamic religion. Furthermore, this article attempts to address such a way of bringing about textual understanding to the context to assist in adapting the contextual significance of a clear and detailed comprehension of Ḥadīth. The significance of this study is to contribute to providing a detailed explanation on both text and context in seeking for clarity on the Ḥadīths’ information and message with a clear basis as a safeguard against extremist interpretations of Islam. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Islamic Religious Thought (Volume I))
Back to TopTop