Go back

Towards a Common Understanding of Socially Integrative Cities in Europe and China

Abstract

Urbanisation is recognised as a powerful force supporting economic growth and innovation. However, as more people have moved to cities in search of new opportunities, the scale of spatial, environmental, and socio-economic inequalities has increased, remaining more than ever an unmet common challenge. In Europe, many blackspots of urban decay have evolved in cities over the past decades. In China, cities have to deal with a number of specific challenges, especially those associated with the strict hukou (household registration) system, and with the massive land conversion stimulated by fiscal reforms of the past. In both parts of the world, new initiatives have been developed in order to deal with problems of segregation and exclusion. Although they di er considerably according to specific preconditions and their societal embeddedness, the objective of this article is to develop a common understanding of socially integrative cities in Europe and China. The work is mainly based on literature analysis, expert interviews, and intensive group discussions. First, the article looks at the relevance of the topic. Second, it traces approaches in Europe and China to promote socially integrative cities back to their origins, and it discusses certain challenges, especially with regard to China. Third, the results of expert meetings on developing a common understanding of socially integrative cities are presented. Five dimensions and twelve features are derived and explained. They are considered as an analytical concept and a general orientation for shaping policies towards promoting socially integrative cities. Finally, conclusions are drawn. The concept of the “socially integrative city” goes beyond the notion of the “inclusive city” as developed in the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the New Urban Agenda. The five dimensions and twelve characteristics of the concept have a global reach. They can be applied anywhere, and they have the potential to complement the respective targets of the Sustainable Development Goals. The article is of interest for a broad group of stakeholders from academia and practice, e.g., experts in urban planning and community development, who are interested in contributing to make cities more sustainable, and especially to enhance social integration.

Table of Contents: Towards Socially Integrative Cities

Urban Sustainability and Social Integration in Cities in Europe and China—An Introduction

PSPaulina SchiappacassePaulina Schiappacasse
BMBernhard MüllerBernhard Müller
JLJian LiuJian Liu
JCJianming CaiJianming Cai
HNHans-Martin NeumannHans-Martin Neumann
BYBaojun YangBaojun Yang

Managing Urban Expansion in Europe: New Impulses for People-Centred Development in China?

PSPaulina SchiappacassePaulina Schiappacasse
BMBernhard MüllerBernhard Müller
JCJianming CaiJianming Cai
EMEnpu MaEnpu Ma

Land Management for Socially Integrative Cities in Europe

JSJulia SueringJulia Suering
AOAndreas OrtnerAndreas Ortner
AWAlexandra WeitkampAlexandra Weitkamp

Towards Socially Integrative Urban  Regeneration—Comparative Perspectives from China and Europe

SRStefanie RoesslerStefanie Roessler
JCJianming CaiJianming Cai
JLJing LinJing Lin
MJMengfan JangMengfan Jang

Community Building through Public Engagement: Variety in Europe and China

TVThea Marie VallerThea Marie Valler
MKMarius KorsnesMarius Korsnes
JLJiayan LiuJiayan Liu
YCYulin ChenYulin Chen

Transformative Factors of Post-Industrial Urban Spaces in China and Italy

BHBadiaa HamamaBadiaa Hamama
MRMaria Paola RepellinoMaria Paola Repellino
JLJian LiuJian Liu
MBMichele BoninoMichele Bonino

Looking at Socially Integrative Cities through the Educating City: The Example of Educational Museums in Europe and China

FDFabrizio d’AnielloFabrizio d’Aniello
ZXZhuqing XuZhuqing Xu
EPElisabetta PatriziElisabetta Patrizi
SPStefano PolentaStefano Polenta

Embracing Complexity Theory for Effective Transition to Socially Integrative Cities

EPEdna PasherEdna Pasher
LSLee SharirLee Sharir
OHOtthein HerzogOtthein Herzog
YNYahel NudlerYahel Nudler
BCBuyang CaoBuyang Cao
ZWZhiqiang WuZhiqiang Wu
MHMor HarirMor Harir

Enhancing Capacity Building for Urban Transformation as a Means to Close the Planning–Implementation Gap in Europe and China

SMSusanne MeyerSusanne Meyer
CBChristoph BrodnikChristoph Brodnik
GHGudrun HaindlmaierGudrun Haindlmaier
HNHans-Martin NeumannHans-Martin Neumann
DJDaiva Jakutyte-WalangitangDaiva Jakutyte-Walangitang
JCJianming CaiJianming Cai
YHYan HanYan Han
JLJing LinJing Lin

Regression Analyses of Air Pollution and Transport Based on Multiple Data Sources—A Decision Support Example for Socially Integrative City Planning

MLMingyue LiuMingyue Liu
BCBuyang CaoBuyang Cao
MCMengfan ChenMengfan Chen
OHOtthein HerzogOtthein Herzog
EPEdna PasherEdna Pasher
AWAnnemie WyckmansAnnemie Wyckmans
ZWZhiqiang WuZhiqiang Wu

Urban Living Labs as Instruments of Open Innovation: Examples of Sino–European Cooperation

AWAnnemie WyckmansAnnemie Wyckmans
YWYu WangYu Wang
MKMarius KorsnesMarius Korsnes
PAPål AunePål Aune
YYYang YuYang Yu
CLChang LiuChang Liu
EPEdna PasherEdna Pasher
MHMor HarirMor Harir
LSLee SharirLee Sharir
OHOtthein HerzogOtthein Herzog
BCBuyang CaoBuyang Cao
NKNikolaos KontinakisNikolaos Kontinakis
ACAnthony ColcloughAnthony Colclough