Clinical and Translational Research in Auditory Processing Disorder

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Otolaryngology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (25 June 2023) | Viewed by 17200

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. The Hearing Institute, Institut Pasteur, Inserm UMR 1120 « Genetics and Physiology of Hearing », Paris, France
2. Department of Audiology and Otoneurological Evaluation, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France
3. Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
Interests: audiology; otoneurology; hearing disorders; auditory perception; speech and language processing; vestibular function; balance disorders; evoked potentials

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Auditory processing disorder (APD), also known as central auditory dysfunction or King–Kopetzky syndrome, affects 2%–7% of children. It has been reported that 20% of adults would have at least some form of APD. Prevalence reaches 40% in children with learning difficulties, leading to major psychological, academic, and socio-professional repercussions. APD was first described almost a century ago. While pure-tone air and bone-conduction audiometry may be normal, APD results in persistent difficulties in understanding speech whenever faced with acoustically challenging environments: patients’ attention cannot be selectively directed to verbal stimuli and this difficulty worsens in case of concomitant exposure to background noise. Diagnostic procedures should include behavioral techniques to assess the subject's ability to binaurally separate and integrate relevant information. Psychophysical methods should also be used to evaluate temporal integration as well as acoustic pattern discrimination abilities. Today, APD is thought to result from abnormal neural connectivity along the auditory pathway, from the cochlea to the auditory cortex and vice versa, suggesting that both bottom-up and top-down processes involved in auditory perception would be damaged.

This Special Issue aims to provide the reader with a state-of-the-art overview of APD and related comorbidities. This covers research on the pathophysiology of APD, innovative diagnostic procedures, and therapeutic strategies compatible with a personalized-medicine-based approach. The submission of translational research work carried out to benefit the patient is also strongly encouraged.

Prof. Dr. Hung Thai-Van
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • auditory processing disorder
  • King–Kopetzky syndrome
  • learning disabilities
  • speech-in-noise
  • dichotic listening
  • binaural hearing
  • hearing aids
  • auditory training
  • auditory plasticity
  • auditory development

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

13 pages, 1165 KiB  
Article
The Magnitude of Contralateral Suppression of Otoacoustic Emissions Is Ear- and Age-Dependent
by Hung Thai-Van, Evelyne Veuillet, Marie-Thérèse Le Normand, Maxime Damien, Charles-Alexandre Joly and Pierre Reynard
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(13), 4553; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134553 - 7 Jul 2023
Viewed by 881
Abstract
The maturation of the uncrossed medial olivocochlear (UMOC) efferent remains poorly documented to date. The UMOC efferent system allows listeners to not only detect but also to process, recognize, and discriminate auditory stimuli. Its fibers can be explored non-invasively by recording the effect [...] Read more.
The maturation of the uncrossed medial olivocochlear (UMOC) efferent remains poorly documented to date. The UMOC efferent system allows listeners to not only detect but also to process, recognize, and discriminate auditory stimuli. Its fibers can be explored non-invasively by recording the effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS), resulting in a decrease in the amplitude of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE). The objective of the present cross-sectional study was to investigate how the effectiveness of this system varies with age in healthy subjects aged 8 years to adulthood. For this purpose, 120 right-handed native French-speaking subjects (57 females and 63 males) were divided into five age groups of 24 subjects each: 8y–10y, 10y–11y6m, 11y6m–13y, 13y–17y, and ≥18y. TEOAE amplitudes with and without CAS were recorded. The equivalent attenuation (EA) was calculated, corresponding to the change in TEOAE amplitude equivalent to the effect generated by CAS. General linear models were performed to control for the effect of ear, sex, and age on EA. No sex effect was found. A stronger EA was consistently found regardless of age group in the right ear compared to the left. In contrast to the right ear, for which, on average, EA remained constant across age groups, an increasingly weaker TEOAE suppression effect with age was found in the left ear, reinforcing the asymmetrical functioning of the UMOC efferent system in favor of the right ear in adulthood. Further studies are needed to investigate the lateralization of the UMOC efferent system and its changes over time in cases of atypical or reversed cortical asymmetries, especially in subjects with specific learning disorders. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical and Translational Research in Auditory Processing Disorder)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1347 KiB  
Article
Assessing Auditory Processing in Children with Listening Difficulties: A Pilot Study
by Shaghayegh Omidvar, Fauve Duquette-Laplante, Caryn Bursch, Benoît Jutras and Amineh Koravand
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(3), 897; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12030897 - 23 Jan 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1772
Abstract
Background: Auditory processing disorders (APD) may be one of the problems experienced by children with listening difficulties (LiD). The combination of auditory behavioural and electrophysiological tests could help to provide a better understanding of the abilities/disabilities of children with LiD. The current study [...] Read more.
Background: Auditory processing disorders (APD) may be one of the problems experienced by children with listening difficulties (LiD). The combination of auditory behavioural and electrophysiological tests could help to provide a better understanding of the abilities/disabilities of children with LiD. The current study aimed to quantify the auditory processing abilities and function in children with LiD. Methods: Twenty children, ten with LiD (age = 8.46; SD = 1.39) and ten typically developing (TD) (age = 9.45; SD = 1.57) participated in this study. All children were evaluated with auditory processing tests as well as with attention and phonemic synthesis tasks. Electrophysiological measures were also conducted with click and speech auditory brainstem responses (ABR). Results: Children with LiD performed significantly worse than TD children for most behavioural tasks, indicating shortcomings in functional auditory processing. Moreover, the click-ABR wave I amplitude was smaller, and the speech-ABR waves D and E latencies were longer for the LiD children compared to the results of TD children. No significant difference was found when evaluating neural correlates between groups. Conclusions: Combining behavioural testing with click-ABR and speech-ABR can highlight functional and neurophysiological deficiencies in children with learning and listening issues, especially at the brainstem level. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical and Translational Research in Auditory Processing Disorder)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2015 KiB  
Article
Age-Related Dichotic Listening Skills in Impaired and Non-Impaired Readers: A Comparative Study
by Pierre Reynard, Charles-Alexandre Joly, Maxime Damien, Marie-Thérèse Le Normand, Evelyne Veuillet and Hung Thai-Van
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(2), 666; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020666 - 14 Jan 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1866
Abstract
Dichotic listening is the high-level auditory process which enables the perception of different verbal stimuli delivered simultaneously to the right and left ears (binaural integration), as well as the perception of a verbal stimulus presented to one ear while ignoring a different stimulus [...] Read more.
Dichotic listening is the high-level auditory process which enables the perception of different verbal stimuli delivered simultaneously to the right and left ears (binaural integration), as well as the perception of a verbal stimulus presented to one ear while ignoring a different stimulus in the other ear (binaural separation). Deficits in central auditory processing have been reported in children with learning disabilities. The present study aimed to compare dichotic listening performances in right-handed impaired readers (IR) and non-impaired readers (non-IR) according to age. For this, a cross-sectional study was conducted in 120 IR (56 males and 64 females) divided into five age groups and 120 non-IR (63 male and 57 female) matched on chronological age (8 to 9 years; 9 to 10 years; 10 to 12 years; 12 to 18 years; adult). They were tested for binaural integration and binaural separation, allowing for the calculation of dichotic aptitude (DA), ear prevalence (EP), and attentional shift index (ASI). A series of ANOVAs showed an effect of age and of the reading group for all the dichotic-related measures, except for EP. Binaural separation scores were lower in IR who also showed more intrusive responses compared to non-IR. These intrusive responses, which were more frequent on the right ear for IR, decreased with age in both groups. Overall, these results suggest that dichotic listening scores improve with age as the central auditory pathways mature. However, whatever the age, performances are lower in IR than in non-IR. This might be explained by an incomplete maturation of the auditory pathways in IR; an early start for long-term follow-up and auditory training is suggested. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical and Translational Research in Auditory Processing Disorder)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 853 KiB  
Article
A Study on the Reference Values and Cutoff Criteria of Masking Level Difference for Children Aged 7–12 Years
by Carlos Alberto Leite Filho, Mônica de Oliveira Viana, Fátima Cristina Alves Branco-Barreiro and Silvana Maria Monte Coelho Frota
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(18), 5282; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185282 - 7 Sep 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1185
Abstract
The Masking Level Difference (MLD) test is one of the main instruments for investigating binaural interaction. Studies with children aged 7–12 years still disagree about the influence of age on test performance and present discordant reference values. This study aimed to verify the [...] Read more.
The Masking Level Difference (MLD) test is one of the main instruments for investigating binaural interaction. Studies with children aged 7–12 years still disagree about the influence of age on test performance and present discordant reference values. This study aimed to verify the effect of age on the performance of children aged 7–12 years in the MLD test and to establish reference values and cutoff criteria for this age group. Fifty-nine children with normal hearing were organized in three groups according to their age: 7–8 (n = 20), 9–10 (n = 20), and 11–12 (n = 19) years. The participants completed the MLD test by Auditec®. The Kruskal–Wallis statistical test was used to compare groups. Reference values were obtained by calculating mean, standard deviation, median, mode, and percentiles, while the cutoff criterion was obtained by subtracting two standard deviations from the mean. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding the MLD test measures. The mean MLD was 10.51 ± 1.84 dB and the cutoff point was set at 7 dB. Thus, reference values for the MLD test were established for children aged 7–12 years, who presented no effect of age on test performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical and Translational Research in Auditory Processing Disorder)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 879 KiB  
Article
Evidence of Validity and Normative Values of a New Auditory Backward Masking Test
by Renata Filippini, Carlos Alberto Leite Filho, Gabriela Melo Santos Bonassa Barros, Frank E. Musiek and Eliane Schochat
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(17), 4933; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11174933 - 23 Aug 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1395
Abstract
There are still no valid, clinically feasible instruments to assess backward masking (BM), an auditory temporal processing (ATP) phenomenon. The aim of this study was to develop, standardize and present evidence of validity for a behavioral test for BM assessment. Young adults were [...] Read more.
There are still no valid, clinically feasible instruments to assess backward masking (BM), an auditory temporal processing (ATP) phenomenon. The aim of this study was to develop, standardize and present evidence of validity for a behavioral test for BM assessment. Young adults were submitted to a BM test (BMT), where they were asked to identify a 1000 Hz pure tone followed by a narrowband noise with interstimulus intervals of 0 to 400 ms and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) between −20 and −30 dB. The correct response rate and target sound detection threshold were calculated, and the results compared with those of young adults with abnormal ATP tests and older adults. Diagnostic accuracy analyses were carried out. Young adults with normal ATP obtained an average correct response rate of 89 and 87% for SNR −20 and −30 dB, respectively, with average thresholds between 10 and 15 ms and no difference between the left and right ears. Results were more consistent at SNR −20 dB, and the best diagnostic accuracy was obtained for SNR −20 dB, with good specificity, but low sensitivity. Normative values were obtained for the BMT, which proved to be clinically feasible, with preliminary evidence of validity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical and Translational Research in Auditory Processing Disorder)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1253 KiB  
Article
Implications for Early Diagnosis and Treatment in Schizophrenia Due to Correlation between Auditory Perceptual Deficits and Cognitive Impairment
by Nikolaos Moschopoulos, Ioannis Nimatoudis, Stergios Kaprinis, Kosmas Boutsikos, Christos Sidiras and Vasiliki Iliadou
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(19), 4557; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194557 - 30 Sep 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2652
Abstract
It is indicated that auditory perception deficits are present in schizophrenia and related to formal thought disorder. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the association of auditory deficits with cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. An experimental group of 50 schizophrenia patients [...] Read more.
It is indicated that auditory perception deficits are present in schizophrenia and related to formal thought disorder. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the association of auditory deficits with cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. An experimental group of 50 schizophrenia patients completed a battery of auditory processing evaluation and a neuropsychological battery of tests. Correlations between neuropsychological battery scores and auditory processing scores were examined. Cognitive impairment was correlated with auditory processing deficits in schizophrenia patients. All neuropsychological test scores were significantly correlated with at least one auditory processing test score. Our findings support the coexistence of auditory processing disorder, severe cognitive impairment, and formal thought disorder in a subgroup of schizophrenia patients. This may have important implications in schizophrenia research, as well as in early diagnosis and nonpharmacological treatment of the disorder. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical and Translational Research in Auditory Processing Disorder)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1675 KiB  
Article
Executive Function and Sensory Processing in Dichotic Listening of Young Adults with Listening Difficulties
by Aline Tocchini Pascoinelli, Eliane Schochat and Cristina Ferraz Borges Murphy
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(18), 4255; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184255 - 19 Sep 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2362
Abstract
Previous studies have suggested that varying attention demands in dichotic listening (DL) tasks might be a clinically feasible method to distinguish ‘bottom-up’ from ‘top-down’ deficits in listening. This study aims to investigate DL processing in adults with listening difficulties (LD). We assessed the [...] Read more.
Previous studies have suggested that varying attention demands in dichotic listening (DL) tasks might be a clinically feasible method to distinguish ‘bottom-up’ from ‘top-down’ deficits in listening. This study aims to investigate DL processing in adults with listening difficulties (LD). We assessed the performance of a listening difficulties group (LDG) (n = 24, mean age = 24, backward digit span = 4.0) and a control group (CG) (n = 25, mean age = 29.2, backward digit span = 6.4) in DL tests involving non-forced and both right and left-forced attention. The results indicated an overall significantly worse performance of LDG compared to the CG, which was greater for forced-left condition. This same result was observed when controlling for working memory (WM) variance. Both groups presented an overall right ear advantage with no difference in terms of the magnitude of advantage. These results indicate that LD presented by the LDG might be due to a combination of sensory and cognitive deficits, with emphasis on the cognitive component. However, the WM, although impaired in the LDG group, was not the main factor in segregating both groups. The role of the additional cognitive processes such as inhibitory control in LD is discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical and Translational Research in Auditory Processing Disorder)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

20 pages, 932 KiB  
Review
Towards the Clinical Application of Gene Therapy for Genetic Inner Ear Diseases
by Ghizlene Lahlou, Charlotte Calvet, Marie Giorgi, Marie-José Lecomte and Saaid Safieddine
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(3), 1046; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031046 - 29 Jan 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3432
Abstract
Hearing loss, the most common human sensory defect worldwide, is a major public health problem. About 70% of congenital forms and 25% of adult-onset forms of deafness are of genetic origin. In total, 136 deafness genes have already been identified and there are [...] Read more.
Hearing loss, the most common human sensory defect worldwide, is a major public health problem. About 70% of congenital forms and 25% of adult-onset forms of deafness are of genetic origin. In total, 136 deafness genes have already been identified and there are thought to be several hundred more awaiting identification. However, there is currently no cure for sensorineural deafness. In recent years, translational research studies have shown gene therapy to be effective against inherited inner ear diseases, and the application of this technology to humans is now within reach. We provide here a comprehensive and practical overview of current advances in gene therapy for inherited deafness, with and without an associated vestibular defect. We focus on the different gene therapy approaches, considering their prospects, including the viral vector used, and the delivery route. We also discuss the clinical application of the various strategies, their strengths, weaknesses, and the challenges to be overcome. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical and Translational Research in Auditory Processing Disorder)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop