sensors-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Cooperative Detection and Localization of Interference Sources in GNSS

A special issue of Sensors (ISSN 1424-8220). This special issue belongs to the section "Remote Sensors".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 February 2021) | Viewed by 6596

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
LINKS Foundation, 10138 Torino, Italy
Interests: GNSS; anti-spoofing and anti-jamming solutions; LEO-PNT
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland
Interests: vision-aided navigation; sensor and GNSS fusion for navigation; situational awareness; automated traffic and smart cities; GNSS interference mitigation; spatiotemporal data

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Today, GNSS user communities have reached full awareness of the danger that GNSS signal interference, either jamming or spoofing, or both, may cause on their sectors, challenging quality and continuity of service, productivity, economical revenues, but also reliability and safety. The number of reported real-world incidents related to GNSS interference at international airports, on highway systems, in metropolitan areas, and more is increasing, as well as the perception of the need for means to block and prevent them.

Signal jamming, either intentional (“informed”) or not, may cause disruption of the GNSS-based service for a single user or over a certain area, while spoofing is a more subtle threat, because it aims at fooling the victim GNSS receiver, taking control of the position or time information it produces. Sometimes the victim is unaware of the attack; other times, the victim coincides with the spoofer, for example, when they can obtain economical revenues from cheating its own PNT information. Nonetheless, the last ten years of R&D have demonstrated that in all the cases, interference attacks leave traces into the receiver, more or less evident and recognizable. Such traces, or clues, once detected in the receiver observables, give the chance of transforming a feared vulnerability into a potential resilience if these clues are opportunely exploited.

However, detection is only the first step in managing the risk associated to GNSS interference. Once the attack is set up, thee ways are then possible: The receiver warns the user and stops providing the positioning and timing service; the receiver attempts to mitigate the effects of the attack with ad hoc signal processing; a user level system or service attempts to neutralize the cause of the interference, locating the interference source and blocking it, even with law enforcement actions. In the first and second way, the state of the art offers several solutions, able to detect and mitigate various types of attacks using signal processing capabilities residing in the receiver itself, or in collaboration with other on-board sensors, typically inertial units. The third way brings a different perspective: cooperation among several receivers subject to the same attack not only allows more reliably detecting the event and issuing early warnings but can also enable procedures of source localization. In this perspective, GNSS receivers act as remote and distributed sensors in a network of peers, which improves resilience through detection and localization of interference sources.

This Special Issue proposes to gather examples of the most recent advances and results of systems and techniques to locate sources of GNSS interference, using GNSS receivers but possibly also other sensors in a collaborative way, exploiting connectivity, data crowd-sourcing, and network processing in distributed or centralized architectures. Detection and localization architectures may use traditional or innovative location means, including, for example, drones. The concept of interference broadly encompasses here all the types of GNSS jamming and spoofing. Of major interest is the discussion of solid results of on-field experiments or hardware-in-the-loop emulations in realistic conditions, including theoretical analyses and derivations.

Perspective papers are invited to cover the following topics, although they should not be limited to this list:

  • Collaborative interference detection and classification;
  • Collaborative interference geolocation;
  • Network-based resilience to GNSS interference;
  • Centralized or distributed architectures to geolocate interference source;
  • Techniques based on time-difference-of-arrival (TDOA), power-difference-of-arrival (PDOA), or angle of arrival (AOA) to find interference sources.

Dr. Emanuela Falletti
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Laura Ruotsalainen
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sensors is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • GNSS interference
  • GNSS Jamming
  • GNSS Spoofing
  • Detection
  • Source geolocation
  • Collaborative processing
  • Crowd sourcing

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 39034 KiB  
Article
A Comparative Analysis of the Response of GNSS Receivers under Vertical and Horizontal L1/E1 Chirp Jamming
by Polona Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Franc Dimc and Matej Bažec
Sensors 2021, 21(4), 1446; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041446 - 19 Feb 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2918
Abstract
Jamming is becoming a serious threat to various users of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). Therefore, live monitoring tests are required to estimate the sensitivity range of GNSS receivers under jamming. This study analyses the response of some mass-market and professional-grade receivers to [...] Read more.
Jamming is becoming a serious threat to various users of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). Therefore, live monitoring tests are required to estimate the sensitivity range of GNSS receivers under jamming. This study analyses the response of some mass-market and professional-grade receivers to intentional interferences based on different 3D jammer positions. First, the vertical jamming was investigated, followed by a horizontal experiment where the receivers were placed at three locations while the jammer was moving within a triangular area. The aim was to determine a fingerprint of the influence of the L1/E1 chirp jammer on receivers used in the research. The results show that low-cost receivers are much more susceptible to interference, while the latest generation of GNSS geodetic receivers are much more resilient. It is encouraging that positioning in the presence of jamming could be achieved on a larger scale, especially by using professional receivers. An attempt to position the jammer will be left for trials when a more frequency stable device is applied. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

24 pages, 1412 KiB  
Article
Collaborative Solutions for Interference Management in GNSS-Based Aircraft Navigation
by Mario Nicola, Gianluca Falco, Ruben Morales Ferre, Elena-Simona Lohan, Alberto de la Fuente and Emanuela Falletti
Sensors 2020, 20(15), 4085; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20154085 - 22 Jul 2020
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 2918
Abstract
Nowadays, the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) technology is not the primary means of navigation for civil aviation and Air Traffic Control, but its role is increasing. Consequently, the vulnerabilities of GNSSs to Radio Frequency Interference, including the dangerous intentional sources of interference [...] Read more.
Nowadays, the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) technology is not the primary means of navigation for civil aviation and Air Traffic Control, but its role is increasing. Consequently, the vulnerabilities of GNSSs to Radio Frequency Interference, including the dangerous intentional sources of interference (i.e., jamming and spoofing), raise concerns and special attention also in the aviation field. This panorama urges for figuring out effective solutions able to cope with GNSS interference and preserve safety of operations. In the frame of a Single European Sky Air traffic management Research (SESAR) Exploratory Research initiative, a novel, effective, and affordable concept of GNSS interference management for civil aviation has been developed. This new interference management concept is able to raise early warnings to the on-board navigation system about the detection of interfering signals and their classification, and then to estimate the Direction of Arrival (DoA) of the source of interference allowing the adoption of appropriate countermeasures against the individuated source. This paper describes the interference management concept and presents the on-field tests which allowed for assessing the reached level of performance and confirmed the applicability of this approach to the aviation applications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop