Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
2.0
2.4
Journals
Children
Special Issues
Children with Specific Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Assessment and Intervention
share announcement

Children with Specific Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Assessment and Intervention

A special issue of Children (ISSN 2227-9067). This special issue belongs to the section "Child Neurology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 June 2024 | Viewed by 3234

Special Issue Editor

Dr. Carla Sogos

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Neuroscience, Section of Child Neuropsychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy
Interests: autism spectrum disorder; attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; neurodevelopmental disorders; child psychopathology; treatment in child psychiatry
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

On behalf of the Editorial Team of the journal Children, I am pleased to announce the launch of this Special Issue “Children with Specific Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Assessment and Intervention” lead by Dr. Carla Sogos (Sapienza University of Rome). As Guest Editor, I am particularly pleased to launch this Special Issue because it focuses on a crucial topic in child neuropsychiatry, and it highlights the importance of increasing knowledge about neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) as serious chronic conditions with a prevalence of 10–15% in children and adolescents. It is important to take into consideration the high level of heterogeneity and overlap in NDDs, also considering developmental change across a person’s lifetime.

There is much evidence in the literature showing that an early diagnosis in neurodevelopmental disorders allows patients to start personalized and intensive treatment, leading to a better prognosis. Hence, it is a relevant issue to expand the evidence on new diagnostic protocols that can prevent missed diagnosis and can allow us to detect and to treat comorbidities. Moreover, this Special Issue could deepen the impact of several therapeutic protocols (individual and group therapy) on the emotional–behavioral profile of children affected by NDDs, also considering innovative and technological tools.

Researchers and authors are invited to submit original research and literature reviews that may have a significant impact on clinical presentation, diagnostic assessment, and novel therapeutic as well as intervention approaches in neurodevelopmental disorders.

Dr. Carla Sogos
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Children is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • autism
  • neurodevelopmental disorders
  • children
  • assessment
  • intervention

Published Papers (3 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

20 pages, 300 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Psychotic Risk in a Sample of Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder Compared to a Group of “Clinical High Risk” Patients: A Preliminary Study
by Valeria Mammarella, Elena Monducci, Alessia Maffucci, Letizia Terenzi, Mauro Ferrara and Carla Sogos
Children 2024, 11(3), 372; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11030372 - 21 Mar 2024
Viewed by 876
Abstract
1. Background: Autism spectrum disorder and psychotic risk show several overlapping symptoms, so differential diagnosis is often difficult. In addition, there is a high rate of comorbidity between the two conditions, which further complicates the work of clinicians. We evaluated the presence of [...] Read more.
1. Background: Autism spectrum disorder and psychotic risk show several overlapping symptoms, so differential diagnosis is often difficult. In addition, there is a high rate of comorbidity between the two conditions, which further complicates the work of clinicians. We evaluated the presence of subthreshold psychotic symptoms and/or defined psychotic risk syndromes in autistic children and adolescents; we compared the prevalence, type, and severity of psychotic risk symptoms with those of a group of non-autistic patients at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P). 2. Methods: In total, 23 autistic patients and 14 CHR-P patients without autism (aged 8–17) were enrolled in the study. The main assessment was made through clinical interviews for autism (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition—ADOS-2, Autism Diagnostic Interview, Revised—ADI-R) and psychotic risk (Schizophrenia Proneness Instrument, Child and Youth version—SPI-CY, Structured Interview for Psychosis Risk Syndromes—SIPS). 3. Results: No above-threshold psychotic risk symptoms were detected in our autistic patients, but subthreshold psychotic symptoms were identified in all areas. Specific items from all four dimensions of SIPS appear to be more specific for psychotic risk than autism without comorbidity. 4. Conclusions: An a priori screening of psychotic risk in neurodiverse populations is fundamental to prevent more severe conditions. Research should clarify the effective specificity of the available tools to modify them to improve their detection capability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Children with Specific Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Assessment and Intervention)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 555 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Sensory Processing Issues in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Experiences of Maltreatment
by Ayako Ide-Okochi, Mu He, Tomofumi Tokieda, Satsuki Nakamura and Nobutomo Matsunaga
Children 2024, 11(2), 216; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11020216 - 07 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1115
Abstract
This study aims to identify the sensory characteristics of children with both developmental disabilities such as ASD and ADHD and a history of child maltreatment (DM group), children with developmental disabilities (DD group), and typically developed children (TD group). The sensory characteristics of [...] Read more.
This study aims to identify the sensory characteristics of children with both developmental disabilities such as ASD and ADHD and a history of child maltreatment (DM group), children with developmental disabilities (DD group), and typically developed children (TD group). The sensory characteristics of 24 children were assessed through virtual reality and self-administered questionnaires. The results elucidated that the duration of gazing at the “teacher” (60–75 s) was significantly different with the DM group’s gaze being shorter than the DD group’s gaze (p = 0.042). The duration of the “others” gaze (45–60 s) was also significantly different with the DM group’s gaze being longer than the DD and TD groups’ gaze (p = 0.018; p = 0.030). Additionally, the scores for tactile sensitivity, taste/smell sensitivity, under-responsive/seeks sensation, and the total short-term sensory profile were significantly different between the DM-DD and DD-TD groups. The scores of the heart rate perception test and Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness were significantly lower in the DM and DD groups. In conclusion, children who have experienced trauma and developmental disabilities may have different sensory characteristics than children with only developmental disabilities or none, implying the need for further research and tailored care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Children with Specific Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Assessment and Intervention)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Other

Jump to: Research

19 pages, 661 KiB  
Systematic Review
Comparing Executive Functions in Children and Adolescents with Autism and ADHD—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Claudia Ceruti, Alessandra Mingozzi, Nicoletta Scionti and Gian Marco Marzocchi
Children 2024, 11(4), 473; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11040473 - 15 Apr 2024
Viewed by 895
Abstract
Two neurodevelopmental conditions, autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), have been associated with executive function (EF) impairments but the specificity of their impairments is still controversial. The present meta-analysis aimed to identify the differences in EF profiles of ASD, [...] Read more.
Two neurodevelopmental conditions, autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), have been associated with executive function (EF) impairments but the specificity of their impairments is still controversial. The present meta-analysis aimed to identify the differences in EF profiles of ASD, ADHD, and ASD+ADHD in relation to a control group of individuals with typical development (TD) and to understand whether the EF performance could change depending upon the type of measure used to assess EF (performance tests vs. questionnaires). Results from 36 eligible studies revealed that ADHD and ASD showed more difficulties than the TD group in tests and, particularly, in questionnaires. No significant differences in the EF profile emerged between ASD and ADHD when assessed through neuropsychological tests (d = 0.02), while significant differences emerged when assessed through questionnaires, with ADHD having higher ratings than ASD (d = −0.34). EF questionnaires and neuropsychological tests may catch two different constructs of EF, with the former being more predictive of everyday life EF impairments. The comparison between the double diagnosis group (ADHD+ASD) and the clinical groups pointed out that the former has a more similar EF profile to the ADHD-alone one and that it shows more difficulties than ASD-alone. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Children with Specific Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Assessment and Intervention)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-3
Back to TopTop