Go back

Embracing Complexity Theory for Effective Transition to Socially Integrative Cities

Abstract

This article offers complexity theory as a theoretical framework for a transition into socially integrative cities enabled by digitalization. To increase our understanding of the change processes in cities, we can look to the natural sciences for inspiration–specifically, to complexity theory. According to this theory, the city is a living organism, an ecosystem in which there are close relationships among streams of resources, knowledge, and people. It is a system in which, as in nature, a phenomenon of co-evolution occurs–the emergence of processes and self-organization of all agents in the system–that provides the creation of a new order in a natural evolutionary process. The community is one of the key success factors to make cities more attractive to residents, business, and tourists. Community building needs enabling infrastructure for its creation and development. The city can function as a hub for community-building and, in this way, encourage and enable the natural self-emergence of the residents into different communities of interest. Digital technology makes it possible to develop communities on-line in addition to community-building off-line. The process described in this article includes the conceptual framework that is based on complexity theory and the methodological concept based on Urban Living Labs. In addition, we conducted different types of experiments as part of the empirical action study to validate the theoretical basis of the complexity theory. The experiments include a variety of online activities and a few face-to-face activities. The combination of both online and offine support motivates stakeholders to participate and collaborate in, and register on, the platform. Inspired by complexity theory, we believe that urban planners and policy makers should explore the principles identified in the research of complex adaptive systems, such as emergence, self-organization, co-evolution and their translation into R&D projects as user-centered design (UCD), which inspired us in our development of the online Community of Communities (CoC). We believe that one cannot plan a new city or a new neighborhood or any urban renewal activities without engaging all current and future stakeholders: planners, policy makers, academia, residents, businesses and even tourists. This was our focus too, as described in this chapter. In addition, Tel Aviv’s case study is presented as an example of a process of building an online platform, Community of Communities, that can contribute to the transition towards digital city.

Table of Contents: Towards Socially Integrative Cities

Urban Sustainability and Social Integration in Cities in Europe and China—An Introduction

PSPaulina SchiappacassePaulina Schiappacasse
BMBernhard MüllerBernhard Müller
JLJian LiuJian Liu
JCJianming CaiJianming Cai
HNHans-Martin NeumannHans-Martin Neumann
BYBaojun YangBaojun Yang

Towards a Common Understanding of Socially Integrative Cities in Europe and China

PSPaulina SchiappacassePaulina Schiappacasse
BMBernhard MüllerBernhard Müller
JCJianming CaiJianming Cai

Managing Urban Expansion in Europe: New Impulses for People-Centred Development in China?

PSPaulina SchiappacassePaulina Schiappacasse
BMBernhard MüllerBernhard Müller
JCJianming CaiJianming Cai
EMEnpu MaEnpu Ma

Land Management for Socially Integrative Cities in Europe

JSJulia SueringJulia Suering
AOAndreas OrtnerAndreas Ortner
AWAlexandra WeitkampAlexandra Weitkamp

Towards Socially Integrative Urban  Regeneration—Comparative Perspectives from China and Europe

SRStefanie RoesslerStefanie Roessler
JCJianming CaiJianming Cai
JLJing LinJing Lin
MJMengfan JangMengfan Jang

Community Building through Public Engagement: Variety in Europe and China

TVThea Marie VallerThea Marie Valler
MKMarius KorsnesMarius Korsnes
JLJiayan LiuJiayan Liu
YCYulin ChenYulin Chen

Transformative Factors of Post-Industrial Urban Spaces in China and Italy

BHBadiaa HamamaBadiaa Hamama
MRMaria Paola RepellinoMaria Paola Repellino
JLJian LiuJian Liu
MBMichele BoninoMichele Bonino

Looking at Socially Integrative Cities through the Educating City: The Example of Educational Museums in Europe and China

FDFabrizio d’AnielloFabrizio d’Aniello
ZXZhuqing XuZhuqing Xu
EPElisabetta PatriziElisabetta Patrizi
SPStefano PolentaStefano Polenta

Enhancing Capacity Building for Urban Transformation as a Means to Close the Planning–Implementation Gap in Europe and China

SMSusanne MeyerSusanne Meyer
CBChristoph BrodnikChristoph Brodnik
GHGudrun HaindlmaierGudrun Haindlmaier
HNHans-Martin NeumannHans-Martin Neumann
DJDaiva Jakutyte-WalangitangDaiva Jakutyte-Walangitang
JCJianming CaiJianming Cai
YHYan HanYan Han
JLJing LinJing Lin

Regression Analyses of Air Pollution and Transport Based on Multiple Data Sources—A Decision Support Example for Socially Integrative City Planning

MLMingyue LiuMingyue Liu
BCBuyang CaoBuyang Cao
MCMengfan ChenMengfan Chen
OHOtthein HerzogOtthein Herzog
EPEdna PasherEdna Pasher
AWAnnemie WyckmansAnnemie Wyckmans
ZWZhiqiang WuZhiqiang Wu

Urban Living Labs as Instruments of Open Innovation: Examples of Sino–European Cooperation

AWAnnemie WyckmansAnnemie Wyckmans
YWYu WangYu Wang
MKMarius KorsnesMarius Korsnes
PAPål AunePål Aune
YYYang YuYang Yu
CLChang LiuChang Liu
EPEdna PasherEdna Pasher
MHMor HarirMor Harir
LSLee SharirLee Sharir
OHOtthein HerzogOtthein Herzog
BCBuyang CaoBuyang Cao
NKNikolaos KontinakisNikolaos Kontinakis
ACAnthony ColcloughAnthony Colclough