Clinical Advances in Traumatic Brain Injury

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Clinical Neurology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 August 2024 | Viewed by 1116

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
Interests: traumatic brain injury; critical care; anesthesiology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global public health problem. Every year, over 69 million TBI cases are reported worldwide. TBI affects patients in high- and low–middle-income countries and across different age groups. Despite decades of research, guidelines and recommendations, several questions remain unanswered:

  1. What is the optimal management of care for patients with TBI? Are we providing care concordant with the latest evidence, guidelines and recommendations?
  2. How can we advance the care of patients with TBI in resource-limited clinical settings? What are the challenges in adapting guidelines across different resource settings?
  3. Are we providing safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, efficient and equitable care to our patients with TBI?
  4. What are the principles of TBI care in the emergency room, the intensive care unit and the operating room? How similar or different are these?
  5. What is the role of multimodal monitoring?
  6. What are the advances in neuro prognostication after TBI? There is continued interest in when and how we should prognosticate. What direction does the evidence point us to?

In this Special Issue, we aim to discuss these areas and invite a broad panel of experts to contribute.

Dr. Abhijit V. Lele
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • traumatic brain injury
  • guideline/recommendations
  • concordant care
  • resource limited clinical setting
  • multimodal monitoring
  • neuroprognostication
  • safe/effective/patient-centered/timely/efficient/equitable care
  • quality improvement

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 677 KiB  
Article
Good Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Patients One Year after mTBI despite Incomplete Recovery: An Indication of the Disability Paradox?
by Sophie M. Coffeng, Amaal Eman Abdulle, Harm J. van der Horn, Myrthe E. de Koning, Jan C. ter Maaten, Jacoba M. Spikman and Joukje van der Naalt
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(9), 2655; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092655 - 1 May 2024
Viewed by 387
Abstract
Background: Older adults (OAs) with mild traumatic brain injury (OA-mTBI) are a growing population, but studies on long-term outcomes and quality of life are scarce. Our aim was to determine the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in OA-mTBI one year after injury [...] Read more.
Background: Older adults (OAs) with mild traumatic brain injury (OA-mTBI) are a growing population, but studies on long-term outcomes and quality of life are scarce. Our aim was to determine the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in OA-mTBI one year after injury and to assess the early predictors of HRQoL. Methods: Data from a prospective follow-up study of 164 older (≥60 years) and 289 younger mTBI patients (<60 years) admitted to the emergency department were analyzed. Post-traumatic complaints, emotional distress and coping were evaluated 2 weeks post-injury using standardized questionnaires. At 12 months post-injury, HRQoL and functional recovery were determined with the abbreviated version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life scale and Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE), respectively. Results: One year post-injury, 80% (n = 131) of the OA-mTBI rated their HRQoL as “good” or “very good”, which was comparable to younger patients (79% (n = 226), p = 0.72). Incomplete recovery (GOSE <8) was present in 43% (n = 69) of OA-mTBI, with 67% (n = 46) reporting good HRQoL. Two weeks post-injury, fewer OA-mTBI had (≥2) post-traumatic complaints compared to younger patients (68% vs. 80%, p = 0.01). In the multivariable analyses, only depression-related symptoms (OR = 1.20 for each symptom, 95% CI = 1.01–1.34, p < 0.01) were predictors of poor HRQoL in OA-mTBI. Conclusions: Similar to younger patients, most OA-mTBI rated their HRQoL as good at one year after injury, although a considerable proportion showed incomplete recovery according to the GOSE, suggesting a disability paradox. Depression-related symptoms emerged as a significant predictor for poor HRQoL and can be identified as an early target for treatment after mTBI. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Traumatic Brain Injury)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 1830 KiB  
Article
Early Cardiac Evaluation, Abnormal Test Results, and Associations with Outcomes in Patients with Acute Brain Injury Admitted to a Neurocritical Care Unit
by Abhijit V. Lele, Jeffery Liu, Thitikan Kunapaisal, Nophanan Chaikittisilpa, Taniga Kiatchai, Michael K. Meno, Osayd R. Assad, Julie Pham, Christine T. Fong, Andrew M. Walters, Koichiro Nandate, Tumul Chowdhury, Vijay Krishnamoorthy, Monica S. Vavilala and Younghoon Kwon
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(9), 2526; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092526 - 25 Apr 2024
Viewed by 495
Abstract
Background: to examine factors associated with cardiac evaluation and associations between cardiac test abnormalities and clinical outcomes in patients with acute brain injury (ABI) due to acute ischemic stroke (AIS), spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and traumatic brain injury (TBI) [...] Read more.
Background: to examine factors associated with cardiac evaluation and associations between cardiac test abnormalities and clinical outcomes in patients with acute brain injury (ABI) due to acute ischemic stroke (AIS), spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and traumatic brain injury (TBI) requiring neurocritical care. Methods: In a cohort of patients ≥18 years, we examined the utilization of electrocardiography (ECG), beta-natriuretic peptide (BNP), cardiac troponin (cTnI), and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). We investigated the association between cTnI, BNP, sex-adjusted prolonged QTc interval, low ejection fraction (EF < 40%), all-cause mortality, death by neurologic criteria (DNC), transition to comfort measures only (CMO), and hospital discharge to home using univariable and multivariable analysis (adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance carrier, pre-admission cardiac disorder, ABI type, admission Glasgow Coma Scale Score, mechanical ventilation, and intracranial pressure [ICP] monitoring). Results: The final sample comprised 11,822 patients: AIS (46.7%), sICH (18.5%), SAH (14.8%), and TBI (20.0%). A total of 63% (n = 7472) received cardiac workup, which increased over nine years (p < 0.001). A cardiac investigation was associated with increased age, male sex (aOR 1.16 [1.07, 1.27]), non-white ethnicity (aOR), non-commercial insurance (aOR 1.21 [1.09, 1.33]), pre-admission cardiac disorder (aOR 1.21 [1.09, 1.34]), mechanical ventilation (aOR1.78 [1.57, 2.02]) and ICP monitoring (aOR1.68 [1.49, 1.89]). Compared to AIS, sICH (aOR 0.25 [0.22, 0.29]), SAH (aOR 0.36 [0.30, 0.43]), and TBI (aOR 0.19 [0.17, 0.24]) patients were less likely to receive cardiac investigation. Patients with troponin 25th–50th quartile (aOR 1.65 [1.10–2.47]), troponin 50th–75th quartile (aOR 1.79 [1.22–2.63]), troponin >75th quartile (aOR 2.18 [1.49–3.17]), BNP 50th-75th quartile (aOR 2.86 [1.28–6.40]), BNP >75th quartile (aOR 4.54 [2.09–9.85]), prolonged QTc (aOR 3.41 [2.28; 5.30]), and EF < 40% (aOR 2.47 [1.07; 5.14]) were more likely to be DNC. Patients with troponin 50th–75th quartile (aOR 1.77 [1.14–2.73]), troponin >75th quartile (aOR 1.81 [1.18–2.78]), and prolonged QTc (aOR 1.71 [1.39; 2.12]) were more likely to be associated with a transition to CMO. Patients with prolonged QTc (aOR 0.66 [0.58; 0.76]) were less likely to be discharged home. Conclusions: This large, single-center study demonstrates low rates of cardiac evaluations in TBI, SAH, and sICH compared to AIS. However, there are strong associations between electrocardiography, biomarkers of cardiac injury and heart failure, and echocardiography findings on clinical outcomes in patients with ABI. Findings need validation in a multicenter cohort. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Traumatic Brain Injury)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop