Next Article in Journal
Identification of Water Stress in Citrus Leaves Using Sensing Technologies
Next Article in Special Issue
A Review of the Applications of Chitin and Its Derivatives in Agriculture to Modify Plant-Microbial Interactions and Improve Crop Yields
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Introduction of Aureobasidium pullulans to the Phyllosphere of Organically Grown Strawberries with Focus on Its Establishment and Interactions with the Resident Microbiome

Agronomy 2013, 3(4), 732-746; doi:10.3390/agronomy3040732

Enhancing the Sustainability of Quinoa Production and Soil Resilience by Using Bioproducts Made with Native Microorganisms
Noel Ortuño *, José Antonio Castillo *, Mayra Claros, Oscar Navia, Marlene Angulo, Daniel Barja, Claudia Gutiérrez and Violeta Angulo
Fundación PROINPA, Av. Meneces Km 4, El Paso, Cochabamba, Bolivia
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; Tel.: +591-4-431-9595; Fax: +591-4-431-9600.
Received: 18 July 2013; in revised form: 15 October 2013 / Accepted: 15 October 2013 / Published: 4 November 2013


: Microorganisms are involved in a network of interactions with plants, promoting growth and acting as biocontrol agents against diseases. In this work, we studied native microorganisms associated with quinoa plants (Chenopodium quinoa) and the application of these organisms to the organic production of quinoa in the Andean Altiplano. Quinoa is a non-cereal grain native to the Andean highlands and is highly nutritious and gluten-free. As such, the international demand for quinoa has increased substantially in recent years. We isolated native endophytic bacteria that are able to fix nitrogen, solubilize phosphate and synthesize a phytohormone and native strains of Trichoderma, a fungus typically used for increasing plant growth and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Greenhouse assays and field trials allowed for selecting promissory bacterial isolates, mostly belonging to Bacillus and Paenibacillus genera, that increased plant length, panicle weight and grain yield. Selected microbial isolates were large-scale multiplied in simple and inexpensive culture media and then formulated to obtain bioproducts that were distributed among local farmers. Thus, we developed a technology for the exploitation of beneficial microbes, offering promising and environmentally friendly strategies for the organic production of quinoa without perturbing the native microbial diversity of Andean soils and making them more resilient to the adverse effects of climatic change and the over-production of quinoa.
plant growth-promoting bacteria; Trichoderma; endophytes; quinoa; Andean Altiplano; soil

1. Introduction

Soil is a fundamental and irreplaceable natural resource, providing the essential connection between the land, air and water resources that allow life on Earth. As an example, it maintains the life of microorganisms that are involved in biogeochemical cycles, nutrient recycling and carbon storage. Soil also sustains agricultural production, which, together with the oceans, is the most important source of food for animals and humans. However, soil resources are threatened due to degradation and desertification. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization [1], soil degradation is a “process which lowers the current and/or potential capability of soil to produce goods and services”. Thus, soil degradation is a threat that national and international organizations are trying to hinder and reverse.

The flat land area located between the Andes Mountains, known as the Altiplano, shared between Peru and Bolivia, is facing a rapid process of soil erosion, due to increasing drought, climate change, population growth and altered farming practices. This process leads to desertification, which results in soils with low vegetable cover and very poor organic matter content. These problems have caused drastic decreases in the production of crops, reducing the already low incomes of the farmers. In some cases, the farmers have used agrochemicals to mitigate soil fertility problems, with the potential of negative effects on the environment. In parallel, there is an increasing demand in international markets for organic products, such as the quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). Quinoa is a native pseudograin from the Altiplano, where local people domesticated it since ancestral times. Despite its ancestral condition, quinoa has lately become particular popular, due to its gluten-free and high nutritional value properties (with an average of 14.8% protein and an exceptional balance between oil, protein and starch, [2]). During the last 10 years, Bolivian quinoa exportation increased 26 times in value and nine times in volume [3]. This is the reason why quinoa, the most economically attractive crop from this area, is urging Andean growers to intensify its production beyond sustainability.

Organic production is a national priority in countries like Bolivia and has been mainly driven by the international demand for organic products for exportation. This motivates the agricultural sector, which seeks to produce food respecting the environment and the health of farmers. For this reason, it is necessary to develop adequate technologies to support organic production and according to local requirements. These technologies include bioproducts based on living microorganisms that are used as biofertilizers and biocontrol agents for pests and diseases, depending on the microbial species with which they have been made. Bioproducts are important tools to help reduce the harmful effects of chemical fertilizers and pesticides in the environment and to produce food free of contaminants and at a lower cost, in this way helping the economy of small farmers. Bioproducts can also help to improve the quality of the soils in the Altiplano by retaining microbial populations, which will help to mitigate soil degradation and enable farmers to produce organic crops, including quinoa, broad beans and potato, among others).

In this work, we focused on the isolation of native microorganisms associated with quinoa at the Bolivian Altiplano and studied their nutrient recycling potential and beneficial effects on plant growth. The best microbial isolates were used to formulate bioproducts for organic production, which were distributed among local farmers. We intentionally sought to work with native microorganisms to reduce the disturbance of the Altiplano soil ecosystem and to keep the technology as simple as possible, in order to provide cost-effective technologies for Andean farmers.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Microbial Isolates

Given the need for ecological fertilizers and biopesticides for organic agriculture, our investigation has been directed towards the development of new biotechnologies, to contribute to the clean and healthy production of quinoa and to help mitigate soil degradation. In the last few years, there has been a growing interest in plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPBs) and fungi (PGPFs), because they can recycle nutrients, promote plant growth and, in some cases, prevent the infection of plant tissue by pathogens. Such microorganisms can be symbiotic or free living [4,5]. To reach this goal, we explored the native microorganisms associated with quinoa plants, isolating and identifying a series of bacterial groups. Results indicate that one hundred and four different bacterial isolates were obtained from internal plant tissue (endophytic bacteria), of which fifty five are from roots, eight from stems and forty one from leaves. Of the fungi group, only rhizospheric individuals were isolated. Bacteria and fungi were molecularly identified (see below), consisting of the following:

Rhizosphere microorganisms: Fungi individuals were isolated that belong to the following genera or species: Trichoderma harzianum, T. asperellum, T. koningiopsis, Beauveria bassiana, B. brongniartii and Metarhizium sp.

Endophytic microorganisms: Bacterial species isolated from leaves: Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, B. tequilensis, B. subtilis, B. pumilus, B. licheniformis, B. horikoshii, B. atrophaeus, B. thuringiensis and Paenibacillus sp. Bacterial species isolated from stems and roots: B. aryabhattai, B. subtilis, B. horikoshii, B. megaterium, Pseudomonas sp., Paenibacillus sp. and P. odorifer.

2.2. Functional Activities of Isolated Microorganisms Promoting Plant Nutrition and Growth

Functional tests performed under in vitro conditions allowed us to analyze the bacterial isolates that we obtained from quinoa plants for the evidence of nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization and plant growth hormone (indole-3-acetic acid, IAA) production capabilities. From all endosphere isolates, a number of them showed desired features: P-solubilization (72 isolates), N-fixation (30 isolates) and IAA production (59 isolates). Some isolates exhibited multiple functions. Thus, almost 70% of bacterial isolates exhibited beneficial activity, which is consistent with other works that aimed to obtain bacteria with the three tested properties [6,7]. These bacterial isolates belong to bacterial groups well known as PGPBs (i.e., Bacillus, Paenibacillus and Pseudomonas [8,9]).

Although we identified a range of fungi species, we only focused on isolating and characterizing individuals from the Trichoderma genus, since members of this group are well recognized as PGPF and as biocontrol agents against a wide range of soil-borne pathogens [10,11].

The conservation of the isolates was structured under laboratory conditions, considering origin, date of harvesting, altitude and plant tissue information. Storing conditions were 4 °C, a relative humidity of 50% and tryptone soy agar (TSA) as the culture medium. This collection constitutes a valuable source of bacteria and fungi strains for future research on agricultural and biotechnological applications.

2.3. Greenhouse Testing

Bacterial isolates that showed positive results for the three tests performed under in vitro conditions were used to inoculate plants under greenhouse conditions in order to confirm their beneficial properties in an in vivo assessment. After a post-inoculation period of eight weeks, quinoa plants were harvested and measured for plant height, panicle weight and root weight, volume and length. Statistical analysis showed that the treatments with bacterial isolates did not influence the root weight, volume or length, but increased plant height and panicle weight (Figure 1). The bacterial isolates that increased plant height were 1Bp and 5Bp (B. pumilus, P-solubilization bacteria), 139 and 143 (B. simplex, N-fixing bacteria), 2p, 3p and 4p (Paenibacillus sp., N-fixing bacteria) and BAQ-11 (B. subtilis, N-fixing bacteria) and for panicle weight were 3p and 4p (Paenibacillus sp.) and BAQ-11 (B. subtilis) (Figure 1). Thus, some bacterial isolates that increased panicle weight also increased plant height. All other isolates showed the same behavior on plant height and panicle weight compared to the uninoculated control.

2.4. Selection of the Culture Media of the Substrates for the Large-Scale Multiplication of the Microorganisms

Selected microbial isolates were evaluated for large-scale growth in different media and field-tested by local farmers. We sought to develop a simple, but efficient and, at the same time, inexpensive technology for the multiplication of microorganisms and the formulation of bioproducts; hence, farmers could use this technology for the preparation of their own bioproducts. A culture media for large-scale multiplication of bacteria mostly from the Bacillus genus was developed. For this, six different liquid media were tested (see Materials and Methods). The results, detailed in Figure 2a, indicate that culture medium elaborated with soy protein is statistically superior to the other treatments; consequently, this medium was employed for further large-scale multiplication of Bacilli bacteria. Once the means of culture and the aerobic system were developed, a bioreactor for the multiplication of the bacteria to a greater scale was built. A stainless steel bioreactor (Figure 3a) allowed a production in volumes that enabled a supply for as much as 500 hectares of quinoa in the Andean Altiplano. However, this production is still insufficient, since the extension of quinoa land in the Altiplano is much larger.

Similar to the bacteria production, we sought to identify a suitable and inexpensive substrate for large-scale Trichoderma production (T. harzianum and T. koningiopsis). We tested seven different substrates for T. harzianum growth and spore development. There were significant differences among substrates, with substrate 1 (rice grain), followed by substrate 5 (rice grain:husk, 1:1) and 6 (rice grain:husk 1:2.33), showing the most potential (Figure 2b). Fungi spores were used for the formulation of bioproducts by mixing them with inert material.

Figure 1. The results of (a) plant height and (b) panicle weight of eight-week-old quinoa plants treated with bacterial suspensions (108 cfu/mL) of different bacterial isolates are shown; control plants represent un-inoculated plants. Height and weight are measured in centimeters and grams, respectively; bacterial isolate identity: 1Bp, 2Bp, 3Bp, 4Bp and 5Bp (B. pumilus); 139, 143 and 149 (B. simplex); 1p, 2p, 3p, 4p and 5p (Paenibacillus sp.); BAQ-11 (B. subtilis).
Figure 1. The results of (a) plant height and (b) panicle weight of eight-week-old quinoa plants treated with bacterial suspensions (108 cfu/mL) of different bacterial isolates are shown; control plants represent un-inoculated plants. Height and weight are measured in centimeters and grams, respectively; bacterial isolate identity: 1Bp, 2Bp, 3Bp, 4Bp and 5Bp (B. pumilus); 139, 143 and 149 (B. simplex); 1p, 2p, 3p, 4p and 5p (Paenibacillus sp.); BAQ-11 (B. subtilis).
Agronomy 03 00732 g001 1024

2.5. Formulation of the Bacteria in Powder

For bioproduct formulation in powder form, the bacteria were mixed with inert media (CaCO3) and placed on metal trays to be dried (Figure 3b). The material was then ground into a fine powder and evaluated for bacteria re-growth and pH and biological property maintenance. Results showed that bacteria from bioproducts were able to grow in culture media, as well as the non-formulated bacteria [12]. To improve the efficiency of producing the bioproducts, a drying apparatus with a capacity to process 350 kg per 36 hours was designed and constructed (Figure 3c). Using this equipment, we anticipate that sufficient bioproduct for 500 hectares can be produced per month, in this way giving the opportunity to supply bioproducts to a larger number of small farmers. The bioproducts (based on bacteria or fungi) were packed in plastic bags (Figure 3d) and named with striking names for distribution among farmers (Figure 3e).

Figure 2. (a) Bacillus and (b) Trichoderma isolates grown in different culture media and substrates, respectively tested to define the best means for a large-scale and inexpensive multiplication of microorganisms. Bacteria or fungal growth was measured calculating the number of colony forming units or spores per milliliter or gram, respectively. TSB, tryptone soy broth.
Figure 2. (a) Bacillus and (b) Trichoderma isolates grown in different culture media and substrates, respectively tested to define the best means for a large-scale and inexpensive multiplication of microorganisms. Bacteria or fungal growth was measured calculating the number of colony forming units or spores per milliliter or gram, respectively. TSB, tryptone soy broth.
Agronomy 03 00732 g002 1024
Figure 3. (a) Stainless steel bioreactors designed for a massive production of Bacillus subtilis spores; (b) Bacillus subtilis culture broth after mixing with inert material (aluminum/calcium silicate); (c) Dryer with forced air for the powder formulation of bacteria; (d) Packing of bioproducts. (e) Biofertilizers ready for distribution among farmers for organic production; (f) Organic quinoa production in the Southern Altiplano (highlands) of Bolivia: at the left quinoa, field supplemented with a bioproduct (Tricobal: B. subtilis, T. koningiopsis and T. harzianum); at the right, control quinoa field without the use of any bioproducts.
Figure 3. (a) Stainless steel bioreactors designed for a massive production of Bacillus subtilis spores; (b) Bacillus subtilis culture broth after mixing with inert material (aluminum/calcium silicate); (c) Dryer with forced air for the powder formulation of bacteria; (d) Packing of bioproducts. (e) Biofertilizers ready for distribution among farmers for organic production; (f) Organic quinoa production in the Southern Altiplano (highlands) of Bolivia: at the left quinoa, field supplemented with a bioproduct (Tricobal: B. subtilis, T. koningiopsis and T. harzianum); at the right, control quinoa field without the use of any bioproducts.
Agronomy 03 00732 g003 1024

2.6. Field Trials: Response of Quinoa to Treatments with Bioproducts

It is important to screen the response of quinoa plants to microbial inoculation under field conditions since in vitro screenings for PGPBs do not always reflect the reality of production on the field (i.e., microbial performance in situ is different from in vitro). Thus, the bioproducts were tested under organic production of quinoa by local Altiplano farmers for plant growth performance and disease control responses. The bioproducts, called Biobacillus (composed of B. subtilis strain BAQ-11) and Tricotop (containing T. koningiopsis y T. harzianum), were tested.

Table 1 shows the results indicating that Biobacillus or Tricotop increased quinoa yield compared to the control without microorganism amendment. Interestingly, using both products, the highest yields were obtained. This led to the idea of creating a third bioproduct, called Tricobal, which is formulated with B. subtilis, T. koningiopsis and T. harzianum.

Table 1. Comparison of the average yield (kg/ha) of quinoa with the use of bioproducts.
Table 1. Comparison of the average yield (kg/ha) of quinoa with the use of bioproducts.
TreatmentAverage yield (kg/ha) *
Control (no bioproduct)1,051.67 c
Biobacillus1,206.67 b
Tricotop1,346.67 b
Tricotop + Biobacillus1,516.67 a

* Different letters mean statistical differences between treatments of p = 0.05.

We evaluated Tricobal over two quinoa production seasons (two different years). Tricobal was soil-applied to farmers’ fields at the time of planting. We measured the plant growth, leaf area, panicle size and average grain yields. Table 2 shows that the differences between treatments with bioproduct (Tricobal) and the controls were significant. Plants treated with Tricobal looked overall healthier and more vigorous than untreated plants (Figure 3f). This result demonstrates that Tricobal is a potential tool for farmers to improve the crop productivity of quinoa.

Table 2. Bioproduct amendment effect on the development and yield of quinoa.
Table 2. Bioproduct amendment effect on the development and yield of quinoa.
YearTreatmentPlant size (cm) mLeaf area (%) mPanicle length (cm) mYield (qq/ha) m,n
1 (2009)Tricobal125 a70 a40 a20 a
Control (no bioproduct)80 b50 b25 b11 b
2 (2010)Tricobal150 a80 a2 a25 a
Control (no bioproduct)110 b55 b30 b12 b

m Different letters mean statistical differences between treatments of p = 0.05; n qq: quintals (46 kg) per hectare.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Microorganisms Isolation

To explore the microbe biodiversity of the Altiplano soil associated with quinoa plants, twenty organic quinoa crop fields were sampled from each Altiplano region: southern (S 19°41'0'', W 66°34'0"), central (S 18°3'0", W 66°59'0") and northern (S 17°4'0", W 68°9'0"), close to Uyuni, Quillacas, Salinas de Garci Mendoza, Jalsuri, Lacaya and Cohana villages, which corresponds to the districts of Potosí, Oruro and La Paz, respectively. Soil samples were obtained by discarding the top 5 cm and collecting the next 20 cm. Plant root samples were taken 15 cm from the tip, stems from the section above the roots and leaves from the upper segment of the plant. All samples were transported to the laboratory under cold temperature for microorganism isolation.

Microorganisms were isolated on culture plates using specific culture media to separate bacteria (TSA) and fungi (potato dextrose agar (PDA)). For rhizosphere microorganism isolation, 10 g of roots with soil were washed with 90 mL of 0.85% NaCl and gentle agitation. Soil residues were vigorously shaken and then plated on respective medium, making dilutions until 10−9. In order to isolate endophytic bacteria, small pieces of leaves (about 1 cm2), stems and roots (1 cm-long) were cut and submerged in 15 mL of potassium phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.0) for 3 h with gently shaking. After this step, plant samples were directly treated with 70% ethanol for 1 min and then with 1.2% sodium hypochlorite for 15 min for superficial sterilization. After rinsing (four times with sterile 0.85% NaCl solution), the tissue fragments were smashed in 30 mL of sterile 0.85% NaCl solution. Serial dilutions were spread on TSA medium and incubated at 28 °C for 72 h. To isolate only endospore-forming bacteria, dilutions were subject to heat (75 °C for 15 min) before plating.

Bacterial colonies were studied at the morphological (color, shape, growing speed, etc.), biochemical (catalase, potassium hydroxide and oxidase) and cellular (Gram stain, flagella and spore presence/absence) level. Taxonomic identification of each bacterial and fungal isolate was performed by following the method described below.

3.2. Establishing the Functional Activity of Microbial Isolates

We attempted to determine the nitrogen (N) fixing, phosphorus (P) solubilizing and growth-promoting activities of bacterial isolates by means of the following methods:

To select bacteria able to fix atmospheric nitrogen, the leaves and roots were tightly washed and then treated with ethanol 70%. Five rinses were done with sterile distilled water to remove ethanol. Under sterile conditions, small fragments (0.5 cm) were cut and deposited on N-free Rennie media (2 g/L agar). Plant tissue fragments were incubated for 6 days at 30 °C without shaking. After incubation, a veil and then a film were grown, which constitutes an inoculum that was later diluted and plated on the same and fresh medium. After an incubation period of 48 h at 30 °C, isolated colonies were obtained. Since the growth medium contains tiny amounts of nitrogen, all bacteria that were able to grow on it could be nitrogen fixers. To confirm this supposition, we determined the identity of bacteria by means of the molecular techniques detailed below.

To select phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria, isolates were culture on NBRIP (National Botanical Research Institute's phosphate) medium [13] at 37 °C for 2 days. After this period, a clear halo was recorded as positive, which means that the phosphate was solubilized.

To select growth-promoting bacteria, we focused on finding isolates that produce IAA. Bacteria were cultured in tryptone soy broth (TSB) supplemented with 5 mM of l-tryptophan at 28 °C for 7 days. After the incubation period, cultures were centrifuged (3802× g for 5 min), and an aliquot of 75 µL of the supernatant was mixed with 225 µL of Salkowski reagent for 30 min under dark conditions. Reddish colored supernatant was read as a positive signal [14].

3.3. Taxonomic Identification of Isolates

To determine or confirm the taxonomic affiliation of the selected microorganisms, we extracted genomic DNA from each isolate following the protocol described by Wilson [15], for bacteria, and Melo and collaborators [16], for fungi. We have amplified by PCR a small genomic region that is conserved among all bacteria using universal primers (Table 3), and then, the amplified fragments were sequenced. For PCR, Phusion high fidelity DNA polymerase (manufactured by NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) and the following conditions were used: each 25-µL amplification reaction mixture comprised ~10 ng chromosomal DNA, 1× HF (high-fidelity) buffer, 0.4 µM forward and reverse primers, 0.2 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphates (NEB), 1× Q reagent (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) and 0.5 U Phusion DNA Polymerase. Reaction conditions for all the primers were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 40 s, primer annealing at 55 °C for 40 s for bacteria and 52–59 °C for 1 min for fungi and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, followed by a final extension step of 72 °C for 5 min. The amplification product was then purified using Qiaquick columns (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s protocol before being used in a sequencing reaction. DNA sequencing was performed at the DNA sequencing facility, the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, following the standard Sanger sequencing protocol. Resulting sequences were edited and trimmed with the BioEdit program [17] and then used to find the most similar sequences in the database using the BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) program [18]. Only matches reaching 99%–100% of identity and covering most of the sequence (>90%) were considered to assign a taxonomic name to the isolates. For analysis of Trichoderma sequences, TrichoBLAST and TrichOKEY programs [19] were also used to analyze DNA sequences from intergenic regions of ribosomal genes and internal segments of the tef1 gene [20,21].

Table 3. Primers used in this work for the identification of microbial isolates; the same primers were used for amplification and sequencing.
Table 3. Primers used in this work for the identification of microbial isolates; the same primers were used for amplification and sequencing.
MicroorganismPrimer nameGene marker aReference
Bacteria27FSSU rRNA[22]
1492RSSU rRNA[22]
TrichodermaITS1FSSU rRNA[23]
EF1-728Ftef1 gene[25]
TEF1LLErevtef1 gene[26]

a SSU rRNA, small subunit ribosomal RNA gene; LSU rRNA, large subunit ribosomal RNA gene.

3.4. Plant Inoculation with Beneficial Bacteria under Greenhouse Conditions

Bacterial isolates that showed functional activity on N-fixing, P-solubilizing and IAA production, as assayed in culture plates, were selected for further analyses on their performance in planta. Each pot containing 1 kg of sterile soil (silt, sand, organic matter mixed in equal parts) was inoculated with 0.5 mL of a bacterial suspension (1 × 108 cfu/mL). Then, three quinoa seeds were sown per pot.

After two months, plants were harvested, and the following parameters were measured: plant height (from the neck to the tip of the panicle, in centimeters); panicle weight (in grams); root weight (discarding neck portion, in grams); root volume (calculating the difference in volume of water displaced in a beaker); and root length of each root from bottom to tip (in centimeters). The assay was intended to follow a complete randomized blocks design, and data were analyzed by the Duncan applied test (p = 0.05) with four repetitions per treatment.

3.5. Large-Scale Multiplication of Bacterial Isolates

For bacteria-based bioproducts, a starter inoculum was prepared by multiplying B. subtilis strain BAQ-11 in TSB medium and incubating them for 3 days at room temperature with agitation until reaching a bacterial concentration of 1 × 108 cfu/mL. Different liquid culture media were tested to define which media was able to produce the highest number of colony forming units per milliliter. We used five different broths made of: (1) tryptic soy broth (commercial culture medium, control); (2) soybean protein (a subproduct from the edible oil industry); (3) potato (Solanum tuberosum L. ssp. andigenum cv. Waych’a); (4) a mix of rice grains and soybean protein (1:1 proportion); (5) rice grains; and (6) a mix of potato and soybean protein (6:1 proportion). These broths were prepared by boiling the product in water for 1 h and then were autoclaved for sterilization. The inoculated broths were incubated in a shaker at 100 rpm and 35 °C for ten days. After incubation, staining was performed with malachite green to verify bacterial spore formation [27]. To determine the number of spores/milliliter, three dilutions were plated on PDA medium for each treatment, using three repetitions of each dilution and 20 observations per repetition. Analysis of variance with four repetitions was employed to statistically validate the differences among treatments.

The best culture medium as assayed above was used for large-scale multiplication. Inoculum grown in TSB medium was employed to establish a larger culture (80 L). Forced sterile air was supplied without agitation, since air itself generates turbulence in the liquid. The culture was incubated at 22–25 °C for 10 days to reach a cell density of 1 × 109 spores/mL. This culture was used to formulate bioproducts (see below).

3.6. Large-Scale Multiplication of Fungi Isolates

The starter inoculum of Trichoderma species was obtained by growing single spores of the fungus on PDA medium. To determine the best substrate for large-scale and fast multiplication of T. harzianum, the starter inoculum was mixed with different sterile substrates: (1) rice grain; (2) clay + sugarcane molasses; (3) calcium carbonate + sugarcane molasses; (4) rice husk; (5) rice grain + rice husk (proportion 1:1); (6) rice grain + rice husk (proportion 1:2.33); and (7) rice husk + sugarcane molasses. Each substrate was incubated for 9 days at 28 °C, and at the end of this period, the number of spores per gram of substrate was measured using the Neubauer chamber under microscope as evidence for fungus growth. Spore calculation was obtained by adding the number of spores of five small squares (0.0025 mm2) and multiplying it by 5000. A variance analysis applied to four repetitions of each treatment helped to statistically define the best substrate for the fungus growth.

The best culture medium as assayed according to the previous experiment was used for large-scale multiplication. The PDA-medium-based starter inoculum was employed to establish a larger culture in sterile rice grains and incubated for 15 days at 28 °C. In this way, a larger fungi biomass was achieved, which, in turn, was employed to inoculate the selected substrate (rice mixed with rice husk (1:1)) for large-scale multiplication. After a period of 15 days, the multiplication medium containing Trichoderma spores was dried on trays, which stresses the fungus, generating more spores. Spores were separated from the multiplication medium by sieving and then were used to formulate bioproducts, as described below.

3.7. Formulation of Bioproducts

For the formulation of bioproducts under powder form, we mixed bacterial broth or Trichoderma spores with bentonite (aluminum/calcium silicate) in a relation of 1 L of bacterial broth or 100 g Trichoderma spores to 1 kg of bentonite. Subsequently, the mix containing the bacterial broth was placed in plastic trays and dried at room temperature using forced air stream for three days to obtain a completely dry product. The product was ground using a hammer mill to obtain a fine powder, which was directly bagged or resuspended in water and dispensed into bottles for the liquid design. The viability of bacterial cells was analyzed to assure a product containing living microorganism (~1 × 109 cfu/mL).

3.8. Plant Inoculation with Bioproducts under Open Field Conditions

At the time of planting (late November), about 7 kg/ha of decomposed sheep manure were deposited as the basal dressing, and then, four quinoa seeds from the “Real Blanca” variety were sown per spot on Altiplano soil, which is mostly sandy (Quillacas area, Oruro district). Bioproducts (Tricotop, Biobacillus or Tricobal) were applied to the soil at doses of 1 kg/ha each. Later and at the branching stage, Biobacillus was also used at 1 kg/ha as foliage fertilizer for all assays, except the control. After two months, quinoa plants were harvested, and the response variables evaluated were plant size, leaf area, panicle length and yield. We assayed the bioproducts on 20 ha (40,000 plants/ha) and evaluated another 20 ha as the control without bioproducts. For the statistical analysis, we used a completely random block design with a split plot layout, where the main plot was the organic matter and small plots were: control (no bioproduct), Biobacillus, Tricotop, Biobacillus + Tricotop or Tricobal. Then, the means were compared by the Duncan applied test (p = 0.05).

4. Conclusions

Plant growth-promoting bacteria and fungi (Trichoderma) were isolated from quinoa tissues and evaluated for their individual and combined effects on the growth promotion of quinoa and the increased production of grain. To our knowledge, this is the first report that deals with the analysis of microorganisms associated with quinoa that grow in its native habitat, the Andean Altiplano. After the large-scale multiplication and formulation steps, we obtained bioproducts by a simple and economical means, which will allows for an environmental friendly production of organic quinoa for international markets, at the same time keeping the native populations of microorganisms in the soil. Undoubtedly, the microorganisms isolated and studied in this work constitute a valuable contribution to the organic production of quinoa (and other crops) under the extreme environmental conditions of the Andean Altiplano and could help to substantially improve the soil resilience of the small-holder quinoa farming systems in the Andean Altiplano.


This work was supported by the “Fondo Regional de Tecnología Agropecuaria” (FONTAGRO), grant number 7075 to Fundación Proinpa and “Consorcio Andino”, funded by the Netherlands Directorate-General for International Cooperation. We wish to thank Robert Gallagher for technical advising and language corrections.

Author contributions: Conceived and guided the research: Noel Ortuño. Performed the laboratory experiments: José Antonio Castillo, Mayra Claros, Marlene Angulo, Violeta Angulo. Performed greenhouse assays: Mayra Claros, Marlene Angulo. Performed field trials: Oscar Navia. Assayed for large-scale multiplication of microorganisms and formulation: Daniel Barja, Claudia Gutiérrez. Wrote the paper: José Antonio Castillo.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. A Provisional Methodology for Soil Degradation Assessment; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 1979; Volume 1, p. 84.
  2. Wright, K.H.; Pike, O.A.; Fairbanks, D.J.; Huber, C.S. Composition of Atriplex hortensis, sweet and bitter Chenopodium quinoa seeds. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 1383–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bolivian Institute of Foreign Trade, Bolivia: Exportaciones de Quinua, CIFRAS, Biweekly Newsletter N°195, IBCE, Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Available online: (accessed on June 14, 2013).
  4. Benizri, E.; Baudoin, E.; Guckert, A. Root colonization by inoculated plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Biocontrol. Sci. Technol. 2001, 11, 557–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bacilio-Jimenez, M.; Aguilar-Flores, S.; Del Valle, M.V.; Perez, A.; Zepeda, A.; Zenteno, E. Endophytic bacteria in rice seeds inhibit early colonization of roots by Azospirillum brasilense. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2001, 33, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cattelan, A.J.; Hartel, P.G.; Fuhrmann, J.J. Screening for plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to promote soybean growth. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1999, 63, 1670–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fürnkranz, M.; Müller, H.; Berg, G. Characterization of plant growth promoting bacteria from crops in Bolivia. J. Plant Dis. Protect. 2009, 116, 149–155. [Google Scholar]
  8. Timmusk, S. Mechanism of Action of the Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Paenibacillus polymixa. Ph.D. Thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, 4 December 2003. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bashan, Y.; Puente, M.E.; de-Bashan, L.E.; Hernandez, J.P. Environmental Uses of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria. In Plant-Microbe Interactions; Ait-Barka, E., Clément, C., Eds.; Research Signpost: Trivandrum, India, 2008; pp. 69–93. [Google Scholar]
  10. Datnoff, L.E.; Pernezny, K.L. Effect of bacterial and fungal microorganisms to colonize tomato roots, improve transplant growth and control of Fusarium crown and root rot. Proc. Florida Tomato Inst. 1998, 111, 26–33. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hermosa, R.; Viterbo, A.; Chet, I.; Monte, E. Plant-beneficial effects of Trichoderma and of its genes. Microbiology 2012, 158, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ortuño, N.; Claros, M. Fundación Proinpa, Cochabamba, Bolivia. Unpublished work. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nautical, C.S. An efficient microbiological growth medium for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 170, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gordon, S.; Weber, R. Colorimetric estimation of indole acetic acid. Plant Physiol. 1951, 26, 192–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wilson, K. Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria. In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology; Ausubel, F.M., Brent, R., Kingston, R.E., Moore, D.D., Seidman, J.G., Smith, J.A., Struhl, K., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1994; pp. 241–245. [Google Scholar]
  16. Melo, S.C.O.; Pungartnik, C.; Cascardo, J.C.M.; Brendel, M. Rapid and efficient protocol for DNA extraction and molecular identification of the basidiomycete Crinipellis perniciosa. Genet. Mol. Res. 2006, 5, 851–855. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  18. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar]
  19. International Subcommission on Trichoderma and Hypocrea website. Available online: (accessed on 23 July 2012).
  20. Druzhinina, I.; Kopchinskiy, A.G.; Komon, M.; Bissett, J.; Szakacs, G.; Kubicek, C.P. An oligonucleotide barcode for species identification in Trichoderma and Hypocrea. Fungal. Genet. Biol. 2005, 42, 813–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kopchinskiy, A.; Komon, M.; Kubicek, C.P.; Druzhinina, I.S. TrichoBLAST: A multiloci database of phylogenetic markers for Trichoderma and Hypocrea powered by sequence diagnosis and similarity search tools. Mycol. Res. 2005, 109, 658–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lane, D.J. 16S/23S Sequencing. In Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics; Stackebrandt, E., Goodfellow, M., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 1991; pp. 115–175. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gardes, M.; Bruns, T.D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—Application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 1993, 2, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chaverri, P.; Castlebury, L.A.; Overton, B.E.; Samuels, G.J. Hypocrea/Trichoderma: Species with conidiophore elongations and green conidia. Mycologia 2003, 95, 1100–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nagy, V.; Seidl, V.; Szakacs, G.; Komon-Zelazowska, M.; Kubicek, C.P.; Druzhinina, I.S. Application of DNA bar codes for screening of industrially important fungi: The haplotype of Trichoderma harzianum sensu stricto indicates superior chitinase formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 7048–7058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bartholomew, J.W.; Mittwer, T. A simplified bacterial spore stain. Stain Technol. 1950, 25, 153–156. [Google Scholar]
Agronomy EISSN 2073-4395 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert