Next Article in Journal
Artificial Recharge via Boreholes Using Treated Wastewater: Possibilities and Prospects
Next Article in Special Issue
Profitability of Nitrification Inhibitors for Abatement of Nitrate Leaching on a Representative Dairy Farm in the Waikato Region of New Zealand
Previous Article in Journal
Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for the Inner and Outer Bluegrass Regions of Kentucky
Previous Article in Special Issue
Economic Effects of Legislative Framework Changes in Groundwater Use Rights for Irrigation
Water 2011, 3(3), 949-963; doi:10.3390/w3030949
Article

The Importance of Institutional Asymmetries to the Development of Binational Aquifer Assessment Programs: The Arizona-Sonora Experience

1,*  and 2
Received: 31 May 2011; in revised form: 31 August 2011 / Accepted: 9 September 2011 / Published: 23 September 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Policy)
Download PDF [4020 KB, updated 26 September 2011; original version uploaded 23 September 2011]
Abstract: Setting water policy depends fundamentally on the location of the supply and demand for water and the legal/institutional framework for water management. Within and across nations, laws and structures for water management decision making vary, often significantly. Recognizing these differences can aid in overcoming challenges inherent to the assessment and management of transboundary waters. This paper examines current binational efforts to develop the scientific information to support water management decision making along the United States-Mexico border. The particular focus is on transboundary aquifers along the border shared by the states of Arizona in the United States and Sonora in Mexico. Legislation enacted in the United States (Public Law 109–448) established a governmental-academic partnership to assess transboundary aquifers. The paper discusses the establishment of a working partnership between Mexico and the United States, which led to an official binational cooperative framework for transboundary assessment. It explains how the extensive effort to recognize and accommodate asymmetries in the underlying legal and regulatory frameworks for water management was essential to meeting the objectives of both countries. The focus of the binational investigations is briefly discussed. The paper concludes by noting the opportunities for additional cross-border scientific and water management collaboration should funding and institutional commitments continue.
Keywords: transboundary aquifers; transboundary waters; water policy; institutional asymmetries; water management transboundary aquifers; transboundary waters; water policy; institutional asymmetries; water management
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Megdal, S.B.; Scott, C.A. The Importance of Institutional Asymmetries to the Development of Binational Aquifer Assessment Programs: The Arizona-Sonora Experience. Water 2011, 3, 949-963.

AMA Style

Megdal SB, Scott CA. The Importance of Institutional Asymmetries to the Development of Binational Aquifer Assessment Programs: The Arizona-Sonora Experience. Water. 2011; 3(3):949-963.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Megdal, Sharon B.; Scott, Christopher A. 2011. "The Importance of Institutional Asymmetries to the Development of Binational Aquifer Assessment Programs: The Arizona-Sonora Experience." Water 3, no. 3: 949-963.


Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert