Next Article in Journal
Effective Botulinum Toxin Injection Guide for Treatment of Temporal Headache
Next Article in Special Issue
Evolution of the Cytolytic Pore-Forming Proteins (Actinoporins) in Sea Anemones
Previous Article in Journal
The Contents of Ustiloxins A and B along with Their Distribution in Rice False Smut Balls
Previous Article in Special Issue
Canopy Venom: Proteomic Comparison among New World Arboreal Pit-Viper Venoms
Article Menu
Issue 9 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Toxins 2016, 8(9), 263; doi:10.3390/toxins8090263

A Tricky Trait: Applying the Fruits of the “Function Debate” in the Philosophy of Biology to the “Venom Debate” in the Science of Toxinology

1
Venom Evolution Lab, School of Bioloigical Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia QLD, 4072 Brisbane, Australia
2
Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St Lucia QLD, 4072 Brisbane, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Ronald A. Jenner
Received: 30 June 2016 / Revised: 30 August 2016 / Accepted: 30 August 2016 / Published: 7 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Collection Evolution of Venom Systems)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1044 KB, uploaded 7 September 2016]   |  

Abstract

The “function debate” in the philosophy of biology and the “venom debate” in the science of toxinology are conceptually related. Venom systems are complex multifunctional traits that have evolved independently numerous times throughout the animal kingdom. No single concept of function, amongst those popularly defended, appears adequate to describe these systems in all their evolutionary contexts and extant variations. As such, a pluralistic view of function, previously defended by some philosophers of biology, is most appropriate. Venom systems, like many other functional traits, exist in nature as points on a continuum and the boundaries between “venomous” and “non-venomous” species may not always be clearly defined. This paper includes a brief overview of the concept of function, followed by in-depth discussion of its application to venom systems. A sound understanding of function may aid in moving the venom debate forward. Similarly, consideration of a complex functional trait such as venom may be of interest to philosophers of biology. View Full-Text
Keywords: function; venom; evolution; debate; philosophy; science function; venom; evolution; debate; philosophy; science
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Jackson, T.N.W.; Fry, B.G. A Tricky Trait: Applying the Fruits of the “Function Debate” in the Philosophy of Biology to the “Venom Debate” in the Science of Toxinology. Toxins 2016, 8, 263.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Toxins EISSN 2072-6651 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top