Next Article in Journal
Assessing Near Surface Hydrologic Processes and Plant Response over a 1600 m Mountain Valley Gradient in the Great Basin, NV, U.S.A.
Previous Article in Journal
Removal of Sb(III) and Sb(V) by Ferric Chloride Coagulation: Implications of Fe Solubility
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Water 2018, 10(4), 419; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040419

A Comparative Assessment of Variable Selection Methods in Urban Water Demand Forecasting

1
School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics, Western Sydney University, Second Avenue, Kingswood, NSW 2751, Australia
2
School of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Southern Queensland, West St, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 9 January 2018 / Revised: 20 March 2018 / Accepted: 29 March 2018 / Published: 3 April 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [10468 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]   |  

Abstract

Urban water demand is influenced by a variety of factors such as climate change, population growth, socio-economic conditions and policy issues. These variables are often correlated with each other, which may create a problem in building appropriate water demand forecasting model. Therefore, selection of the appropriate predictor variables is important for accurate prediction of future water demand. In this study, seven variable selection methods in the context of multiple linear regression analysis were examined in selecting the optimal predictor variable set for long-term residential water demand forecasting model development. These methods were (i) stepwise selection, (ii) backward elimination, (iii) forward selection, (iv) best model with residual mean square error criteria, (v) best model with the Akaike information criterion, (vi) best model with Mallow’s Cp criterion and (vii) principal component analysis (PCA). The results showed that different variable selection methods produced different multiple linear regression models with different sets of predictor variables. Moreover, the selection methods (i)–(vi) showed some irrational relationships between the water demand and the predictor variables due to the presence of a high degree of correlations among the predictor variables, whereas PCA showed promising results in avoiding these irrational behaviours and minimising multicollinearity problems. View Full-Text
Keywords: variable selection; principal component analysis; multiple regression; multicollinearity; long-term water demand forecasting; urban water variable selection; principal component analysis; multiple regression; multicollinearity; long-term water demand forecasting; urban water
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Haque, M.M.; Rahman, A.; Hagare, D.; Chowdhury, R.K. A Comparative Assessment of Variable Selection Methods in Urban Water Demand Forecasting. Water 2018, 10, 419.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top