Laparoscopic and Surgical Treatment for Colorectal Cancer

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 July 2024 | Viewed by 1876

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beilinson Campus, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
Interests: colorectal surgery; robotic laparoscopic and open surgery for advanced and early colorectal cancer

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common diagnosed tumors in the world. Surgery is still the cornerstone for its treatment. The controversy between laparoscopic and open approaches has transformed into debates over the best minimal invasive technique. Advances in preoperative evaluation and neoadjuvant treatment options increased the complexity of treatment possibilities. The present Special Issue aims to collect high-quality reviews, meta-analyses and systematic reviews, original articles, and communications on laparoscopic and surgical treatment for early and advanced colorectal cancer. The Special Issue focuses on all aspects of operative and perioperative treatment modalities and decision making, including advanced new technologies for minimally invasive and organ-preserving surgery.

Prof. Dr. Nir Wasserberg
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • colorectal surgery
  • laparoscopy
  • TME
  • cancer
  • robotic surgery
  • TAMIS
  • TEM
  • TaTME

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

10 pages, 442 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Post-Operative Outcomes of Right Colectomy between Crohn’s Disease and Adenocarcinoma of the Right Colon: A Retrospective Cohort Study
by Naama Bursztyn, Edden Slomowitz, Dan Assaf, Ehab Haj Yahia, Ilan Kent, Nir Wasserberg, Shmuel Avital and Ian White
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(10), 2809; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13102809 - 10 May 2024
Viewed by 261
Abstract
(1) Background: Crohn’s disease (CD) and right-sided colorectal-carcinoma (CRC) are two common indications for right colectomies. Many studies have tried to identify risk factors associated with post-operative complications for both CD and CRC. However, data directly comparing the outcomes of the two are [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Crohn’s disease (CD) and right-sided colorectal-carcinoma (CRC) are two common indications for right colectomies. Many studies have tried to identify risk factors associated with post-operative complications for both CD and CRC. However, data directly comparing the outcomes of the two are sparse. This study aims to compare the 30-day post-operative outcome after a right colectomy for CD versus CRC. Its secondary aim is to identify the factors associated with these outcomes for each group. (2) Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 123 patients who underwent a right colectomy for CD or CRC in a single institution between March 2011 and March 2016. (3) Results: There were no significant differences between the groups when comparing the overall complication rate, the median Clavien–Dindo score, reoperation rates and the length of hospitalization. The leak rate was higher in the Crohn’s group (13.95% (6/43) vs. 3.75% (3/80)), p = 0.049), although the stoma rate was the same (4/43 9.5%; 7/80 9.9%). (4) Conclusions: This study has shown that post-operative complication rate is similar for right colectomy in CD and CRC. However, Crohn’s disease patients did have a higher leak rate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laparoscopic and Surgical Treatment for Colorectal Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 12709 KiB  
Article
The Atlas of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery and Vein under Maximum-Intensity Projection and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction View
by Hongwei Zhang, Shurong Liu, Bingqi Dong, Jing Liu, Xiaochao Guo, Guowei Chen, Yong Jiang, Yingchao Wu, Junling Zhang and Xin Wang
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(3), 879; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030879 - 2 Feb 2024
Viewed by 670
Abstract
(1) Background: Understanding vascular patterns is crucial for minimizing bleeding and operating time in colorectal surgeries. This study aimed to develop an anatomical atlas of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and vein (IMV). (2) Methods: A total of 521 patients with [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Understanding vascular patterns is crucial for minimizing bleeding and operating time in colorectal surgeries. This study aimed to develop an anatomical atlas of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and vein (IMV). (2) Methods: A total of 521 patients with left-sided colorectal cancer were included. IMA and IMV patterns were identified using maximum-intensity projection (MIP) and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction techniques. The accuracy of these techniques was assessed by comparing them with surgical videos. We compared the amount of bleeding and operating time for IMA ligation across different IMA types. (3) Results: Most patients (45.7%) were classified as type I IMA, followed by type II (20.7%), type III (22.6%), and type IV (3.5%). Newly identified type V and type VI patterns were found in 6.5% and 1% of patients, respectively. Of the IMVs, 49.9% drained into the superior mesenteric vein (SMV), 38.4% drained into the splenic vein (SPV), 9.4% drained into the SMV–SPV junction, and only 2.3% drained into the first jejunal vein (J1V). Above the root of the left colic artery (LCA), 13.1% of IMVs had no branches, 50.1% had one, 30.1% had two, and 6.7% had three or more branches. Two patients had two main IMV branches, and ten had IMVs at the edge of the mesocolon with small branches. At the IMA root, 37.2% of LCAs overlapped with the IMV, with 34.0% being lateral, 16.9% distal, 8.7% medial, and both the marginal type of IMV and the persistent descending mesocolon (PDM) type represented 1.4%. MIP had an accuracy of 98.43%, and 3D reconstruction had an accuracy of 100%. Blood loss and operating time were significantly higher in the complex group compared to the simple group for IMA ligation (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: A comprehensive anatomical atlas of the IMA and IMV was provided. Complex IMA patterns were associated with increased bleeding and operating time. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laparoscopic and Surgical Treatment for Colorectal Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 681 KiB  
Article
Incidence and Risk Factors for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome following Trans-Anal Total Mesorectal Excision
by Shani Y. Parnasa, Ido Mizrahi, Brigitte Helou, Adiel Cohen, Mahmoud Abu Gazala, Alon J. Pikarsky and Noam Shussman
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(2), 437; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020437 - 13 Jan 2024
Viewed by 711
Abstract
Background: Trans-anal total mesorectal excision (Ta-TME) is a novel approach for the resection of rectal cancer. Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a frequent functional disorder that might follow restorative proctectomy. Data regarding bowel function after Ta-TME are scarce. The aim of this [...] Read more.
Background: Trans-anal total mesorectal excision (Ta-TME) is a novel approach for the resection of rectal cancer. Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a frequent functional disorder that might follow restorative proctectomy. Data regarding bowel function after Ta-TME are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for the development of LARS following Ta-TME. Methods: A prospectively maintained database of all patients who underwent Ta-TME for rectal cancer at our institution was reviewed. All patients who were operated on from January 2018 to December 2021 were evaluated. The LARS score questionnaire was used via telephone interviews. Incidence, severity and risk factors for LARS were evaluated. Results: Eighty-five patients underwent Ta-TME for rectal cancer between January 2018 and December 2021. Thirty-five patients were excluded due to ostomy status, death, local disease recurrence, ileal pouch or lack of compliance. Fifty patients were included in the analysis. LARS was diagnosed in 76% of patients. Anastomosis distance from dentate line was identified as a risk factor for LARS via multivariate analysis (p = 0.042). Neo-adjuvant therapy, hand sewn anastomosis and anastomotic leak did not increase the risk of LARS. Conclusion: LARS is a frequent condition following ta-TME, as it is used for other approaches to low anterior resection. Anastomosis distance from dentate line is an independent risk factor for LARS. In this study neo-adjuvant therapy, hand sewn anastomosis and anastomotic leak did not increase the risk of LARS. Further studies with longer follow-up times are required to better understand the functional outcomes following Ta-TME. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laparoscopic and Surgical Treatment for Colorectal Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop