ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Molecular Tools in Environmental Risk Assessment: Time for Systems Ecotoxicology?

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Environmental Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2022) | Viewed by 4634

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Associate Laboratory i4HB—Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA, 2825 Caparica, Portugal
2. UCIBIO—Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA, 2825 Caparica, Portugal
Interests: toxicology and environmental toxicology; aquatic biology; genotoxicology; marine toxins and biotechnology; toxicopathology; molecular toxicology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In recent decades, we have witnessed the remarkable evolution of molecular tools in Life Science research, with an emphasis on high-throughput and “omics” methodologies. Ecotoxicologists and environmental toxicologists have contributed to significant methodological advances, in large part due to the obstacles and challenges of surveying nonconventional biological models. It is now acknowledged that Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) should evolve beyond traditional single-endpoint and biomarker approaches directed at specific biogeographical scenarios to integrative strategies that enable modeling and forecasting. Similarly, there is growing awareness of the need for certifiable quantification of toxicants in the environment and living tissue as a means of properly establishing causation in a changing world where humans and wildlife are exposed to an increasing range of pollutants.

Understanding how the networks of genes and the products of their expression are modulated by exposure is paramount to devise toxicological mechanisms and understand downstream pathophysiological effects. In this respect, “omics” and other state-of-the-art approaches are needed to build qualitative and, preferably, quantitative models. Herein, I call for the participation of fellow toxicologists, ecotoxicologists, and environmental toxicologists developing their research with the support of molecular tools, in vivo, in vitro, and even in silico for the purpose of ERA for any class of pollutants, from metals to nanomaterials and compounds of emerging concern or their mixtures. High-quality original research articles combining toxicokinetics and molecular toxicodynamics reaching out to a broad international audience, as well as review papers focusing on methods and future perspectives, are welcome.

Dr. Pedro M. Costa
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • system biology
  • molecular toxicology
  • gene expression
  • transcriptomics, proteomics
  • epigenomics
  • metabolomics
  • bioinformatics
  • pollution
  • environment

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

31 pages, 6514 KiB  
Article
In Silico Insights on the Pro-Inflammatory Potential of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and the Prospective Anti-Inflammatory Capacity of Andrographis paniculata Phytocompounds
by Trixia Julaton, Aibelou Taclendo, Glenn Oyong, Ofelia Rempillo, Maria Cecilia Galvez and Edgar Vallar
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(14), 8588; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148588 - 14 Jul 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1796
Abstract
Inflammation linked to various diseases is the biological response to certain stimuli. The pro-inflammatory potential of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) as potential inducers of inflammation bound to the Toll-like Receptor 4 (TLR4) and the anti-inflammatory capacity of A. paniculata (AP) phytocompounds as prospective [...] Read more.
Inflammation linked to various diseases is the biological response to certain stimuli. The pro-inflammatory potential of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) as potential inducers of inflammation bound to the Toll-like Receptor 4 (TLR4) and the anti-inflammatory capacity of A. paniculata (AP) phytocompounds as prospective inhibitors of the Nuclear Factor Kappa B (NF-κB) p50 transcription factor are investigated via in silico techniques. The molecular docking of the PAHs and AP phytocompounds is performed in AutoDock Vina by calculating their binding energies. The molecular dynamics simulations (MDS) of the apo and ligand-bound complex of the top binding ligands were performed in CABS-flex. The agonists, which included the PAHs indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (IP), and dibenz(a,h)anthracene (DahA), had the highest binding energies of −10 kcal/mol and −9.2 kcal/mol, respectively. The most stable antagonists in the binding site with binding energies to the NF-κB p50 were the AP phytocompounds with −5.6 kcal/mol for ergosterol peroxide and −5.3 kcal/mol for 14-deoxy-14,15-dehydroandrographolide. The MDS of the apo human TLR4 and PAH-bound TLR4, and the apo p50 and the AP phytocompound-bound NF-κB p50 showed minimal fluctuations. These results reveal that IP and DahA are significant inducers of inflammation, whereas ergosterol peroxide and 14-deoxy-14,15-dehydroandrographolide are inhibitors of the NF-κB pathway. Furthermore, the study theorizes that any inflammatory activity induced by PAH can be potentially inhibited by A. paniculata phytocompounds. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 12734 KiB  
Article
In Silico Approach in the Evaluation of Pro-Inflammatory Potential of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Volatile Organic Compounds through Binding Affinity to the Human Toll-Like Receptor 4
by Marie Beatriz Cabral, Celine Joy Dela Cruz, Yumika Sato, Glenn Oyong, Ofelia Rempillo, Maria Cecilia Galvez and Edgar Vallar
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(14), 8360; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148360 - 8 Jul 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2220
Abstract
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are widespread across the globe, existing in the environment in complex mixtures potentially capable of initiating respiratory illnesses. Here, we use an in silico approach to evaluate the potential pro-inflammatory effects of various carcinogenic [...] Read more.
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are widespread across the globe, existing in the environment in complex mixtures potentially capable of initiating respiratory illnesses. Here, we use an in silico approach to evaluate the potential pro-inflammatory effects of various carcinogenic PAHs and VOCs through their binding affinity towards the human toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). For receptors and ligands, RCSB Protein Data Bank and PubChem were used in obtaining their 3D structures, respectively. Autodock Vina was utilized to obtain the best docking poses and binding affinities of each PAH and VOC. Out of the 14 PAHs included in this study, indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene, benzo(ghi)perylene, and benzo[a]pyrene had the highest binding affinity values of −10, −9, and −8.9 kcal/mol, respectively. For the VOCs, out of the 10 compounds studied, benzene, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, and styrene had the highest binding affinity values of −3.6, −3.9, and −4.6 kcal/mol, respectively. Compounds with higher affinity than LPS (−4.1 kcal/com) could potentially induce inflammation, while compounds with lower affinity would be less likely to induce an inflammatory response. Meanwhile, molecular dynamics simulation and RMSF statistical analysis proved that the protein, TLR4, stably preserve its conformation despite ligand interactions. Overall, the structure of the TLR4 was considered inflexible. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop