Next Article in Journal
A Longitudinal Study of Decomposition Odour in Soil Using Sorbent Tubes and Solid Phase Microextraction
Next Article in Special Issue
High-Throughput Mass Spectrometry Applied to Structural Genomics
Previous Article in Journal
Cu Purification Using an Extraction Resin for Determination of Isotope Ratios by Multicollector ICP-MS
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adaptation of a High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography System for the Measurement of Viscosity
 
 
Please note that, as of 1 January 2016, Chromatography has been renamed to Separations and is now published here.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Exhaled Breath Condensate for Proteomic Biomarker Discovery

1
UES Inc., Air Force Research Laboratory, 711th Human Performance Wing/RHXBC, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433, USA
2
Air Force Research Laboratory, 711th Human Performance Wing/RHXBC, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433, USA
3
Air Force Research Laboratory, 711th Human Performance Wing, U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine/OET, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chromatography 2014, 1(3), 108-119; https://doi.org/10.3390/chromatography1030108
Submission received: 8 May 2014 / Revised: 20 June 2014 / Accepted: 24 June 2014 / Published: 2 July 2014

Abstract

:
Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) has been established as a potential source of respiratory biomarkers. Compared to the numerous small molecules identified, the protein content of EBC has remained relatively unstudied due to the methodological and technical difficulties surrounding EBC analysis. In this review, we discuss the proteins identified in EBC, by mass spectrometry, focusing on the significance of those proteins identified. We will also review the limitations surrounding mass spectral EBC protein analysis emphasizing recommendations to enhance EBC protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Finally, we will provide insight into the future directions of the EBC proteomics field.

1. Introduction

Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) has quickly become a subject of research interest due to the high potential for respiratory disease biomarker discovery. Considered an aqueous matrix featuring condensed volatile organic compounds (VOC) from breath and non-volatile droplets of liquid from the respiratory tract, EBC represents an expanded potential for respiratory biomarker discovery beyond VOC breath analysis [1,2,3,4,5]. These properties have allowed EBC to come to the forefront of collection methods for biomarker discovery in respiratory diseases.
Historically, the biomarker discovery field has relied heavily on mass spectrometric approaches for characterizing the contents of complex biological samples and fluids. Exhaled breath condensate is no different. Both gas chromatography and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS and LC-MS/MS respectively) approaches have been applied to EBC to identify molecules of prognostic and predictive significance. This review will discuss the proteins identified using mass spectral methodologies for EBC biomarker discovery with a focus on the significance and limitations associated with EBC analysis.

2. Collection and Sampling

In contrast to invasive and minimally invasive collection methods, such as tissue biopsy, blood and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), exhaled breath condensate is obtained by a completely non-invasive method making it ideal for ailing individuals [6,7]. Furthermore, EBC collection is simplistic, requiring minimal technical skills, allowing for sampling from both children and adults alike [6,7]. These properties make EBC collection and analysis applicable to many respiratory diseases, such as asthma, cystic fibrosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [6,7].
Sampling of EBC can be conducted on commercially available equipment, most notably the Ecoscreen or RTube, or homemade devices such as that put forth by Schleiss et al. [4,8,9]. See Huttmann et al., for details regarding the Ecoscreen and RTube [10]. All these sampling devices strive to condense humid breath, without salivary contamination, into liquid or ice, based on the condensation temperature, for collection and analysis [11]. For review of collection, device variability, sampling pitfalls and recommendations for collection method standardization, in EBC sampling see Horvath et al., Montuschi and Grob et al. [1,8,12]. Since EBC is >99% water, analytes are diluted to detection limits or lower [13]. Steps to concentrate analytes, such as centrifugal evaporation or lyophilization, have been employed to overcome this limitation [4,8]. Despite this analytical obstacle, it is these concentrated samples that hold the most promise for protein biomarker discovery.

3. Exhaled Breath Condensate Proteomics

In contrast to global bottom-up proteomics, EBC proteomic analysis has yielded only a modest number of protein identifications (Table 1). For example, shotgun proteomics of global lysates regularly identify several hundred proteins in a single study with significant protein scores [14]. Conversely, the largest number of significantly identified proteins from EBC using bottom-up approaches, in a single study, was accomplished by Fumagalli et al., with 44 total proteins [15]. This has been attributed to the low concentration, <1 µg/mL, of proteins contained in EBC [16]. While few in number, those already discovered have the potential for high physiologic relevance.
Table 1. List of proteins identified in exhaled breath condensate by mass spectrometry in various diseases. Disease Abbreviations: NS = Non-Smoker, S = Smoker, ES = Ex-Smoker, LT = Lung Transplant, AATD = Pulmonary Emphysema Associated with α1 Antitrypsin Deficiency, COPD = Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, LC = Lung Cancer, ALI/ARDS = Acute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Methodology Abbreviations: LC = Liquid Chromatography, MS/MS = Mass Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry, SELDI = Surface-Enhanced Laser Desorption/Ionization, MALDI = Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization, TOF = Time-of-Flight, 1DE & 2DE = Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis.
Table 1. List of proteins identified in exhaled breath condensate by mass spectrometry in various diseases. Disease Abbreviations: NS = Non-Smoker, S = Smoker, ES = Ex-Smoker, LT = Lung Transplant, AATD = Pulmonary Emphysema Associated with α1 Antitrypsin Deficiency, COPD = Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, LC = Lung Cancer, ALI/ARDS = Acute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Methodology Abbreviations: LC = Liquid Chromatography, MS/MS = Mass Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry, SELDI = Surface-Enhanced Laser Desorption/Ionization, MALDI = Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization, TOF = Time-of-Flight, 1DE & 2DE = Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis.
Protein Identifications from Exhaled Breath Condensate by Mass Spectrometry
#Protein NameAccession NumberDiseaseMethod of DetectionReferenceReported as Contaminant
1Cytokeratin 1P04264Healthy NS, Healthy S, Healthy ES, LT, AATD, Asthma, LCLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF, MALDI-TOF, 2DE-LC-MS/MS[15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24][16,18,24]
2Cytokeratin 9P35527Healthy NS, Healthy S, Healthy ES, LT, AATD, Asthma, LC, ALI/ARDSLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF, MALDI-TOF, 2DE-LC-MS/MS, 1DE-LC-MS/MS[15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,25]
3Cytokeratin 2P35908Healthy NS, Healthy S, Healthy ES, LT, Asthma, LC, ALI/ARDSLC-MS/MS, MALDI-TOF, 1DE-LC-MS/MS[15,16,18,19,20,21,22,24,25][16,18,24]
4Cytokeratin 10P13645Healthy NS, Healthy S, Healthy ES, LT, AATD, Asthma, LC, ALI/ARDSLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF, MALDI-TOF, 2DE-LC-MS/MS, 1DE-LC-MS/MS[15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,25]
5Cytokeratin 14P02533Healthy NS, Healthy S, Healthy ES, LT, Asthma, LCLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF, MALDI-TOF[15,16,19,20,22,24][24]
6Cytokeratin 5P13647Healthy NS, Healthy S, Healthy ES, LT, Asthma, LCLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF, MALDI-TOF[15,16,19,20,22]
7Cytokeratin 6BP04259Healthy NS, Healthy S, LT, AsthmaLC-MS/MS, MALDI-TOF[15,16,18,19,20]
8DermcidinP81605Healthy NS, Healthy S, Healthy ES, LT, Asthma, LCLC-MS/MS, MALDI-TOF[16,19,20,22,24][24]
9Lysozyme CP61626Healthy NS, Healthy S, LT, AATD, Asthma, LCLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF, MALDI-TOF[15,19,20,21,22]
10Cytokeratin 6AP02538Healthy NS, Healthy S, Healthy ES, LT, Asthma, LCLC-MS/MS, MALDI-TOF[16,19,20,22]
11Cytokeratin 16P08779Healthy NS, Healthy S, Healthy ES, LT, Asthma, LC LC-MS/MS, MALDI-TOF[16,19,20,22]
12Serum AlbuminP02768Healthy NS, Healthy S, Asthma, LCLC-MS/MS, MALDI-TOF[15,16,20,22]
13Cytokeratin 8P05787Healthy NS, LT, AsthmaLC-MS/MS, MALDI-TOF[18,19,20]
14UbiquitinP62988Healthy NS, Healthy S, LTLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15,16,19]
15Cystatin AP01040Healthy NS, Healthy S, LT, AATD, COPDLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15,16,19]
16Calgranulin BP06702Healthy NS, Healthy S, AATD, Asthma, COPDLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF, MALDI-TOF[15,20,21]
17HemoglobinP02042Healthy NS, Healthy S, AsthmaMALDI-TOF[20,21,24][24]
18Cytokeratin 4P19013Healthy NS, LTLC-MS/MS, MALDI-TOF[18,19]
19Cytokeratin 17Q04695Healthy NS, Healthy S, Healthy ES, LCLC-MS/MS[16,22]
20α1-Microglobulin/Bikunin PrecursorP02760Healthy NS, Healthy SLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15,16]
21Human Basement Membrane Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan Core ProteinP98160Healthy NS, Healthy SLC-MS/MS[15,16]
22Cerebroside Sulfate ActivatorP07602Healthy NS, Healthy SLC-MS/MS[15,16]
23Lyosomal-Associated Membrane Glycoprotein-2P13473Healthy NS, Healthy SLC-MS/MS[15,16]
24Kininogen 1P01042Healthy NS, Healthy SLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15,16]
25Calgranulin AP05109Healthy NS, Healthy S, AATD, COPDLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF, MALDI-TOF[15,21]
26Interferon ϒP01579Healthy NS, Healthy S, AATD, COPDLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15,17]
27IL-2P60568Healthy NS, Healthy S, AATD, COPDLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15,17]
28IL-15P04933Healthy NS, Healthy S, AATD, COPDLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15,17]
29Heomglobin, Subunit βP68871Healthy NS, Healthy SLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15,16][16]
30DemoplakinP15924Healthy ES, LTLC-MS/MS[19,22]
31FilaggrinQ5D862Healthy ES, LTLC-MS/MS[19,22]
32Prolactin-Induced ProteinP12273Healthy ES, LT, LCLC-MS/MS[19,22]
33Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate dehydrogenaseP04406LT, LCLC-MS/MS[19,22]
34β ActinP06709Asthma, LCLC-MS/MS, MALDI-TOF[20,22]
35Cytokeratin 25Q7Z3Z0Healthy NSLC-MS/MS[16]
36Cytokeratin 26Q7Z3Y9Healthy NS, Healthy SLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15]
37Prostaglandin H2 D-IsomeraseP41222Healthy NSLC-MS/MS[16]
38Leukocyte-Associated Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor 1Q6GTX8Healthy NSLC-MS/MS[16]
39α Actin, Cardiac Muscle 1P68032Healthy NS, Healthy SLC-MS/MS[15]
40Pulmonary Surfactant Associated Protein A1Q8IWL1Healthy NS, Healthy S, AATD, COPDLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15]
41Pulmonary Surfactant Associated Protein A2Q8IWL2Healthy NS, Healthy S, AATD, COPDLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15]
42Laminin β4B4DX23Healthy NS, Healthy SLC-MS/MS[15]
43Histone H1.5P16401Healthy NS, Healthy S, AATD, COPDLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15]
44α1-AntitrypsinP01009Healthy NS, Healthy S, COPDLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15]
45ErythropoietinP01588Healthy NS, Healthy SLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15]
46Complement C3P01024Healthy NS, Healthy SLC-MS/MS[15]
47Nucleolar Protein 4O94818Healthy NS, Healthy SLC-MS/MS[15]
48V-Set & Immunoglobulin Domain-Containing Protein 8Q5VU13Healthy NS, Healthy S, AATD, COPDLC-MS/MS[15]
49Thyroid Hormone Receptor-Associated Protein 3Q9Y2W1Healthy NS, Healthy SLC-MS/MS[15]
50Chromodomain-Helicase-DNA-Binding Protein 1O14646Healthy NS, Healthy SLC-MS/MS[15]
51Zinc Finger CCCH Domain-Containing Protein 4Q9UPT8Healthy NS, Healthy SLC-MS/MS[15]
52Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1P13500Healthy NS, Healthy S, AATD, COPDLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15]
53Interferon α 1/13P01562Healthy NS, Healthy S, COPDLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15]
54Tumor Necrosis FactorP01375Healthy NS, Healthy S, AATD, COPDLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15]
55Growth-Regulated Oncogene α ProteinP09341Healthy NS, Healthy S, AATD, COPDLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15]
56IL-1 αP01583Healthy NS, Healthy S, AATDLC-MS/MS[15]
57IL-1 βP01584Healthy NS, Healthy S, COPDLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15]
58IL-12, Subunit αP29459Healthy NS, Healthy S, COPDLC-MS/MS, SELDI-TOF[15]
59IL-12, Subunit βP29460Healthy NS, Healthy SLC-MS/MS[15]
60Lipocalin-LTLC-MS/MS[19]
61Cytochrome CP99999LTLC-MS/MS[19]
62Desmoglein-LTLC-MS/MS[19]
63HornerinQ86YZ3LTLC-MS/MS[19]
64Annexin A1P04083LTLC-MS/MS[19]
65Serine Protease Inhibitor-LTLC-MS/MS[19]
66Bleomycine HydrolaseQ13867LTLC-MS/MS[19]
67Arginase 1P05089LTLC-MS/MS[19]
68Peroxiredoxin-LTLC-MS/MS[19]
69Caspase 14P31944Healthy S, Healthy ES, LCLC-MS/MS[22]
70Cystatin SNP01037Healthy ESLC-MS/MS[22]
71Growth Hormone Regulated TBC Protein 1Q5TC63LCLC-MS/MS[22]
72Apolipoprotein DP05090Healthy SLC-MS/MS[22]
73Junction PlakoglobinP14923Healthy ESLC-MS/MS[22]
74Submaxillary Gland Androgen-Regulated Protein 3BP02814Healthy ESLC-MS/MS[22]
75Zymogen Granule Protein 16BQ96DA0Healthy ESLC-MS/MS[22]
76Polyubiquitin-BP0CG47Healthy ESLC-MS/MS[22]
77ϒ-GlutamylcyclotransferaseO75223Healthy S, Healthy ES, LCLC-MS/MS[22]
78Zinc α-2-Glycoprotein 1P25311Healthy ESLC-MS/MS[22]
79α ActinP68133Healthy S, LCLC-MS/MS[22]
80Pulmonary Surfactant Associated Protein DP35247Healthy NSMALDI-TOF[18]
The dominant proteins found in EBC are cytokeratin proteins. Most often Cytokeratins 1, 2, 9 and 10 are more prevalent while 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 8, 14, 16, 17, 25, and 26 are also present at a lower frequency [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Several of these cytokeratins, specifically 5, 6, 8, 14 and 17, are expressed in alveolae and bronchii of the lung suggesting EBC is a representative sample of the lower respiratory tract environment [18]. Similarly, Gianazza et al., have reported a 3× increase in the keratin content of EBC from smokers when compared to non-smokers [23,26]. However, many of these cytokeratins and other proteins have been reported as contaminants, associated with either the sampling environment or patient derived, dust and skin debris in ambient air [18,24]. Cytokeratins 1, 2 and 14, dermcidin and hemoglobin fall into this category (Table 1) [16,18,24]. Potentially more important than cytokeratin identification, a recent study has found EBC derived inflammatory mediators, e.g., IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-12α, IL-12β, IL-15, IFN-α, IFN-ϒ, and TNF-α, suggesting the proteomic community is progressing toward the lower end of the dynamic range of EBC [15].
Cytokines in exhaled breath condensate have been reported in the low pg/mL range often bordering the lower limits of detection and/or quantitation by common immunological methodology [27]. For example, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) was shown by Garey et al., by ELISA to range from 7.4 ± 17.5 to 3.9 ± 8.5 pg/mL between smokers and non-smokers which is near their reported 2 pg/mL detection limit for the assay [28]. Mass spectral detection of these potentially low abundant and highly localized proteins by Fumagalli et al., in EBC suggests the methodological and instrumental limitations of EBC proteomics are slowly being overcome [15]. Such results hold promise for using MS to characterize the EBC protein content, across many diseases, expanding our understanding of EBC as a source of protein biomarkers.
The identification of cytokines in exhaled breath condensate also holds diagnostic significance in determining lung inflammation. For example, IL-2 was detected in the EBC of children with asthma and CF while remaining undetectable in control children [29]. Furthermore, protein array data provided by Matsunaga et al., showed increases in IL-4, IL-8, IL-17, TNF-α, RANTES, IP-10, TGF-β, MIP-1α and MIP-1β in asthmatics when compared to healthy individuals [30]. Matsunaga et al., also correlated values of EBC RANTES, TNF-α, and TGF-β with physiological parameters of airway disease [30]. Additionally, Colombo et al., demonstrated IL-8 correlated with clinical biomarkers of cystic fibrosis by biochip array [31]. However, more sensitive assays, such as multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), are needed as these cytokines are often near immunological reagent dependent assay’s detection limits [29]. These examples emphasize the potential for using EBC as a medium to monitor lung inflammatory mediators. Additionally, these data stress the need for novel highly sensitive methods for EBC analysis.

4. Exhaled Breath Condensate Proteomic Limitations

In contrast to the numerous small molecule biomarkers identified, such as leukotrienes (LTB4, CysLT) and nitric oxide (NO), proteomic analysis of EBC has had a limited number of potential protein biomarkers identified due to methodological and instrumental hurdles [4,8,32,33]. The analytical difficulties of EBC proteomics can be attributed to several factors including, low protein concentration, inconsistent sample preparation and sample loss and instrumental sensitivities [34,35,36]. Although present, the limitations surrounding EBC proteomics can be potentially overcome.
Low protein content, <1 µg/mL, in EBC requires measures to concentrate the proteins prior to analysis [16]. Traditionally accomplished through centrifugal evaporation or lyophilization, these steps are reported to concentrate samples up to 20% [4]. Although beneficial, lyophilization has been shown to reduce peptide identifications 50%–90% suggesting other methods or combination of methods such as gel electrophoresis, ultrafiltration, protein precipitation and solid-phase extraction, for sample concentration could improve sample quality and protein ID quantity [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Additionally, lyophilizing instruments are not readily available at most institutions limiting their potential use in EBC methodology [1]. These results suggest lyophilization for sample concentration alone is insufficient to probe low abundant proteins in EBC.
The most common sampling procedure for EBC collection involves normal tidal breathing through a collection device for 10 minutes, ultimately yielding approximately 1 mL of condensate [1,2]. Although variations exist, i.e., condensing temperature, collection device, etc., this procedure has been used routinely for many applications including proteomics [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. A 1 mL sample of EBC for proteomics is insufficient due to the low overall protein abundance. While increasing the sampling time is ideal, it may provide added stress to an already sick individual [16]. To circumvent this limitation, Fumagalli et al., pooled samples from healthy smokers and non-smokers to increase sample protein concentration and obtain MS spectra from the low end of the dynamic range [15]. While they could not characterize distinct individuals in this manner, sample pooling did allow for the MS detection of the highest number of proteins from EBC to date [15].
Many proteomic sample preparation techniques have been applied to exhaled breath condensate with varying success, such as solid-phase extraction, protein precipitation, delipidation and ultrafiltration [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. The most thorough attempt to characterize the differences in sample preparation was conducted by Kurova et al., [16]. They concluded lyophilization followed by standard tryptic digestion yielded the best MS results by reducing sample loss [16]. These results suggest sample handling has a profound effect on MS detection.
The proteomic analysis of EBC has been conducted on many different instruments, such as MALDI-TOF, SELDI-TOF, Ion-trap LC-MS/MS and LC-FT-ICR, each with variable sensitivities (Table 1) [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. As newer more sensitive instruments with high MSN scan rates become available, the field of EBC proteomics will quickly progress. Additionally as the interest in exhaled breath as a source of protein biomarkers grows, more researchers will become involved in EBC protein analysis further advancing the field.

5. Future Directions

Although significant strides have been made in qualitatively analyzing EBC, i.e., small molecule, proteomics, pH, etc., the clinical significance and application of these discoveries currently remains unclear. Further development of MS techniques and instrumentation, sample collection and preparation are required to advance the proteomic characterization to the low end of the dynamic range. Such research will allow for the identification of low abundant disease biomarkers facilitating the development of highly sensitive quantitative MS assays, i.e., multiple reaction monitoring, supporting large-scale clinical biomarker studies. It is these low abundant proteins in conjunction with high sensitivity quantitative assays that could hold significant clinically relevant diagnostic and therapeutic information.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by a subcontract from UES Inc. under Air Force contract FA8650-14-D-6516. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are those of the authors and not necessarily endorsed by the United States Government. The authors would like to thank Jae Kwak, Catherine A. Powell and Grant M. Slusher for their scholarly input for this manuscript.

Author Contributions

Sean W. Harshman prepared and wrote the review. Claude C. Grigsby and Darrin K. Ott provided guidance and direction for the written review.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Grob, N.M.; Aytekin, M.; Dweik, R.A. Biomarkers in exhaled breath condensate: A review of collection, processing and analysis. J. Breath Res. 2008, 2, 037004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mutlu, G.M.; Garey, K.W.; Robbins, R.A.; Danziger, L.H.; Rubinstein, I. Collection and analysis of exhaled breath condensate in humans. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001, 164, 731–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liang, Y.; Yeligar, S.M.; Brown, L.A.S. Exhaled breath condensate: A promising source for biomarkers of lung disease. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 217518. [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis, M.D.; Montpetit, A.; Hunt, J. Exhaled breath condensate: An overview. Immunol. Allergy Clin. 2012, 32, 363–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hunt, J. Exhaled breath condensate: An overview. Immunol. Allergy Clin. 2007, 27, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Montuschi, P.; Barnes, P.J. Analysis of exhaled breath condensate for monitoring airway inflammation. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2002, 23, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Montuschi, P. Indirect monitoring of lung inflammation. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2002, 1, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Horváth, I. Exhaled breath condensate: methodological recommendations and unresolved questions. Eur. Respir. J. 2005, 26, 523–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schleiss, M.B.; Holz, O.; Behnke, M.; Richter, K.; Magnussen, H.; Jörres, R.A. The concentration of hydrogen peroxide in exhaled air depends on expiratory flow rate. Eur. Respir. J. 2000, 16, 1115–1118. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hüttmann, E.-M.; Greulich, T.; Hattesohl, A.; Schmid, S.; Noeske, S.; Herr, C.; John, G.; Jörres, R.A.; Müller, B.; Vogelmeier, C.; Koczulla, A.R. Comparison of Two Devices and Two Breathing Patterns for Exhaled Breath Condensate Sampling. PLoS One 2011, 6, e27467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Griese, M.; Noss, J.; Bredow, C. Protein pattern of exhaled breath condensate and saliva. Proteomics 2002, 2, 690–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Montuschi, P. Analysis of exhaled breath condensate in respiratory medicine: Methodological aspects and potential clinical applications. Ther. Adv. Respir. Dis. 2007, 1, 5–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Effros, R.M.; Hoagland, K.W.; Bosbous, M.; Castillo, D.; Foss, B.; Dunning, M.; Gare, M.; Lin, W.; Sun, F. Dilution of respiratory solutes in exhaled condensates. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002, 165, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Harshman, S.W.; Canella, A.; Ciarlariello, P.D.; Rocci, A.; Agarwal, K.; Smith, E.M.; Talabere, T.; Efebera, Y.A.; Hofmeister, C.C.; Benson, D.M.; et al. Characterization of Multiple Myeloma Vesicles by Label-Free Relative Quantitation. Proteomics 2013, 13, 3013–3029. [Google Scholar]
  15. Fumagalli, M.; Ferrari, F.; Luisetti, M.; Stolk, J.; Hiemstra, P.S.; Capuano, D.; Viglio, S.; Fregonese, L.; Cerveri, I.; Corana, F.; et al. Profiling the Proteome of Exhaled Breath Condensate in Healthy Smokers and COPD Patients by LC-MS/MS. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 13894–13910. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kurova, V.S.; Anaev, E.C.; Kononikhin, A.S.; Fedorchenko, K.Y.; Popov, I.A.; Kalupov, T.L.; Bratanov, D.O.; Nikolaev, E.N.; Varfolomeev, S.D. Proteomics of exhaled breath: Methodological nuances and pitfalls. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2009, 47, 706–712. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fumagalli, M.; Dolcini, L.; Sala, A.; Stolk, J.; Fregonese, L.; Ferrari, F.; Viglio, S.; Luisetti, M.; Iadarola, P. Proteomic analysis of exhaled breath condensate from single patients with pulmonary emphysema associated to alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. J. Proteomics 2008, 71, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hoffmann, H.J.; Tabaksblat, L.M.; Enghild, J.J.; Dahl, R. Human skin keratins are the major proteins in exhaled breath condensate. Eur. Respir. J. 2008, 31, 380–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kurova, V.S.; Anaev, E.C.; Kononikhin, A.S.; Popov, I.A. Mass spectrometric monitoring of exhaled breath condensate proteome of a patient after lung transplantation. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2010, 59, 292–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bloemen, K.; van den Heuvel, R.; Govarts, E.; Hooyberghs, J.; Nelen, V.; Witters, E.; Desager, K.; Schoeters, G. A new approach to study exhaled proteins as potential biomarkers for asthma. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2011, 41, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bloemen, K.; Hooyberghs, J.; Desager, K.; Witters, E.; Schoeters, G. Non-invasive biomarker sampling and analysis of the exhaled breath proteome. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 2009, 3, 498–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cheng, Z.; Lewis, C.R.; Thomas, P.S.; Raftery, M.J.; Chan, A.K. Comparative proteomics analysis of exhaled breath condensate in lung cancer patients. J. Cancer Ther. 2011, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gianazza, E.; Allegra, L.; Bucchioni, E.; Eberini, I.; Puglisi, L.; Blasi, F.; Terzano, C.; Wait, R.; Sirtori, C.R. Increased keratin content detected by proteomic analysis of exhaled breath condensate from healthy persons who smoke. Am. J. Med. 2004, 117, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kurova, V.S.; Kononikhin, A.S.; Sakharov, D.A. Exogenous proteins in exhaled human breath condensate. Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2011, 37, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gessner, C.; Dihazi, H.; Brettschneider, S.; Hammerschmidt, S.; Kuhn, H.; Eschrich, K.; Keller, T.; Engelmann, L.; Sack, U.; Wirtz, H. Presence of cytokeratins in exhaled breath condensate of mechanical ventilated patients. Respir. Med. 2008, 102, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Eberini, I.; Gianazza, E.; Pastorino, U.; Sirtori, C. Assessment of individual lung cancer risk by the proteomic analysis of exhaled breath condensate. Expert Opin. Med. Diagn. 2008, 2, 1309–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Montuschi, P. Exhaled breath condensate analysis in patients with COPD. Clin. Chim. Acta 2005, 356, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Garey, K.W.; Neuhauser, M.M.; Robbins, R.A.; Danziger, L.H.; Rubinstein, I. Markers of inflammation in exhaled breath condensate of young healthy smokers. Chest 2004, 125, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Robroeks, C.M.H.H.T.; bsis, Q.J.; Damoiseaux, J.G.M.C.; Heijmans, P.H.M.; Rosias, P.P.R.; Hendriks, H.J.E.; Dompeling, E. Cytokines in exhaled breath condensate of children with asthma and cystic fibrosis. Ann. Allerg. Asthma. Im. 2006, 96, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Matsunaga, K.; Yanagisawa, S.; Ichikawa, T.; Ueshima, K.; Akamatsu, K.; Hirano, T.; Nakanishi, M.; Yamagata, T.; Minakata, Y.; Ichinose, M. Airway cytokine expression measured by means of protein array in exhaled breath condensate: Correlation with physiologic properties in asthmatic patients. J. Allergy Clin. Immun. 2006, 118, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Colombo, C.; Faelli, N.; Tirelli, A.S.; Fortunato, F.; Biffi, A.; Claut, L.; Cariani, L.; Daccò, V.; Prato, R.; Conese, M. Analysis of inflammatory and immune response biomarkers in sputum and exhaled breath condensate by a multi-parametric biochip array in cystic fibrosis. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2011, 24, 423–432. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hunt, J. Exhaled breath condensate: An evolving tool for noninvasive evaluation of lung disease. J Allergy Clin. Immun. 2002, 110, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tufvesson, E.; van Weele, L.J.; Ekedahl, H.; Bjermer, L. Levels of cysteinyl-leukotrienes in exhaled breath condensate are not due to saliva contamination. Clin. Respir. J. 2010, 4, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dompeling, E.; Jöbsis, Q. Proteomics of exhaled breath condensate: A realistic approach in children with asthma? Clin. Exp. Allergy 2011, 41, 299–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dodig, S.; Čepelak, I. Exhaled breath condensate—From an analytical point of view. Biochem. Med. 2013, 23, 281–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tufvesson, E.; Bjermer, L. Methodological improvements for measuring eicosanoids and cytokines in exhaled breath condensate. Respir. Med. 2006, 100, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Harshman, S.W.; Grigsby, C.C.; Ott, D.K. Exhaled Breath Condensate for Proteomic Biomarker Discovery. Chromatography 2014, 1, 108-119. https://doi.org/10.3390/chromatography1030108

AMA Style

Harshman SW, Grigsby CC, Ott DK. Exhaled Breath Condensate for Proteomic Biomarker Discovery. Chromatography. 2014; 1(3):108-119. https://doi.org/10.3390/chromatography1030108

Chicago/Turabian Style

Harshman, Sean W., Claude C. Grigsby, and Darrin K. Ott. 2014. "Exhaled Breath Condensate for Proteomic Biomarker Discovery" Chromatography 1, no. 3: 108-119. https://doi.org/10.3390/chromatography1030108

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop