Sustainable Manufacturing in Construction

A special issue of Buildings (ISSN 2075-5309). This special issue belongs to the section "Building Energy, Physics, Environment, and Systems".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 July 2023) | Viewed by 12943

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Sustainable Engineering Group, School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
Interests: sustainable engineering; life cycle assessment; waste management
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Buildings and infrastructure consume a significant amount of energy and materials during their construction, which has resulted in a high demand for finite natural resources and disruption of the relationship between ecosystems and human wellbeing. This sector alone is responsible for more than 50% of steel production, 60%–70% of cement production, 50% of urban land utilization, and 40%–50% of the total energy consumption [1]. The extraction of these nonrenewable resources is increasing the ecological footprint, deforestation, loss of biodiversity, waste generation and, most importantly, leaving inadequate resources for our future generations. In addition, buildings contribute to emission of around 25% of global warming gases, resulting in increased drought, bushfires, sea level rise, and heatwaves and ultimately affecting adversely our economy, livelihood, and normal life [2].

Sustainable manufacturing in construction thus focuses on six principles: conservation, reuse, recycle/refurbish, protection of flora and fauna, generation of nontoxic products/wastes, and a high quality of life. Construction techniques, alternative resources/materials, and building practices have evolved over the years, and with the increased need for sustainability or resource conservation for the future generation, new methods of construction need to be developed. There are two key approaches of sustainable manufacturing in construction: the materials that are used and the methods that are utilized.

One of the useful ways to achieve sustainable manufacturing in construction is through the materials that are used. Materials selection plays a pivotal role in reducing the global warming impacts of the buildings. Industrial byproducts and wastes have the potential to significantly reduce the use of energy intensive virgin materials for construction purposes. The prefabrication method has been considered an effective alternative to conventional building. It has gained an increasing amount of attention over the last few decades as materials and building components can be disassembled and reused after the end of life. Several multifunctional prefabricated systems are being developed to reduce the consumption of different types of materials and increase building efficiency. Passive design (e.g., natural ventilation and illumination, building orientation, selection of appropriate materials for a specific climate condition, maximizing solar energy to heat spaces) that maximizes the use of natural energy sources could reduce the consumption of energy while maximizing human comfort. The new buildings can have photovoltaics (PV) integrated in the building envelope. Building integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) contributes to achieving this goal by fully utilizing building surfaces, such as the roof or façade, and to maximize electricity generation. Apart from these sustainable manufacturing approaches, different sustainability assessment tools can used to discern sustainable construction. For example, lifecycle assessment (LCA) can be used to evaluate the environmental, social–economic, and resource impact of building components or even the whole building during their entire life cycle. It can help design buildings for disassembly, remanufacturing, reuse, and recovery. In addition, LCA can produce Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) to make the environmental performance information of buildings accessible to building professionals.

This Special Issue is aimed to cover following topics that are relevant for achieving sustainable construction.

  • Prefabricated/modular buildings
  • Passive design
  • Building integrated photovoltaics
  • Net-zero energy buildings (NZEBs)
  • A new generation of stronger, lighter, and more sustainable building materials
  • Application of LCA/EPD in sustainable construction

References

  1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.118
  2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102109

Dr. Wahidul K. Biswas
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Buildings is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

12 pages, 7618 KiB  
Article
Development of Free-Form Assembly-Type Mold Production Technology Using 3D Printing Technology
by Jongyoung Youn, Minwoo Cho, Hyuntak Chae, Kyeongtae Jeong, Sungjin Kim, Sunglok Do and Donghoon Lee
Buildings 2023, 13(9), 2197; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13092197 - 29 Aug 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 728
Abstract
Free-form molds are used for one-time curve configuration, and because they are produced through manpower, they have issues with reduced precision and the occurrence of errors. In this study, 3D printing technologies were used to ensure precision, and polylactic acid and reusable eco-friendly [...] Read more.
Free-form molds are used for one-time curve configuration, and because they are produced through manpower, they have issues with reduced precision and the occurrence of errors. In this study, 3D printing technologies were used to ensure precision, and polylactic acid and reusable eco-friendly materials to develop free-form assembly-type side-mold production technologies. In verifying the side mold, a free-form concrete panel was produced to check whether deformation occurs due to lateral pressure. Therefore, in this study, to verify this, a free-form concrete panel was produced and 3D-scanned to analyze the error at the side mold and the cause of the error to confirm the performance of the mold. The results showed that the error at each part was small, with a standard deviation of 1.627 mm, and there was little error at the panel joint part, around 1°. Such research is expected to be used in studies related to mold production technologies using 3D printers and on the production of free-form side molds. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Manufacturing in Construction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 5744 KiB  
Article
Techno-Economic and Environmental Analysis of Decommissioned Flowline, Umbilical, and Tubular for Breakwaters
by Xihong Zhang, Wahidul K. Biswas, Andy Watt, Lendyn Philip and Shaun Sadler
Buildings 2023, 13(1), 225; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13010225 - 13 Jan 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1221
Abstract
This paper presents the application of recycled tubular, flowline, and umbilical in coastal protection structures. Flowline and tubular are found to improve the load resistance capacity of concrete beams. Embedment of flowline, umbilical, and tubular into concrete beams would be beneficial to the [...] Read more.
This paper presents the application of recycled tubular, flowline, and umbilical in coastal protection structures. Flowline and tubular are found to improve the load resistance capacity of concrete beams. Embedment of flowline, umbilical, and tubular into concrete beams would be beneficial to the structural performance, which do not noticeably alter the initial cracking strength of the concrete beam but will provide good post-cracking resistance. A techno-economic analysis was performed, which revealed that coastal protection concrete structures with decommissioned components accounting for more than 25% of the concrete weight could be both economically viable and environmentally friendly options. Since global warming is the most dominant environmental impact (i.e., 63%), recycling these decommissioned components from offshore structures could impose positive environmental impacts. Given the limited supply of construction materials in the remote coastal area as well as its proximity to decommissioned oil and gas rig sites, these decommissioned components could have great potential for use as construction materials in the coastal areas adjacent to the oil exploration. This preliminary study finds no showstopper for the concept of recycling the mentioned decommissioned components as coastal protection concrete structures from structural performance, environmental impact, and economic perspectives. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Manufacturing in Construction)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

23 pages, 2923 KiB  
Article
Exploring the Missing Link between Life Cycle Assessment and Circularity Assessment in the Built Environment
by Wai Chung Lam, Steven Claes and Michiel Ritzen
Buildings 2022, 12(12), 2152; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12122152 - 6 Dec 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2183
Abstract
The built environment—with its significant environmental impact and long lifespan—is a key sector in which to implement circular economy principles. So far, however, a coherent framework with circularity indicators has not yet been established. While Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is commonly practiced to [...] Read more.
The built environment—with its significant environmental impact and long lifespan—is a key sector in which to implement circular economy principles. So far, however, a coherent framework with circularity indicators has not yet been established. While Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is commonly practiced to quantify the total environmental impact, it is designed and intended to assess linear life cycles, making it unsuitable for circularity assessment. Thus this paper explores an objective method to link LCA to a semi-quantified circularity indicator. Four variants of external wall designs of two case studies are analyzed. The explored possibilities of linking LCA results or mass input flows to the circularity indicator show differences in outcome. Furthermore, the analysis shows that decision-making can be affected by choice of assessing only a circularity indicator, an environmental impact indicator, or mass input flows, as opposed to a scenario in which a linked approach of these parameters is applied. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Manufacturing in Construction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1464 KiB  
Article
Towards Sustainable Construction Practices: How to Reinvigorate Vernacular Buildings in the Digital Era?
by Christina Priavolou, Nikiforos Tsiouris, Vasilis Niaros and Vasilis Kostakis
Buildings 2021, 11(7), 297; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11070297 - 7 Jul 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3713
Abstract
The starting point of this article is the critique on socioeconomic and environmental implications of conventional construction practices around sustainability. The focus is on exploring the sustainability dynamics of the emerging “Design Global, Manufacture Local” (DGML) configuration with emphasis on building construction. Combined [...] Read more.
The starting point of this article is the critique on socioeconomic and environmental implications of conventional construction practices around sustainability. The focus is on exploring the sustainability dynamics of the emerging “Design Global, Manufacture Local” (DGML) configuration with emphasis on building construction. Combined with the concept of conviviality which we identify in aspects of vernacular architecture we explore how it can foster meaningful sustainability practices in the construction sector. We introduce a framework of “open construction systems”, an expression of DGML in building construction, as a way to foster the conjunctive use of the digital commons and local manufacturing technologies for the construction of buildings through three interlocked elements—modularity, sharing and adaptability. We suggest that the “open construction systems” framework may point towards more sustainability in building construction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Manufacturing in Construction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

29 pages, 9283 KiB  
Review
Review on the Developments of Structure, Construction Automation, and Monitoring of Intelligent Construction
by Kewei Liu, Qingfei Meng, Qingzhao Kong and Xihong Zhang
Buildings 2022, 12(11), 1890; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111890 - 4 Nov 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3298
Abstract
The building and construction industry is a traditional industry that features high-capacity investment, long return period, high environment impact, and low technology demand in the past decades. With the fast development of technology and the demand for environmental sustainability, it is inevitable for [...] Read more.
The building and construction industry is a traditional industry that features high-capacity investment, long return period, high environment impact, and low technology demand in the past decades. With the fast development of technology and the demand for environmental sustainability, it is inevitable for the building and construction industry to embrace the revolution of technology. Intelligent construction is developed in light of advanced technologies including advanced computing technology, 3D design and manufacturing, automation and control, sensing, unmanned aircraft, and autonomous intelligence. It is also closely integrated with using perceived, analytical, decision-making coordination for building construction with perceived intelligent execution technology in the processes. Currently, there is no consensus definition on “intelligent construction” despite its rapid development. This paper reviews existing and current development in intelligent construction focusing on the following three aspects: (a) new structural forms, which are innovative and with potential or are being applied to automated and mass manufacturing/construction; (b) automated and intelligent construction system; and (c) advanced structure sensing and monitoring technology. These three components do not compromise the entire aspects for intelligent construction, but they have no doubt are the core elements for intelligent construction towards future building systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Manufacturing in Construction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop