Spinal Disorders: Current Treatment and Future Opportunities

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Orthopedics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (25 August 2022) | Viewed by 26972

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Orthopedics, Division of Spine Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
Interests: spine disorders; spine surgery; spinal cord injury; spine-abnormities and deformities
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Spinal disorders are common, and lead to substantial morbidity and loss of productivity in society. Spinal disorders can be due to congenital, degenerative, traumatic, and oncological causes. As diagnostic advances such as MRI/MRA, CT/CT myelography, EMG, laboratory testing, and health related quality of life outcomes/patient reported outcome measures have become more commonplace, research advances into these techniques have led to improvements in care of spinal disorders. Similarly, surgical technology and procedures have advanced rapidly over the last generation, making spinal surgery safer and more effective. Only with ongoing research will we be able to continue advancing the field of spine care and spinal surgery.

In this Special Issue, we invite submissions that focus on spinal disorders and spinal surgery. Submissions can be in the form of literature reviews providing insight into current knowledge and technical know-how, as well as original research that addresses key questions in spine care. Spinal disorders are diverse in their presentation, treatment, and outcomes, thus any submission relating to spinal disorders will be considered.

We look forward to receiving your submission.

Prof. Dr. Alan H Daniels
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Spine
  • Spine surgery
  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Scoliosis
  • Cervical Myelopathy
  • Spine surgery training
  • Disc replacement
  • Spine trauma
  • Spine infection
  • Spine fracture
  • Spinal epidural abscess

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

13 pages, 2550 KiB  
Article
Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement Led to Lower Screw Loosening Rate than Fluoroscopy-Guided Technique in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
by Yen-Po Lai, Yu-Hsien Lin, Yun-Che Wu, Cheng-Min Shih, Kun-Hui Chen, Cheng-Hung Lee and Chien-Chou Pan
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(17), 4989; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11174989 - 25 Aug 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2166
Abstract
Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement for spine surgery has become popular in recent years. This study compares clinical, radiographic outcomes and the screw loosening rate between robot-assisted and fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement in patients who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). We retrospectively examined [...] Read more.
Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement for spine surgery has become popular in recent years. This study compares clinical, radiographic outcomes and the screw loosening rate between robot-assisted and fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement in patients who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). We retrospectively examined 108 patients with the degenerative lumbar disease who underwent TLIF. According to whether the robotic system was used, patients were assigned to either the robot-assisted (Ro TLIF, n = 29) or fluoroscopy-guided TLIF (FG TLIF, n = 79) group. Radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcomes, including leg and back pain visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), were assessed. Loosening signs were noted in 48 out of 552 pedicle screws. The screw loosening rate was higher in the FG TLIF (10.2%) than Ro TLIF group (4.3%). A significant correlation was found between screw loosening and age, the number of level(s) fused, and the ratio of the average distance from the pedicle screw to the upper endplate to vertebral body height. VAS-leg, VAS-back, and ODI showed significant improvements in both groups postoperatively (all p < 0.05). These results indicated that robot-assisted pedicle screw placement in TLIF had a lower screw loosening rate and similar patient-reported outcomes compared with the fluoroscopy-guided technique. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spinal Disorders: Current Treatment and Future Opportunities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 225 KiB  
Article
Preoperative MRI and Intraoperative Monitoring Differentially Prevent Neurological Sequelae in Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgical Correction, While Curves >70 Degrees Increase the Risk of Neurophysiological Incidences
by Konstantinos Pazarlis, Håkan Jonsson, Thomas Karlsson and Nikos Schizas
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(9), 2602; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092602 - 5 May 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1432
Abstract
The aim was to investigate the role of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative monitoring (IOM) in the prevention of correction-related complications in idiopathic scoliosis (IS). We conducted a retrospective case study of 129 patients with juvenile and adolescent IS. The operations [...] Read more.
The aim was to investigate the role of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative monitoring (IOM) in the prevention of correction-related complications in idiopathic scoliosis (IS). We conducted a retrospective case study of 129 patients with juvenile and adolescent IS. The operations took place between 2005 and 2018 in Uppsala University Hospital. Data from MRI scans and IOM were collected. The patients were divided into groups depending on Lenke’s classification, sex, major curve (MC) size, and onset age. Neurophysiological incidences were reported in ten patients (7.8%), while nine of them had no signs of intraspinal pathology. Six patients (4.7%) had transient incidences; however, in four patients (3.1%), an intervention was required for the normalization of action potentials. Three of them had an MC >70 degrees, which was significantly higher than the expected value. Eight patients (6.1%) had intraspinal pathologies, and two of them (1.5%) underwent decompression. We suggest the continuation of MRI screening preoperatively and, most importantly, the use of IOM. In three cases with no signs of pathology in the MRI, IOM prevented possible neurological injuries. MCs >70 degrees should be considered a risk factor for the occurrence of neurophysiological deficiencies that require action to be normalized. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spinal Disorders: Current Treatment and Future Opportunities)
11 pages, 1506 KiB  
Article
Association between Sagittal Cervical Spinal Alignment and Degenerative Cervical Spondylosis: A Retrospective Study Using a New Scoring System
by Chahyun Oh, Minwook Lee, Boohwi Hong, Byong-Sop Song, Sangwon Yun, Sanghun Kwon, Youngkwon Ko, Sun Yeul Lee and Chan Noh
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(7), 1772; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071772 - 23 Mar 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3493
Abstract
(1) Background: Prolonged neck flexion is thought to cause harmful loading on the cervical spine. Along with the degenerative process, cervical alignment tends to change toward lordotic curvature. The association between cervical alignment and cervical spondylosis remains unclear. (2) Methods: Three raters retrospectively [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Prolonged neck flexion is thought to cause harmful loading on the cervical spine. Along with the degenerative process, cervical alignment tends to change toward lordotic curvature. The association between cervical alignment and cervical spondylosis remains unclear. (2) Methods: Three raters retrospectively assessed cervical radiographies of outpatients at a tertiary center in 2019 using degenerative cervical spondylosis score (DCS score; a newly developed scoring system), C2-7 absolute rotational angle (ARA), and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA). (3) Results: A total of 561 patients were included in the analysis. Multiple regression analysis with adjustments for age and sex revealed that C2-7 ARA, rather than SVA, was a significant parameter for degenerative spondylosis. The interaction between age and C2-7 ARA was significant, indicating that the increase in DCS score with increasing age was more pronounced in patients with kyphotic cervical alignment. The direct effect of age on DCS score was 0.349 (95% CI 0.319 to 0.380, p < 0.001) and the proportion of the mediation effect of C2-7 ARA was −0.125 (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: C2-7 ARA was significantly associated with DCS after adjustment for both age and sex. Subjects with more kyphotic cervical alignment showed a greater correlation between increased DCS score and older age. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spinal Disorders: Current Treatment and Future Opportunities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 256 KiB  
Article
Prevalence of Restless Legs Syndrome and its Symptoms among Patients with Spinal Disorders
by Hidetomi Terai, Hiromitsu Toyoda, Masatoshi Hoshino, Akinobu Suzuki, Shinji Takahashi, Koji Tamai, Shoichiro Ohyama, Akito Yabu and Hiroaki Nakamura
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(21), 5001; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215001 - 27 Oct 2021
Viewed by 1594
Abstract
Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a neurological disorder that causes uncomfortable sensations in the legs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the symptoms of RLS in patients with spinal disorders and the impact of RLS on the clinical outcomes of lumbar [...] Read more.
Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a neurological disorder that causes uncomfortable sensations in the legs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the symptoms of RLS in patients with spinal disorders and the impact of RLS on the clinical outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The records of 278 patients (age range 65–92 years) with spinal disorders who visited our outpatient clinic were reviewed. We used a survey to identify subjects with RLS based on the International RLS Study Group diagnostic criteria. We further recorded patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, sleeping time, mental health condition, and the occurrence of leg cramps. Thirty-two patients (11.5%) met the criteria for RLS. The prevalence of anxiety (46.9% vs. 26.6%, p = 0.023) and leg cramps (90.6% vs. 73.2%, p = 0.030) was higher in patients with RLS than in those without. RLS was present in 12.3% of LSS patients. The visual analog scale score for lower back pain before surgery and at the final follow-up was significantly higher in LSS patients with RLS than in those without. However, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, JOA score improvement ratio, and VAS score for leg numbness were not significantly different between the groups. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spinal Disorders: Current Treatment and Future Opportunities)
9 pages, 1456 KiB  
Article
Machine Learning Prediction of Length of Stay in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients Undergoing Posterior Spine Fusion Surgery
by Andrew S Zhang, Ashwin Veeramani, Matthew S. Quinn, Daniel Alsoof, Eren O. Kuris and Alan H. Daniels
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(18), 4074; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184074 - 9 Sep 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2262
Abstract
(1) Background: Length of stay (LOS) is a commonly reported metric used to assess surgical success, patient outcomes, and economic impact. The focus of this study is to use a variety of machine learning algorithms to reliably predict whether a patient undergoing posterior [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Length of stay (LOS) is a commonly reported metric used to assess surgical success, patient outcomes, and economic impact. The focus of this study is to use a variety of machine learning algorithms to reliably predict whether a patient undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery treatment for Adult Spine Deformity (ASD) will experience a prolonged LOS. (2) Methods: Patients undergoing treatment for ASD with posterior spinal fusion surgery were selected from the American College of Surgeon’s NSQIP dataset. Prolonged LOS was defined as a LOS greater than or equal to 9 days. Data was analyzed with the Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, XGBoost, and Gradient Boosting functions in Python with the Sci-Kit learn package. Prediction accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. (3) Results: 1281 posterior patients were analyzed. The five algorithms had prediction accuracies between 68% and 83% for posterior cases (AUC: 0.566–0.821). Multivariable regression indicated that increased Work Relative Value Units (RVU), elevated American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and longer operating times were linked to longer LOS. (4) Conclusions: Machine learning algorithms can predict if patients will experience an increased LOS following ASD surgery. Therefore, medical resources can be more appropriately allocated towards patients who are at risk of prolonged LOS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spinal Disorders: Current Treatment and Future Opportunities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1735 KiB  
Article
Pain Control Affects the Radiographic Diagnosis of Segmental Instability in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
by Shih-Hsiang Chou, Sung-Yen Lin, Po-Chih Shen, Hung-Pin Tu, Hsuan-Ti Huang, Chia-Lung Shih and Cheng-Chang Lu
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(17), 3984; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173984 - 2 Sep 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 11005
Abstract
Background: Diagnosing intervertebral instability is crucial for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). Disabling back pain will reduce spinal mobility which leads to an underestimate of the incidence of intervertebral instability. We hypothesized that adequate analgesia could alter the flexion/extension exam performance, [...] Read more.
Background: Diagnosing intervertebral instability is crucial for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). Disabling back pain will reduce spinal mobility which leads to an underestimate of the incidence of intervertebral instability. We hypothesized that adequate analgesia could alter the flexion/extension exam performance, and thus increase the diagnostic accuracy of segmental instability. Materials and methods: One hundred patients with low-grade DLS were prospectively enrolled in the before–after cohort study. Standing lateral flexion/extension radiographs of lumbar spines were examined and analyzed before and after intramuscular injections of 30 mg ketorolac. Results: Pain score decreased significantly after analgesic injections (p < 0.001). Dynamic slip (DS), dynamic segmental angle (DA), dynamic lumbar lordosis, and slip percentage (SP) were significantly increased after pain reduction (all p < 0.001). According to the diagnostic criteria for segmental instability (DS > 4.5 mm, DA > 15°, or SP > 15%), there were 4%, 4%, and 0.7% of total motion segments fulfilling the criteria which markedly increased to 42%, 32%, and 16.7% after analgesia was administered. The incidence of instability also increased from 6% to 38% after analgesia. Conclusions: The diagnosis rate of intervertebral instability is commonly underestimated in the presence of low back pain. This short-term pain relief facilitates reliable functional imaging adding to the diagnosis of intervertebral instability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spinal Disorders: Current Treatment and Future Opportunities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 739 KiB  
Article
The Relationship between Adjacent Segment Pathology and Facet Joint Violation by Pedicle Screw after Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation Surgery
by Ho-Seok Oh and Hyoung-Yeon Seo
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(13), 2911; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132911 - 29 Jun 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 1640
Abstract
Transpedicular screw instrumentation systems have been increasingly utilized during the fusion of lumbar spine procedures. The superior segment facet joint violation of the pedicle screw is thought to have potential for accelerating symptomatic adjacent-segment pathology (ASP). The purpose of this study was to [...] Read more.
Transpedicular screw instrumentation systems have been increasingly utilized during the fusion of lumbar spine procedures. The superior segment facet joint violation of the pedicle screw is thought to have potential for accelerating symptomatic adjacent-segment pathology (ASP). The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the superior segment facet joint violation by transpedicular screws and the development of ASP. Among all patients who underwent operations involving one- or two-level posterior lumbar arthrodesis at the Chonnam National University Hospital from 1992 to 2012, 87 patients were selected for this study. Fifty-six patients were included in the ASP group, and 31 were included in the non-ASP group. We used lumbar three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) to assess the violation of the superior facet joint by a transpedicular screw. The assessment is presented in scores ranging from zero to two, with zero indicating no violation (type I); one point indicating suspected violation (type II); and two points indicating definitely facet joint violation (type III). Facet violation was reported in 31 patients in the ASP group (n = 56), and in 13 patients in the non-ASP group (n = 31). The types of facet joint violation according to our scoring system were as follows: type I, 59 screws (52.7%); type II, 26 screws (23.2%); and type III, 27 screws (24.1%) in the ASP group; and type I, 43 screws (69.4%), type II, 14 screws (22.6 %); and type III, 5 screws (8.0%) in the non-ASP group. The score of facet joint violation in each patient according to our scoring system were as follows: 0 points, 25 patients (44.6%); 1 point, 8 patients (14.3%); 2 points, 4 patients (7.1%); 3 points, 11 patients (19.7%); 4 points, 8 patients (14.3%) in the ASP group; and 0 points, 18 patients (58.1%); 1 point, 4 patients (12.9%); 2 points, 7 patients (22.6%); 3 points, 2 patients (6.4%); 4 points, 0 patients (0%) in the non-ASP group. The mean scores were 1.4 points in the ASP group and 0.8 points in the non-ASP group (p < 0.05). We conclude that the position of the pedicle screw farther away from the facet joint surface can reduce the degeneration of the superior adjacent segment. Therefore, close attention to the screw position during surgery may reduce the rate of superior adjacent-segment pathologies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spinal Disorders: Current Treatment and Future Opportunities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

11 pages, 1649 KiB  
Review
Antibiotic Cement Utilization for the Prophylaxis and Treatment of Infections in Spine Surgery: Basic Science Principles and Rationale for Clinical Use
by George M. Anderson, Camilo Osorio, Ellis M. Berns, Umar Masood, Daniel Alsoof, Christopher L. McDonald, Andrew S. Zhang, John Andrew Younghein, Eren O. Kuris, Albert Telfeian and Alan H. Daniels
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(12), 3481; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123481 - 17 Jun 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2198
Abstract
Antibiotic bone cement (ABC) is an effective tool for the prophylaxis and treatment of osteomyelitis due to the controlled, sustained release of local antibiotics. ABC has been proven to be effective in the orthopedic fields of arthroplasty and extremity trauma, but the adoption [...] Read more.
Antibiotic bone cement (ABC) is an effective tool for the prophylaxis and treatment of osteomyelitis due to the controlled, sustained release of local antibiotics. ABC has been proven to be effective in the orthopedic fields of arthroplasty and extremity trauma, but the adoption of ABC in spine surgery is limited. The characteristics of ABC make it an optimal solution for treating vertebral osteomyelitis (VO), a serious complication following spine surgery, typically caused by bacterial and sometimes fungal and parasitic pathogens. VO can be devastating, as infection can result in pathogenic biofilms on instrumentation that is dangerous to remove. New techniques, such as kyphoplasty and novel vertebroplasty methods, could amplify the potential of ABC in spine surgery. However, caution should be exercised when using ABC as there is some evidence of toxicity to patients and surgeons, antibiotic allergies, bone cement structural impairment, and possible development of antibiotic resistance. The purpose of this article is to describe the basic science of antibiotic cement utilization and review its usage in spine surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spinal Disorders: Current Treatment and Future Opportunities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop