Special Issue "Immigration and Global Migration: Politics, Policy, and Human Rights Immigration Reform and the Politics of Immigration"
A special issue of Laws (ISSN 2075-471X).
Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 October 2013)
Prof. Dr. Kevin R. Johnson
School of Law, University of California, Davis, Rm. 2020 King Hall, Davis, CA 95616, USA
Interests: immigration law and policy; refugee law; complex litigation; civil procedure (including civil litigation and complex litigation); civil rights; critical race theory; critical latina/o theory
For close to a decade, there has been discussion of “comprehensive immigration reform” in the United States, as well as developing nations around the world. Reform proposals in many different countries generally address enforcement, labor migration (with a focus on increasing migration of skilled labor), national security, and controlling the flow of refugees. In the United States, immigration reform in general terms would include a path to legalization (or amnesty) for the 11-12 million undocumented immigrants living in the country, changes to the rules for legal immigration, and increased border enforcement. In addition, a potent political movement of college students emerged calling for congressional enactment of the “DREAM Act,” which, among other things, would regularize the immigration status of undocumented college students. At the same time, with congressional action, a number of states, including Arizona, passed their own immigration enforcement laws, which required local police to participate in immigration enforcement and provoking cries of racism from Latina/os (U.S. citizens as well as immigrants. While U.S. immigration reform may influence changes to other nations’ immigration laws, local politics, conditions, and migration patterns will influence the reform in any particular nation.
Scholars can offer important insights on what immigration reform should look like in its particulars, which unquestionably will continue to be a subject of significant debate in many nations.
Prof. Dr. Kevin R. Johnson
Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. Papers will be published continuously (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.
Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are refereed through a peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Laws is an international peer-reviewed Open Access quarterly journal published by MDPI.
Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. For the first couple of issues the Article Processing Charge (APC) will be waived for well-prepared manuscripts. English correction and/or formatting fees of 250 CHF (Swiss Francs) will be charged in certain cases for those articles accepted for publication that require extensive additional formatting and/or English corrections.
- border enforcement
- civil rights
- global migration
- human rights
- immigration reform
- labor migration
- national security
- national sovereignty
Article: Understanding Proposed Changes to the H-1B Visa: Protecting American Government Interests, Improving the Opportunities for American Companies, or Potentially Hurting Hopeful Immigrants?
Laws 2013, 2(3), 233-243; doi:10.3390/laws2030233
Received: 25 June 2013; in revised form: 8 August 2013 / Accepted: 16 August 2013 / Published: 21 August 2013| Download PDF Full-text (187 KB)
Article: Sub-Federal Enforcement of Immigration Law: An Introduction to the Problem of Pretextual Enforcement and Inadequate Remedies
Laws 2014, 3(1), 61-84; doi:10.3390/laws3010061
Received: 8 November 2013; in revised form: 11 January 2014 / Accepted: 13 January 2014 / Published: 22 January 2014| Download PDF Full-text (269 KB)
Laws 2014, 3(1), 117-140; doi:10.3390/laws3010117
Received: 23 November 2013; in revised form: 20 January 2014 / Accepted: 22 January 2014 / Published: 27 January 2014| Download PDF Full-text (110 KB)
Last update: 17 January 2013