Geology of Uranium Deposits

A special issue of Minerals (ISSN 2075-163X). This special issue belongs to the section "Mineral Deposits".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (21 May 2021) | Viewed by 27355

Special Issue Editors

1. Centre for Exploration Targeting (CET), The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
2. Wilde Geoscience Consulting, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
Interests: geochemistry; mineralogy; geometallurgy; uranium; gold; base-metals; lithium
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
Economic Geology Research Centre, school of Earth & Environmental Science, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
Interests: exploration targeting; mineral systems; structural geology; geology of gold; copper and uranium deposits
CSIRO Mineral Resources, ARRC, PO Box 1130, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
Interests: uranium geology; AI application in exploration; ore body knowledge

Special Issue Information

Dear colleagues,

The study of uranium deposits is crucial for the discovery of much-needed new resources and the profitable exploitation of these new deposits. The precipitous drop in uranium price during the 1980s led to a worldwide reduction of research into uranium deposits. Today, most supply–demand scenarios require a major investment in new mines to satisfy the requirements of reactors under construction as well as those in the planning phase. Thus, there is a need for new research into the deposits using modern mineral systems thinking and application of the many new technologies that have been developed since the heyday of uranium deposit research in past decades. This Special Issue intends to bring together the latest research into uranium deposits, particularly into deposit types that have seen very little new work since the eighties. We welcome all descriptive deposit models, detailed studies on ore-forming processes, mineralogical studies and discovery case studies that might help in future discovery and metallurgical applications.

Dr. Andy Wilde
Dr. Oliver Kreuzer
Dr. Alex Otto
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Minerals is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Uranium deposits
  • geology
  • mineralogy
  • geochemistry
  • case studies
  • ore-forming processes

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

2 pages, 138 KiB  
Editorial
Editorial for Special Issue “Geology of Uranium Deposits”
by Andy Wilde
Minerals 2021, 11(9), 951; https://doi.org/10.3390/min11090951 - 31 Aug 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1323
Abstract
The study of uranium deposits is crucial for the discovery of much-needed new resources of uranium [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geology of Uranium Deposits)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

23 pages, 13610 KiB  
Article
Uranium Deposits of Erlian Basin (China): Role of Carbonaceous Debris Organic Matter and Hydrocarbon Fluids on Uranium Mineralization
by Lin-Fei Qiu, Xi-De Li, Wu-Sheng Liu, Bao-Qun Hu, Long Gao and Zhong-Bo He
Minerals 2021, 11(5), 532; https://doi.org/10.3390/min11050532 - 18 May 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2901
Abstract
The relationship of sedimentary organic matter, oil-gas and sandstone-type uranium (U) deposits is the key problem of U-mineralization. Whether migrate hydrocarbons participate in U-mineralization is still a controversy. Typical U deposits of the Erlian Basin in northeast China have been investigated through detailed [...] Read more.
The relationship of sedimentary organic matter, oil-gas and sandstone-type uranium (U) deposits is the key problem of U-mineralization. Whether migrate hydrocarbons participate in U-mineralization is still a controversy. Typical U deposits of the Erlian Basin in northeast China have been investigated through detailed petrography, mineralogical, micro spectroscopic, organic geochemical and C-isotope studies. Petrographic observations, Microscopic Laser Raman Spectroscopic, Infrared Spectroscopic and Scanning Electron Microscope analyses indicated there are three types of organic matter (including carbonaceous debris and migrated hydrocarbons). A significant amount of uranium was associated with pyrites, clay minerals and carbonaceous debris organic matter, either coexisted with hydrocarbon fluids. There are at least two stages mineralization events, stage I is related to sedimentary organic matter (syngenetic pre-enrichment stage), and stage II is related to mobile hydrocarbon fluids (main mineralization stage). Therefore, our results support that migrated hydrocarbons were involved as a reducing agent for the main uranium mineralization after synsedimentary mineralization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geology of Uranium Deposits)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 5622 KiB  
Article
Relationship between Uranium Minerals and Pyrite and Its Genetic Significance in the Mianhuakeng Deposit, Northern Guangdong Province
by Lirong Li, Zhengqi Wang and Deru Xu
Minerals 2021, 11(1), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/min11010073 - 13 Jan 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3114
Abstract
Granite-related uranium ore is an important uranium resource type in China and worldwide. Whether the uranium geochemical theory “U6+ oxidative migration and U4+ reductive precipitation” is applicable to the granite-related uranium mineralization theory has not been determined. Detailed field and petrographic [...] Read more.
Granite-related uranium ore is an important uranium resource type in China and worldwide. Whether the uranium geochemical theory “U6+ oxidative migration and U4+ reductive precipitation” is applicable to the granite-related uranium mineralization theory has not been determined. Detailed field and petrographic work, as well as scanning electron microscopy energy spectrum analysis, are conducted in this study to analyze the relationship between uranium minerals and pyrite from different ore types and evaluate the mechanism for the precipitation and enrichment of uranium in the Mianhuakeng uranium deposit of northern Guangdong. Uranium ore bodies in the Mianhuakeng deposit generally occur as vein-filling or vein-disseminated types. Four different kinds of ores are recognized: fluorite, carbonate, siliceous, and reddening types. Despite differences in the mineral assemblages, veined ores share similar characteristics and show that uranium minerals (1) occur in the central part or periphery of vein-filling ores or in interphase arrangements with syn-ore fluorite, quartz, or calcite veins; (2) occur as veinlets or are disseminated in cataclastic altered granite; (3) are inlaid with gangue minerals, primarily calcite, fluorite, and microcrystalline quartz; and (4) are closely associated with pyrite in aggregates or relatively independent states, forming straight boundaries with syn-ore gangue minerals that have euhedral and intact crystals and show mosaic growth features. All these results indicate that both pyrite and uranium minerals are co-crystallized products of the ore-forming fluid. Combined with previous research suggesting that the reducing fluid was sourced from mantle, this study shows that decreased pressure and temperature, as well as changes in pH and the solubility (saturation) of changes, rather than the redox reaction, caused the uranium precipitation in the Mianhuakeng deposit. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geology of Uranium Deposits)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 8594 KiB  
Article
The Bigrlyi Tabular Sandstone-Hosted Uranium–Vanadium Deposit, Ngalia Basin, Central Australia
by Susanne Schmid, Wayne R. Taylor and Daniel P. Jordan
Minerals 2020, 10(10), 896; https://doi.org/10.3390/min10100896 - 9 Oct 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3008
Abstract
The Bigrlyi deposit is a tabular, sandstone-hosted, uranium–vanadium deposit of Carboniferous age located in the Ngalia Basin of central Australia. The deposit is similar to the continental, fluvial Saltwash-type of sandstone-hosted U-V deposits which are well known from the Colorado Plateau, USA. Most [...] Read more.
The Bigrlyi deposit is a tabular, sandstone-hosted, uranium–vanadium deposit of Carboniferous age located in the Ngalia Basin of central Australia. The deposit is similar to the continental, fluvial Saltwash-type of sandstone-hosted U-V deposits which are well known from the Colorado Plateau, USA. Most mineralization at Bigrlyi occurs as thin, multiple-stacked, stratiform lenses at the base of fluvial channels near the contact between a grey sandstone succession and a hematitic, purple–red sandstone succession. A larger halo of lower grade vanadium mineralization extends beyond the main U-V-mineralized zone. The host is an immature, feldspathic sandstone, grading into arkose and lithic-rich variants. Lithic ‘rip-up’ clasts of clay-rich sediments are common in the basal parts of fluvial channels, and are frequently the focus of, and have acted as sites for, U-V mineralization. Coffinite and uraninite are the main uranium minerals, with the former dominant. Vanadium is mainly hosted by Fe-V-bearing clays and chlorite, including roscoelite, grading into vanadian illite, the interlayer mineral corrensite, and altered detrital biotite. The V-Fe–oxyhydroxide minerals montroseite, haggite and doloresite, and altered detrital Fe-Ti oxides, are minor V-hosts. Mineralized zones correlate with enrichments in Se, Li, Ba, Be, Mo, Mg and Fe, and elevated Se/S ratios are characteristic of U-mineralized zones. Petrographic studies show that a heterogeneous mixture of variably mineralized lithic clasts is present; in the same rock, some clasts are Fe-rich and only weakly U-V-mineralized, while other clasts are strongly V- and/or U-mineralized. These observations point to mineralization processes that did not take place in-situ in the host sandstone at the site of deposition as required by conventional groundwater models. Lead isotope results provide evidence of the open-system mobility of radiogenic elements in parts of the deposit. In V-bearing zones, radiogenic Pb contents were found to be unsupported by current U levels, suggesting that over time U has been mobilized from these zones and redistributed, resulting in U-enrichment in other parts of the deposit. Mobility pathways were likely open over time from early in the history of the Bigrlyi deposit. A hybrid mineralization model, involving an interplay between solution-precipitation processes, detrital transport and post-depositional U remobilization, is proposed for Bigrlyi. Ferrous-ion-bearing clay minerals and pyrite are considered to be the most likely primary reductants/adsorbents, while the deposit is lacking carbonaceous matter. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geology of Uranium Deposits)
Show Figures

Figure 1

56 pages, 10496 KiB  
Article
Unconformity-Type Uranium Systems: A Comparative Review and Predictive Modelling of Critical Genetic Factors
by Matt Bruce, Oliver Kreuzer, Andy Wilde, Amanda Buckingham, Kristin Butera and Frank Bierlein
Minerals 2020, 10(9), 738; https://doi.org/10.3390/min10090738 - 21 Aug 2020
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 7429
Abstract
A review of descriptive and genetic models is presented for unconformity-type uranium deposits with particular attention given to spatial representations of key process components of the mineralising system and their mappable expressions. This information formed the basis for the construction of mineral potential [...] Read more.
A review of descriptive and genetic models is presented for unconformity-type uranium deposits with particular attention given to spatial representations of key process components of the mineralising system and their mappable expressions. This information formed the basis for the construction of mineral potential models for the world’s premier unconformity-style uranium provinces, the Athabasca Basin in Saskatchewan, Canada (>650,000 t U3O8), and the NW McArthur Basin in the Northern Territory, Australia (>450,000 t U3O8). A novel set of ‘edge’ detection routines was used to identify high-contrast zones in gridded geophysical data in support of the mineral potential modelling. This approach to geophysical data processing and interpretation offers a virtually unbiased means of detecting potential basement structures under cover and at a range of scales. Fuzzy logic mineral potential mapping was demonstrated to be a useful tool for delineating areas that have high potential for hosting economic uranium concentrations, utilising all knowledge and incorporating all relevant spatial data available for the project area. The resulting models not only effectively ‘rediscover’ the known uranium mineralisation but also highlight several other areas containing all of the mappable components deemed critical for the accumulation of economic uranium deposits. The intelligence amplification approach to mineral potential modelling presented herein is an example of augmenting expert-driven conceptual targeting with the powerful logic and rationality of modern computing. The result is a targeting tool that captures the current status quo of geospatial and exploration information and conceptual knowledge pertaining to unconformity-type uranium systems. Importantly, the tool can be readily updated once new information or knowledge comes to hand. As with every targeting tool, these models should not be utilised in isolation, but as one of several inputs informing exploration decision-making. Nor should they be regarded as ‘treasure maps’, but rather as pointers towards areas of high potential that are worthy of further investigation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geology of Uranium Deposits)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

20 pages, 3385 KiB  
Review
Shear-Hosted Uranium Deposits: A Review
by Andy Wilde
Minerals 2020, 10(11), 954; https://doi.org/10.3390/min10110954 - 26 Oct 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 7921
Abstract
A group of uranium deposits is described that is hosted within polyphase shear zones. The group is economically significant, collectively containing over 500,000 tonnes of uranium and several examples have been or are being mined. Over a hundred individual deposits are known widely [...] Read more.
A group of uranium deposits is described that is hosted within polyphase shear zones. The group is economically significant, collectively containing over 500,000 tonnes of uranium and several examples have been or are being mined. Over a hundred individual deposits are known widely spread over many countries. It is proposed that this group be assigned to a new shear-hosted uranium deposit category. Uranium deposition was superimposed upon intense and extensive feldspathic alteration formed during ductile deformation. This intense alteration has led to the alternative albitite-type or metasomatite-type nomenclature. The evidence is clear that in most cases uranium mineralization postdates regionally extensive feldspar alteration and is associated with a range of alteration assemblages which overprint early albite or K-feldspar dominant alteration. Abundance of hydrothermal zirconium and phosphate minerals is a common characteristic of this group which implies high activity of F and P during mineralisation, but the source of hydrothermal fluids remains uncertain. Also uncertain is the geodynamic setting of uranium mineralisation which is a consequence of absolute mineralisation age being poorly defined. Data from three of the four major districts are suggestive that mineralisation was a consequence of fluid migration along shears during regional compression. This paper reviews key aspects of the group in a mineral systems context, focussing on the four major districts of Kropyvnytskyi (Ukraine), Lagoa Real (Brazil), Mount Isa (Australia) and the Central Mineral Belt (Canada). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geology of Uranium Deposits)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop