Next Article in Journal
Pollutant Removal and Hydraulic Reduction Performance of Field Grassed Swales during Runoff Simulation Experiments
Next Article in Special Issue
Nitrate Removal from Wastewater through Biological Denitrification with OGA 24 in a Batch Reactor
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Continuous Phytoplankton Culture System for Ocean Acidification Experiments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Conditions in Kenyan Rural Schools: Are Schools Meeting the Needs of Menstruating Girls?
Water 2014, 6(7), 1873-1886; doi:10.3390/w6071873
Article

Marketing Household Water Treatment: Willingness to Pay Results from an Experiment in Rural Kenya

1
,
2
 and
3,*
Received: 29 April 2014 / Revised: 7 June 2014 / Accepted: 11 June 2014 / Published: 26 June 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Treatment and Human Health)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [258 KB, uploaded 9 June 2015]   |   Browse Figures

Abstract

Despite increasing availability of household water treatment products, demand in developing countries remains low. Willingness to pay for water treatment products and factors that affect demand are not well understood. In this study, we estimate willingness to pay for WaterGuard, a dilute chlorine solution for point-of-use water treatment, using actual purchase decisions at randomly assigned prices. Secondly, we identify household characteristics that are correlated with the purchase decision. Among a sample of 854 respondents from 107 villages in rural Kenya, we find that mean willingness to pay is approximately 80% of the market price. Although only 35% of sample households purchased WaterGuard at the market price, 67% of those offered a 50% discount purchased the product. A marketing message emphasizing child health did not have a significant effect on purchase behavior, overall or among the subset of households with children under five. These findings suggest that rural Kenyans are willing to pay for WaterGuard at low prices but are very sensitive to increasing price. Households with young children that could benefit the most from use of WaterGuard do not appear to be more likely to purchase the product, and a marketing message designed to target this population was ineffective.
Keywords: household water treatment; chlorination; willingness to pay; Kenya household water treatment; chlorination; willingness to pay; Kenya
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Share & Cite This Article

Further Mendeley | CiteULike
Export to BibTeX |
EndNote
MDPI and ACS Style

Blum, A.G.; Null, C.; Hoffmann, V. Marketing Household Water Treatment: Willingness to Pay Results from an Experiment in Rural Kenya. Water 2014, 6, 1873-1886.

View more citation formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

For more information on the journal, click here

Comments

Cited By

[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert