HCI for and within Open and Reproducible Science

A special issue of Multimodal Technologies and Interaction (ISSN 2414-4088).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 December 2021) | Viewed by 3164

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Interests: UX design; human—computer interaction; open science; reproducible data science; tangible artefacts interaction; gamification; rapid prototyping; design thinking; IoT security communication

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

For this Special Issue, we are soliciting original and unpublished research on the role of human–computer interaction (HCI) for and within open and reproducible science. Reproducibility is widely recognized as a cornerstone of science that enables research validation and reuse. Open data and science transparency are increasingly important as data volumes and research complexity grow across the sciences. In fact, stakeholders at all levels of scientific processes recognize open science (OS) guidelines and initiatives as necessary tools to meet today’s challenges in a globalized big data science community. Funding agencies issue OS regulations, journals and conferences demand data sharing, and academic institutions issue policies. However, we know that purely extrinsic forms of motivation fail to install and maintain healthy and sustainable attitudes and practices. How likely are we to motivate researchers to take the extra effort of fully documenting and sharing novel procedures if we engage them through policies that demand a clear set of common files in exchange for (financial) appraisal?

The growing body of HCI research at the intersection of OS and data science highlights the role of our field in supporting positive change towards open and reproducible science. This Special Issue honors and explores the unique role that HCI plays in elucidating how we can support and motivate this positive change in science through the design of future tools, from digital lab notebooks to domain-tailored research data management services. In addition to tool-centered investigations, we further solicit original research about scientists and scientific communities across all fields that inform about current research practices and needs, with particular regard to their impact on open and reproducible science.

While discussing the role that HCI plays in supporting changes in scientific practices, we should not overlook ongoing discussions on the role of OS within HCI, a field that stands out through the remarkable collaboration of researchers with diverse scientific backgrounds. Mapping reproducible practices across sciences, we are likely to further the discussion in our community and to introduce new approaches. Thus, we invite original research that explores the state of open and reproducible science in HCI, as well as work that shows how human-centered investigations in other fields of science inform our understanding of needs and practices in HCI.

We are soliciting original and unpublished research related to HCI for and within open and reproducible science, including, but not limited to:

  • Human-centered design of supportive tools;
  • Theoretical and empirical research on practices, requirements, and platform usage;
  • Explorations into collaborative frameworks and how they impact practices;
  • Role of HCI in supporting openness;
  • Beyond the single field: generalizable tools and approaches;
  • Creating meaningful incentives;
  • Motivation for OS and data management;
  • Research data management tools as drivers of knowledge transfer;
  • State and needs of open and reproducible science in HCI;
  • Addressing the gap: what is open is not necessarily enough; and what is reproducible is not necessarily open.

Dr. Sebastian Stefan Feger
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

10 pages, 236 KiB  
Article
Reproducibility: A Researcher-Centered Definition
by Sebastian Stefan Feger and Paweł W. Woźniak
Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2022, 6(2), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6020017 - 20 Feb 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2699
Abstract
Recent years have introduced major shifts in scientific reporting and publishing. The scientific community, publishers, funding agencies, and the public expect research to adhere to principles of openness, reproducibility, replicability, and repeatability. However, studies have shown that scientists often have neither the right [...] Read more.
Recent years have introduced major shifts in scientific reporting and publishing. The scientific community, publishers, funding agencies, and the public expect research to adhere to principles of openness, reproducibility, replicability, and repeatability. However, studies have shown that scientists often have neither the right tools nor suitable support at their disposal to meet these modern science challenges. In fact, even the concrete expectations connected to these terms may be unclear and subject to field-specific, organizational, and personal interpretations. Based on a narrative literature review of work that defines characteristics of open science, reproducibility, replicability, and repeatability, as well as a review of recent work on researcher-centered requirements, we find that the bottom-up practices and needs of researchers contrast top-down expectations encoded in terms related to reproducibility and open science. We identify and define reproducibility as a central term that concerns the ease of access to scientific resources, as well as their completeness, to the degree required for efficiently and effectively interacting with scientific work. We hope that this characterization helps to create a mutual understanding across science stakeholders, in turn paving the way for suitable and stimulating environments, fit to address the challenges of modern science reporting and publishing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue HCI for and within Open and Reproducible Science)
Back to TopTop